February 27, 2009 10:17 AM

Dodd: Show Me The Bailout Money

(CBS/AP)  President-elect Barack Obama has asked President Bush to formally notify Congress on his behalf of his intent to request the second tranche of funding for the Treasury Department's programs targeting the financial crisis.

White House spokesperson Dana Perino said Obama called Mr. Bush this morning to ask for the action on the TARP fund.

CBS News White House correspondent Peter Maer reports that the president agreed to the request.

But there is asking, and then there is getting.

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd is setting out the conditions necessary for Congress to approve releasing the second $350 billion of the roughly $700 billion federal rescue plan.

Speaking on CBS' The Early Show, Dodd said that in order to win authorization of such additional spending, the government will have to do a much better job of accounting to the taxpayers for where money already spent has gone.

The Treasury Department has spent about half of the $700 billion that make up the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) approved last Fall; Congress must approve a release of the remaining $350 billion. In addition, President-elect Barack Obama is asking Congress to ready an ADDITIONAL economic stimulus package, of between $750 and $800 billion, as a combination of infrastructure spending, renewable energy projects, and tax relief for businesses and individuals.

Given the criticisms about how the administration has spent TARP funds, with little to no accountability or proof that the money has fulfilled its intended purpose, lawmakers are evincing qualms about approving a release of the remaining $350 billion - and then adding an additional $800 billion on top of that.

Dodd said that Obama had expressed to him his dissatisfaction with how TARP money has been administered so far and that he intends to "re-brand" the program.

"He's not happy with how mismanaged this program has been over the last several weeks," Dodd told Early Show anchor Maggie Rodriguez. "Money going to lenders without assurances [they] are actually going to lend, executive compensation not being limited, as it was promised it would be. So there need to be far more assurances about the accountability standards and how this is all going to work.

"These assurances have to be forthcoming, and if they're not, then we'll have trouble passing this. But if they are, then I believe there's a good chance that this money will be approved."

Dodd said that in addition to higher accountability standards, the bailout's overseers must do more to mitigate foreclosures which, he said, "may be the most important aspect at all.

"We need to put a tourniquet on the 9,000 foreclosures that are occurring every day in this country."

Dodd told Rodriguez that he was encouraged by assurances during a two-hour meeting yesterday with former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, a key Obama economic adviser, and that "I feel better this morning" about prospects for approval.

He has been told Obama's team will be offering specifics on how the money will be managed. Barring that, Dodd said legislation would be put forward "that will demand those kind of standards if this money is going to go forward."

In response to criticisms about the tax cut portion of Obama's proposed package (which some assign as a political move to win the support of conservatives), Dodd said while he shared those concerns, some tax cuts are what he called "stimulative" and not just giveaways.

"I suppose each one of us might write it a bit differently, but the fact that there are some tax cuts in here that are probably going to be necessary and probably the right step to be taking," Dodd said. "I'd like to see a bit more of the infrastructure than we have in this bill, but that's just one person's opinion. Overall, I think the president-elect has it about right."

Several senators predicted that a vote in Congress on the remaining TARP funds is possible this week, as early as Monday.

Bush And Obama Tag-Team Congress For Remaining Bailout Funds

A vote in Congress on releasing the remaining TARP funds is likely soon, possibly this week, several senators predicted after a briefing yesterday on the Wall Street bailout as well as on Mr. Obama's separate plan intended to spur the economy.

The idea is to make the money available to the new administration shortly after Obama takes office Jan. 20. The unpopular bailout has featured unconditional infusions of money into financial institutions that have done little to account for it.

A request for TARP funds would force a vote within days on whether to block the funding, but the deck is stacked in favor of President Bush and Mr. Obama winning release of the remaining $350 billion.

Congress can pass a resolution disapproving the request, but the White House could veto the resolution; then, just one-third of either chamber would be needed to uphold the veto and win release of the money.

"Larry Summers made a very strong argument for why it's important and critical for the overall recovery," said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass. "And I think that's an argument that most senators understand."

Summers sought to win over Senate Democrats even as the GOP leader of the House, John Boehner of Ohio, warned that any effort to release the additional money would be a tough sell.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson originally promised the money would be used to buy up toxic mortgage-related securities whose falling values have clogged credit markets and brought many financial institutions to the brink of failure.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said that President Bush and Mr. Obama's team were near agreement on submitting notice to Congress about using the remaining $350 billion.

"We're waiting to hear from President Bush and/or President-elect Obama as to what, if anything, they're going to do," said Reid, D-Nev., "and that's occurring as we speak."

But to prevail, Mr. Obama and his team must soothe senators who feel burned by the way the Bush administration has used the TARP.

Selling The Obama Plan

Meanwhile, Mr. Obama and his team are aggressively working to build support for his economic stimulus plan, hoping it will be ready within a few weeks of his taking office.

"Let's not only provide a jumpstart to the economy and immediately create or save three million jobs, but let's also put a down-payment on some of the structural problems we have in our economy," Obama said.

Some Democrats are questioning whether too much is going to tax cuts.

"Marginal tax incentives tend not to work well when the economy is falling away sharply," said Sen. Kent Conrad of North Dakota.

The package features aid to cash-strapped state governments, $500 to $1,000 tax cuts for most workers and working couples, a huge spending package blending old-fashioned public works projects with aid to the poor and unemployed, and a variety of other initiatives.

Advocates for using tax cuts to promote alternative energy won concessions and the Obama team promised to make a $3,000 job creation tax credit - which has attracted considerable criticism - more workable.

Meanwhile, transition officials were resisting efforts to use the economic recovery bill to address the alternative minimum tax, which has affected more and more middle-income families.

CBS News White House correspondent Chip Reid reports that while sources on Capitol Hill say Obama's plan is likely to pass in something close to its current form, economists question whether it will be enough.

"We should use this money as efficiently as possible to create jobs," Dr. Peter Morici, Robert H. Smith School of Business, told CBS News. "That's best accomplished by spending it on roads, bridges, schools, putting people directly back to work, than by rebating taxes to individuals and businesses who may spend the money or who just may put it under their mattresses and save it.

"Once the effects of the stimulus wear off, those jobs will disappear if he doesn't fix what's broken in the economy."

House speaker Nancy Pelosi says lawmakers will have the details ironed out by President's Day in mid-February, or their annual President's Day recess will be cancelled.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 48 Comments
by marcy3pu January 13, 2009 12:35 PM EST
Any money that is not accounted for from it''s original purpose and designed should be paid back (out-of-pocket) immediately!!!

Why should we (taxpayers) have to pay for the "good life" of miscreants.
Reply to this comment
by gophwy71 January 13, 2009 10:45 AM EST
""""Dodd, like Frank, played a significant role in tanking this economy.

Next CBS will parade Pelosi out to make it look like she is here to help as well.

We''''d had enough of our government''''s help. There are too many crooks in Washington
Posted by payasyougo at 09:17 PM : Jan 12, 2009""""

You know that''s right....
Reply to this comment
by payasyougo January 13, 2009 12:17 AM EST
Dodd, like Frank, played a significant role in tanking this economy.

Next CBS will parade Pelosi out to make it look like she is here to help as well.

We''d had enough of our government''s help. There are too many crooks in Washington

Reply to this comment
by blog_fever2 January 12, 2009 7:10 PM EST
I have the one, true, perfect solution to our economy''''s problem. Instead of all these bailouts and throwing money down a bottomless pit, why dont Congress get with the Credit Reporting Agencies and wipe everyone''''s credit clean? Talk about jolt to the economy!!! There would be no need for TARP or any other bailout loans.... Think about it... if this country were to fall today and you had to move to another nation, would your fico score follow you there or affect any of your purchases?
Reply to this comment
by gophwy71 January 12, 2009 5:46 PM EST

""""....whaever type og Karl Rove republican LIAR you really are

please refrain from trying to shift the blame from the

countries problems to the democrats, we all know

that starting with Reagan the country began its

great slide into the second republican depression,

we all know who was at the helm when 9/11 occured,

and we all know what kind of people brought us the

war in Iraq, and a war criminal, a man with no

integrity, to the presidency of the United States.

Evangelical trash like you. We are all praying that

one day you may become a human being.
Posted by pythoncharly at 11:10 AM : Jan 12, 2009""""

What a fruit. You know it was Barney Frank along with Obama and Dodd that suckered all those subprime lenders in...
Reply to this comment
by gophwy71 January 12, 2009 5:42 PM EST
""""1.5 trillion dollars given to 300 million americans would be 5000.00 for every man woman and child in the US. Now that would stir the economy, instead we give it all to 5 or 6 companies who just lined their pockets with it and said the hell with you when asked where the money went. As for bailing out those people who bought homes they could not afford, let them move into an apartment and stop whinning. I didn''''t tell them to buy a home bigger than they needed, that they couldn''''t afford, was overpriced and now can''''t sell. Why should I have to bail them out.
Posted by withad at 11:04 AM : Jan 12, 2009""""

Where would it come from!!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Reply to this comment
by schoolmarm22 January 12, 2009 5:22 PM EST
There should have been strict accountability measures put in place before a single dime was handed out. The bail-out money will not benefit the American taxpayer because the same inept and corrupt CEOs will still be handling the funds.
Reply to this comment
by lochlan-2009 January 12, 2009 5:05 PM EST
How about we go after the peoplewho stole the billions?

Yeah, like that will ever happen. It''s so sad it''s not even funny.
Reply to this comment
by harbinger09 January 12, 2009 4:37 PM EST
That repeal is what put us where we are today. Once again more than enough complicity to go around on both parties.

Posted by renrivers at 01:31 PM : Jan 12, 2009


That, and the short sell bill that was pushed through by Phil Gramm and McCain in 2005.
Reply to this comment
by harbinger09 January 12, 2009 4:35 PM EST
They were the ones that passed the bills that were sent to the president for his signature, they were the ones who allowed the bills to be passed without any oversight built into them, and one of the point men on the senate side was Barrack Obama.

Their is more than enough guilt to go around, and for any Democrat who claims he can think and chew gum at the same time to deny the complicity of the Democrats in all of this, is ludicrous.

Posted by renrivers at 01:18 PM : Jan 12, 2009


The bills you are referring to, which allowed deregulation of S & Ls, deregulation of the banking industry were authored by Phil Gramm (a Republican) and the other bills were also authored by Republicans (though Dems may have also backed some of the bills) these bills were passed in 1999, and 2005. Congress was controlled by the Republicans from 1994-2006. YOu do the math. What the Dems are responsible for, is taking advantage (like the Republicans) of the deregulation and pushing for lax oversight for Fannie and Freddie along with the Republicans--but who actually pushed and authored the bills for Clinton and Bush to sign? EAch time, a Republican controlled Congress. The Dems will be the ones blamed for putting this 750 billion dollar joke on the taxpayers--because they are the only party who never argued or resisted the next set of lies from a man who had consistently lied to them for years (Bush).
Reply to this comment
See all 48 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook