Jan. 12, 2009

Land Mines Ahead For Hillary

Politico: Secretary Of State Nominee Crams For Impending Confirmation Hearings

  • Hillary Clinton has reached out to all of her living predecessors at State, chatting often with pal Madeline Albright. She’s also contacted every member of the Foreign Relations Committee by phone or in person.

    Hillary Clinton has reached out to all of her living predecessors at State, chatting often with pal Madeline Albright. She’s also contacted every member of the Foreign Relations Committee by phone or in person.  (AP)

  • In-Depth Obama's Cabinet

    The latest names and status of posts within Obama's new administration.


(The Politico)  Hillary Clinton, ever the preparation junkie, is cramming for Tuesday’s confirmation hearing - intent on downplaying old disagreements with Barack Obama and parrying questions about her husband’s overseas entanglements, aides say.

Barring a bombshell revelation, all sides expect Clinton to be speedily confirmed as secretary of state. But her rendezvous with the Foreign Relations Committee at 9:30 a.m. Tuesday still offers its share of potential land mines.

Nobody’s fonder of huddling secretly with a close-knit, tight-lipped clutch of advisers than Hillary Clinton. And she’s been huddling plenty in recent days, gaming out defenses to possible attacks against her husband while synchronizing her policy positions with Obama to avoid embarrassing public disagreements on Iraq, Iran and Israel.

“If they hit her on any personal stuff or on the Bill s-t, she’ll hit the ball out of the park,” said a longtime adviser, speaking on condition of anonymity.

“She’s far more concerned with the substance,” the person said. “This is the re-emergence of the non-political Hillary. The most discomfort is where she and Obama disagree - the ‘you’re naive’ stuff. She can’t show up the president, she can’t appear like she’s trying to formulate her own foreign policy.”

Clinton’s task is made easier by the fact that Obama quietly adopted many of his former rival’s more hawkish foreign policy positions by the end of the primaries.

Her path may also be eased by the fact that Obama’s attorney general-designate, Eric Holder, has become the main lightening rod for GOP opposition in the Senate.

“Holder’s attracting most of the attention on the right,” says Steve Clemons, vice president of the progressive New America Foundation.

“She’s different. She’s a respected senator, and if they attack her, they will just appear mean and nasty… and they’ll appear as if they are undermining America’s diplomatic standing. And the Democrats are going to use soft, soft gloves.”

The committee’s staff is so confident Clinton will sail through that it has scheduled only a single day of hearings - although it has taken the precaution of reserving the committee room for Wednesday just in case. That’s a far cry from previous secretary of state confirmations: In 1981, Al Haig had to endure a five-day grilling about his role in Watergate before earning approval.

“We expect her confirmation hearing to be congenial, fair and swift,” said Sen. John Kerry’s committee spokesman Frederick Jones.

To ensure that nothing goes awry, Clinton has assembled a confirmation commando unit of sorts, featuring her post-campaign inner circle, including Cheryl Mills, Maggie Williams and her trusted Senate chief of staff, Tamera Luzzatto.

To that core, she’s added a new collection of Clinton-Obama foreign policy experts to coach her on the issues and the Byzantine bureaucracy at Foggy Bottom. They include Clinton Senate staffer Andrew Shapiro, former ambassadors Joe Huggins and Vickie Huddleston, a pair of incoming deputy secretaries of state - Jim Steinberg and Jack Lew - Clinton campaign policy maven Jake Sullivan, and Wendy Sherman, a highly regarded State Department veteran who helped shape Bill Clinton’s Haiti policy in the 1990s.

Moreover, the ever-conscientious Clinton has reached out to all of her living predecessors at State, chatting often with pal Madeline Albright. She’s also contacted every member of the Foreign Relations Committee by phone or in person.

One of those sit-downs was with Indiana Sen. Richard Lugar, the committee’s top Republican and a close friend of Vice President-elect Joe Biden.

Lugar has told Republicans he’s concerned about the former president’s charities but tha he’s convinced Hillary Clinton is up to the job. Nonetheless, there are several potential problem children on the GOP side, with noise likely to come from the committee’s most conservative members Jim DeMint (R-S.C), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) and David Vitter (R-La.).

“Over the recess, Sen. Vitter has had his staff investigate some of the potential conflicts of interest between the secretary of state and her husband’s enterprises,” says Vitter spokesman Joel DiGrado. “He’s going to ask her to provide a more substantial explanation.”

Tennessee Republican Bob Corker is also reportedly a concern to Clinton’s team, not so much over ideology but rather because he’s unpredictable, creative and has a knack for getting press.

The New York Times stoked the opposition on Sunday, with an editorial exhorting the committee to explore “the awkward intersection between Mrs. Clinton’s new post and the charitable and business activities of her husband.”

The editorial board, while expressing general support for her appointment, urged the former first lady to revise a five-page agreement with Obama requiring annual reports on Bill Clinton’s international fundraising efforts on behalf of his charities.

“Disclosure of Mr. Clinton’s charitable fundraising and relevant private fees should be done monthly, or at least quarterly, not just once a year,” the paper demanded.

Obama transition spokeswoman Brooke Anderson quickly swatted aside that suggestion, telling Politico in an e-mail: “The agreement with the Clinton Foundation goes well beyond the requirements of the law to help avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest.”

The Bill Clinton controversy is likely to attract the most attention, but Clinton’s team is actually more focused on erasing lingering doubts about whether she would be an Obama team player, according to people with knowledge of the situation.

Clinton and Obama clashed often on foreign affairs during their epic 17-month primary fight. He hammered her early and often over her Oct. 2002 vote for the Iraq invasion - and she returned fire by labeling him “naïve” after a 2007 debate in which he said he would negotiate with foreign despots with no preconditions.

But after Clinton’s defeat, Obama moved closer to Clinton’s mildly more hawkish worldview - and he began speaking out more stridently in support of Israel, ratcheting up his rhetoric against Iran’s leadership and placing pre-conditions on face-to-face talks with America’s enemies.

Still, there’s some room for potential problems. One area is Iran: Clinton voted against a 2007 resolution that labeled the country’s Revolutionary Guard a “terrorist” organization; Obama skipped the vote but later said he would have voted no, fearing the resolution could be misused as a pretext for the Bush administration to attack the Tehran regime.

And Clinton, a stalwart supporter of Israel in a state that demands such a position, must also be careful not to move too far beyond Obama’s noncommittal public statements about Israel’s controversial and bloody invasion of Gaza.

"People should not expect that she will go any further than what [Obama] has said by that point,” said a Senate aide familiar with her confirmation preparations.

But Clemons, a longtime observer of Washington’s foreign policy establishment, thinks Obama and Clinton are now in such lock-step on most issues that he might use her testimony this week to signal shifts in policy - even on Israel.

“There’s going to be some very subtle shading of language that will be intended to send messages to Israel and others,” said Clemons.


By Amie Parnes,Glenn Thrush
© 2009 POLITICO



We cover politics with enterprise, style, and impact.

Add a Comment See all 28 Comments
by enviro_wacko January 14, 2009 11:28 PM EST
The position of Secretary of State is fourth in line for succession to the Predidency. If I were the three in front of Billary, I would hire food tasters, keep bomb sniffing dogs with me at all times, never be alone with her, wire tap all her calls,(in case she is talking to a Gumba, arranging an "accident" and never go jogging alone

Posted by denny1233 at 01:58 PM : Jan 13, 2009

Yes, except you''re a high school dropout who works at the Dairy Queen.
Reply to this comment
by denny1233-2009 January 13, 2009 4:58 PM EST
The position of Secretary of State is fourth in line for succession to the Predidency. If I were the three in front of Billary, I would hire food tasters, keep bomb sniffing dogs with me at all times, never be alone with her, wire tap all her calls,(in case she is talking to a Gumba, arranging an "accident" and never go jogging alone
Reply to this comment
by denny1233-2009 January 13, 2009 4:22 PM EST
Like alcoholism, she must admit her addition to lying, before, she can over come it. No offense meant to Hilliary. Just a little constructive critisium. I apoligise to the Hilliary ditto heads.


Posted by johnjacobs4 at 12:07 PM : Jan 13, 2009

You have hit the nail on the head. But, don''''''''''''''''t apoligize.Hillary Clinton is a lieing cheating sack of s--hit!Here again, she is given a position of power she is niether qualified for or deserving. Her dog in heat Arkansas trailor trash husband stayed away from the hearings because it might bring back memories of the Clinton,cheating, lieing years.Which any clear thinking Senator on the panel would reject her for.She is a vicious liar, and a power hungry meglamaniac. She will stick a knife up Obama''''''''''''''''s a--ss if she gets the opportunity. He was a fool, to select this overachieving lieing, wench to be Sec.Of State.
Reply to this comment
by wvu74621 January 13, 2009 9:54 AM EST
The landmines are''nt real just like the sniper fire in Bosnia. All in her fuzzy memory/imigination. How can you trust someone that lies to Americas face on National Television.
Reply to this comment
by sjbj2322 January 12, 2009 10:26 PM EST
I think a lot of people here that have the nerve to question how well Hillary will be received by Republicans forget something very important. She has already won the overall approval of most of them because unlike Obama, she was always perceived to be a moderate. Part of the difficulty that many Hillary supporters (Democrats and Independents)had in transferring their support to Obama was that when it came down to it Hillary as a moderate Democrat was closer in her thinking to McCain a liberal leaning Republican. As for all of the garbage from the past surrounding Bill - let the woman have her day. She may well surprise a lot of you. She towed the line when she had to but don''t doubt for a moment this woman has a mind - a sharp mind of her own. The real question is whether Bill will allow her to have her day in the sun that she deserves.
Reply to this comment
by murrowseye January 12, 2009 7:53 PM EST
"...said a longtime adviser, speaking on condition of anonymity.

%u201CShe%u2019s far more concerned with the substance,%u201D the person said. %u201CThis is the re-emergence of the non-political Hillary..."

HOW LAUGHABLE! Hillary, non-political? LOL!
Reply to this comment
by yongamerica January 12, 2009 7:25 PM EST
All the radical Republicans have and will make sure Hillary is surrounded in landmines.

Its a shame when one''s political party is revered as much as a religion. And the Republicans have taken politics to that level. If you aren''t a Republican you don''t believe in God and you are not a real American. Republican paranoia at its best.
Reply to this comment
by brianp55 January 12, 2009 7:11 PM EST
"How did Hillary get so high up in her career when she accomplished nothing?" .....Posted by peace4321

Well, almost nothing, other than getting married.
Reply to this comment
by creeper00 January 12, 2009 7:01 PM EST
After the way her own party treated her in the primaries, I fully expect them to beat her up in the confirmation hearings.

It''s open season on women.
Reply to this comment
by specialty8 January 12, 2009 6:54 PM EST
obmaking,
before its to late take both hands and insert them on the choosen ones rear,take a deep breath and push as hard as you can to remove your head.Exhale to get that taste out of your mouth and you may still have a chance.Good luck.
Reply to this comment
by specialty8 January 12, 2009 6:48 PM EST
peace4321,
Remember Hillary knows how to dodge snipper fire. Landmines are no problem for someone who can dodge bullets!
Reply to this comment
by specialty8 January 12, 2009 6:28 PM EST
guyfrompa,
If obama keeps getting all of these ghost popping up He we will be lucky to make 4yrs. Seems every week a new one comes out of the closet.
Reply to this comment
by brianp55 January 12, 2009 5:44 PM EST
"*** I''''d rather see amnesty mccain blown to bits! along with the illegal immigrants he supports!"

.....Posted by auscross1277

I''ll second that.
Reply to this comment
by auscross1277 January 12, 2009 5:32 PM EST
What could have been.......
President Hillary Clinton.....
Posted by opedanderson at 02:08 PM : Jan 12, 2009
*** As long as she does a decent job as Secretary of state over the next 8 years, she will be a shoe in to be the next democratic presidential candidate, and then president in a landslide victory... all she has to do is avoid any big differences with Obama over the next 8 years.... atleast no public known problems!
Reply to this comment
by auscross1277 January 12, 2009 5:30 PM EST
I hope she steps on those land mines and blows herself to bits.
Posted by sly_64 at 02:04 PM : Jan 12, 2009
*** I''d rather see amnesty mccain blown to bits! along with the illegal immigrants he supports!
Reply to this comment
by auscross1277 January 12, 2009 5:29 PM EST
Nonetheless, there are several potential problem children on the GOP side, with noise likely to come from the committee%u2019s most conservative members Jim DeMint (R-S.C), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) and David Vitter (R-La.)..... Instead of causing problems for Hillary... maybe DeMint, Vitter, and Barrasso should instead question why the republican party let an amnesty supporter like Juan Mccain be their parties nominee this past election... or atleast make sure the next republican nominee doesn''t support any amnesty bills... That is the only way I would ever even consider voting republican again... if they stop supporting amnesty for illegals!
Reply to this comment
by opedanderson January 12, 2009 5:08 PM EST
What could have been.......

President Hillary Clinton.....
Reply to this comment
by sly_64 January 12, 2009 5:04 PM EST
I hope she steps on those land mines and blows herself to bits.
Reply to this comment
by brianp55 January 12, 2009 4:58 PM EST
Yes, Hillary is a woman of abundant talent and will make an outstanding Secretary of State. I have high hopes that she will be able to resolve America''s thorniest international issues. I would suggest that Obama send her immediately to the tribal areas of Waziristan to show them who''s boss.
Reply to this comment
by roscoe2400-2009 January 12, 2009 4:54 PM EST
What a completely worthless, anti-American rag for southern white America hating trash!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by ConDumbistan at 12:12 PM : Jan 12, 2009


Do you count Slick Willie and HillBilly from Arkansas in that crowd??
Reply to this comment
See all 28 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: