NASA Details Columbia Crew's Grisly Deaths

Graphic 400-Page Report Explores Five Fatal Possibilities; Exact Causes Of Death Uncertain

(CBS/AP)  Seat restraints, pressure suits and helmets of the doomed crew of the space shuttle Columbia didn't work well, leading to "lethal trauma" as the out-of-control ship lost pressure and broke apart, killing all seven astronauts, a new NASA report says.

At least one crew member was alive and pushing buttons for half a minute after a first loud alarm sounded, as he futilely tried to right Columbia during that disastrous day Feb. 1, 2003.

In fact, by that time, there was nothing anyone could have done to survive as the fatally damaged shuttle streaked across Texas to a landing in Florida what would never take place.

But NASA scrutinizes the final minutes of the shuttle tragedy in a new 400-page report released Tuesday. The agency hopes to help engineers design a new shuttle replacement capsule more capable of surviving an accident. An internal NASA team recommends 30 changes based on Columbia, many of them aimed at pressurization suits, helmets and seatbelts.

As was already known, the astronauts died either from lack of oxygen during depressurization or from hitting something as the spacecraft spun violently out of control. The report said it wasn't clear which of those events killed them.

And in the case of the helmets and other gear, three crew members weren't wearing gloves, which provide crucial protection from depressurization. One wasn't in the seat, one wasn't wearing a helmet and several were not fully strapped in. The gloves were off because they are too bulky to do certain tasks and there is too little time to prepare for re-entry, the report notes.

Had all those procedures been followed, the astronauts might have lived longer and been able to take more actions, but they still wouldn't have survived, the report says.

The new report comes five years after an independent investigation panel issued its own exhaustive analysis on Columbia, but it focused heavily on the cause of the accident and the culture of NASA.

The new document lists five "events" that were each potentially lethal to the crew: Loss of cabin pressure just before or as the cabin broke up; crew members, unconscious or already dead, crashing into objects in the module; being thrown from their seats and the module; exposure to a near vacuum at 100,000 feet; and hitting the ground.

A timeline of what was happening in crew compartment shows that the first loud master alarm - from a failure in control jets - would have rung at least four seconds before the shuttle went out of control.

Twenty-six seconds later either Commander Rick Husband or Pilot William McCool - in the upper deck with two other astronauts - "was conscious and able to respond to events that were occurring on board."

Shortly after that, the crew cabin depressurized, "the first event of lethal potential." That would have caused "loss of consciousness" and lack of oxygen. It took 41 seconds for complete loss of pressure.

Dr. Jonathan Clark, a former NASA flight surgeon whose astronaut wife, Laurel, died aboard Columbia, praised NASA's leadership for releasing the report "even though it says, in some ways, you guys didn't do a great job.

"I guess the thing I'm surprised about, if anything, is that (the report) actually got out," said Clark, who was a member of the team that wrote it. "There were so many forces" that didn't want to produce the report because it would again put the astronauts' families in the media spotlight.

Some of the recommendations already are being applied to the next-generation spaceship being designed to take astronauts to the moon and Mars, said Clark, who now works for the National Space Biomedical Research Institute at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston.

Kirstie McCool Chadwick, sister of pilot William McCool, said a copy of the report arrived at her Florida home by FedEx Tuesday morning but that she had not read it.

"We've moved on," Chadwick said. "I'll read it. But it's private. It's our business ... Our family has moved on from the accident and we don't want to reopen wounds.

In the immediate aftermath of the disaster, NASA appointed an independent panel to investigate its cause. That group released its blistering report on Aug. 27, 2003, warning that unless there were sweeping changes to the space program "the scene is set for another accident."

Columbia disintegrated as it returned to Earth at the end of its space mission. The accident was caused by a hole in the shuttle's left wing that occurred at launch. Here is a look at the seven who perished Feb. 1, 2003:

Commander Rick Husband, 45, was an Air Force colonel from Amarillo, Texas. The former test pilot was selected as an astronaut in 1994 on his fourth try. He was survived by his wife and two children. Besides flying, Husband's other passion in life was singing. The baritone sang in a church choir for years and used to sing in barbershop quartets.

Pilot William McCool, 41, was a Navy commander who grew up in Lubbock, Texas. He graduated second in his 1983 class at the Naval Academy, went on to test pilot school and became an astronaut in 1996. McCool was an experienced Navy pilot with more than 2,800 hours in flight. McCool was married with three sons. The Columbia mission was his first spaceflight.

Payload commander Michael Anderson, 43, was the son of an Air Force man and grew up on military bases. He was flying for the Air Force when NASA chose him in 1994 as one of only a handful of black astronauts. He traveled to Russia's Mir space station in 1998. The lieutenant colonel was a native of Spokane, Wash. and was married with two daughters. He was in charge of Columbia's dozens of science experiments.

Kalpana Chawla, 41, emigrated to the United States from India in 1980s. At the time, she wanted to design aircraft. She was chosen as an astronaut in 1994 after working at NASA's Ames Research Center in northern California. She had flown to space once before, in 1997. She was survived by a husband.

David Brown, 46, was a Navy captain, pilot and doctor. The Arlington, Va., native joined the Navy after a medical internship, then went on to fly the A-6E Intruder and F-18. He became an astronaut in 1996. Columbia's mission was his first spaceflight.

Laurel Clark, 41, was a diving medical officer aboard submarines and then a flight surgeon before she became an astronaut in 1996. Her role on Columbia was to help with science experiments. The Racine, Wis., native was married to a NASA doctor and had a son.

Ilan Ramon, 48, was a colonel in Israel's air force and the first Israeli in space. His mother and grandmother survived the Auschwitz death camp, and his father fought for Israel's statehood alongside grandfather. Ramon fought in the Yom Kippur War 1973 and the Lebanon War 1982 and served for years as a fighter pilot. He was chosen as Israel's first astronaut in 1997, then moved to Houston the next year to train. He had a wife and four children who lived in Tel Aviv.

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Share:

• Share
• Yahoo! Buzz
• Twitter
• Mixx

More From U.S.

• Cuba-U.S. Immigration Talks Pushed to Feb.
• Fort Hood Unit Deploys Despite Losses
• Oops! Fla. Gov. Sent Parents to Sex Line
• Tiger Woods Whiffs on Scandal's P.R.
• Tiger's Fall Reignites Role Model Debate
• Did Woods, Uchitel Strike a Deal?
• GM, China Partner to Tackle India Market

• 

  VideoObama: Prostitution Legalization?

• 

  VideoExcerpt: Harlem Children's Zone

Add a Comment

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• next

See all 40 Comments

by Krazcarl January 2, 2009 12:44 PM EST

As I see this they did nothing wrong and deserve hero status and my respect bou on the other hand outsideofthegreat hubble pictures thespaceprogram is one very large waste of cash thereareno habitable planets in our solar system the 2 best canidates are venus {over 600 degrees at the equator and mars 60 below at the equator your choice of camping out on the north pole or in a volcano were traped untill we can travel the speed of light and even then it will take years to get there. This money should be spent on earth based projects heating homes better batteries mining the ocean and even ocean based comunities for aqua-culture and mining not wasted going to dead planets that my friends is centries away. Oh yea helium 3 is just propaganda to justfy the wasteof cash.

Reply to this comment

by nordeck52 January 2, 2009 12:16 AM EST

Posted by HETUP at 11:37 AM : Dec 31, 2008


Clearly you''ve never used any sort of technology, and you''ve never bought something from a store, because you''re implying that things we got from the space program, like bar codes, are a waste of time! Next time you''re in a long line at a supermarket or other store, just think about how much longer the line would be if there weren''t any bar codes.

Reply to this comment

by gwwilson11 January 1, 2009 3:00 PM EST

I too knew something was definitely wrong on that early ( Saturday? ) morning following the blackout period. I have followed the space program from my youth as well ( 53 yrs. old )and pretty much know the landing sequence of events. I remember thinking it was not a good omen for our country as we were about to embark on a little military campaign.
I still grieve for our space ( as well as war ) heroes.

Reply to this comment

by runningralph January 1, 2009 2:19 AM EST

I don''t think there is anything that can''t be done by robots. There may be a few things but not much. Send the robots out and forget about reentry.

Reply to this comment

by luvcomments December 31, 2008 11:44 PM EST

"Had all those procedures been followed, the astronauts might have lived longer...... but they still wouldn''t have survived"

I guess we can choose to see it as some sort of blessing that their terror wasn''t prolonged by "procedures" since they were doomed anyway because of the initial damage.

Reply to this comment

by oldpilot954 December 31, 2008 9:51 PM EST

The only ones to benefit from space is the big money engineers, why aren''''t they doing something about gas mileage. --Posted by HETUP

Think again! The micro-processor in your computer and through-out your car, many modern insulation material, many composite materials, etc. were spinoffs from NASA. Yes they probably would have been developed eventually but it would have taken longer. Add into that information that we have gained on global mapping and environmental research that could only be done from space. Anyone who is likely to be posting on the internet also likely has benefited from the Space Program.

Reply to this comment

by barbaram99 December 31, 2008 8:29 PM EST

I am from Maine. I live in Seattle. My late gram felt the same way as HETUP. I feel war is more of a waste. WE do benefit from the space programme. I would rether mankind live in peace and learn to use the tools to learn about the earth and the other planets as we need to.

Reply to this comment

by evian_ycnan December 31, 2008 5:26 PM EST

Posted by txgrouch2008 at 11:55 AM : Dec 31, 2008

There is debate on the checklist that if the charging of the LOX was done later in the sequence, there is no need for the foam at all.

There was no need for an O2 environment in Grissom''s Apollo caspsule. (MacCaffey & White)

Perhaps the whole of the issue is to turn the operation over to the Navy. The military has what is known as "acceptable" losses (which is, of course, any and all).

Reply to this comment

by habu99-2009 December 31, 2008 4:06 PM EST

"Had all those procedures been followed, the astronauts might have lived longer and been able to take more actions, but they still wouldn''t have survived, the report says."

So the dead astronauts get to have their hands slapped posthumously by this report for not following procedures. I wonder what NASA''s "procedure" is for dealing with a complete and violent structural failure of the shuttle during reentry where the occupants have maybe a minute from the first alarm until near certain death? These were all highly trained individuals who would follow procedure to the nth degree until there was no procedure to follow. Maybe the astronauts other than the Commander and Pilot were trying to make sure their helmets and/or gloves were secure in order to try to survive a rapid cabin depressurization. Maybe gloves, helmets, and seat belts were wrenched out of place when the shuttle began to break apart. It doesn''t matter, had they all been strapped in and following "procedure" they still would have died. Many mistakes were made in this disaster, yes, but I for one don''t believe the astronauts who paid the ultimate price should be blamed in any way for events beyond their control. Their legacies and their families deserve better.

Reply to this comment

by hetup-2009 December 31, 2008 2:37 PM EST

At least it wasn''t Nasa''s fault. They did the best they could. We all were very saddened by this event. I don''t think we should be going into space anyway. Isn''t there enough for us to do here? The only ones to benefit from space is the big money engineers, why aren''t they doing something about gas mileage. And if you think about all the snow, we still plow roads for heavens sake. What did Maine ever get out of the space program? Have they ever sent lobsters into space? Good grief.

Reply to this comment

• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• next

See all 40 Comments

Add a comment

Comment SUBMIT

Click here to add another comment.

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

Comment reply

Submit Cancel

The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. By using this Web site you agree to accept our Terms of Service. Click here to read the Rules of Engagement.

Report offensive content:

If you believe this comment is offensive or violates the CBSNews.com Terms of Use, you can report it below (this will not automatically remove the comment). Once reported, our staff will be notified and the comment will be reviewed.

Select type of offense:

Offensive: Sexually explicit or offensive language

Spam: Advertisements, commercial links, or repetitive posts

Disruptive posting: Flaming or offending other users

Illegal activities: Promote cracked software, or other illegal content

Off-topic: Commentary unrelated to the storyline

Comments (optional):

Report Cancel

E-mail this comment to a friend.

E-mail this to: (Separate multiple e-mail addresses with commas. Limited to 10 addresses.)

Your e-mail address:

Send me a copy of this message

Note: Your e-mail address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the e-mail and in case of transmission error. Neither your address nor the recipients's address will be used for any other purpose.

Add your own personal message: (Optional)

Hi, I found this user's comment on CBSNews.com and thought you might be interested in reading it. Send e-mail Cancel

[Krazcarl]

As I see this they did nothing wrong and deserve hero status and my respect bou on the other hand outsideofthegreat hubble pictures thespaceprogram is one very large waste of cash thereareno habitable planets in our solar system the 2 best canidates are venus {over 600 degrees at the equator and mars 60 below at the equator your choice of camping out on the north pole or in a volcano were traped untill we can travel the speed of light and even then it will take years to get there. This money should be spent on earth based projects heating homes better batteries mining the ocean and even ocean based comunities for aqua-culture and mining not wasted going to dead planets that my friends is centries away. Oh yea helium 3 is just propaganda to justfy the wasteof cash.

[nordeck52]

Posted by HETUP at 11:37 AM : Dec 31, 2008


Clearly you''ve never used any sort of technology, and you''ve never bought something from a store, because you''re implying that things we got from the space program, like bar codes, are a waste of time! Next time you''re in a long line at a supermarket or other store, just think about how much longer the line would be if there weren''t any bar codes.

[gwwilson11]

I too knew something was definitely wrong on that early ( Saturday? ) morning following the blackout period. I have followed the space program from my youth as well ( 53 yrs. old )and pretty much know the landing sequence of events. I remember thinking it was not a good omen for our country as we were about to embark on a little military campaign.
I still grieve for our space ( as well as war ) heroes.

[runningralph]

I don''t think there is anything that can''t be done by robots. There may be a few things but not much. Send the robots out and forget about reentry.

[luvcomments]

"Had all those procedures been followed, the astronauts might have lived longer...... but they still wouldn''t have survived"

I guess we can choose to see it as some sort of blessing that their terror wasn''t prolonged by "procedures" since they were doomed anyway because of the initial damage.

[oldpilot954]

The only ones to benefit from space is the big money engineers, why aren''''t they doing something about gas mileage. --Posted by HETUP

Think again! The micro-processor in your computer and through-out your car, many modern insulation material, many composite materials, etc. were spinoffs from NASA. Yes they probably would have been developed eventually but it would have taken longer. Add into that information that we have gained on global mapping and environmental research that could only be done from space. Anyone who is likely to be posting on the internet also likely has benefited from the Space Program.

[barbaram99]

I am from Maine. I live in Seattle. My late gram felt the same way as HETUP. I feel war is more of a waste. WE do benefit from the space programme. I would rether mankind live in peace and learn to use the tools to learn about the earth and the other planets as we need to.

[evian_ycnan]

Posted by txgrouch2008 at 11:55 AM : Dec 31, 2008

There is debate on the checklist that if the charging of the LOX was done later in the sequence, there is no need for the foam at all.

There was no need for an O2 environment in Grissom''s Apollo caspsule. (MacCaffey & White)

Perhaps the whole of the issue is to turn the operation over to the Navy. The military has what is known as "acceptable" losses (which is, of course, any and all).

[habu99-2009]

"Had all those procedures been followed, the astronauts might have lived longer and been able to take more actions, but they still wouldn''t have survived, the report says."

So the dead astronauts get to have their hands slapped posthumously by this report for not following procedures. I wonder what NASA''s "procedure" is for dealing with a complete and violent structural failure of the shuttle during reentry where the occupants have maybe a minute from the first alarm until near certain death? These were all highly trained individuals who would follow procedure to the nth degree until there was no procedure to follow. Maybe the astronauts other than the Commander and Pilot were trying to make sure their helmets and/or gloves were secure in order to try to survive a rapid cabin depressurization. Maybe gloves, helmets, and seat belts were wrenched out of place when the shuttle began to break apart. It doesn''t matter, had they all been strapped in and following "procedure" they still would have died. Many mistakes were made in this disaster, yes, but I for one don''t believe the astronauts who paid the ultimate price should be blamed in any way for events beyond their control. Their legacies and their families deserve better.

[hetup-2009]

At least it wasn''t Nasa''s fault. They did the best they could. We all were very saddened by this event. I don''t think we should be going into space anyway. Isn''t there enough for us to do here? The only ones to benefit from space is the big money engineers, why aren''t they doing something about gas mileage. And if you think about all the snow, we still plow roads for heavens sake. What did Maine ever get out of the space program? Have they ever sent lobsters into space? Good grief.