February 11, 2009 1:46 PM

Obama Preparing Order To Close Guantanamo

(CBS/AP)  President-elect Barack Obama is preparing to issue an executive order his first week in office — and perhaps his first day — to close the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, according to two presidential transition team advisers.

It's unlikely the detention facility at the Navy base in Cuba will be closed anytime soon. In an interview last weekend, Mr. Obama said it would be "a challenge" to close it even within the first 100 days of his administration.

But the order, which one adviser said could be issued as early as Jan. 20, would start the process of deciding what to do with the estimated 250 al Qaeda and Taliban suspects and potential witnesses who are being held there. Most have not been charged with a crime.

The Guantanamo directive would be one of a series of executive orders Mr. Obama is planning to issue shortly after he takes office next Tuesday, according to the two advisers. Also expected is an executive order about certain interrogation methods, but details were not immediately available Monday.

The advisers spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the orders that have not yet been finalized.

Obama transition team spokeswoman Brooke Anderson declined comment Monday.

The two advisers said the executive order will direct the new administration to look at each of the cases of the Guantanamo detainees to see whether they can be released or if they should still be held — and if so, where.

Many of the Guantanamo detainees are cleared for release, and others could be sent back to their native countries and held there. But many nations have resisted Bush administration efforts to repatriate the prisoners back home. Both Obama advisers said it's hoped that nations that had initially resisted taking detainees will be more willing to do so after dealing with the new administration.

What remains the thorniest issue for Mr. Obama, the advisers said, is what to do with the rest of the prisoners — including at least 15 so-called "high value detainees" considered among the most dangerous there.

Detainees held on U.S. soil would have certain legal rights that they were not entitled to while imprisoned in Cuba. It's also not clear if they would face trial through the current military tribunal system, or in federal civilian courts, or though a to-be-developed legal system that would mark a hybrid of the two.

Where to imprison the detainees also is a problem.

Mr. Obama promised during the presidential campaign to shut Guantanamo, endearing him to constitutional law experts, civil libertarians and other critics who called the Bush administration detentions a violation of international law.

But he acknowledged in an interview Sunday that the process of closing the prison would be harder and longer than initially thought.

"That's a challenge," Obama said on ABC's "This Week." "I think it's going to take some time and our legal teams are working in consultation with our national security apparatus as we speak to help design exactly what we need to do.

"But I don't want to be ambiguous about this," he said. "We are going to close Guantanamo and we are going to make sure that the procedures we set up are ones that abide by our constitution."

President George W. Bush established military tribunals to prosecute detainees at Guantanamo. He also supports closing the prison, but strongly opposes bringing prisoners to the United States.

Earlier this month on Face The Nation, Vice President Dick Cheney said he was against closing Guantanamo and that he would, if asked, advise Obama to maintain the Bush administration's controversial interrogation policies and keep Guantanamo open.

"I would hope that for the sake of the nation, that this administration and future administrations will continue those policies," said Cheney, who also said he hoped Obama would not succumb to his "campaign rhetoric" of saying that an Obama administration would not torture.

Lawmakers have moved to block transfer of the detainees to at least two potential and frequently discussed military facilities: an Army prison at Fr. Leavenworth, Kan., and a Navy brig in Charleston, S.C. A Marine Corps prison at Camp Pendleton in Southern California also is under consideration, a Pentagon official said.

Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., said Monday that "it's hard to show why terror suspects should be housed in Kansas."

"If the holding facility at Guantanamo Bay is closed, a new facility should be built, designed specifically to handle detainees," Brownback said in a statement.

A Pentagon team also has been looking at how to shut Guantanamo and move its detainees but spokesman Bryan Whitman did not immediately know Monday whether it was completed.

The executive order marks only a first step at what is likely to be a long legal process. Still, American Civil Liberties Union legislative director Caroline Fredrickson called "extremely meaningful" even if the Guantanamo prison can't be closed immediately.

"It's clear that there is a process of time that will be necessary to close it properly, to make sure that human rights and respected and security is protected," Fredrickson said. "But the fact that it's set in motion is extremely good news."


© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 211 Comments
by mrzerato January 14, 2009 9:55 PM EST
here will he put these terrorist that wish to destroy the USA?

Posted by fcs25

Lets put them in prison or give them the death penalty, after a trial. If the prosecutors can not prove that they are dangerous terrorists, then what in the hell are we doing keeping them. Do we keep people locked up because we suspect they are terrorists?
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 January 14, 2009 3:13 PM EST
"I guess Obama and the libs feel that if Osam is captured on a foriegn battle field he should be transported to the U.S. and gioven all the rights and representations afforde to criminals with US citizenship, the other option would be to move and release him to authorities of his native country. Anyone see any problems with that theory? LOL!" Posted by notblue

None at all, it is in fact the law of the land, as well as international land. If convicted, the proper sanctions are proscribed by law, if found innocent, then he must be sent to the land of his citizenship.

You do understand what law is, don''t you?
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 January 14, 2009 3:09 PM EST
"President Bush and Vice President Cheney have said that interrogations never involved torture. "The United States does not torture. It''s against our laws, and it''s against our values," Bush asserted on Sept. 6, 2006...and in a interview last week with the Weekly Standard, Cheney said, "And I think on the left wing of the Democratic Party, there are some people who believe that we really tortured."

"We tortured [Mohammed al-]Qahtani," said Susan J. Crawford, in her first interview since being named convening authority of military commissions by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates in February 2007. "His treatment met the legal definition of torture. And that''s why I did not refer the case" for prosecution."

"The harsh techniques used against Qahtani, she said, were approved by then-Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld. "A lot of this happened on his watch," she said. Last month, a Senate Armed Services Committee report concluded that "Rumsfeld''s authorization of aggressive interrogation techniques for use at Guantanamo Bay was a direct cause of detainee abuse there."
Reply to this comment
by talaan77 January 14, 2009 1:01 PM EST
The problem is that their are many innocent people at Gitmo, get your heads out of the sand
Reply to this comment
by fredcs25 January 14, 2009 9:42 AM EST
Where will he put these terrorist that wish to destroy the USA?
Reply to this comment
by thgdriver1 January 13, 2009 11:15 PM EST
Nobama should build a new facility next door to the white house. He is so intent on coddling these detainees from Gitmo he would only have to walk next door to hold their hans.
Reply to this comment
by notblue January 13, 2009 8:26 PM EST
!
Reply to this comment
by notblue January 13, 2009 7:35 PM EST
I guess Obama and the libs feel that if Osam is captured on a foriegn battle field he should be transported to the U.S. and gioven all the rights and representations afforde to criminals with US citizenship, the other option would be to move and release him to authorities of his native country. Anyone see any problems with that theory? LOL!
Reply to this comment
by brannigon January 13, 2009 6:51 PM EST
Yeah, thats real smart supehero! Close Gitmo so they can go home and tell everything that they''ve learned. Are we supposed to be at war, or is this a paint ball game? America''s gone stupid!!!
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 January 13, 2009 5:32 PM EST
gotta go, hearings are back on.
Reply to this comment
See all 211 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook