April 30, 2009 10:00 AM

House Passes $819 Billion Stimulus Plan

(CBS/AP)  The House of Representatives late Wednesday passed President Barack Obama's $819 billion plan to stimulate the economy and curtail the nation's year-old recession.

The 244-188 vote proceeded along party lines as expected. Only 12 Democrats opposed the measure, and no Republicans supported it.

Senate committees have been working on a separate version of the measure. It is not clear how quickly the Senate version will be completed, passed, and reconciled with the House measure, but Congressional leaders have promised Mr. Obama they would send him a completed bill by mid-February.

The House vote came after days of intense lobbying by the new president, including personal appeals to congressional Republicans. GOP lawmakers spurned Obama, saying the bill contains too much spending and not enough tax cuts.

Republican critics say the bill was little more than the fulfillment of a long-standing Democratic wish-list. Those critics pointed to $1 billion for Amtrak, $41 billion for local school districts and $127 billion for health care for the poor and unemployed, reports CBS News chief White House correspondent Chip Reid.

Democrats argued that the bill was imperative with the economy in the worst shape since the Depression.

The lack of bipartisan support was a disappointment for Mr. Obama, Reid said, although the president put out a statement praising the bill's passage. White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs stressed that a lot can still change in the coming weeks, calling today's events the third inning of a nine-inning game, Reid reports.

"The plan now moves to the Senate, and I hope that we can continue to strengthen this plan before it gets to my desk. But what we can't do is drag our feet or allow the same partisan differences to get in our way. We must move swiftly and boldly to put Americans back to work, and that is exactly what this plan begins to do,'' said Obama in his statement after the bill's passage.

The legislation includes an estimated $544 in federal spending and $275 billion in tax cuts for individuals and businesses. It includes money for highway construction and mass transit.

The Obama recovery package would be the largest spending bill ever to move through Congress. The House measure had been estimated to cost $825 billion, but the Congressional Budget Office updated the bill's price tag to $816 billion after accountants recalculated the cost. That total rose by $3 billion when the House approved a Democratic amendment for mass transit.

Read the full text of President Obama's address
Read highlights of the Obama stimulus package
Earlier Wednesday, Mr. Obama sat down at the White House with a group of key business leaders to shore up backing for the massive spending and tax cut measure.

The group included pillars of the U.S. economy whose workforces are now taking it on the chin: I.B.M., which recently announced 2,800 layoff, Xerox (3.000 job cuts), Motorola (6,100), and Corning, which announced 3,500 layoffs just yesterday, Reid reports.

"These are people who make things, who hire people," Mr. Obama said at the start of the meeting with more than a dozen top executives. "They are on the front lines in seeing the enormous problems in our economy right now. Their ideas and their concerns have helped to shape our recovery package."

Mr. Obama expressed a sense of urgency but also said thate he and the corporate leaders "left our meeting confident that we can still turn our economy around."

But while popular perception is that Mr. Obama's plan enjoys wide support among economists, CNET's Declan McCullough writes that there is substantial skepticism in the field about the stimulus package's prospects for success.

There does seem to be one thing most can agree on, though - something needs to be done.

"I think the vast majority of economists on the liberal side, the conservative side, think we do need a stimulus along with other policy steps. But we need stimulus," Mark Zandi, of Moody's Economy, told CBS' The Early Show Wednesday.

Mr. Obama has spent his first days in office trying to drum up support for the plan. It's the first major test of his presidency; how he handles the volatile situation, and the effect of his stimulus package on the economy, could well set the tone for his presidency.

Much of the spending would be for items such as health care, jobless benefits, food stamps and other programs that benefit victims of the downturn.

The president said he understood skepticism about the size of the stimulus package, "which is why this recovery plan will include unprecedented measures that will allow the American people to hold my administration accountable." He said Americans would be able to follow the spending on a new Web site, www.recovery.gov.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 443 Comments
by grahampoor January 30, 2009 7:52 AM EST
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act will be a step in the right direction: Just giving money to individuals will not keep us competitive. We lead with companies like Google because the USA invented the Internet in a government research lab, same for nuclear power, the semi conductor, digital cameras. There is no reason we can''t be a leader in new sources of energy. Tax breaks alone will not keep us a leading economy. What are you going to spend your money on? A TV made in China? The approach to the Golden Gate bridge has bridge that is the 3rd worst in the country. We need broadband and wireless Internet our schools need upgrades and health care would be cheaper if we put our records online. Let''s give our workers and small business the infrastructure to succeed.
Reply to this comment
by idotalkalot January 30, 2009 3:02 AM EST
I am so angry that our government thinks that Americans are idiots! Why would anyone throw money to thieves? Many Americans, including myself, feel the smart move would have been to split that bail out money to tax paying American People who are under a certain wage limit. They could then pay off their houses, cars, student loans, credit cards, etc; therefore stimulating the economy. Banks would have money, mortgage companines would be flourishing, plus people would have money to shop and stimulate the economy. But instead, it was decided that we should give the thieves that put us in this position more money to spend as they see fit; or pad their own wallets. I am so angry with our government. I have lost ALL trust in our government and giving money to the people could not have been near as bad as what AIG, Walstreet, bankcards, etc have done with the money. Now, credit card rates are skyrocketing, jobs lost daily, seeing the crooks in high places moch us is almost too much to bare. Hope is dwindling, and the starch white shirts really DON''T CARE! I have so much repect for our President and my heart goes out to him to be so brave to sit in a den of thieves and try to reason with greed. God Bless this great country an our brave new President~
Reply to this comment
by idotalkalot January 30, 2009 3:02 AM EST
I am so angry that our government thinks that Americans are idiots! Why would anyone throw money to thieves? Many Americans, including myself, feel the smart move would have been to split that bail out money to tax paying American People who are under a certain wage limit. They could then pay off their houses, cars, student loans, credit cards, etc; therefore stimulating the economy. Banks would have money, mortgage companines would be flourishing, plus people would have money to shop and stimulate the economy. But instead, it was decided that we should give the thieves that put us in this position more money to spend as they see fit; or pad their own wallets. I am so angry with our government. I have lost ALL trust in our government and giving money to the people could not have been near as bad as what AIG, Walstreet, bankcards, etc have done with the money. Now, credit card rates are skyrocketing, jobs lost daily, seeing the crooks in high places moch us is almost too much to bare. Hope is dwindling, and the starch white shirts really DON''T CARE! I have so much repect for our President and my heart goes out to him to be so brave to sit in a den of thieves and try to reason with greed. God Bless this great country an our brave new President~
Reply to this comment
by idotalkalot January 30, 2009 3:01 AM EST
I am so angry that our government thinks that Americans are idiots! Why would anyone throw money to thieves? Many Americans, including myself, feel the smart move would have been to split that bail out money to tax paying American People who are under a certain wage limit. They could then pay off their houses, cars, student loans, credit cards, etc; therefore stimulating the economy. Banks would have money, mortgage companines would be flourishing, plus people would have money to shop and stimulate the economy. But instead, it was decided that we should give the thieves that put us in this position more money to spend as they see fit; or pad their own wallets. I am so angry with our government. I have lost ALL trust in our government and giving money to the people could not have been near as bad as what AIG, Walstreet, bankcards, etc have done with the money. Now, credit card rates are skyrocketing, jobs lost daily, seeing the crooks in high places moch us is almost too much to bare. Hope is dwindling, and the starch white shirts really DON''T CARE! I have so much repect for our President and my heart goes out to him to be so brave to sit in a den of thieves and try to reason with greed. God Bless this great country an our brave new President~
Reply to this comment
by libra217 January 30, 2009 12:04 AM EST
5.2 Billion for ACORN? $335 millions for STD prevention?

Posted by hclinton2012 at 04:33 PM : Jan 29, 2009

You really should try to keep up better. The $ for "STD prevention" was removed from the bill before the House vote - at Obama''''s request. He deemed it "inappropriate", but you''''''''re still willing to blame him for it. It was NEVER his idea.

There is no $5.2 billion for Acorn. That is just a lie. There is $4.19 billion for "community stabilization programs", most of which is designated for state and local governments. Rep. Boehner expressed a fear that Acorn might be eligible for a small part of it, but there is no designation for Acorn.

Source: foxnews.com
Reply to this comment
by themooniac January 29, 2009 10:16 PM EST
LOL,
"Republican critics say the bill was little more than the fulfillment of a long-standing Democratic wish-list. Those critics pointed to $1 billion for Amtrak, $41 billion for local school districts and $127 billion for health care for the poor and unemployed"
.... and thats why the people ar now wise to the Republicans... I guess we should have just handed the money to Halliburton and the ignororamus'' war in Iraq
Reply to this comment
by omded January 29, 2009 9:31 PM EST
Below is some helpful advice on how to best help the US economy by spending your stimulus check wisely:

If you spend that money at Wal-Mart, all the money will go to China .

If you spend it on gasoline it will go to the Arabs.

If you purchase a computer it will go to India .

If you purchase fruit and vegetables it will go to Mexico , Honduras , and Guatemala (unless you buy organic).

If you buy a car it will go to Japan .

If you purchase useless *** it will go to Taiwan .

And none of it will help the American economy.

We need to keep that money here in America . You can keep the money in America by spending it at yard sales, going to a baseball game, or spend it on prostitutes, beer (domestic ONLY), or tattoos, since those are the only businesses still in the US.

Reply to this comment
by omded January 29, 2009 9:28 PM EST
This year, taxpayers will receive an Economic Stimulus Payment.. This is a very exciting new program that I will explain using the Q and A format:

"Q. What is an Economic Stimulus Payment?
"A. It is money that the federal government will send to taxpayers.

"Q. Where will the government get this money?
"A. From taxpayers.

"Q. So the government is giving me back my own money?
"A. Only a smidgen.

"Q. What is the purpose of this payment?
"A. The plan is that you will use the money to purchase a high-definition TV set, thus stimulating the economy.

"Q. But isn''t that stimulating the economy of China ?
"A. Shut up."
Reply to this comment
by nikosk11 January 29, 2009 9:22 PM EST
Don''t send a dime to those districts that the their republiscum reps voted "no" and let the scums explain to their people why they voted agaist it?

Reply to this comment
by win4usa January 29, 2009 8:32 PM EST
Democrats just pissing away more of our tax dollars for political paybacks that won''t create jobs. Pork, Pork and more Pork.
Reply to this comment
See all 443 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook