U.S. Shoots Down U.N. Call For Ceasefire
Libyan-Sponsored Proposal To End Israel's Gaza Offensive Blocked By U.S. Concerns Over Hamas Rockets
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Securing A Ceasefire in Gaza
World leaders, including French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair are traveling to the Middle East to broker a ceasefire in Gaza. Pam Falk, CBS News Foreign Affairs Analyst, examines the effort.
-
Photo
Alejandro Wolff, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N., waits to speak to reporters after emergency consultations of the Security Council which ended without any agreement Saturday, Jan. 3, 2009. Wolff said the Council's call for an immediate end to the violence "would have no underpinning for success." (AP Photo/David Karp)
-
Interactive
United Nations
For more than 60 years, the United Nations has struggled to forge peace, end poverty and heal the world.
- Stories
- Israeli Forces Bisect Gaza Strip
- Israeli T-Shirts Joke About Killing Arabs
- Osama: Israel Inflicts "Holocaust" In Gaza
- Ex-Intel Pick Lashes Out At "Israel Lobby"
- Israeli Children Get Fortified Playground
- Clinton: Israeli Actions "Unhelpful"
- Clinton Makes First Visit To Region
- U.S., Netanyahu To Huddle On Peace Efforts
- Israel Mulls Prisoner Swap With Hamas
In-Depth:
Video:
The U.N. met for four hours Saturday night after Israel began a ground incursion into Gaza, but failed to reach agreement on any statement, and rejected a Libyan-sponsored proposal calling for an immediate ceasefire.
The U.N. Security Council had issued a consensus statement on New Year’s Eve, but the Deputy U.S. Ambassador, Alejandro Wolff, blocked anything in writing which would have come out of the late-night meeting, which took place shortly after the ground incursion began.
The reason, Wolff said, was that the U.S. believed that there was no immediate prospect that Hamas militants would cease their rocket attacks against Israel.
"We're not going to equate the actions of Israel, a member state of the United Nations, with the actions of the terrorist group Hamas; there is no equivalence there," Wolff said. "The Charter of this organization respects the right of every member state to exercise its self-defense. And Israel's self-defense is not negotiable."
Meeting in emergency session but failing to issue any written statement of consensus, finger-pointing was the only common ground. The Palestinian Representative said the U.S. was the only nation which blocked a statement. The Libyan Ambassador said that the lack of a unified position by the Arab nations was also at fault.
It was not surprising that the Security Council did not reach an agreement, since the United States - with veto power on the Council - supports Israel’s position that negotiations should take place outside the U.N. until the moment that Hamas stops the shelling of southern Israel. But the lack of agreement stands in stark contrast with a U.N. Security Council Resolution passed only two weeks earlier, during calmer days, which called for a two-state solution and a restart of the peace negotiations.
The Security Council was scolded by U.N. General Assembly President Miguel D’Escoto, a former Nicaraguan Sandinista, who called the lack of action by the Security Council an illustration of the Security Council's disfunctionality. He called the failure of action a "monstrosity."
"There are some members of the Security Council that are trying to protect their own political interests," d'Escoto said. "This is a real shame … people are dying."
Secretary General Ban Ki-moon said that he was certain that the ground incursion would increase civilian suffering.
The only sign of agreement was a verbal statement by France's U.N. Ambassador who, as Council president, announced there were "strong convergences" among the 15 members to express serious concern about the deteriorating situation in Gaza and the need for "an immediate, permanent and fully respected ceasefire."
The Security Council will return when a high level delegation of Arab ambassadors arrives in New York Sunday or Monday and will hear from Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Tuesday.
The diplomatic stalemate reflected the divisions within the Security Council about what to do next - to have the U.N. formulate a plan, or to enforce an agreement once Hamas has agreed to a ceasefire and the parties involved agree to international monitors to secure against the smuggling of arms into Gaza.
In the end, if a durable ceasefire is put into place, it is likely that the U.N. Security Council would be asked by its members to put together a new road map to enforce the peace - but there appears to be no prospect of that at least in the next few days.
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 6
- next
See all 254 CommentsWhy can we NEVER put America''''s safety and security first, and mind our own F***ING BUSINESS?!?!?!?
Posted by IamHungry68
------------------
We tried that, got Pearl Harbor as a reward...
Posted by Albo58
We didn''t steal Canada or Mexico''s land!! What do you expect them to do moron just stand there and allow themselves to be destroyed????? Grow up! The Jews started it when they took someone else''s land in 48!
Why can we NEVER put America''''''''s safety and security first, and mind our own F***ING BUSINESS?!?!?!?
Posted by IamHungry68
------------------
We tried that, got Pearl Harbor as a reward...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by hadenough43
No, we got pearl harbor in return because we were secretly shipping weapons to england. when the germans attack and disarmed the french in less than a month and also turned on russia, they attack england. the war was been fought in england and American knew if England goes down the we would be in big trouble. we helped the british win that battle by sending them weapons and in response, the *** attacked us. we always have our nose in something and this what worries me most about being an american and this is the reason why we are always hated around the world and some rag head will always try to do something like september 11 again. We cant fully police our people, let the world take care of their problems. Isreals needs to defend herself from terrorist but we dont need to add more flames to the fire.
Posted by grumpas
********************
Maybe if I say this often enough someone will get it. This is not a LAND WAR, this is a HOLY WAR. This is about religion not land. Two faiths with two different prophets, each prophet claims their faith to be the chosen people of God. This is the basis for this war and for every other Muslim/Jewish war in history, Nothing else.
Posted by grumpas at 09:14 AM
Correction, we stole Mexico''''s land.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by earache4
Nice response. but if history is on my side which it is. this land use to belong to the jews. the epgytians had jewish slaves and i promise you they didnt have to get on boats to go get them. i am using the bible as a my history and history tells us all christian that that peace of land occupied bout the isrealites now is theirs. they never stole anything back, they were given back their land. the problem is the islamic extremist who dont care for anyone else but them selves. Even in Nigeria where i lived for a few years when my parents moved there. the Northern part which is mostly muslim, would sometimes go around towns and burns churches and kill christians. thats the islamic for most extremist. to them Mohammed preached its ok to be violent. so if you
wonder why groups like hamas, hezbollah and the taliban are the way they are, it has nothing to do with a land, but more to do with their believes. And they are cowards because they never come out and fight fair, and they use civillians as a shield.
Posted by grumpas at 09:14 AM
Correction, we stole Mexico''''s land.
Posted by earache4
---------------------
Yea, and we tried to sreal Canada''s land, too. But we got our butt''s kicked.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by earache4
I must have missed the science in the bible, so please why dont you school me on your vast knowledge.
Posted by earache4
********************
While you may not like it, the Bible does state that the land was given to the Jewish people by God. That makes the muslims angry because according to their prophet they are Gods chosen and they believe the land should be theirs. This is a Holy War. Throughout history Muslims and other religions have invaded Israel and sought the destruction and removal of the Jewish people for that reason. You have two "chosen" people battling over the land "given" to those chosen.
We could have our god call us the "chosen people" and give us North America.....and why not South America, too.
Tht way, we could be just like those folks back there in the stone age when they created their gods.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by endrepubs
You should probaly read your post before the hit the publish button. you called the isrealist oppressive, but then in the same breath said they wont be any terrorist act on Maerica if we didnt side with isreal. which means you agree this people are terrorist. i must have missed the news when an isrealist strapped himself with a bomb and walked to gaza or any other muslim country and blew himself up and other people. this people having been attacking isreal for while and when isreal defends themselves from this terrorist which they are since you yourself just admitted it. they are the one being oppressive. so if i come to your house and fire bullets at your front door and then you defend yourself, then you are an oppressive person. Come on be just a little bit smarter
That clenches it. The big dude is certainly the arbiter of property law world wide. LMAO
Hanan Awarekeh
http://www.almanar.com.lb/news
site/NewsD
etails.aspx?id=69127&languag
e=en
04/01/2009
And as it has vowed, the Palestinian resistance was waiting for the occupation soldiers to foil their aggression, killing nine of them and wounding dozens others, according to Ezz-eddine Al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas%u2019s military wing. Hamas resistance fighters also said they have destroyed an Israeli Merkava with a B-29bomb.
Hamas announced it had captured two Israeli soldiers, an event which, for Israel, would highlight the political risk domestically of sending its troops into Gaza.
Hanan Awarekeh
http://www.almanar.com.lb/news
site/NewsD
etails.aspx?id=69127&languag
e=en
04/01/2009
And as it has vowed, the Palestinian resistance was waiting for the occupation soldiers to foil their aggression, killing nine of them and wounding dozens others, according to Ezz-eddine Al-Qassam Brigades, Hamas%u2019s military wing. Hamas resistance fighters also said they have destroyed an Israeli Merkava with a B-29bomb.
Hamas announced it had captured two Israeli soldiers, an event which, for Israel, would highlight the political risk domestically of sending its troops into Gaza.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by plutoboy
i dont think too many people would disagree about bush being a bad president. but too many poeple on here talk without facts. why dont you give us facts on how isreal is a terrorist state. in waiting for your response, i will state "facts" on why they arent.
Fact 1 - Hamas millitants were firing rockets into Isreal before the isrealites began their air strike.
Fact 2 - They are ready to stop this offensive attack as long as Hamas stops firing rocket, which they chose not to do
Fact 3- I have never seen, or read anything about any persons from isreal strapping themselves with bombs and going into any muslim country to blow themselves up and terrorize their people.
Fact 4- many Muslims from many muslim countries have commited terrorist act on Isreal, by suicide bombers.
Fact 5- If hamas didnt start with the rockets into southern isreal, this would be another boring sunday, but instead they did and have being doing that for while and because of that, they brought this offensive attack unto themselves and the people of gaza, because they hid like cowards between the civilians.
So please state yours
We could have our god call us the "chosen people" and give us North America.....and why not South America, too.
Tht way, we could be just like those folks back there in the stone age when they created their gods.
Posted by hadenough43
**********************
This is much more complex than just "creating" a God.
This goes back to Abraham and his sons, Isaac and Ishmael. Isaac stayed true to the Jewish beliefs, Ishmael chose the Muslim religion. Both were raised as the "chosen" of God. Both were raised in what is now Israel. These two "tribes" have fought for centuries and will continue to do so until they can reach an understanding. Both of them are related.
posted by BillBe at 10:09 AM : Jan 04, 2009
I don''t know if you realize that what you are saying in practical terms is "kill them all"... I think that was tried before, by the nazi''s, and apparently it didn''t work out too well...
Posted by thefan08
In the struggle to take back Palestine from the Arabs, Jewish fighters loaded explosives into a wagon and parked it by a police station... This was called by one academic, the world''s first known use of a "car" bomb... and by the way, the academic wasn''t arab or muslim... he was from the mid-west of the U.S.
If this does not place the Jews as rightful heirs to the land nothing else will.
Posted by demswin08
*******************
Dating the existance of Israel and the Jewish people does not matter to the Muslim community. They are the decendants of Ishmael and believe they have more rights than the decendants of Isaac. Which is where this all comes to war.
posted by BillBe at 10:09 AM : Jan 04, 2009
I don''''t know if you realize that what you are saying in practical terms is "kill them all"... I think that was tried before, by the nazi''''s, and apparently it didn''''t work out too well...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by fleshmonger1
Do you people on read before responding. he said kill all the "radicals". let me repeat that. kill all the "radicals". not all the civilians. i mean come on people, some of you are stupid enough to justify what hamas is doing but atleast be smart enough to read.
We could have our god call us the "chosen people" and give us North America.....and why not South America, too.
Tht way, we could be just like those folks back there in the stone age when they created their gods.
Posted by hadenough43
**********************
This is much more complex than just "creating" a God.
This goes back to Abraham and his sons, Isaac and Ishmael. Isaac stayed true to the Jewish beliefs, Ishmael chose the Muslim religion. Both were raised as the "chosen" of God. Both were raised in what is now Israel. These two "tribes" have fought for centuries and will continue to do so until they can reach an understanding. Both of them are related.
Posted by DebinOK1
------------------------
I just see that as a part of a larger picture. When a "god" gets created, one of the purposes,it seems to me, is that it''s usually for the self serving purpose of bestowing "chosen" status upon the creator. That''s the genesis of the problem. Historically speaking.
Posted by demswin08
********************
Yes they have. That this will continue far after we are gone, I don''t know. The twelve tribes of Israel will eventually unite. When that may be, who knows. When they do if you believe what scripture says, they have three and a half years of peace. After that scripture suggests the rise of the beast.
if you would have read my post... I said "in PRACTICAL terms" If you could only kill the radicals and if the radicals didn''t have family that would be angered by the death of their family member, then what you are inferring that billbe meant would be right, but since you will kill more than just radicals and since the radicals will have family members that will take it upon themselves to avenge the death of their kin, in PRACTICAL terms, you would have to kill them all.... and by the way, I didn''t justify anything that hamas is doing... that would be another incorrect inference by you...
Posted by thefan08 at 10:20 AM : Jan 04, 2009
Unfortunately, most religious freaks find no distinction between the two.
They take the "if it''s brown - it''s down" attitude.
KILLING Innocent civilians is not negotiable either dirt-bag.
This reeks of PNAC and the BUsh administration.
They take the "if it''''s brown - it''''s down" attitude.
Posted by grouchyjohn
***********************
Moses was brown, Abraham was brown, Jesus was brown.
if you would have read my post... I said "in PRACTICAL terms" If you could only kill the radicals and if the radicals didn''''t have family that would be angered by the death of their family member, then what you are inferring that billbe meant would be right, but since you will kill more than just radicals and since the radicals will have family members that will take it upon themselves to avenge the death of their kin, in PRACTICAL terms, you would have to kill them all.... and by the way, I didn''''t justify anything that hamas is doing... that would be another incorrect inference by you...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by fleshmonger1
First of all, Hamas militants are not from gaza, they moved to gaza just like the taliban move to afghnistan. They moved in 2007 and over staged the palestinian government through a coup, so "Pratically", there is no freaking way all the people in gaza would be somehow related to the hamas millitant. You called what the isrealites were doing the same as the nazis, so please tell me how you werent siding with hamas based on that idiotic statement.
If you can find where I said anything about Isreal acting like nazi''s then you''re on better dope than I am... I was responding to billbe, someone who I don''t think represents the Iraely government. He made the comment I responded to, not the government of Israel. Secondly, I don''t see how your point, even if it''s true, about how the hamas fighters are foreigners makes anything I said wrong... They are in Gaza so any civilians killed would be most likely Palestinian and the radical foreigners probably still have family somewhere that would swear revenge and as you pointed out, they would and could go to gaza to get it... As far as your assertion that I am siding with hamas, I only said that human beings who have family killed will be angry about it and may want revenge, that is siding with human nature, not hamas...
I bet you could have an argument in a room by yourself..
By the way no matter what name you use David praised the god of Abraham. Many names for the same God including Jehovah.! But not Jesus Christ!
_____________________________________________________
That is exactly what Israel doesn''t want. They don''t want Islamics coming in and taking over the Israeli government either through a coup OR by breeding them out! Israel wants theirs to be a Jewish nation. And if you let it be overrun by anyone, whether, Islamic or Christian or Hindu or anything, then it will no longer be a Jewish nation.
I think here in America we need to be more conservative about who we let in, but I don''t have any control over that. But a little nation like Israel needs to be able to control it''s borders.
Saudi Arabia and Iran control who comes in there. But no one makes a big deal out of that.
The battle against Israel is a spiritual battle that Israel will eventually win, through tribulation, but still win.
Posted by NezNative
____________________________________________________
"Before Abraham was, I AM"
Jesus said "I come in my father''s name"
There is no other name under heaven, given amoung men by which we must be saved.
We Christians worship that God of Israel who came as the messiah, the christ, whom the Jews did not acknowledge. But they will one day. They think they are still waiting for his FIRST coming, but in truth, it will be his second coming.
Your last post was idiotic. and like i said in one of my ealier post, if you are going to come on here and mouth out stupid words, then states fact. Osama bin landen was trained by the USA (and guess what there are videos to prove it), during the cold war, when we were trying to fight then USSR. whatever happened from that moment to where they want to destroy America all the time had nothing to do with Isreal. so please dont be a fool and state garbage on here.
Things today are different and can be explained with science.
Also another reason for the continued religious movement is one of people being in fear of the unknown. The appeal of life everlasting has taken on among the folks.
So far no one has been able to prove it exists.Yet people continue to pray to and believe in a man that is invisible that supposedly promised this.
Posted by demswin08
--------------------
Where you use the term "stupid", I would probably use the therm "ignorant".
Ignorance is simply not knowing.
Stupidity is willfully refusing to know. And I would suggest we gotta a lot of that around these days.
It does not go without notice that the "god" people will reject science when it reveals something that conflicts with their precious "beliefs", while at the same time eagerly embracing the fruits of that same science when it promotes health, extends life span, and, in general, makes this life better.
One of the many hypocrisies they''re stuck with in order to maintain their precious "beliefs".
Again - stupidity is "willfull ignorance". It''s alive and well in all those little and large churches everywhere.
In return the Israelis have: spied on us, attacked the USS Liberty, assassinated Kennedy (he was opposed to their secret nuclear program, see john-f-kennedydotnet/mossadandtheassassi
nationdothtm), made us complicit in their crimes against humanity in their murder and theft of the Palestinians, and lied to and brainwashed us via their Neocon Israeli-firster dual citizenship agents to get us into Iraq -- so no Zionist boys would be lost and Israel wouldn''''t have to spend any of their own trillions to take out Iraq (which was never a threat to us, only to them).
Posted by twoctruth
-------------------
You work at MacDonalds, huh? No kiddin''....
(Sorry folks, I just couldn''t resist)
Again - stupidity is "willfull ignorance". It''''s alive and well in all those little and large churches everywhere.
Posted by hadenough43 at 11:01 AM : Jan 04, 2009
Just for the sake of intellectual honesty, that stupidity that you consider "willful ignorance" wouldn''t have anything to do with lifestyle issues?
Or is that your principle objection-moral beliefs conflict with some lifestyle that you''re addicted to and can''t let go?
Again - stupidity is "willfull ignorance". It''''''''s alive and well in all those little and large churches everywhere.
Posted by hadenough43 at 11:01 AM : Jan 04, 2009
Just for the sake of intellectual honesty, that stupidity that you consider "willful ignorance" wouldn''''t have anything to do with lifestyle issues?
Or is that your principle objection-moral beliefs conflict with some lifestyle that you''''re addicted to and can''''t let go?
Posted by wl7bzh
----------------------
Huh???
Posted by DebinOK1 at 10:36 AM : Jan 04, 2009
Yep, in the desert sun, you and I would probably be brown. But, were these guys black?
Posted by hadenough43 at 11:17 AM : Jan 04, 2009
Simply put, is your objection to religious or moral beliefs principally one of lifestyle?
Posted by hadenough43 at 11:17 AM : Jan 04, 2009
Simply put, is your objection to religious or moral beliefs principally one of lifestyle?
Posted by wl7bzh
------------------
The definition of intellectual honesty is that one''s core beliefs are consistent with the best evidence available to one at the time.
I don''t have any objections to any "beliefs", religious, moral, or otherwise - so long as they are intellectually honest.
Posted by hadenough43 at 11:23 AM : Jan 04, 2009
Great! So does your best evidence of core beliefs of religion conflict with your lifestyle?
They stash weapons; bombs etc. in hospitals, mosques, civil houses and schools exactly for this reason- they know that the Israeli army will not bomb those places. Over the years, they have dig tunnels between Egypt and Gaza to smuggle everything, including weapons which is being used against us.
The Israeli army has such advanced technologies they can surgically hit those places. And that is exactly what we are doing. The manipulations in the media, done by the Arabs are ridicules, at best.
Ask yourself- what would you do if your life was constantly under threat? Look at the map. Maybe that will help you grasp our geographic situation.
The purpose of the Israeli army is to defend. Not attack.
So next time you think about how miserable and poor the Palestinians are, and how powerful and evil the Israelis are- think again. Israel has left Gaza more than 3 (!) years ago- their chaos and fights among themselves are not our responsibility.
(Written by a left-wing Israeli who thinks terror should not win anywhere in the world).
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 6
- next
See all 254 Comments