Vaccine-Autism Link Ruled Out By Court

Judges Find No Evidence Of Autism Risk From Vaccines In Three Cases Brought By Parents

(CBS/ AP)  Vaccines aren't to blame for autism, a special federal court declared Thursday in a blow to thousands of families hoping to win compensation and to many more who are convinced of a connection.

The special masters who decided the case expressed sympathy for the families, some of whom have made emotional pleas describing their children's conditions, but the rulings were blunt: There's little if any evidence to support claims of a vaccine-autism link.

The evidence "is weak, contradictory and unpersuasive," concluded Special Master Denise Vowell. "Sadly, the petitioners in this litigation have been the victims of bad science conducted to support litigation rather than to advance medical and scientific understanding" of autism.

Science years ago reached the conclusion that there's no connection, but Thursday's rulings in a trio of cases still have far-reaching implications - offering reassurance to parents scared about vaccinating their babies because of a small but vocal anti-vaccine movement. Some vaccine-preventable diseases, including measles, are on the rise, and last fall a Minnesota baby who hadn't been vaccinated against meningitis died of that disease.

The special court represented a chance for vindication for families who blame vaccines for their children's autism. Known as "the people's court," the U.S. Court of Claims is different from many other courts: The families involved didn't have to prove the inoculations definitely caused the complex neurological disorder, just that they probably did.

More than 5,500 claims have been filed by families seeking compensation through the government's Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, and Thursday's rulings dealt with the first three test cases to settle which if any claims had merit. The first cases argued that a combination of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine plus other shots triggered autism.

"I must decide this case not on sentiment but by analyzing the evidence," said Special Master George Hastings Jr., writing specifically about Michelle Cedillo of Yuma, Ariz., who is disabled with autism, inflammatory bowel disease and other disorders that her parents blame on a measles vaccine given at 15 months.

"Unfortunately, the Cedillos have been misled by physicians who are guilty, in my view, of gross medical misjudgment," Hastings concluded.

CBS News medical correspondent Dr. Jon LaPook says there is a downside to continuing to look to make absolutely sure there's no link between vaccines and autism.

"A lot of experts are saying we're spending all this time and money looking at that potential link. We need to be spending it on early diagnosis and treatment," LaPook said.

Attorneys for the families said they were disappointed and may appeal.

"There was certainly no scientific proof that vaccines caused autism, but that's not the standard; the standard is likelihood," said Kevin Conway of Boston who represented the Cedillos. "We thought our evidence was solid."

"Certainly those three families are discouraged with the ruling," added Tom Powers, a Portland, Ore., attorney overseeing all the claims. "It's a big step, it's a significant step but it's not the last step."

Indeed, the court's ruling will do little to change the minds of parents who believe vaccines have harmed their children, said the head of a consumer group that questions vaccine safety, the National Vaccine Information Center.

"I think it is a mistake to conclude that because these few test cases were denied compensation, that it's been decided vaccines don't play any role in regressive autism," said Barbara Loe Fisher, the center's president.

The court still must rule on additional cases that argue a different link - that vaccines that once carried the mercury-containing preservative thimerosal are to blame, if the mercury reached and damaged brain cells - and Powers said families making those claims remain hopeful. The court has given no timetable for a ruling.

But Thursday's rulings clearly gave great credence to numerous large studies that have looked for but not found any link between the measles vaccine, other vaccines and autism.

"Hopefully, the determination by the special masters will help reassure parents that vaccines do not cause autism," the Department of Health and Human Services said in a statement that pledged to continue research into possible causes and better treatments.

"It's a great day for science, it's a great day for America's children when the court rules in favor of science," said Dr. Paul Offit, an infectious disease expert at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and developer of a vaccine for rotavirus.

"A choice not to get a vaccine is not a risk-free choice," Offit added, pointing to recent outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases that authorities suspect are partly due to delayed or rejected vaccinations.

Autism is best known for impairing a child's ability to communicate and interact. Recent data suggest a 10-fold increase in autism rates over the past decade, although it's unclear how much of the surge reflects better diagnosis.

Worry about a vaccine link first arose in 1998 when a British physician, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, published a medical journal article linking a particular type of autism and bowel disease to the measles vaccine. The study was soon discredited, and British medical authorities now are investigating professional misconduct charges against Wakefield.

Then came questions about thimerosal, a preservative that manufacturers began removing from all vaccines given to infants in 2001. Today it is present only in certain formulations of the flu shot.

[garbosmed]

Mercury was not "banned" from vaccines. If you go to the FDA website and look at their list of approved excipients, it will tell you in black and white that thimerosal is still in several vaccines at full dose levels, including the flu shot that is given annually. There are others that have mercury at "trace" levels; it''s used in the manufacturing process and chelated out, leaving trace amounts behind, kind of like decaffeinated coffee. Given the number of vaccines and the body weight of an infant, those trace amounts could still be significant. In a person with normally functioning kidneys and immune systems, this might not be a problem; but for infants with trouble excreting toxins it could cause severe neurological problems.

[lucasnico]

The point is mute. Thimerosol has been out of vaccines for quite a while. So why beat a dead horse. There now is evidence for a genetic (at least partial) couse for autism. I rember when everyone was crucifying OB''''s for cerebral palsy which turned out to be rarely if ever caused by Obstetrical negligence. All of this pre-occupation with thimerosol is distracting the search for the real cause(s) of autism.

Posted by brainteaser2

While banned in ''99, in many states vaccines containing thimerosal were used through 2002.... A mute point? Mercury in any vaccine at any time is/was beyond unnecessary and extremely irresponsible.

[brainteaser2]

The point is mute. Thimerosol has been out of vaccines for quite a while. So why beat a dead horse. There now is evidence for a genetic (at least partial) couse for autism. I rember when everyone was crucifying OB''s for cerebral palsy which turned out to be rarely if ever caused by Obstetrical negligence. All of this pre-occupation with thimerosol is distracting the search for the real cause(s) of autism.

[endrepubs]

Since vaccines have been ruled out, this should intensify efforts to find the true reason for the explosion of autism related disorders.

[erasmus606]

All i know is that if i took my child to McDonals''''s for a hamburger and a couple of hours later they were throwing up so bad I had to take them to the hospital I would think it probably was the hambuger.

Posted by spiritwalk at 03:19 PM : Feb 12, 2009

But that may not be necessarily so. Say you had the hamburger for dinner, it could have been from what you ate for lunch or breakfast. You don''t always get sick immediately. It can take up to 24 hours or more for food poisoning to show up.

[lucasnico]

The facts should matter, if you really do care for your kids. Risking polio, measles, all these killer diseases, for a fear that every reputable scientist says is simply false, is not wise.


Posted by SusanHelit at 01:30 PM : Feb 12, 2009

Hey it''s BIG PHARM SUE, friend and ally to the big drug manufacturers. If thimerosal is so safe, why did Ely Lilly try to indemnify itself as part of the patriot act?? Why have they spent millions in lobbying efforts with our government? why are parents lined up to sue them? what is thimerosal all about BIG PHARM SUE??

[lucasnico]

Hmmm, read my posts below and his and see who is making a more compelling argument. When you resort to insults, especially at the beginning of an argument, it just comes off as a sign of desperation and an admission of your inability to mount a real argument. Pretty pathetic really.


Posted by rational_1

you have nothing compelling to say or ad.... you simply duplicate.....very sad for a person who claims academic intelligence and is in a position to teach.... you have much to learn.

[garbosmed]

And the financial news:
From TradeTheNews.com: "Merck & Co Inc Update: FDA reports a death after vaccination with Rotateq - death from intussusception (bowel obstruction) will be added to prescribing information for doctors.

In additional news, the FDA has sent a letter to Merck ordering the company to clean up violations at its PA vaccine plant: The nine-page warning letter gives Merck 15 days to tell the FDA how it will correct the violations. Otherwise, the FDA says it could suspend the plant''s manufacturing license and seize products."

These are the folks you are defending here.

[garbosmed]

Yes, actually, I do know what intussusception is. In fact, here''s some info from the FDA''s website:

"In 1998, FDA approved a different live vaccine against rotavirus that was later withdrawn from the market because of its association with an increased risk of intussusception, a rare, life-threatening type of blockage or twisting of the intestine. Intussusception occurs spontaneously in approximately 1 in 2,000 healthy young infants and children per year, but occurred at an increased rate during the first week or two following vaccination with the previous rotavirus vaccine."

From the updated (2008) package insert for RotaTeq, also found at the FDA website:
"Since FDA approval, reports of infants with intussusception have been received by VAERS. Intussusception occurred days and sometimes weeks after vaccination. Some infants needed hospitalization, surgery on their intestines,or a special *** to treat this problem. Death from intussusception has occurred. Contact your doctor or go to the emergency department right away if your child has any symptoms of intussusception, even if it has been several weeks since the last vaccine dose."

[lloydbest1]

For the curious:
Thimerosol is a organic sulphurated mercury compound, ethylmercurithiosalicylate that, as far as I can tell, has no toxic limit established. It may be relatively harmless; relatively being an operative word here. I am not in a position to accuse the medical establishment of fudging or unethical behavior but it should be noted that thimerosol breaks down into ethylmercury rather easily and we KNOW that guy IS extremely toxic.
So what I am saying is maybe the Special Masters are right; that thimerosol in vaccines may not apprecialbly increase Autism rates but that doesn''t make such vaccines safe!
As long as the risk exists that breakdown products can foul a vaccine we need to inform parents who are nervous about vaccinating their children there are alternatives that do not use mercury (or aluminum) compounds and they are available.
In no way do I defend refusal to vaccinate kids but EVEN IF there is no connection between Autism rates and thimerosol, there is no need to use a vaccine contaning it since single dose units eliminate the need and there are other, safer preservatives out there.

[rational_1]

And a baby died from intususception caused by Paul Offit''''s rotavirus vaccine. Of course, you wouldn''''t have seen that in the mainstream press, because it was only reported in the financial pages alongside Merck''''s stock data.
Posted by Garbosmed at 09:03 PM : Feb 12, 2009

Do you know what intussusception is? It''s basically a mechanical withdrawing of the intestine into itself (analogous to a car radio antenna withdrawing when you turn the radio off). How exactly do you think a vaccine is going to do this? This seems as plausible as me taking an ibuprofen, breaking my arm and blaming the pill.

[rational_1]

Ahhh, here we go......more idiotic ramblings from the guy who allegedly works at a "research university,"
Posted by lucasnico at 09:38 PM : Feb 12, 2009

Hmmm, read my posts below and his and see who is making a more compelling argument. When you resort to insults, especially at the beginning of an argument, it just comes off as a sign of desperation and an admission of your inability to mount a real argument. Pretty pathetic really.

[lucasnico]

By the way in the course of my readings I came across a story that said two kids in England died of measles in 2008. THIS is what happens when vaccinations rates decrease. You know what else happens? Polio patients in wheelchairs or iron lungs, influenza pandemics that kill millions, smallpox, etc...


Posted by rational_1 at 08:39 PM : Feb 12, 2009

Ahhh, here we go......more idiotic ramblings from the guy who allegedly works at a "research university," yet only spews from what he gathers on the internet... has no personal dealings with autism, thimerosal, medical science, or parents who have autistic children...........please, go shut down your computer and either get out and live in the real world, or make yourself a peanut butter sandwich.

[garbosmed]

And a baby died from intususception caused by Paul Offit''s rotavirus vaccine. Of course, you wouldn''t have seen that in the mainstream press, because it was only reported in the financial pages alongside Merck''s stock data.

Once upon a time, like the last time a rotavirus vaccine caused intususception, people actually cared when vaccines did damage, and when they did the vaccines were pulled from the market. Like yestderday when Spain pulled Gardasil after two reactions. Imagine that! But here in the U.S., all those girls who''ve had bad reactions, it''s all just a coincidence.

History bends toward justice, regardless of today''s decisions, or whatever happens to poor Dr. Wakefield. Too many people are affected for the truth to remain hidden.

[kirstinharr]

I''ve seen it firsthand with my own child, 22 years ago. I know he was completely "normal" and was ranking high on pediatricians charts until a military change of station required 6 immunizations in one day for him. After that, we watched him spiral downward. Hand flapping, lack of eye contact and every other symptom of autism. Today, he is an adult with Asperger''s and we KNOW it was a result of those immunizations. Docs and the Fed Government swore Agent Orange was safe. It wasn''t. One day, the truth will be admitted. I know the truth, today...My youngest son lives it everyday.

[rational_1]

And the Times article on Wakefield is journalistic malfeasance that may result in a libel suit. The person who wrote the article is the same one who brought the dodgy charges against Wakefield in the first place, and the allegations against Wakefield in the article are patently false, and rebutted here in the Spectator:
Posted by Garbosmed at 06:49 PM : Feb 12, 2009

In contrast to what you say, from what I''ve just read on this on the Internet the accusations against Wakefield are perhaps even worse than I thought. And how would you explain that 10 of Wakefield''s 12 co-authors on his Lancet paper published a retraction of the interpretations published in that paper? Not exactly confidence-inspiring.
By the way in the course of my readings I came across a story that said two kids in England died of measles in 2008. THIS is what happens when vaccinations rates decrease. You know what else happens? Polio patients in wheelchairs or iron lungs, influenza pandemics that kill millions, smallpox, etc...

[garbosmed]

Let me get this straight -- when the Poling case is conceded and its found that vaccines contributed to her autism, it''s a one-off that is supposed to have no bearing on other cases of injury --nothing to see here, move along. But when these cases are found against the plaintiffs, it''s supposed to mean that ALL vaccines don''t cause autism? Give me a break.

A case was just decided in favor of the plaintiff that Hepatitis B vaccine caused her MS, from which she subsequently died.

This is the same vaccine that is injected into newborn infants. It is high in aluminum, as are the anthrax vaccines given to our troops which has been linked (via science! In a DOD and Congressional report!) to Gulf War illness. The same adjuvant is in Gardasil, which has caused death and cases of debilitating neuro-muscular degeneration akin to ALS in previously healthy young girls.

This is about more than autism, more than MMR and more than thimerosal. And don''t think you will be immune-- the pharma companies have a whole host of goodies in store for the adult population, now that the kids'' market is pretty well saturated.

[mdalerwill]

First, I am very sympathetic to parents raising autistic children, and I understand wanting to find a cause and prevent the occurence.

However, and forgive me if someone already said this, note this quote...from the article...from one of the attorneys representing the families: "There was certainly no scientific proof that vaccines caused autism...."

Doesn''t that pretty much say it all?

[sandy19731]

Scientists are supposed to make no money on their knowledge.

OK, got it.
Makes repaying those student loans kind of rough, though.

[garbosmed]

And the Times article on Wakefield is journalistic malfeasance that may result in a libel suit. The person who wrote the article is the same one who brought the dodgy charges against Wakefield in the first place, and the allegations against Wakefield in the article are patently false, and rebutted here in the Spectator:

http://www.spectator.co.uk/melaniephillips/3346281/the-witchhunt-against-andrew-wakefield.thtml