BAGHDAD, Jan. 5, 2009

U.S. Opens New $700M Baghdad Embassy

Largest American Embassy Ever Called Symbol of Continuing U.S. Commitment In Iraq

    • The U.S. flag is raised during a ceremony marking the opening of the new U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, Iraq, Monday, Jan. 5, 2009. Photo

      The U.S. flag is raised during a ceremony marking the opening of the new U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, Iraq, Monday, Jan. 5, 2009.  (AP Photo/Hadi Mizban)

    • U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker speaks at the opening of the new U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, Jan. 5, 2009. Photo

      U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker speaks at the opening of the new U.S. Embassy in Baghdad, Jan. 5, 2009.  (AP Photo/Hadi Mizban)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Fast Facts Iraq

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

(AP)  The United States inaugurated its largest embassy ever on Monday, officially opening a fortress-like compound in the heart of the Green Zone as a testament to America's commitment to Iraq.

Addressing an inauguration ceremony under tight security, Ambassador Ryan Crocker said the $700 million embassy was testimony to America's long-term friendship with Iraq, where about 146,000 U.S. troops are deployed.

"I think we have seen a tremendous amount of progress, even since September. But the development of this new Iraq is going to be a very long time in the making, and we need to be engaged here," Crocker told The Associated Press in an interview ahead of Monday's opening of the new U.S. Embassy in Baghdad.

Attacks once again rocked Baghdad a day after a suicide bomber killed at least 38 people at a Shiite shrine just four miles north of the site of the new embassy. Four bombs exploded in different parts of Baghdad just before noon on Monday, killing four people and wounding 19.

During the ceremony at the new embassy, U.S. Marines raised the American flag over the building, which sits on a 104-acre site and has space for 1,000 employees. The adobe-colored buildings resemble a corporate campus surrounded by huge walls of reinforced concrete.

"It is from the embassy that you see before you that we will continue the tradition of friendship, cooperation and support begun by the many dedicated Americans who have worked in Iraq since 2003," said U.S. Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte, who served as the first American ambassador to Iraq after the 2003 U.S.-led invasion, at the ceremony, held in the complex's courtyard.

Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, a longtime Washington ally, praised President George W. Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003 and topple the regime of Saddam Hussein, who was executed two years ago.

"The building of this site would not be possible without the courageous decision by President Bush to liberate Iraq," said Talabani, a Kurd. "This building is not only a compound for the embassy but a symbol of the deep friendship between the two peoples of Iraq and America."

U.S. diplomats and military officials moved into the embassy on Dec. 31 after vacating Saddam's Republican Palace, which they occupied when they captured Baghdad in April 2003. The palace will now seat the Iraqi government and the office of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, who did not attend the Monday's ceremony because he was traveling in Iran.

Quote

The building of this site would not be possible without the courageous decision by President Bush to liberate Iraq.

Iraqi President Jalal Talabani
Crocker said that, since 2003 invasion, "perhaps no single week has been more important than this past week. On Dec. 31 we left the republican palace."

For nearly six years, the grandiose and gaudy palace, with its gold-plated bathroom fixtures and enormous chandeliers, served as both headquarters for occupying forces and the hub for the Green Zone - the walled-off swath of central Baghdad that was formally turned over to the Iraqi government on New Year's Day.

The handover came on the same day that a security agreement between Iraq and the United States went into effect. It replaced a U.N. mandate that allowed the U.S. and other foreign troops to operate in Iraq.

Under the new agreement, U.S. troops will no longer conduct unilateral operations and will act only in concert with Iraqi forces. They must also leave major Iraqi cities by June and the entire country by the end of 2011. Another accord mapped out the bilateral relations.

"Iraq has now assumed the lead for all security operations and our bilateral relationship going forward will be governed" by the two agreements, Crocker said. "Iraq is in a new era and so is the Iraqi-U.S. relationship."

Though violence has plummeted around Iraq in the past year, with attacks dropping from an average 180 a day to just 10, horrific bombings still plague the capital. Many recent attacks have targeted pilgrims during ceremonies commemorating the death of a much revered Shiite saint.

(AP Photo/Loay Hameed)
On Monday, a roadside bomb killed two police officers and wounded five in eastern Baghdad. Another killed a man driving in central Baghdad while two roadside bombs wounded more than 10 people - including seven Shiites preparing to head to the holy city of Karbala, south of Baghdad, where the ceremonies will reach their pinnacle on Wednesday.

(Left: Fire fighters hose down cars at the site of a blast in Abu Dshir in Baghdad Monday.)

Iraqi officials said Sunday's suicide bomber, who killed at least 38 people outside the shrine of Imam Mousa al-Kazim in Baghdad, was a man disguised as a woman. Initial reports said the attacker was a woman concealing a bomb under her black cloak. At least 17 of the dead were Iranian pilgrims.

In response to that attack, Iraqi authorities banned female pilgrims from entering the district for ceremonies on Tuesday and Wednesday.

Hundreds of thousands of Shiite pilgrims are expected to visit Karbala and other shrines around Iraq during Ashura, which on Wednesday will mark the anniversary of the 7th-century death of Prophet Muhammad's grandson Hussein.

He was killed in a battle on the plains of Karbala near the Euphrates River. The battle, part of the dispute over the leadership of a young Muslim nation following Muhammad's death in 632, enshrined Islam's split into Sunni and Shiite branches.

Iraqi security forces have deployed thousands of troops in Baghdad, Karbala and on roads linking the two cities to safeguard the ceremonies. Attacks by al Qaeda in Iraq, Sunni insurgents and even a Shiite cult have killed hundreds of people in recent years.

© MMIX The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from Iraq After Saddam

Add a Comment See all 47 Comments
by used2bfedup1 January 5, 2009 1:32 PM PST
To the tune of Queen:

Another billion bites the dust...
Reply to this comment
by brannigon January 5, 2009 2:04 PM PST
And what good will an embassy do there? It will just get blown up by the terrorist animals!!!
Reply to this comment
by trigs_8 January 5, 2009 2:24 PM PST
It should go well with our old embassy in Iran. Shut off the money faucet and let the chips fall where they may. We can''t prop up there government forever. Does anyone remember the Shah of Iran? We spend billions of dollars in Iraq without any public debate but try to spend money to save auto jobs and the lid comes off the Country. We are a Country of sheep and deserve this economic meltdown.
Reply to this comment
by hermitdave January 5, 2009 2:54 PM PST
WOW--at last, the grand opening of BUSH PALACE. Only 700 million to build a memorial to the worst president in American history. Iraq is a good place for it, we don''t want it over here. I hope inside they have giant paintings of all the CEO''s of big oil.
Reply to this comment
by rusure5 January 5, 2009 2:56 PM PST
This would make an excellent holding and processing facility for Bush regime officials and collaborators, as they await execution for their grave crimes.

Good luck to the people of Iraq, in expelling the murderous occupiers from your country.

Time is on your side.
Reply to this comment
by rapepublicon January 5, 2009 3:12 PM PST

''Crocker said the $700 million embassy was testimony to America''s long-term friendship with Iraq, where about 146,000 U.S. troops are deployed.''


???


''The development of this new Iraq is going to be a very long time in the making.''


(He actually came right out and said that?)


''It is from the embassy that you see before you that we will continue the tradition of friendship, cooperation and support. . . .''


Lovely.




How perfectly perverse -- ''a corporate campus surrounded by huge walls of reinforced concrete.''

An ugly, grinning, painted ***, nowhere near the price (in human lives OR dollars) except to Greedy Oily Predators slavering in crude-drunk lust, with millions in public funds burning holes in their $1000 suits.



God Bless America!


Reply to this comment
by random_radar January 5, 2009 3:27 PM PST
If we are friends with Iraq, how come we need a walled fortress and 146,000 troops?
Reply to this comment
by leeanna58 January 5, 2009 3:31 PM PST
before wall mart these christian hypocrits

were wanting us to go to war with the communists,

that was one excuse for Vietnam, of course the

animals in the republiCON party will do anything to make money, even if it is treason

Posted by pythoncharly

As I recall, involvement in Vietnam began during the Camelot Era of John Kennedy, and was escalated during the Johnson Administration after John Kennedy was assinated.

Apparently, lying and hypocrasy is non partisan.
Reply to this comment
by leeanna58 January 5, 2009 3:34 PM PST
I can see building an embassy in Iraq, but 700 million dollars? What did they do? Put in marble columns in the foyer, and gold plated icons in a baroque ball room. And as was previously stated, now the terrorists have a new toy to blow up.
Reply to this comment
by excoachken January 5, 2009 3:38 PM PST
Maybe they can form a search party to find the missing $9 Billion in cash that was "lost" early in the "war." Since it is there, I would suggest that one of Obama''s first acts as Prez would be to assign *** Cheyney as it''s guardian, since with all of the "good feelings" our occupation has developed, the Iraqi people would really probably love to have hm as close as possible to Baghdad.
Reply to this comment
by nobdysfool January 5, 2009 3:42 PM PST
"The building of this site would not be possible without the courageous decision by President Bush to liberate Iraq"--Iraqi President Jalal Talabani
--------------------------------
Iraq is now liberated? GET OUR TROOPS HOME THEN!! NOW!!
Reply to this comment
by idnnsg January 5, 2009 3:47 PM PST
$700 million? I''m sure the Iraqis could have made better use of that money for food, clothes, schools, roads, electricity, etc. -- you know, all the stuff we destroyed.

The "Symbol of Continuing U.S. Commitment In Iraq" is really just a symbol of murder, oppression, occupation, and destruction.
Reply to this comment
by nobdysfool January 5, 2009 3:54 PM PST
I''''m sure the Iraqis could have made better use of that money for food, clothes, schools, roads, electricity, etc. -- you know, all the stuff we destroyed.

Posted by IDNNSG at 03:47 PM : Jan 05, 2009
-----------------------
For real! This story, among all the other travesties occuring because of our oh-so-competent government, is enough to make a person puke their entire guts out.
Reply to this comment
by brianp55 January 5, 2009 3:57 PM PST
Mark my words...someone is going to fly a plane into it. "Build it and they will come."
Reply to this comment
by navyjimfl January 5, 2009 3:58 PM PST
$700 million down the drain..... once we pull our troops out the country will fall into chaos and the embassy staff will flee.....
Reply to this comment
by sandy19731 January 5, 2009 4:03 PM PST
***
Reply to this comment
by caddillackid January 5, 2009 5:14 PM PST
700 million dollars! I just dont understand any of this! I mean, okay I can understand the want/need to have the embassy, but 700 milli? 1 milli would have been to much in this economy we''re suffering from. I think if the first Bush (the daddy) had done the job correctly and finished the job back in 1991 during the first gulf war, then maybe by now Iraq would have been liberated for quite some time now, be back on it''s feet for quite some time now, and able to provide for it''s own security by now! And the 700 million that the U.S. Govt is so readily able spend on that *** could have been divided up amoung its own people we desperately could use and need it...NOW! Atleast it would have gone to good use, instead they build an embassy today, that won''t be there tomorrow! They are just going to blow it up like they do the rest of anything American on that soil. It''s almost like taking a child and putting them in a house with Michael Jackson and expecting that the child wont be molested...LOL. Just food for thought...Americas officials need to think!!! We need to get better at electing folks. Like i said...i just don''t understand it.
Reply to this comment
by chris32324 January 5, 2009 5:19 PM PST
too funny,,the u.s. blows 700M in baghdad for a fort, as soon as the u.s. is outta there,,that baby will be a new baghdad Super 7.
Reply to this comment
by jamster31 January 5, 2009 5:44 PM PST
That''ll be a 24 hour target.
Reply to this comment
by mavnomore January 5, 2009 5:55 PM PST
They can p!ss it away in Iraq while New Orleans is still in ruins.
Reply to this comment
by cowman290 January 5, 2009 6:03 PM PST
This is beyond dumber than dumb. Total stupidity.
Reply to this comment
by debinok1 January 5, 2009 6:19 PM PST
Why so much? Wasn''t it possible to build a smaller less expensive structure that would still be effective? I for one am tired of my tax dollars being the worlds credit card.
Reply to this comment
by shelleyt3 January 5, 2009 6:30 PM PST
I find this obscene, and always wonder how this sort of thing can come to be? The people of this country, myself included, are just trying to survive financially. We''re working ourselves to death and can''t even afford decent medical and dental care and our government spends that kind of money on this ***??? I was outraged last year when I heard about it and am doubly so now. So, we "show our commitment" to the Iraqi people, who don''t really want us there any longer. Where is the commitment to the American People? I could use several thousand dollars to pay off my medical and dental bills, how about it?? Huh? I could use a bailout!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by magoo2u1 January 5, 2009 6:43 PM PST
"....can''''t even afford decent medical and dental care and our government spends........ "
////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Look here pal, if your not earning at least 250k per year you don''t don''t deserve health care you parasitic socialist scum. Join the republican party and go get a good job. All that talk about health care for everyone is proof positive the democrats hate America.
Reply to this comment
by rudy6543 January 5, 2009 6:46 PM PST
Oh swell. 700 Million dollar embassy and the largest EVA! But we can''t afford health care or anything else for our own people. So who got the no-bid contract to build it?
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 January 5, 2009 6:48 PM PST
This thing had better be built stronger than the Pentagon and harder to get into than Ft Knox
Reply to this comment
by be_real January 5, 2009 7:27 PM PST
"....can''''''''t even afford decent medical and dental care and our government spends........ "
/////////////////////////////////////
///////////////
Look here pal, if your not earning at least 250k per year you don''''t don''''t deserve health care you parasitic socialist scum. Join the republican party and go get a good job. All that talk about health care for everyone is proof positive the democrats hate America.


Posted by magoo2u1 at 06:43 PM : Jan 05, 2009


"Join the republican party and go get a good job"

RFLO - Idiot............

Reply to this comment
by zzy-izzy January 5, 2009 7:27 PM PST
PLEASE TELL ME THIS IS A F-U-C-K-I-N-G JOKE $700 MILLION DOLLARS OF TAXPAYERS MONEY FOR THIS WHO IN THE HELL PASSED THIS WITH A LOT OF CHILDERN IN THIS COUNTRY WITH NO HEALTHCARE AND THE STUPID S-O-N-OF-A-B-I-C-H-E-S DO SOMETHING LIKE THIS.
Reply to this comment
by be_real January 5, 2009 7:28 PM PST
They can p!ss it away in Iraq while New Orleans is still in ruins.


Posted by mavnomore at 05:55 PM : Jan 05, 2009



Good Point!!!!
Reply to this comment
by endrepubs January 5, 2009 7:33 PM PST
Another 700 million dollars for Halliburton. D-i-c-k Cheney''s going away gift!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by nativewoman January 5, 2009 8:03 PM PST
Posted by BagdadsHere9 at 07:06 PM : Jan 05, 2009

Au contraire! Gotta job. Got insurance.

Can''t afford an annual physical as the deductible is $725.00 + $30.00 co-pay 25% of any lab work.

Annual physical runs about $500.00 - $600.00 they told me. $30.00 co-pay 25% of any lab work. Can''t afford that either.

Just like having no insurance atall!

Not living high on the hog either. No credit card bills to speak of. Don''t drive a fancy car. Don''t wear fancy clothes. Don''t eat out. Don''t go to movies.

Just barely able to meet the basic needs of food, clothing and shelter for 5 people and caring for elderly parents in poor health.

And I''m one of the "lucky" ones having what is considered a "good" job with "good" insurance.

And with unemployment at the highest rate in 14 years, it doesn''t bode well for the unemployed looking for jobs.
Reply to this comment
by mikefl11 January 5, 2009 8:08 PM PST
Mission Accomplished! We fixed Iraq and built a billion dollar monument to prove it. Bush 41 must be so proud.
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 January 5, 2009 8:43 PM PST


Posted by magoo2u1 at 06:43 PM : Jan 05, 2009


Wasn''t Magoo blind as a bat. Go back and read this story you ---- never mind you are not worth it
Reply to this comment
by babooph January 5, 2009 8:55 PM PST
More middle class tax $ down the drain.
Reply to this comment
by wardoglrs January 5, 2009 9:06 PM PST
Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That''s why the United States came into the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost.

http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/history/zionism/news.php?q=1228947965

GOOGLE:
BENJAMIN FREEDMAN SPEAKS: A JEWISH DEFECTOR WARNS AMERICA
Reply to this comment
by dnc4evr89 January 5, 2009 9:09 PM PST
700M at the taxpayers expense, just so it can be bombed and fired upon, can we the taxpayers reposses?.....sell it off piece by piece
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 January 5, 2009 9:19 PM PST
I find this obscene, and always wonder how this sort of thing can come to be? The people of this country, myself included, are just trying to survive financially. We''''re working ourselves to death and can''''t even afford decent medical and dental care and our government spends that kind of money on this ***??? I was outraged last year when I heard about it and am doubly so now. So, we "show our commitment" to the Iraqi people, who don''''t really want us there any longer. Where is the commitment to the American People? I could use several thousand dollars to pay off my medical and dental bills, how about it?? Huh? I could use a bailout!!!!!!!!

Posted by shelleyt3 at 06:30 PM : Jan 05, 2009

Shelley it is sad isn''t it, and to think daddy Bush want his other son to be president (Jeb) If I ever hear the name Bush again
Reply to this comment
by american_gir January 5, 2009 9:55 PM PST
I find this obscene, and always wonder how this sort of thing can come to be? The people of this country, myself included, are just trying to survive financially. We''''re working ourselves to death and can''''t even afford decent medical and dental care and our government spends that kind of money on this ***??? I was outraged last year when I heard about it and am doubly so now. So, we "show our commitment" to the Iraqi people, who don''''t really want us there any longer. Where is the commitment to the American People? I could use several thousand dollars to pay off my medical and dental bills, how about it?? Huh? I could use a bailout!!!!!!!!

Posted by shelleyt3 at 06:30 PM : Jan 05, 200


**** ugly *** go kill urself if u cant make money ok
Reply to this comment
by ms1-1-1 January 5, 2009 10:05 PM PST
Ambassador Ryan Crocker said teh $700 million embassy was testimony to America''s Long-term friendship with Irq. where about 146,000 U.S. troops are deplyed ....


is this for REAL? We have starving U.S. Citizen, who lost homes, lost jobs, are peniless and we mysteriously found ...$700 million


- CBS - you had better not be blocking this ...

- B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T-
Reply to this comment
by ms1-1-1 January 5, 2009 10:11 PM PST
- OH BUSH is building a new brothel for REPUBLICANs...


Here I was so devasted because United States of America has been jobless, homeless, penny less, at the expense of 8 years of failed BUSH-IT... but wait there''s so much more to come ...

hey, why aren''t the REPUBLICANs posting ... must be high oh Jenna Bush cocaine...
Reply to this comment
by samrt-2009 January 6, 2009 12:57 AM PST
The statements by John Negroponte, Ambassador Ryan Crocker, and Jalal Talabani sound ludicrously like flowery speeches by the old Soviet Union Politburo apparatchiks at similar dog and pony shows held years ago. Pure, saccharine propaganda.

This is one of those government handout attempts at "reporting." Nowhere is there a suggestion of why the U.S. requires such an enormous embassy in Iraq, or any attempt to find out. Sorry, WaPo, you fail the Stenography Test on this one.
Reply to this comment
by samrt-2009 January 6, 2009 1:00 AM PST
Looks like it''s past my bedtime. Meant to praise CBS rather than WaPo. Night-night.
Reply to this comment
by koopa98 January 6, 2009 1:28 AM PST
Spending $700m on an embassy in a country that won''t let the U.S attack Iran from its territory. What IS Bush thinking!?
Reply to this comment
by evian_ycnan January 6, 2009 5:34 AM PST
Spending $700m on an embassy in a country that won''''t let the U.S attack Iran from its territory. What IS Bush thinking!?

Posted by Koopa98 at 01:28 AM : Jan 06, 2009

It`s better than that... it`ll be empty inside 5 years. When the puppets are overthrown, we will once again be tossed.
Reply to this comment
by evian_ycnan January 6, 2009 5:40 AM PST
During the ceremony at the new embassy, U.S. Marines raised the American flag over the building, which sits on a 104-acre site and has space for 1,000 employees. The adobe-colored buildings resemble a corporate campus surrounded by huge walls of reinforced concrete.

The first castle built by the Crusaders in over 1700 years. Picture of embassy at link

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SiegeofAntioch.jpeg
Reply to this comment
by harbinger09 January 6, 2009 7:49 AM PST
Why would the US ever construct an embassy costing over half a billion dollars in a country we "claim" we have no intention of staying in? Rampant waste--then we wonder why we are facing economic collapse--very similar to the collapse of the Soviet Union after their protracted and expensive war with Afghanistan--and we still spend about 10 billion a MONTH just to be in Iraq fighting the war that started with LIES. Smart. (NOT)
Reply to this comment
by indivthinker January 6, 2009 10:00 AM PST
Posted by endrepubs at 04:14 AM : Jan 06, 2009

You must be an Obama supporter, because you have no idea about what is going to hit you once Obama is in office. Obama is going to hand out more bailouts like they''re candy... the last figure was around $800 BILLION, more than the cost of the entire war in Iraq. The Democratic-led Congress passed the $700 billion bailout earlier this year, and they want more to give out.

Add that to the trillions of dollars that Obama wants to spend on new (public, taxpayer funded) "jobs" for the infrastructure, plus hundreds of billions of dollars on new healthcare welfare handouts (paid for by the upper and middle classes) to be redistributed to the working and the lower classes. AND, add that to the fact that Obama will still maintain military spending, plus spending in Iraq for the next "sixteen" months (which is a lie, it will be more than that), and he will spend more money on the escalation in Afghanistan.

What''s the icing on the cake? Oh yes, Obama has said that he won''t do a thing about the Bush taxcuts (rather than let them expire in two years), AND he says he wants to give away hundreds of billions away in "middle class tax cuts".

So you haven''t seen anything yet. Bush may have been bad, but Obama is going to be the worst thing to ever hit the US treasury. I bet we add more to the deficit in the next four years than Bush did in all eight of his.
Reply to this comment
See all 47 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs