U.S. Spends Millions To Dole Out Bailout

Government Estimates $6.5M In January Salaries, Administrative Costs For Rescue Package

(CBS/AP)  The U.S. government estimates it will spend $6.5 million by the end of January in salaries and other administrative costs for the $700 billion financial rescue program.

The Treasury Department estimate issued Tuesday is part of the latest update it is required to provide Congress on the operation of the largest government bailout effort in U.S. history.

The government estimates it will spend nearly $1.2 million on salaries through the end of January and more than $5.3 million on other expenses.

The Treasury Department said Monday it had supplied another $15 billion to seven U.S. banks in the latest round of payments from the $700 billion rescue fund.

The biggest payment in the new round totaled $7.58 billion to Pittsburgh-based PNC Financial Services Group Inc., according to Treasury officials.

The latest payments bring the amount the government has committed to buying bank stock as a way of bolstering the financial system to $187.5 billion. Treasury said it has provided support to financial institutions in 41 states and Puerto Rico.

Besides PNC, Treasury provided $3.41 billion to Fifth Third Bancorp of Cincinnati and $1.35 billion to Atlanta-based SunTrust Banks Inc. The announcement Monday covered payments that were made on Dec. 31.

Under the law that established the $700 billion financial rescue program, Treasury has two business days after giving final approval to release the money to make that action public. In many cases, the individual financial institutions publicize that they have received approval for financial rescue support before the official Treasury announcement.

---

Click here to view the Treasury Dept.'s December bailout report

---

The government is buying stock in banks in an effort to bolster the companies' balance sheets and spur them to step up lending to fight the worst financial crisis to hit the country since the 1930s.

But critics contend that many banks are not using the government funds for the purposes that Congress intended. An Associated Press survey last month of 21 banks that had received at least $1 billion each in government support found that none of them would provide specific answers to how the money was used.

Besides purchasing bank stock, the government also has tapped the bailout fund to supply support to insurance giant American International Group, and last week released money to General Motors Corp. and its financing arm GMAC LLC.

Treasury also said it had provided an additional $20 billion to Citigroup Inc. on Dec. 31 under a program it has dubbed its "targeted investment program" to provide support for the banking giant. It already had provided Citigroup an initial $25 billion.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said last month when the Bush administration announced it would provide emergency loans to GM and Chrysler LLC that it had committed the first half of the $700 billion rescue program and Congress would need to authorize use of the final $350 billion.

That money cannot be tapped until the administration sends a report to Congress explaining how it plans to use the final $350 billion.

Treasury spokeswoman Brookly McLaughlin said Monday the administration was continuing to have conversations with the economic team of President-elect Barack Obama and with leaders in Congress about release of the final $350 billion.

She said no decision had been made on when the report requesting the next $350 billion would be sent to Congress. Many lawmakers believe that request will be delayed until after Mr. Obama takes office on Jan. 20.

[jsmithcsa]

Altho'' I doubt it will happen, I hope Obama''s bailout works better than the last one we did like this -- in 1929 (as you may recall, Joe Biden reported that FDR announced it on TV then).

[standlee5]

What do politicians do except spend money. I can''t beleive that the we''ve allowed them to spend so recklessly. Then Mr. obama the saviour the biggest pork barrell spender in the Senate. Millions in earmarks or was it billions. Hey he''s got expensive tastes.

[blog_fever]

If you feel like you are destined for doom... leave while you can... otherwise please keep your cynical statements to yourself.

[blog_fever]

"Let brotherly love continue" Hebrews 13:1

[billrich11]

Posted by ddaryl1 at 04:08 PM : Jan 06, 2009


Daryl, please remove Nobama''s black snake from your mouth and put it back in his pants before you offer something like this in the future.

[standlee5]

Government Estimates $6.5M In January Salaries, Administrative Costs For Rescue Package"


Welcome to the Democrat''s brave new world. It''s a system designed to exclusively to support itself. We can''t lay off govt. workers because it''ll overwhelm unemployment insurance. Over half population pays no income tax and votes itself leaders who''ll dole out more money to them. We''re destined for doom.

[stupidrules3]

It''s really ironic how expensive it is to make numbers move through a computer. It''s not like the money was used to buy gas for big trucks to deliver a bunch of cash. Probably generated about a ton of paperwork that no one will ever read anyway. It''s amazing how efficient our government is.

[ddaryl1]

LMAO at the conservative whine...I meant swine

Obama is creating jobs in his package. Something Bush never did unless military is job creation, but most of our soldiers end up close to bankrupt after they do their duty.

Obama is giving tax breaks to the middle class. Didn''t Bush give pretty significant tax breaks to the wealthy when he was in office, why is Obama''s tax breaks a terrible idea, but none of you neo-cons republicans say anything about that. Wasn''t the Bush tax cuts supposed to provide extra capital to the welathy and the businesses which they would use ot invest into more infrastrucutre and R&D that would produce more jobs for Americans ???

why the selective memeory republicans WHY???

nothing a republican says should even be considered anyore, I would gladly vote for someone else outside of democrats, but I will never for as long as I live vote for or even show respect to neo-con republicans who would rather see this ocuntry fail miserably then to even consider that a democrat be successful in the eyes of the country.

rpeublicans are sick people

[asawho]

Who wrote that muddled line "to dole out bailout" pure idiocy!

[trillion1]

All the rightwing can do now is whine and claim they can tell the future. Unfortunatly for them no one needs a crystal ball to see what they''ve done to this country in the past.

[likeitis5050]

Ohhhhhhh....for all the people who fell for all the bs hook line and sinker and actually think they are going to SAVE money under Obama...I wouldn''t wanna be you when the light bulb finally goes on!!!!!

[specialty8]

billrich,
not so fast, the Obama handout is not a one lump check. It amounts to about $9.60 a week off of your tax. After he raises the tax on fuel to 10cent plus a gallon you will be in the hole again. See Obama knows how to make money.

[billrich11]

Guess I am going to be forced to say thank you to Barack NObama....

I''m one of the Americans who haven''t had to pay a dimes worth of Federal Income Tax for the past five years, thanks to G.W. Bush''s tax cuts....

Now today I hear Barack NObama is gonna arrange for me to get a substantial welfare payment disguised as a "tax break" in the form of a cash payment this year.

Well Mr. NObama, thank you, I didn''t vote for you, and never would, but I do thank you for the welfare payment you are gonna arrange for me to receive.

[used2bfedup1]

Well ofcourse they have to spend millions to dole out the bailout. You dont expect people to take money for free do you liberals?

Posted by lady_organs at 01:21 PM : Jan 06, 2009

Isnt this the bailout thats going to the bankers, lawyers, and such. Republicans all!

[used2bfedup1]

now it takes money to spend money!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by djberson at 01:45 PM : Jan 06, 2009

Or a printing press.

[misssuzq]

Why can''t we get countries to payback the gazillions that we have given them?

Why is it that we take care of people who hate us and not our OWN American CITIZENS - our own country?

These are things that the government did without our approval - we only get a choice of elected officials but never get to voice our opinion and they make dumba$$ decisions!

$15 BILLION dollars - you could give each American CITIZEN a couple of million so that we could afford to make purchases to keep things afloat!

Rebuild devastated areas from floods, hurricanes and tornados. Money for NATURAL disasters, not man made ones.

No one is saving American CITIZENS and we are not being asked via a vote as to what we would like or not like to be done, so money is being given away like Monopoly money.

[djberson]

now it takes money to spend money!