Senate Turns Down Roland Burris
Blagojevich's Appointee Says He Is Looking At Options For Getting Seat After Rejection On Capitol Hill
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Burris Hits Capitol Hill
Roland Burris, appointed by Ill. Gov. Rod Blagojevich, may be excluded in today's U.S. Senate swearing in. Maggie Rodriguez talks to Burris about the validity of his appointment.
-
Video
Burris Ready For Washington
Roland Burris spoke with reporters as he departed for Washington where he plans to be seated as President-elect Obama?s replacement in the Senate. Burris said that if he is turned away he will take legal action.
-
Video
Senate Seat Spectacle
Roland Burris has arrived in Washington, D.C. expecting to be sworn in as the new Senator for Illinois. But Democrats have said they'll bar his appointment. Wyatt Andrews reports.
-
-
Photo
Illinois U.S. Senate appointee Roland Burris leaves the U.S. Capitol, seen rear, in Washington, Tuesday, Jan. 6, 2009, after he was turned away when he appeared to take his seat. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
-
Photo
Roland Burris talks with the media, Jan. 6, 2009. (CBS)
-
-
Interactive
Political Scandals
Politics can be a strange and dirty business. Check out some of the biggest missteps and mishaps in recent history.
Standing amid a huge throng of reporters and television cameras in a cold and steady rain, Burris, 71, declared that he had been informed that "my credentials are not in order and will not be accepted."
The former Illinois attorney general said he was "not seeking to have any type of confrontation" over taking the seat that he was appointed to by embattled Gov. Rod Blagojevich. But Burris also said he was looking at options for taking the seat.
"Mr. Burris is not in possession of the necessary credentials from the state of Illinois," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada later said in his speech opening the new session of Congress.
It was a spectacular demonstration of political gridlock at a time when the Democratic-controlled Congress has been eagerly awaiting Mr. Obama's inauguration while nervously anticipating tense work on a much-discussed stimulus program to steady the faltering economy.
An attorney for Burris, Timothy W. Wright III, said that "our credentials were rejected by the secretary of the Senate. We were not allowed to be placed in the record books. We were not allowed to proceed to the floor for purposes of taking oath. All of which we think was improperly done and is against the law of this land. We will consider our options and we will certainly let you know what our decisions will be soon thereafter."
Asked what his options were, Wright said there possibly could be a court challenge and he said that Burris also would continue to talk to the Senate leadership.
There had been earlier indications that the Senate would disallow Burris to take his seat, at least in part because his letter of appointment from Blagojevich was not co-signed by Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White.
Some of Burris' supporters have bemoaned the fact that Democrats would stand in the way of the Senate gaining its only black member. Burris himself downplayed the issue of race, telling reporters: "I cannot control my supporters. I have never in my life, in all my years of being elected to office, thought anything about race."
Earlier Tuesday, Burris had tense negotiations with Terrence Gainer, the Senate's sergeant at arms.
On CBS' The Early Show this morning, Burris dismissed his critics, saying his appointment by the scandal-plagued governor is valid.
"They're causing the drama, my appointment is legal. Are you saying there is something wrong with me? I'm qualified," Burris, who was the first African-American elected to statewide office and was the former Illinois attorney general, said. (Watch the video)
"There's nothing wrong with Roland Burris and there's nothing wrong with the appointment," Burris said.
In his defense, Burris, 71, pointed to Blagojevich's decision Monday to hold an election for a successor to Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill., Mr. Obama's chief of staff. Burris said it proves the embattled governor still has legal authority to carry out his duties.
"As I read the U.S. Constitution," Burris said, it says the "governor shall fill a vacancy, and as a former attorney general of my state, I have no knowledge of where a secretary of state has veto power over a governor carrying out his constitutional duties."
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said Monday that Burris cannot take his seat because he "has not been certified by the state of Illinois." Additionally, Senate Democrats say Burris' appointment is tainted because of the charges Blagojevich faces.
Burris has threatened to sue Senate Democrats if they do not swear him in as the chamber's only black member.
©MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.




- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 165 CommentsNow send this guy packing home if the new governor wants to appoint him then so be it.
Congress, get a life, do something other than complain about what some nut job govenor did and get to work doing the people''s work, not your own narccisist gratification of "how great we are!!"
----------------------Posted by DaVicar3 at 11:34 AM : Jan 06, 2009
===========================
As you well know, no one has said it''s because he''s black -- It''s because he was appointed by Blago, who is still under investigation for his illegal pay-to-play activities. You''re just race-baiting the forum.
The Democrats turning away a Black American.
Reminds of us of when the Democrat Party rule the South and the Blacks there from 1860''s to the 1960''s not to mention the illegal milita the Dems started to control Blacks in the South, the KKK.
Yep, Democrats still at it only this time instead of turning away Black children from all white schools now their turning them away from serving in Congress................sad
"I have years of experience as the Attorney General of the fifth largest state. Can I have the job of a US senator"? "No"
THIS WAS AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACT
And, I''m a Democrat. Harry Reid may have set himself up for a Republican impeachment.
Burris was appointed by Blagojevich who was asking for
a personal payoff for filling the senate seat.
Caroline Kennedy is going to be appointed by Paterson because she will bring in $100 million to the NY Democratic Party.
What is the difference you ask?
Paterson will get his campaign money out of this in a check from the Democratic Party.
Blagojevich just wanted the check made out to him personally.
Both senate seats were up for sale and both governors want proceeds from the sale. The only reason paterson is not in trouble is because he is getting the money laundered through the party first.
Either both are guilty of corruption or neither. Either both Burris and Kennedy get seated or neither.
Either we all smarten up or just give up and let all the senate seats go to the highest bidder.
the people of America lose!
Roland Burris is of the best selections a Gov. of any state could make to fill Obama''s no vacant Senate seat.
Posted by ccfsdca at 12:00 PM : Jan 06, 2009
What''s ridiculous is how many people George Bush is responsible for murdering in Iraq, and he''ll never spend a day behind bars for it.
That''s ridiculous!
Posted by perceptions5
And if the Dems accepted him, you would be ranging about Dems accepting a tainted appontment. As usual, you''re laughable.
But nope. CONSERVATIVES are still at it. Doesn''t matter whether racists called themselves Dems in the 1960''s or Repubs now in 2009. The racists and hate mongers were always and will always be CONSERVATIVES, regardless what party they belonged to.
Roland Burris is skum.
Go way old man.
You are part of the "machine"
stop trying to fool everyone into
thinking you are soooo innocent.
Sorry, Burris, but you''ll have to ask for a refund for that Senate seat.
Stop cross-posting, n00b. This discussion isn''t about tariffs.
Silly Neocons...
Blagojevich hasn''t been convicted of anything, he is legally entitled to appoint a successor and Burns is qualified.
The Republicans have created an environment where no one can follow the rules, even if they want to, and this lawlessness has seeped down into every part of American life.
These loony-left d-crats sure know how to live up to their party''''s jackas* symbol.
Posted by LoonyLeft at 12:16 PM : Jan 06, 2009
We love our party''s symbol. What is better, having a piece of elephant or a piece of a$$??? You tell me.
Oh what a sore looser you are. It hurts loosing the White House, the Senate, the House, the trust of the American people. But you know, Republiscums brought this to themselves. All these years you danced to the tune of the Bush/Chenney junta. Now, is time to pay the fiddler. LOOSERS.
George Wallace has/had nothing on harry reid, absolutely nothing.
While I am a conservative I totally support thie appointment. AND, I do have a right to voice that opinion.
The dems profess to uphold the contitution and have slammed Bush for 8 years saying how he trashed our constitution.
Burris was duly put in the senate by a sitting governor. If you dems don''t have the intestinal fortitude to FORCE blago out of office then you have to deal with his actions.Burris is within his rights to take that seat.
If this were a Republican I could just imagine the outrage.
This is fun!!
This has nothing to do with race, political parties or his shoe size. But if this IS going to be a new start for America, the last thing we need is to open it wondering about the legality and honesty of one of its members.
Face it no matter who you get if they come from Illinois and are existing politicians your guaranteed to be getting a crook. Whats one more crook when you already have 99 others seated?
Of course, we knew they were delusional, didn''t we?
After all, they supported the Village Idiot for eight years.
Posted by txgrouch2008 at 12:54 PM : Jan 06, 2009
The Republican list is ten times as long.
Posted by txgrouch2008
After 12 of the last 14 years of Repub Congressional control, the last eight years with a Repub president, and most of the judicial nominated by Repubs, the Dems will have to be in power a very long time to catch up to the Repub free-for-all the last 14 years.
But, not much more could be expected from a politician who owes his position to Chicago-style politics.
And, before anyone whines about Obama not being closely tied to Blagojevich, remember that Obama endorsed Blagojevich...not just once, but twice.
And, we still have much to learn about the Bill Richardson scandal and its connections to the Obama regime.
By the way, just who created the "Office of the President Elect?" I can''t seem to find the "Office" provided for anywhere in the Constitution.
Posted by keystonebull
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Oh, wait. You''re serious.
Let me laugh HARDER.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
What you''re saying is that they should give Burris the senate seat because he''s black? Shouldn''t it be because he''s the right man for the job? We just elected a black man not because of his color, but because he is the best and the brightest America had to offer.
I am amazed lighting did not strike Harry Reid when he said the appointment was tainted. Everything Harry, Nancy, and Barney touch is tainted. For that matter about 90% of government is tainted.
CHANGE WE CAN BELEIVE IN
AMERICA - OUR TIME HAS COME
VOTE FOR ME AND CLEAN UP WASHINGTON -(better clean up Illinois first]
Posted by Logansprings
It was created by the Presidential Transition Act of 1963.
Posted by nycsense
You have to understand, if they seated him, LackofPerception5 would have then blasted Dems for allowing a tainted Senator to sit.
In reality, a majority of the Democrats in Congress for the last 16 years (at least) have been just as spineless and pork-barrel minded as the Republicans. They just come in a different style of package.
But, we are all about to learn that reality as the Obama regime comes more and more under the media and public spotlight.
Posted by keystonebull at 01:01 PM : Jan 06, 2009
Hey, I think someone is here besides me and SND(x).
Posted by txgrouch2008 at 01:03 PM : Jan 06, 2009
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes, and is it not truly amazing how so many Bush/republican apologists still have the gall to criticize ANYONE after the past 8 years?
Since there was no full vote of the Senate, it''s obvious that Burris'' rejection was the decision of Harry Reid. Who wants to wager he''s not carrying out Obama''s orders? Five''ll get you ten Obama''s behind this.
At this rate they''re going to need a whole fleet of buses.
Just another case of "The Man" keeping the black man down.
This is fun.
Posted by nycsense
What is it that people do not understand about race? Barack Obama is biracial, not black. While Obama may claim to be "black" or "African-American," being the son of a white mother from Wichita, Kansas, he is just as "white" as he is "black."
What Obama or the swooning Obamabots choose to portray his heritage is irrelevant to the truth.
Obama is biracial.
I really don''t give a *** about Chicago. How much of that is Obama responsible for? Guilt by association does not count. Sorry.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 165 Comments