WASHINGTON, Jan. 25, 2009
Guantanamo Case Files In Disarray
Washington Post: Obama Admin. Finds Files On Detainees Non-Existent Or "Scattered" Across Agencies
-
Play CBS Video Video GOP Bristles At Gitmo Closing Critics of Obama's plan say it places hope in front of reality, and will incite more attacks. Rep. Jane Harmon-D, Calif. and Rep. Pete Hoekstra-R, Mich. debate the issue with Maggie Rodriguez.
-
Video Notebook: Closing Gitmo President Obama issued an executive order to close down Guantanamo Bay and end harsh interrogations of its prisoners. As Randall Pinkston reports, not all Americans agree with this decision.
-
Video Obama Closes Gitmo President Obama signed an executive order calling for military prison Guantanamo Bay to be closed and prisoners moved.
-
Special Report War On Terror Complete coverage of the military's battle against terrorism.
-
Interactive Gitmo Tribunals Detainees on trial, photos and a history of the naval base.
Instead, they found that information on individual prisoners is "scattered throughout the executive branch," a senior administration official said. The executive order Obama signed Thursday orders the prison closed within one year, and a Cabinet-level panel named to review each case separately will have to spend its initial weeks and perhaps months scouring the corners of the federal government in search of relevant material.
Several former Bush administration officials agreed that the files are incomplete and that no single government entity was charged with pulling together all the facts and the range of options for each prisoner. They said that the CIA and other intelligence agencies were reluctant to share information, and that the Bush administration's focus on detention and interrogation made preparation of viable prosecutions a far lower priority.
But other former officials took issue with the criticism and suggested that the new team has begun to appreciate the complexity and dangers of the issue and is looking for excuses.
After promising quick solutions, one former senior official said, the Obama administration is now "backpedaling and trying to buy time" by blaming its predecessor. Unless political appointees decide to overrule the recommendations of the career bureaucrats handling the issue under both administrations, he predicted, the new review will reach the same conclusion as the last: that most of the detainees can be neither released nor easily tried in this country.
"All but about 60 who have been approved for release," assuming countries can be found to accept them, "are either high-level al Qaeda people responsible for 9/11 or bombings, or were high-level Taliban or al Qaeda facilitators or money people," said the former official who, like others, insisted on anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to reporters about such matters. He acknowledged that he relied on Pentagon assurances that the files were comprehensive and in order rather than reading them himself.
Obama officials said they want to make their own judgments.
"The consensus among almost everyone is that the current system is not in our national interest and not sustainable," another senior official said. But "it's clear that we can't clear up this issue overnight" partly because the files "are not comprehensive."
Charles D. "Cully" Stimson, who served as deputy assistant defense secretary for detainee affairs in 2006-2007, said he had persistent problems in attempts to assemble all information on individual cases. Threats to recommend the release or transfer of a detainee were often required, he said, to persuade the CIA to "cough up a sentence or two."
A second former Pentagon official said most individual files are heavily summarized dossiers that do not contain the kind of background and investigative work that would be put together by a federal prosecution team. He described "regular food fights" among different parts of the government over information-sharing on the detainees.
A CIA spokesman denied that the agency had not been "forthcoming" with detainee information, saying that such suggestions were "simply wrong" and that "we have worked very closely with other agencies to share what we know" about the prisoners. While denying there had been problems, one intelligence official said the Defense Department was far more likely to be responsible for any information lapses, since it had initially detained and interrogated most of the prisoners and had been in charge of them at the prison.
Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell said that the Defense Department would cooperate fully in the review.
"Fundamentally, we believe that the individual files on each detainee are comprehensive and sufficiently organized," Morrell said. He added that "in many cases, there will be thousands of pages of documents ... which makes a comprehensive assessment a time-consuming endeavor."
"Not all the documents are physically located in one place," Morrell said, but most are available through a database.
"The main point here is that there are lots of records, and we are prepared to make them available to anybody who needs to see them as part of this review."
There have been indications from within and outside the government for some time, however, that evidence and other materials on the Guantanamo prisoners were in disarray, even though most of the detainees have been held for years.
Justice Department lawyers responding in federal courts to defense challenges over the past six months have said repeatedly that the government was overwhelmed by the sudden need to assemble material after Supreme Court rulings giving detainees habeas corpus and other rights.
In one federal filing, the Justice Department said that "the record ... is not simply a collection of papers sitting in a box at the Defense Department. It is a massive undertaking just to produce the record in this one case." In another filing, the department said that "defending these cases requires an intense, inter-agency coordination of efforts. None of the relevant agencies, however, was prepared to handle this volume of habeas cases on an expedited basis."
Evidence gathered for military commission trials is in disarray, according to some former officials, who said military lawyers lacked the trial experience to prosecute complex international terrorism cases.
In a court filing this month, Darrel Vandeveld, a former military prosecutor at Guantanamo who asked to be relieved of his duties, said evidence was "strewn throughout the prosecution offices in desk drawers, bookcases packed with vaguely-labeled plastic containers, or even simply piled on the tops of desks."
He said he once accidentally found "crucial physical evidence" that "had been tossed in a locker located at Guantanamo and promptly forgotten."
Staff researcher Julie Tate contributed to this report.
By Washington Post Staff Writers Karen DeYoung and Peter Finn
© 2009 The Washington Post. All rights reserved.
- The missing stuff is probably with the Rose Law Firm billing records.
Posted by b4ucmyI at 09:37 PM : Jan 25, 2009
Why would Bush give the Democrats ammunition that could only come back to haunt him and GOP??
Get real and quit making excuses for King Loser. - Reply to this comment
- gee if the rest of the world invaded the US like we did Afghanistan,,,,,,,would Americans not fire back?.....I hope the world doesn''t invade us to arrest Bush for his war crimes....If they want him they can have him.....The liar administration has nothing on these people they were taken there to put on a show that Bush and company was keeping the world safe....BS...Bush was responsible for 911...why else do you think there was such a sham investigation....full of holes and would never stand up to the laws of science.
- Reply to this comment
- They swept up a whole lot of people by mistake without investigation, and they don''''t know what to do with them.
Professor Mark Denbea
I don''t know, when I was on the battlefield, my unit did''nt stop to investigate wether or not someone shooting at us was just sadly mistaken. - Reply to this comment
- I may be wrong..but I don''t think I am, but the GITMO Oversight Committe Chairman was Democratic Senator Ben Nelson from Nebraska.
- Reply to this comment
- This was by design...so no one could be held accountable. Having worked for several federal agencies, I know this shell game all too well. If everyone is responsible, then no one can be held responsible.
- Reply to this comment
- Pelosi Shrugs off Alcatraz as Possible Terror Detention Facility
Republicans opposing an Obama administration order to close Guantanamo Bay prison facility within a year suggest sending terror detainees to House Speaker Pelosi''s district. - Reply to this comment
- Obama''s team is making excuses to slow down the process. If there are only 60 men we don''t want to release or don''t have countries willing to accept, I doubt the files are that incomplete. Quit whining and get your butts in gear. George is gone, you can''t blame anything else on him.
- Reply to this comment
- What we sow, we reap. As we do the right thing, we will grow strong as a country.
- Reply to this comment
- Posted by TexHillGirl at 10:10 PM
There you go again, with the same old communist martian lines. Get a life. - Reply to this comment
- "In response to the discovery that many of the detainees at Guantanamo Bay prison who have been held for years without charge have scattered or incomplete case files"
The missing stuff is probably with the Rose Law Firm billing records. - Reply to this comment


Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.






