Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     +0.00
14000.51
+0.00
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.00
2.01
+0.00
March 30, 2009 1:01 PM

GM Bankruptcy In Bondholders' Hands

By
CBSNews
(CBS/ AP)  We forgave billions in debt, now give us more money. This is the message General Motors bondholders have sent to the flailing automaker along with the threat of pushing the company into bankruptcy, according to a newspaper report.

All week, GM has been in negotiations with bondholders, who want the automaker to give them 50 cents on the dollar, instead of the 30-cent return currently offered in an effort to cut the company's unsecured debt to $9.2 billion, part of its requirement for accepting a $13.4 billion federal loan package, sources tell the Detroit News.

Should GM fail to reach a deal with its bondholders, along with United Auto Workers, the government could take back the $9.4 billion it has already dispensed, and force the company into bankruptcy.

The Detroit News sums up the bondholders' argument: "GM's hourly retiree health care obligations totaled $47 billion before the company and the UAW in 2007 agreed to reduce GM's liability to about $35 billion, to be paid into a trust to be run by the union. The company already has allocated $15 billion for that. GM wants to pay half of the remaining $20 billion in cash and half in company stock, which is a target included in GM's loan terms."

"GM is working diligently with all of our stakeholders as we restructure our business and work toward meeting the requirements of our loan agreements with the government," spokeswoman Renee Rashid-Merem told the newspaper.

The report follows Tuesday's news that GM will cut 10,000 salaried jobs, citing the need to restructure itself with a government deadline looming.

The automaker said it will reduce its total number of salaried workers to 63,000 from 73,000 this year. About 3,400 of GM's 29,500 salaried U.S. jobs are expected to be eliminated.

The company's statement said that the separations would be done through GM's severance plan, so there would be no buyout or early retirement packages as GM had offered in the past.

In its plan to Congress submitted late last year, GM said work force reductions would be necessary in order for it to be viable for the long term. Most of the cuts are expected to take place by May 1.

Meanwhile, the automaker would receive a tax break in the Obama administration's proposed $790 billion stimulus bill after arguing its government-led restructuring would unintentionally lead to at least $7 billion in tax liabilities.

General Motors, which received a $13.4 billion lifeline from the Bush administration last year, would have been required to pay additional income taxes from its government loans, potentially undermining its turnaround plan.

Lawmakers said several conditions in the Detroit company's loan agreement with the government could trigger an "ownership change" under the tax law. That tax law was designed to prevent companies from merging to avoid a hefty tax bill.

The loan agreement gives the government shares in the company in exchange for the financing and requires GM to convert outstanding debt into equity and make payments in the form of stock to a health care fund for retired workers.

All three of the provisions could trigger the ownership change clause. GM officials said a major part of the federal loans would have been used to pay income taxes instead of funding the company's restructuring.

CBS/ AP
Add a Comment See all 40 Comments
by aubfmet March 7, 2009 11:28 AM EST
GM will go into bankrupcy. In the reorganization, currect stockholders will get zero. The current debt holders ( bondholders ) will become the new stockholders, and it won't be worth much. I watched this happen with another minor stock, now the big one. They can argue and debate, but in the end this how it will turn out.
Reply to this comment
by thetireguy1 February 25, 2009 2:25 PM EST
Sell all cars in inventory at any price, stop building new ones, when the lots are full of cars!
Liquidate excesses in all areas and pray the American people still want to buy the cars that
your building!
Reply to this comment
by mcv57 February 13, 2009 9:20 PM EST
GM is a scussy, fow *** that needed to be flushed decades ago.
Reply to this comment
by dink217 February 13, 2009 8:59 PM EST
DID YOU KNOW THAT OUR CONSTITUTION SAYS TO ''''PROTECT'''' AGAINST ''''GLOBALIZATION''''?
HUH?
DID YOU?
WHAT ARE YOU AN IDIOT?

Why don''t you show us where the Constitution say that.
Posted by whitemale09 at 11:24 AM : Feb 13, 2009
Reply to this comment
by otiswestfall February 13, 2009 7:32 PM EST
Folks. How about we share ideas on how to enjoy what time we have left before we all starve. Loews sells these biodegradable pots that come ready to plant, filled with good dirt and bulbs that are a couple weeks from blooming. Crocus. Daffodils. Tulips. I planted some last Spring and the Spring before. They come back quite well each year. I''m going to plant some more of those next month. After I starve to death in my own home, my bones will eventually deteriorate with my house. But the bulbs I planted may continue to bloom every Spring for years to come. That one of the ways I want to invest what is left of my life before America destroys itself from its own internal rot.
Reply to this comment
by whitemale09 February 13, 2009 2:24 PM EST
Including benefits, the actual hourly rate of an auto worker is $83.00 per hour. Very few businesses can sustain that level of cost for any length of time. GM needs to collapse, dissolve the union and start over again with strong management personnel that will run the company. The union goons need to go down the drain along with the spineless current management personnel.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by JackP32 at 10:42 AM : Feb 13, 2009


You are absolutely WRONG!

Your post is completely STUPID!

An American company can sustain these high paying wages if our government protected its economy against GLOBALIZATION!

DO YOU UNDERSTAND THAT?

DID YOU KNOW THAT OUR CONSTITUTION SAYS TO ''PROTECT'' AGAINST ''GLOBALIZATION''?

HUH?

DID YOU?

WHAT ARE YOU AN IDIOT?
Reply to this comment
by jackp32 February 13, 2009 1:42 PM EST
Including benefits, the actual hourly rate of an auto worker is $83.00 per hour. Very few businesses can sustain that level of cost for any length of time. GM needs to collapse, dissolve the union and start over again with strong management personnel that will run the company. The union goons need to go down the drain along with the spineless current management personnel.
Reply to this comment
by andor3 February 13, 2009 6:04 AM EST
if you blame the UAW for GMs problems... well let us just say you are looking in the wrong place. CEO is a better TLA for blame.
Reply to this comment
by whitemale09 February 13, 2009 12:39 AM EST
Blame America first? Yes, when it comes to Globalisation, Climate change and the collapsing worldwide economy we ARE to blame first, sorry. And may the Lord and our grandchildren forgive us for what we all, not just GWB, have done to this world!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by ballpen1 at 01:00 PM : Feb 12, 2009--

Well I agree that we should take responsibility but I always lay blame towards those who have allowed this corrupting British influence of ''free markets'' and ''globalization'' to infiltrate our political system.

We do have a responsibility to the world and the first thing we can do is to allow them to be sovereign by ending ''private-central-banking'' systems.

That way nation-states around the world can use their own sovereign credit to develop and sign long term treaty contracts for materials, supplies and even labor to help them develop a real ''physical economy''.

We can help them without loans to build mag-lev transportation, nuclear power plants to desalinate the sea and irrigate the desert.

We owe this to them, will you use your frustration and join us to repay back the world withoug Wall Street/City of London profiteers?
Reply to this comment
by talk2chief February 12, 2009 10:42 PM EST
What good is a union, if your can''t sell cars?
Reply to this comment
See all 40 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook