Obama Confident Republicans Will Back Plan
President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden will meet with congressional leaders at the White House on Monday afternoon in an effort to press Congress to move swiftly on the $800 billion-plus economic stimulus package.
"Very modest differences" should not get in the way of swift congressional passage of a massive economic stimulus package, Mr. Obama said Monday.
The president spoke to reporters as he and Vermont Gov. Jim Douglas, the Republican vice chairman of the National Governors Association, were about to meet in the Oval Office about the plan.
Douglas agreed with Mr. Obama, saying that a stimulus package is essential to getting the country moving again. Douglas is among the several Republican governors who are breaking with their GOP colleagues in Congress to ask for approval of the plan.
On Sunday, Mr. Obama said he was confident congressional Republicans will come around to support the final version of the legislation, repeating what his top aides and officials have been telling reporters in recent days, that the final package would be close to its objectives - to save or create 3 to 4 million jobs - and Republicans would be able to back it.
"I am confident that by the time we have the final package on the floor that we are going to see substantial support, and people are going to see this is a serious effort. It has no earmarks. We are going to be trimming out things that are not relevant to putting people back to work right now," Mr. Obama said.
However, Mr. Obama's Republican opponent in the 2008 election, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, criticized the plan for costing too much and not having an "end game."
McCain told CBS' The Early Show Monday that he appreciated the president's efforts to cross the aisle and listen to Republicans' concerns, but that "now it's time to sit down and negotiate."
"We're not there yet, we're a long way away," he added.
(Check out Senate Republicans' alternate plan on the Hotsheet blog.)
With the president continuing to forecast a dire short-term economic outlook, senators from both parties signaled a readiness on Sunday to negotiate, particularly on Republican proposals aimed at reinvigorating the housing market. The housing collapse in the second half of last year set in motion the worst U.S. economic decline in 80 years
"It's going to take a number of months before we stop falling," Mr. Obama said in a television interview linked to NBC's coverage of the Super Bowl.
The president had a bipartisan group of 15 lawmakers at the White House on Sunday to watch the game as he continued personal interaction with legislators - part of his pledge to change the bitterly partisan atmosphere that has gripped the U.S. political system in recent decades.
The stimulus plan passed in the House of Representatives last week without a single Republican vote in support, and faces intense scrutiny in the U.S. Senate this week.
Mr. Obama has been fighting hard for quick passage of the stimulus package, declaring it was needed immediately to help stem the economic slide. He also contends both political parties need to unite behind the effort that could send the U.S. budget deficit quickly soaring past $2 trillion, creating a fiscal and political time bomb.
"I've done extraordinary outreach to the Republicans," Mr. Obama said in the television interview, forecasting a significant number of Republicans eventually would fall in line.
If the stimulus plan is to survive a Senate vote, Mr. Obama will need Republican support because his fellow Democrats, while in the majority, do not yet hold the 60 seats needed to overcome a Republican filibuster - a parliamentary move that would keep the plan from going to a vote.
On Sunday, a key Democratic senator, New York's Charles Schumer, said he was open to Republican proposals that would provide a $15,000 tax credit to every home buyer and lowering mortgage interest rates to 4.5 percent.
"I think we will get real agreement on the housing part," Schumer said on CBS television.
Republicans in both houses have attacked the Mr. Obama plan - especially as it was voted out of the House of Representatives last week - calling it a grab bag of Democratic spending initiatives that will not quickly stimulate the economy and only serve to burden the federal government with new and lasting budget obligations.
The top Republican in the Senate, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, and his Texas colleague, Kay Bailey Hutchison, told Sunday television interviewers they want the stimulus package to be: "Timely, temporary and targeted."
In tandem with the stimulus program, the Obama administration was moving to reformulate how to spend the second half of a $700 billion financial bailout plan put in place in the last months of the administration of President George W. Bush to avoid the collapse of the country's financial system.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has said the administration was considering a government-run "bad bank" to buy up financial institutions' so-called toxic assets. But some officials now say that option is gone because of the potential cost, with some estimating it could take as much as $2 trillion to cleanse financial institutions' balance sheets.
Still, many ideas under consideration could end up costing hundreds of billions beyond the original price tag. Mr. Obama advisers would not rule out seeking more than the $350 billion already set aside.
The Bush administration's spending of the first $350 billion of the bailout package drew heavy bipartisan and public criticism because it went overwhelmingly to bankers who have not put much of the money into the credit system. Mr. Obama only gained access to the second $350 billion with written assurances to Congress that the funds would reach Americans facing home mortgage foreclosures and in need of credit for autos and other big ticket items.
While facing Republican opposition in Congress, Mr. Obama's stimulus plan was receiving support from most Republican governors because it would send billions to states for education, public works and health care. State treasuries are drained by the financial crisis, and governors are desperate for money from Washington.
During the final three months of 2008, the national economy recorded its worst contraction in a quarter-century, declining 3.8 percent. That rate could accelerate to 5 percent or more this quarter.
© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report. "Very modest differences" should not get in the way of swift congressional passage of a massive economic stimulus package, Mr. Obama said Monday.
The president spoke to reporters as he and Vermont Gov. Jim Douglas, the Republican vice chairman of the National Governors Association, were about to meet in the Oval Office about the plan.
Douglas agreed with Mr. Obama, saying that a stimulus package is essential to getting the country moving again. Douglas is among the several Republican governors who are breaking with their GOP colleagues in Congress to ask for approval of the plan.
On Sunday, Mr. Obama said he was confident congressional Republicans will come around to support the final version of the legislation, repeating what his top aides and officials have been telling reporters in recent days, that the final package would be close to its objectives - to save or create 3 to 4 million jobs - and Republicans would be able to back it.
"I am confident that by the time we have the final package on the floor that we are going to see substantial support, and people are going to see this is a serious effort. It has no earmarks. We are going to be trimming out things that are not relevant to putting people back to work right now," Mr. Obama said.
However, Mr. Obama's Republican opponent in the 2008 election, Sen. John McCain of Arizona, criticized the plan for costing too much and not having an "end game."
McCain told CBS' The Early Show Monday that he appreciated the president's efforts to cross the aisle and listen to Republicans' concerns, but that "now it's time to sit down and negotiate."
"We're not there yet, we're a long way away," he added.
(Check out Senate Republicans' alternate plan on the Hotsheet blog.)
With the president continuing to forecast a dire short-term economic outlook, senators from both parties signaled a readiness on Sunday to negotiate, particularly on Republican proposals aimed at reinvigorating the housing market. The housing collapse in the second half of last year set in motion the worst U.S. economic decline in 80 years
"It's going to take a number of months before we stop falling," Mr. Obama said in a television interview linked to NBC's coverage of the Super Bowl.
The president had a bipartisan group of 15 lawmakers at the White House on Sunday to watch the game as he continued personal interaction with legislators - part of his pledge to change the bitterly partisan atmosphere that has gripped the U.S. political system in recent decades.
The stimulus plan passed in the House of Representatives last week without a single Republican vote in support, and faces intense scrutiny in the U.S. Senate this week.
Mr. Obama has been fighting hard for quick passage of the stimulus package, declaring it was needed immediately to help stem the economic slide. He also contends both political parties need to unite behind the effort that could send the U.S. budget deficit quickly soaring past $2 trillion, creating a fiscal and political time bomb.
Initial efforts - a personal visit to the Capitol building to meet lawmakers of both parties and cocktails with them at the White House - paid no dividend last week when every House Republican rejected the measure as too heavily loaded with government spending and too little keyed to tax relief.
"I've done extraordinary outreach to the Republicans," Mr. Obama said in the television interview, forecasting a significant number of Republicans eventually would fall in line.
If the stimulus plan is to survive a Senate vote, Mr. Obama will need Republican support because his fellow Democrats, while in the majority, do not yet hold the 60 seats needed to overcome a Republican filibuster - a parliamentary move that would keep the plan from going to a vote.
On Sunday, a key Democratic senator, New York's Charles Schumer, said he was open to Republican proposals that would provide a $15,000 tax credit to every home buyer and lowering mortgage interest rates to 4.5 percent.
"I think we will get real agreement on the housing part," Schumer said on CBS television.
Republicans in both houses have attacked the Mr. Obama plan - especially as it was voted out of the House of Representatives last week - calling it a grab bag of Democratic spending initiatives that will not quickly stimulate the economy and only serve to burden the federal government with new and lasting budget obligations.
The top Republican in the Senate, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, and his Texas colleague, Kay Bailey Hutchison, told Sunday television interviewers they want the stimulus package to be: "Timely, temporary and targeted."
In tandem with the stimulus program, the Obama administration was moving to reformulate how to spend the second half of a $700 billion financial bailout plan put in place in the last months of the administration of President George W. Bush to avoid the collapse of the country's financial system.
Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has said the administration was considering a government-run "bad bank" to buy up financial institutions' so-called toxic assets. But some officials now say that option is gone because of the potential cost, with some estimating it could take as much as $2 trillion to cleanse financial institutions' balance sheets.
Still, many ideas under consideration could end up costing hundreds of billions beyond the original price tag. Mr. Obama advisers would not rule out seeking more than the $350 billion already set aside.
The Bush administration's spending of the first $350 billion of the bailout package drew heavy bipartisan and public criticism because it went overwhelmingly to bankers who have not put much of the money into the credit system. Mr. Obama only gained access to the second $350 billion with written assurances to Congress that the funds would reach Americans facing home mortgage foreclosures and in need of credit for autos and other big ticket items.
While facing Republican opposition in Congress, Mr. Obama's stimulus plan was receiving support from most Republican governors because it would send billions to states for education, public works and health care. State treasuries are drained by the financial crisis, and governors are desperate for money from Washington.
During the final three months of 2008, the national economy recorded its worst contraction in a quarter-century, declining 3.8 percent. That rate could accelerate to 5 percent or more this quarter.
Popular in Politics
- Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" 436 Comments
- Anthony Weiner comeback try begins: Running for NYC mayor 92 Comments
- Major immigration overhaul passes first big test 61 Comments
- Top IRS official to invoke 5th Amendment at congressional testimony 190 Comments
- Will tornado relief funding escape politics?
- U.S. IDs several men possibly responsible for Benghazi attack
- Va. GOP candidate: Planned Parenthood "more lethal" for blacks than KKK 1195 Comments
- Poll: Most think IRS targeting was deliberate 200 Comments
What a clown!!
He''''s made MORE decisions that are beneficial to America in 14 days, than Bush did in his last two terms!!
And if he didn''''t have to clean up after Bush, he could be making some REAL progress!!
As for the rest of your post, what do you think big business is going to ask for? Tax cuts and less regulations.
What do you think private citizens are going to ask for? Tax cuts and more stimulus checks.
Apparently you''''re the ONLY person that could not / would not see that coming!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by hungry686 at 08:18 PM : Feb 02, 2009
Here we go again!!! First attack the person (me), then attack the past (Bush), and then ask a question that is off the subject and not helpful.
Heres the deal: Only 22% of Americans aproved of Bush performance so nearly 80% of the people you talk with find your argument about Bush to be meaningless and self serving reference to the past.
I said nothing about tax cuts, they might help. But, realistically, our problem is much deeper than a few percentage points of taxation.
Obama NEEDS the power that comes with working with the establishment, not against it. Like it or not, in todays world, the power is with the producers and that means the people and their industries.
So, stop attacking every right winger you see with those cries of "Bush was bad" and help us help Obama to get things right.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by hungry686 at 08:04 PM : Feb 02, 2009
Obamas biggest fault is his stubborn insistence that only HE can fix it. A real leader would have multiple meetings with private citizens and captains of industry with one question: "What does government have to do to empower you to succeed?'' FDR did that, so did JFK and Clinton. Then, when he met wih other politicians he could speak with authority.
But hes not ready to do that because, as McCain said: "He''s not ready to lead."
sorry buddy, my bad!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by williamayer at 07:37 PM : Feb 02, 2009
No problem. Its hard to follow things on this board.
If it was not for the war we would still be suffering from the new comunist deal!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by williamayer at 07:11 PM : Feb 02, 2009
You came in late. I was explaining that Obama could get industry to help him with his stimulus if he wanted to. And he could use FDR as a cover to save face. FDR, after working the "New Deal" for 8 years was faced with WWII and turned to industry. Then things started working for him. If you look back a few posts you will see what I was trying to suggest.
Posted by machineguy at 06:25 PM : Feb 02, 2009
YOU''''RE DREAMING!!!!!
There''''s NO WAY a liberal like Obama could EVER say that out loud.
Honesty???? HA!
Ingenuity???? What century are YOU living in??? In the 21st century, STEALING is the way to get money.
HARD WORK???? ROTFL!!! WORK IS FOR LOSERS!!!!!
Welcome to our brave new world.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by txgrouch2009 at 06:56 PM : Feb 02, 2009
Sadly, you are right. But it has to end and a real leader would find the way. A way that wasnt mired in partisan name calling and threats. I wrote to show the only way I see. I was speaking truth when I said FDR did it so Obama could cover himself that way. FDR called on idustry to win the war and wound up with a good economy.
Machineguy -- I meant no offense. Perhaps I didnt read all of your posts and jumped to conclusions. I am not perfect :)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by LICKBALLS111 at 06:54 PM : Feb 02, 2009
No problem. But the real question is how do we get this guy to do things like I wrote. We are stuck with him for another 3 years, 11 months, and 352 days. Somehow, we need to lead him. His ego is imense and words like I wrote are the only way I see. Let him take credit for getting industry involved.
Then why give the dummy Obama any credit? The guys a bust. He''''s an idiot and if you followed the election, you would know so.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by LICKBALLS111 at 06:41 PM : Feb 02, 2009
I headlined my post with the words: "Why Not??" I thne presented what I think is the most reasonable approach for a true leader. Since it didnt happen and wont happen we are left to the same conclusion. But, I present it as constructive criticism. Even fanatic liberals should see that what I present is the best way out of this. But Obama wont do it because he is afraid to be in the same room with a significant group of true industry leaders. FDR did, Truman did, JFK did, and Clinton did. So, what does this say about Obama?
Did you vote for Obama?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by LICKBALLS111 at 06:38 PM : Feb 02, 2009
Nope.
Speakinup -- It is I, poopus. Machineguy is a dummy liberal. It is quite apparent that the dummy liberal ideology is alive and well on here tonight. It must be defeated. It will be defeated.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by LICKBALLS111 at 06:34 PM : Feb 02, 2009
Please dont attack me personally. It demeans the discussion.
In fact, I am a staunch conservative. If you read the post you will see it is peppered with conservative ideals (industry participation, united we stand, etc.).
It doesnt matter, liberal or conservative, we are in this together and what I present is the fastest, bestest way out.