
WASHINGTON, Jan. 12, 2009
Where Did The Bailout Billions Really Go?
CBS Evening News Exclusive: Were Bank Bailout Winners And Losers Cherry-Picked?
-
Play CBS Video Video Bailout Money Trail Congress is wary of how President-elect Obama plans to spend TARP funds as Bush bailout billions went to buy other banks and not to free up credit, reports Sharyl Attkisson.
-
Video Bailout Bait And Switch? The financial industry bailout was supposed to help troubled mortgage holders and free up credit lending. So why have the firms used the money to buy up smaller banks? Sharyl Attkisson reports.
-
Panelists testify at a Senate Banking Committee hearing Nov. 13, 2008. (CBS)
-
Timeline Stopgap Measures A look at the series of government moves to try and stem the financial meltdown.
-
Timeline Financial Meltdown Track major events that lead to one of the most tumultuous times in Wall Street's history.

• Murtha's Defense Earmarks Questioned
• Bailout Banks Hike Up Charges
• Student Loan Charity Under Fire
• Bailout Money To Tax Havens
• Big Bank's Bailout Spending Spree
• The Impossible-To-Track Bailout
• Where Did The Bailout Billions Really Go?
• Pension System A Runaway Train
• Parking Garage To Nowhere
• Did D.C. Bribery Cost Troop Lives?
• Teach For America Gets Schooled
• USDA Jobs A Day At The Beach?
• From Lawmaker To Lobbyist
• Flying The Empty Skies
• Fishing For Tax $$
• Millions In Pills, Flushed
But once the bill became law on October 3, Henry Paulson's Treasury Department moved quickly on an entirely different front: Give bailout money to select banks to help them buy competitors. It was largely under the public radar, with only anonymous government officials acknowledging the strategy, CBS News investigative correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports.
During the hearing on Nov. 13, Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., called it "confounding to me."
Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, said it "breaks with congressional intent."
But CBS News has learned the banking industry was clued-in from the start.
Listen to what BB&T Bank's chief executive told analysts in a conference call shortly after the bailout passed. He's not talking about using bailout funds to help with mortgages or consumer credit - but to buy other banks.
"This is a relatively inexpensive way to raise capital for acquisition opportunities," said John Allison, CEO of BB&T.
A month later, they got $3 billion in bailout money.
Just look at all the banks we found that have gotten taxpayer bailout funds, and are gobbling up the competition:
Nobody from the Treasury Department would respond to CBS News' questions. But some analysts say the idea is to strengthen the banking industry by giving strong banks the means to take over weak ones.
It's not necessarily working out that way.
Some banks judged by federal regulators as "strong," like Merrill Lynch and Provident Bancshares, are the very ones getting bought out.
And some in Congress are upset that the Treasury Secretary is hand-picking winners and losers.
In a November 14 hearing, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said: "Hank Paulson gets to decide who lives and who dies? Who buys whom?"Read more at Couric & Co. Blog: Bailout "Bait And Switch?"
Take PNC Bank and National City. Both wanted bailout money but only PNC got it: Then, it bought National City.
Rep. Kucinich is from Cleveland, where National City was based. He grilled the Treasury official in charge of the bailout, Neel Kashkari, saying in the Nov. 14 hearing: "You picked a winner, PNC, and you picked a loser, National City Bank."
Kashkari responded: "With deep respect, it is not appropriate for me to speak about an individual institution, but I can talk generally about …"
"Well, with deep respect, you know, you put 4,000 people out of work in the city of Cleveland," Kucinich said. "You're, you know … are you taking a Fifth Amendment here?"
"No, sir," Kashkari said. "I don't think it's a good use of taxpayer money to put taxpayer capital into a financial institution that's going to fail."
"Boy, you know that statement that you just made you will hear about for the rest of your career," Kucinich said.
With billions going to banks and so far not helping with the mortgage crisis, congressional leaders this week said no further bailout money will be given to Treasury without much stricter conditions.
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Read more at Couric & Co. Blog: Bailout "Bait And Switch?"
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 9
- next
See all 161 CommentsYou, sir, are a babbling IDIOT.
Anybody who believes that truly is a fool. This is naught but a scheme to centralize control of the money supply in the U.S. - and thus ultimate control of the nation itself.
Why do you think Goldman''s cycled so many alumni through the White House? For the fabulous salaries?
lolllllllllllllllllll......
Posted by mrdadguy
I agree with you on this issue. I am sure that while we sit here so smug when we think of all our so called freedoms here in the U.S., intellegent people elsewhere in the world are having a good laugh at how stupid and incompetant we are. We pay out the nose in taxes every year to support any jerk who holds their hand out, and then we borrow massive amounts of money to buy things we can''t afford and don''t need, just because we can. Then at tax time every year we whine and complain, but re-elect the same corrupt cretins who give more rights to illegal freeloaders than we are allowed ourselves, and we believe it when they tell us that it''s too expensive to deport them.
HA HA HA
Lloyds of London only accepts members who are willing to commit all their personal wealth behind the insurance contracts (bets) that they place. Only after three years of the annual closing are the profits or losses declared. This lapse of time allows for the claims to be settled and any gain or loss is paid out or money paid back.
This principle should be adopted by anyone collecting and investing funds on behalf of third parties.
Simple and clean. Most speculators will disappear.
Marie Antoinette upon hearing the people had no bread--
Said:
"Then let them eat cake".
It seems to resonate here.
Perhaps its time for New American Revolution-
To bring out the Guillotine !!!
Place one on the steps of Congress-
And overthrow the ruling class!!!
Maybe then we would get some accountability!!!
"Neither the wealthy nor the poor believe in the work ethic.
The poor don''''t believe because no matter how hard they work, they still can''''t make enough to live on. So they still have to eat food from the trash and steal to get by. And if you can do that, why work?"
Believe me, the poor are not poor by choice. Obviously you have never been poor or you would not make the ridiculous statements about poor people. And who says rich people don''t have a good work ethic. How do you think they got rich, by being lazy? You don''t make a bit of sense.
Didn''t hear about that. I''M SHOCKED!!!!
What is truly amazing is that Congress was being flooded with grievances from citizens and taxpayers resisting this use of taxpayer money BEFORE it was handed over. AND Congress actually by-passed decades if not century''s old legisilation regarding the use of taxpayer money for something like this and IN PARTICULAR acquisition legislation that would specifically allow Paulson uninhibited and unaccountable distribution of taxpayer dollars to whomever at whatever he deemed fit without any oversight.
Just so we know what sort of Congress we''re talking about. I can SPECIFICALLY recall sending e-mailing my own objections INCLUDING asking why most of this taxpayer socialized capital wasn''t in the immediate short term being use to provide direct loans and credit to people who needed it and do this at rates that banks would not.
I do believe the REAL CONCERN for Congress at the time and even NOW is saving capitalism/opportunism with no strings attached, BUT... and this can''t be stated more clearly... STRICTLY at the EXPENSE of taxpayers on the order of TRILLIONS.
Apparently what we''re trying to save in America is welfare for the elite, where consumers and taxpayers are NOT the capitalists in any way or form.
Nothing democratic about that... or free.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 9
- next
See all 161 Comments