U.N. Council Passes Cease-Fire Resolution

Vote Is 14-0 In Security Council, With U.S. Abstaining; But Measure Is Nonbinding To Israel And Hamas

(CBS/AP)  The U.N. Security Council approved a resolution late Thursday calling for an immediate and durable cease-fire between Hamas militants and Israeli forces now fighting in the Gaza Strip.

The vote was 14-0, with the United States abstaining.

The vote followed three days of intense negotiations between ministers from key Arab nations and the council's veto-wielding Western powers - the United States, Britain and France. It came on the 13th day of an Israeli air and ground offensive against the Islamic group Hamas, which rules Gaza and has been launching rockets and mortars into southern Israel for years.

The United States, Israel's closest ally, and Arab nations that have close ties to Hamas negotiated the text of the resolution. But it will be up to Israel and Hamas to decide to stop their military activities.

"We are all very conscious that peace is made on the ground while resolutions are written in the United Nations," British Foreign Secretary David Miliband said. "Our job here is to support the efforts for peace on the ground and to help turn the good words on paper into changes on the ground that are desperately needed."

The agreement came on the third day of an emergency council session demanded by the Arabs to try to end the fighting in Gaza.

Although passing a resolution at the U.N. doesn’t guarantee that either Hamas or Israel will respect it, the vote means Arab League countries and the U.K. and France - which negotiated the deal - have agreed on the design for a cease-fire, reported CBS News foreign affairs analyst Pamela Falk at U.N. headquarters.

In addition to the cease-fire, the resolution calls for the unimpeded provision of humanitarian assistance in Gaza, the re-opening of border crossings, and a crackdown on arms smuggling to Hamas, added Falk. (Click here to read more analysis from Falk in World Watch.)

Israeli envoys went to Cairo, Egypt, on Thursday and held talks with Egyptian officials on an initiative by the presidents of Egypt and France that calls for a temporary truce. Hamas militants have yet to commit to coming to Cairo for talks and said they have major reservations about the plan.

Rice said the U.S. abstained - knowing that the resolution would pass - because the Washington wanted to see the results of the Egyptian mediation efforts, presumably meaning the Bush administration wanted to see if Hamas was on board with a cease-fire. Earlier in the day, Hamas officials rejected the Cairo proposal.

"The issue (for Israel) is how to keep Hamas from re-arming after any potential cease-fire," reports CBS News correspondent Mark Phillips from the Israel-Gaza border. "If they simply bring more weaponry in, the Israelis fear they will just be back here in six months having to do this all over again."

Hamas violently wrested control of the Gaza Strip from the Palestinian Authority in June 2007 and is considered a terrorist organization by the U.S. and Israel.

Israel's government said Wednesday that it viewed the Egyptian-French proposal positively but stopped short of acceptance.

Thursday night's resolution came during a week of rising Palestinian casualties in Gaza. The death toll topped 700 Palestinians Thursday, according to Gaza medical officials. Eleven Israelis have died since the offensive began on Dec. 27.

In Washington, the Senate unanimously adopted a resolution Thursday stating an "unwavering commitment" to Israel and its right to defend itself, while also calling for "a viable and independent Palestinian state living in peace alongside a secure state of Israel." The House was expected to pass a similar measure Friday.

[toolmangler-2009]

Takes few seconds to watch this:

http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=eTGbP55HGi8
and then comment on the cease fire consequences

Posted by factsearcher at 10:13 AM : Jan 09, 2009





Been there, done that. Its the truth, but old news to me.

[koopa98]

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ah aha aha ah aha ha . . . .ha . . ha . . .ha. Phew.

[rrozsa-2009]

israel, on the other hand, brought their land from desert to an oasis with an amazing irrigation system created by them...where you can see greenery in the desert..what an amazing country!
parasites? yes the palestinians

---------------------------Posted by factsearcher at 08:35 PM : Jan 08, 2009

===========

Most people (including the media) ignore that piece of history. The Palestinians only want the part back that Israel developed and toiled over to make olive groves, etc. which were never there before.

[rhs648]

Why did Israel go into Gaza? To stop Hamas from bombing Israel. Israel left Gaza in 2005, giving Palestinians the chance to run their own lives. Despite this, more than 6300 rockets and mortars have been fired into Israel since then.During the past year alone, more than 3000 rockets and mortars have been launched into Israel. If Hamas promises no more missiles ever, Israel will stop. Not a complicated formula.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Dkaufman81

A great analysis.

[vexit]

Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)

http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Foreign_Policy_Institutions/CFR_Debates_Torture.html

[vexit]

These Wars are not run by the Muslim people or the US people. They are orcistrated by organizations like Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). And they are run by the Rich elite who all belong to the International Banking Corperations. They don''t care if its Isreal, Irag or even the US who is hurt. They are the war makers because they are the ones that lend the money to both sides and then control the finances of countries. They are fooling all of the people all of the time. They want a One World Order ruled by the Rich Elite. Like a super Russia of the past. Where the common people are controlled or eliminated if they put up a fuss. Greed and Greed. They are nolonger human and don''t care who dies as long as they get their pieces of gold and power. Some think one world government means no wars, and paridise. No it means no freedoms and mass killings and electronic trackings. Hurdings into small cities. Barely enough food. servitude to these elitists. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

[matter77]

The Bible doesn''t say "Thou Shalt Not Kill". The 6th commandment is "Thou Shalt Not Commit Murder". Big difference.

[cbs_tom]

"teaching something that is based on observable scientific evidence".
Posted by endurorob at 07:42 AM : Jan 09, 2009

As much as I like your postings, I have to disagree on your statement. At this point, evolution cannot be proven by the "scientific method". In order to do so, it would have to be something that can be repeated and considered as fact. I do understand that it is a theory, but with many holes.

[songwriter16]

In song: "LULLABY FOR A CHILD IN WAR"

http://soundclick.com/share?songid=6086636

(free download)

Mike Nobel, Maine

[factsearcher]

Takes few seconds to watch this:

http://jp.youtube.com/watch?v=eTGbP55HGi8

and then comment on the cease fire consequences