Dec 30, 2008

Virginity Pledges Don't Stop Teen Sex

But Those Who Make Pledges Are Less Likely To Use Condoms Or Other Birth Control When They Do Have Sex

  • Play CBS Video Video Notebook: Teen Sex

    Teen sex has not declined, according to a CDC report. But unsafe sex and STD rates are higher, despite the Bush administration's continued support of abstinence programs. Katie Couric comments.

  • Video 'Sex Show' Raises Eyebrows

    "Only On The Web": Cynthia Bowers speaks with Nikol Hasler, host of "Midwest Teen Sex Show," about the online production that has raised a few eyebrows among teens, parents, and educators.

  • Video Web Show Tackles Teen Sex

    It isn't just Jamie Lynn Spears; across the country more teenage kids are having kids. A controversial Web show for teens is trying to change that. Cynthia Bowers reports.

  • Photo

     (CBS/iStockphoto)

(WebMD)  Teenagers who take virginity pledges are no less sexually active than other teens, according to a new study.

But the results, published in the journal Pediatrics, suggest that these virginity pledgers are less likely to protect themselves against pregnancy or disease when they do have sex.

Researchers say the findings suggest that virginity pledges may not significantly affect teenagers' sexual behavior. Instead, they may decrease the likelihood of teenagers taking precautions, such as using a condom or using birth control when they do have sex.

Researchers say the federal government spends about $200 million annually on abstinence promotion programs, which include virginity pledges. Two previous studies have suggested that virginity pledges can delay sex, but researchers say those studies did not account for pre-existing differences between pledgers and non-pledgers.

In this study, researchers compared the sexual behavior of 289 teenagers who reported taking a virginity pledge in a 1996 national survey to 645 non-pledgers who were matched on more than 100 factors, such as religious beliefs and attitudes toward sex and birth control.

The results showed that five years after taking the virginity pledge:

  • 82 percent of pledgers denied ever having taken the pledge.

  • Pledgers and matched non-pledgers did not differ in rates of premarital sex, sexually transmitted disease, or oral or anal sex behaviors.

  • Pledgers had, on average, 0.1 fewer sexual partners in the past year but did not differ from non-pledgers in the number of lifetime sexual partners and the age of first sex.

    The biggest difference between the two groups came in the area of condom and birth control use. The study showed that fewer pledgers used birth control or condoms in the past year or any form of birth control the last time they had sex.

    Researcher Janet Elise Rosenbaum, Ph.D., of Harvard University, says the findings suggest that health care providers should provide birth control information to all teenagers, especially virginity pledgers.

    By Jennifer Warner
    Reviewed by Louise Chang
    ©2005-2008 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved.

    Video and Galleries from Health: WebMD

    Add a Comment See all 63 Comments
    by dnamj December 30, 2008 11:45 PM EST
    You can''t overcome a billion years of evolution with a stupid "pledge". Don''t deny biology: plan for it.
    Reply to this comment
    by downtowner97 December 31, 2008 12:20 AM EST
    There''s no way to comment on this article without being edited.
    Reply to this comment
    by erasmus606 December 31, 2008 12:38 AM EST
    There''''s no way to comment on this article without being edited.

    Posted by downtowner97 at 09:20 PM : Dec 30, 2008

    Sure there is.

    It''s all because those baaaad boys can''t keep that thing of theirs LOCKED UP!

    I know, I know, it isn''t just their fault. The girls can''t keep their legs closed either.

    Too much information?

    Well, if there were some half decent parents out there, teaching their kids right from wrong, there wouldn''t be such a problem. It wouldn''t solve it completely but it certainly would be a start.


    Reply to this comment
    by kansas1946 December 31, 2008 1:10 AM EST
    Virginity Pledges Don''t Stop Teen ***
    *******************************

    Duh.
    Reply to this comment
    by kansas1946 December 31, 2008 1:12 AM EST
    Well, if there were some half decent parents out there, teaching their kids right from wrong, there wouldn''''t be such a problem. It wouldn''''t solve it completely but it certainly would be a start.





    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Posted by erasmus606 at 09:38 PM : Dec 30, 2008
    + report abuse
    **************************************

    Right from wrong? They only kid in our extended family that ended up pregnant before marriage so far is the ministers daughter.
    Reply to this comment
    by erasmus606 December 31, 2008 1:27 AM EST
    They only kid in our extended family that ended up pregnant before marriage so far is the ministers daughter.

    Posted by kansas1946 at 10:12 PM : Dec 30, 2008

    Ministers, cops.....worst parents.




    Reply to this comment
    by Mccarthyaw December 31, 2008 1:43 AM EST
    WHAT? Abstinence-only education doesn''t work? Who woulda thought.
    Reply to this comment
    by idnnsg December 31, 2008 2:34 AM EST
    "Well, if there were some half decent parents out there, teaching their kids right from wrong, there wouldn''t be such a problem." -- erasmus606

    That''s EXACTLY the kind of naive perspective that the abstinence only people suffer from! The desire to procreate is based on a biological imperative. Lectures from parents telling, their kids what''s "right" and what''s "wrong", have very little effect in over-riding the most basic drive of all biological beings.

    Whether you like it or not, most human beings (of any age) are going to engage in s3xu@l activity when they get the opportunity. So, wouldn''t it be a good idea to tell the kids what they need to know about preventing unwanted pregnancy and disease? Or, do you think they should all just suffer and die because they chose to do something YOU think is "wrong"?
    Reply to this comment
    by debinok1 December 31, 2008 3:02 AM EST
    Hormones are hormones. If you teach a teen about protected intercourse, they are more apt to use the protection. Teaching abstinence on the other hand goes against every raging hormone in a teenagers body.
    Having the mindset that says "if they don''t know about it, they wont do it" is unrealistic. Think about how many 7 and 8 month babies were born to newlyweds before it was acceptable to be pregnant before marriage.
    Reply to this comment
    by drivelphobe December 31, 2008 3:30 AM EST
    Teenage relations is when it is the most exciting and every encounter is a memorable learning expeeience.

    Teaching the common sense of protection, both from disease and pregnancy, is mandatory. Not much one can do to stop what comes naturally and is lots of fun.

    The downside occurs during spousal selection, when the past presents itself and the one you want finds you repulsive for your past acts. Well, that''s the way it goes.

    There is something nice about a person who hasn''t swapped liquids with hundreds of people.
    Reply to this comment
    by comeon11 December 31, 2008 6:27 AM EST
    Propaganda, I think so. It won''t work when we have all these subliminal messages on tv, magazinees, and every form of media having such influences on impressionable young people. The reason it doesn''t stop teen *** is because of society pushing ***. Duh.
    Reply to this comment
    by comeon11 December 31, 2008 6:29 AM EST
    endrepubs ....................stop trying to discredit Christians to validate your lifestyle.
    Reply to this comment
    by smurfcrusher December 31, 2008 7:05 AM EST
    Another Bush victory. Stupidity reigns supreme!

    Worst president ever.
    Reply to this comment
    by comeon11 December 31, 2008 7:32 AM EST
    jmcgilvray...............now we are trying to change the definition of pervertion- propaganda, i think so. desire does not mean that one has to do it. if it did society wouldn''t last two years.
    Reply to this comment
    by irmcvet971 December 31, 2008 8:28 AM EST
    No! Say it isn''t true! The Religious Reich is Wrong... AGAIN!! Can anyone name ANYTHING involving Social Issues in this nation that the Religious Reich has EVER been right about?
    Reply to this comment
    by irmcvet971 December 31, 2008 8:35 AM EST
    endrepubs ....................stop trying to discredit Christians to validate your lifestyle.

    Posted by comeon11 at 03:29 AM : Dec 31, 2008


    LOL I don''t think ANYONE has to "discredit" Fundies! They do that just fine themselves. If you doubt the absolute FAILURE of the Religious Reich, use your search engine and pull up the HISTORY of the Southern Baptist! Now you want to talk about being on the WRONG side of HISTORY? Supported Jim Crowe, Child Labor and the right of employers to discriminate. They stood against women''s right to vote, Blacks right to vote, the 40 hour work week and Tobacco Warnings. The one thing they were for, when 80% of their ministers were members of the Klan but are against today? Separation of Church and State! Go figure!
    Reply to this comment
    by comeon11 December 31, 2008 8:39 AM EST
    irmcvet971.....................stop trying to discredit christianity to validate your lifestyle. its quite obvious.
    Reply to this comment
    by comeon11 December 31, 2008 8:40 AM EST
    irmcvet971 .....................btw, the civil rights, abolishment, and feminism were all led by religious groups buddy. BTW, MLK Jr. was a pastor.
    Reply to this comment
    by barbaraf4 December 31, 2008 8:45 AM EST
    "The results showed that five years after taking the virginity pledge: 82 percent of pledgers denied ever having taken the pledge."
    ~~~~~~~~
    Let''s pull our collective and individual heads out of the sand and admit abstinence promotion programs should be changed to education programs.

    Since most teenage boys (maybe most men in general) are just hound-dogs when it comes to se*xx, let''s educate our daughters to protect themselves from STDs and pregnancy. Ignoring this behavior doesn''t mean it doesn''t exist, and acknowledging it doesn''t mean you approve. Just educate your daughters so you won''t have to deal with an unwanted pregnancy.
    Reply to this comment
    by comeon11 December 31, 2008 9:00 AM EST
    Let''s pull out our head from underneath the sand and realize that we first have to respond to the high level of sexual imagery on every media forum. Instead of trying to work around the problem, we need to solve the problem. Enough of all the sexual imagery on television, music videos, magazines etc. and sexual innuendos on children and teen channels. this is ridiculous.
    Reply to this comment
    by mytoosense December 31, 2008 9:09 AM EST
    Bad Pee Pee, BAD pee pee!!!!!!!!!!!
    Reply to this comment
    by mytoosense December 31, 2008 9:15 AM EST
    ...Instead of trying to work around the problem, we need to solve the problem. Enough of all the sexual imagery on television, music videos, magazines etc. and sexual innuendos on children and teen channels. this is ridiculous.
    -------------------------
    Posted by comeon11

    What we need to do is identify the problem,
    How''s this:

    Consensual *** is not Bad, Unwanted Pregnancy is Bad.

    Now was that so difficult?...
    Reply to this comment
    by thickredhair December 31, 2008 9:17 AM EST
    lets look at the example of sarah palin''s young daughter bristol, oh wait a min. we can''t use her as an example
    Reply to this comment
    by kamsack50 December 31, 2008 9:28 AM EST
    barbaraf4
    Feminist educators/teachers have been repeating this kind of air-head blurb since 1970. That''s why the present situation exists - in schools AND in the media.
    Also, how do you so carelessly dismiss the sensitivity and ambivalence men and boys may have about sexx? Talk about dumb stereotyping.
    Reply to this comment
    by barbaraf4 December 31, 2008 9:51 AM EST
    That''s why the present situation exists - in schools AND in the media. Posted by kamsack50
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    The present situation exists because parents abdicated their responsibility of raising their children. Now the teenagers run the family and parents cave in to demands for expensive electronic toys and designer clothes. There are no expectations and no consequence.

    Educate your daughters. That is the only way to prevent STDs and unwanted pregnancies. If you want to spend your retirement raising your grandkids, then disregard this suggestion.
    Reply to this comment
    by irmcvet971 December 31, 2008 9:53 AM EST
    Let''''s pull out our head from underneath the sand and realize that we first have to respond to the high level of sexual imagery on every media forum. Instead of trying to work around the problem, we need to solve the problem. Enough of all the sexual imagery on television, music videos, magazines etc. and sexual innuendos on children and teen channels. this is ridiculous.

    Posted by comeon11 at 06:00 AM : Dec 31, 2008

    I grew up in the 50''s and you can''t get more FASCIST than they were then. I mean NOTHING even remotely close to sexual contact was allowed to be seen on TV, the movies or anything else! Did it help? NO! You can''t control Nature and you can''t tell a Teenager NOT to do something or NOT to look at something. That is the BEST way to make sure they DO look or watch! It''s called HUMAN Nature and we should turn over the Education of you youth to PROFESSIONAL''S who aren''t hamstrung by old tired and FAILED Religious Beliefs!!
    Reply to this comment
    by irmcvet971 December 31, 2008 9:55 AM EST
    mcvet971.....................stop trying to discredit christianity to validate your lifestyle. its quite obvious.

    Posted by comeon11 at 05:39 AM : Dec 31, 2008


    Well POINT out something I said that was WRONG! You and LOSERS like you keep trying to stop folks from pointing to the MOUNTAIN of failure the Religious Reich has served upon us. It''s not going to work. When you''ve NEVER been right in the past why should ANYONE listen to you NOW?? Sieg Heil and Amen
    Reply to this comment
    by endurorob December 31, 2008 9:57 AM EST
    O.K. Lets stop trying to fool ourselves. Teens are going to have *** that is just nature. Preaching abstinance only is idiotic you can not stop them from having ***. I remember when I was a teen and every time I saw, smelled, or heard a girl the first thing that popped into my head was ***. You can''t stop them the best we can do is try to educate them to prevent disease and unwanted pregnancy.
    Reply to this comment
    by kesac4650 December 31, 2008 10:24 AM EST
    And Alcoholic''s Annonymous doesn''t stop drinking. Parole Officers don''t stop criminals from relapsing, and on and on and on..............
    None of that is news. Chicken soup doesn''t prevent a cold, but that certainly doesn''t make it a bad thing.
    Reply to this comment
    by tmittelstaed December 31, 2008 10:26 AM EST
    "...I remember when I was a teen and every time I saw, smelled, or heard a girl the first thing that popped into my head was ***...."

    What the h e l l happened to you? Did it fall off? It''s been many years since I''ve been a teen and still, every time I see, smell or hear a woman the first thing that popps into my head is s e x.
    Reply to this comment
    by endurorob December 31, 2008 10:45 AM EST
    And Alcoholic''''s Annonymous doesn''''t stop drinking. Parole Officers don''''t stop criminals from relapsing, and on and on and on..............
    None of that is news. Chicken soup doesn''''t prevent a cold, but that certainly doesn''''t make it a bad thing.

    Posted by kesac4650

    What makes it a bad thing is those, including the current president, who want abstinance to be the only thing taught to teens and forego any other type of education towards disease prevention and birth control.
    Reply to this comment
    by endurorob December 31, 2008 10:46 AM EST
    What the h e l l happened to you? Did it fall off? It''''s been many years since I''''ve been a teen and still, every time I see, smell or hear a woman the first thing that popps into my head is s e x.

    Posted by tmittelstaed

    It still pops but I am better at controlling the external indications.
    Reply to this comment
    by scottyusa December 31, 2008 11:02 AM EST
    Really? This is a surprise only to those advocating this rediculous idea. We all know how well abstention works in the heat of the night. This is just as rediculous as Nancy Reagan''s "just say no" to drugs drive. If it were only that easy.
    Reply to this comment
    by ofbyfor3 December 31, 2008 11:13 AM EST
    The law of unintended consequences at work once again. Virginity pledges actually have a NEGATIVE impact on the behavior that it was intended to affect.
    Reply to this comment
    by hatesthecolt December 31, 2008 11:36 AM EST
    I cannot believe they thought they had to do a study on this; it should have been obvious to anyone who was a teenager and attended high school. GEEEZ.
    Reply to this comment
    by brannigon December 31, 2008 12:15 PM EST
    ITS A MORAL ISSUE YOU IDIOTS! MAN, THIS COUNTRY HAS LOST ITS MIND!!!
    Reply to this comment
    by grumpas December 31, 2008 12:22 PM EST
    The Abstinence Only program needs to be the first to meet the chopping block. It''s only the product of a mindless boob that catered to religious nuts for a few votes. It''s a complete waste of time, money and only gives religion precious federal funds to waste on such ignorance. Everyone with a brain in their head knows it doesn''t work. There are actually a lot of we American''s who can think for ourselves out here. We don''t need to constantly consult a bible to make our daily decisions.
    Reply to this comment
    by honestabe8 December 31, 2008 12:30 PM EST
    drmaqazi: what a bunch of sheep jockeys wrote 2,000 years ago has no relevance to the 21st century
    Reply to this comment
    by honestabe8 December 31, 2008 12:32 PM EST
    you_fools: pledges meant nothing before billy boy clinton. you are foolish for making it a political issue.
    Reply to this comment
    by hatesthecolt December 31, 2008 12:34 PM EST
    Thanks to the libs.. Pledges mean nothing.. They also taught our children the oral $ex isn''''t really $ex per the former president of the United States, Billy "I can''''t keep it in my pants" CLInTon..

    Posted by you_fools

    Hmmm, I seem to remember George Bush pledging to be a uniter not a divider before he drove a big@$$ wedge into the heart of the country. And didn''t his Dad say he wasn''t going to raise taxes ever? Don''t be a hypocrite.
    Reply to this comment
    by Meg003 December 31, 2008 12:56 PM EST
    This is just another failed example of trying to pay government workers to rear children. It didn''t work with the DARE (Drug Abuse Resistance Education)Program: no study has ever found a reduction in drug use from DARE, yet our hard-earned money is still poured down that rat hole. Abstinence education will never work, either.

    What does work to help young people make the choices that are best for them is parental support and mentoring. If the federal government would remove itself from our public schools, and stop legislating and ruling against local school control on curriculum and disciplinary issues, states could reduce class sizes, because their would be fewer classes to teach and no need for alternative schools. Reduced class sizes and inflexible course selections would mean more opportunities for students to stay in school and graduate. Small class sizes are one proven way of giving students a better shot at achieving success, because of greater opportunities for individual attention and mentoring, yet every time the federal government steps in with new requirements, class sizes increase.

    Reply to this comment
    by ford555551 December 31, 2008 1:16 PM EST
    SARAH PALIN''S DAUGHTER IS STILL A VIRGIN BECAUSE SHE IS THE DAUGHTER OF A REPUBLICAN. AM I RIGHT?
    Reply to this comment
    by observer2020 December 31, 2008 1:28 PM EST
    I cannot believe they thought they had to do a study on this; it should have been obvious to anyone who was a teenager and attended high school. GEEEZ.
    Posted by hatesthecolt
    In this "recession" or whatever, they still have to throw money at something stupid. I guess that''s why people are choosing to home-school their kids...but who knows what kind of adults they will become. Only time will tell.
    Educate your kids (don''t wait until the schools get around to it). Assume YOUR responsibility and teach your kids about protection and diseases. Because kids will be kids and have s*e*x where ever and when ever they can. Just make them smarter about it.
    Reply to this comment
    by eggy1620 December 31, 2008 3:21 PM EST
    Abstinence can be argued to be sinful behavior because it is conscious action taken for the purpose of preventing pregnancy.
    Reply to this comment
    by caldwellptr December 31, 2008 6:10 PM EST
    I didn''t need to make a pledge to remain a virgin.
    Reply to this comment
    by kesac4650 December 31, 2008 6:17 PM EST
    Those pledges have nothing to do with anything the government did.
    Chicken soup won''t cure a cold either, so we need to ridicule Campbell''s until they cave in and get it off the shelves.
    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 December 31, 2008 9:01 PM EST
    Well I wonder who is right...
    According to the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), the overall proportion of both sexually experienced teens (54.1% - 46.8%) and currently sexually active teens (37.5% - 33.9%) decreased from 1991 through 2005.
    or this one
    The pregnancy rate declined for all women under 30 years of age, but the sharpest drop was among teenagers, with the teen pregnancy rate falling by 15 percent from its record high in 1991. Among the factors driving this downturn in teen pregnancies... [is] the leveling off of teen sexual activity.

    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 December 31, 2008 9:11 PM EST
    I have also read that in America there are two types of *** educations given to children.
    One is abstinence plus which is dangerous where the "abstinence-plus" programs are essentially condom education with a quasi-abstinence component.

    "These programs have virtually no abstinence in them at all,"
    The Physicians Consortium, a group of more than 2,000 physicians nationwide, has issued a report exposing just how offensive "abstinence-plus" programs really are.
    From wht I have read the programs have gone beyond just promoting condoms. They promote all kinds of deviant sexu-ality bondage and all types of bizarre ***-ual behavior that we think that most people, even as adults, would find offensive. Yet, these are programs directed towards children, and we as parents have allowed it, wew sat quite while they destroyed our children..
    I think it is about time that parents looked up what abstinence plus really is teaching their children.
    The programs and Web sites contain some shocking things, such as:

    advising students to take a trip to the grocery store to search for sexual lubricants; and
    having students practice putting condoms on, utilizing cucumbers and anatomically correct plastic models.

    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 December 31, 2008 9:20 PM EST
    There are two types of *** education in America, abstinence-only and abstinence-plus education, but the differences couldn''t be greater--or more shocking. Despite the "abstinence" in the name, parents would be appalled to see the sexually-explicit material peddled to kids in abstinence-plus programs, so of course abstinece plus wont work.
    In one exercise, students are encouraged to pursue various alternatives to sexual intercourse. So far, so good. But the recommended activities? Body massage, bathing together, "sensuous feeding," joint masturbation, and-get this-watching "erotic movies". Of course, when ***** teenagers with unbridled hormones engage in these not-quite PG-13 actions, they''ll be satisfied and exclaim, "Wow-thank goodness I have no need to have *** now!"

    Perhaps the most disturbing element of both these programs is the target demographic: 9 to 15 year-olds. Rather than condemning these courses as purveyors of promiscuity to young children, the CDC lauds them as model examples for others to emulate, and expects these kids with unbridled hormones will do nothing.
    conversely,
    Promoting abstinence works both in the classroom and through a public relations campaign. Abstinence by Choice, which operates in 20 schools in and around Little Rock, Arkansas, has had a measurable impact on the lives of the 4,000 7th-9th graders it reaches each year. Sexual activity rates among boys plunged 30 percent, and the rate for girls fell plummeted 40 percent.
    Reply to this comment
    by gaye5 December 31, 2008 9:43 PM EST
    jmcgilvray sited...Chastity - the most unnatural of all the sexual perversions.~Aldous Huxley

    Se-x outside a marriage, can be a death trap..
    For sexually active girls age fourteen to seventeen, the rates of depression are more than three times higher than for those who have not been sexually active.
    Sexually active boys "are more than twice as likely to be depressed as are those who are not sexually active." And both boys and girls who have been sexually active are more likely to commit suicide.

    In the U.S., 1 in 4 sexually active teens become infected with an STD every year. Some common STDs are chlamydia, gonorrhea, genital warts (also known as HPV - human papillomavirus), and herpes. (Facts in Brief: Teen *** and Pregnancy, The Alan Guttmacher Institute, New York, 1996).
    Nineteen (19) million new STD infections occur each year, almost half of them among young people ages 15 to 24.
    One in two sexually active youth will contract an STD by age 25.
    Half of all new HIV infections occur among adolescents.
    In 2004, an estimated 7,761 young people were living with AIDS, a 42% increase since 2000, when 5,457 young people were living with AIDS.
    And now in 2008 the problem is a lot worse.

    Well I intended to keep away from such diseases and did, no *** out side a married partner works.. and yep it was hard but worth it..
    Reply to this comment
    See all 63 Comments
    • MOST POPULAR
    • Viewed
    • Commented
    Latest News
    Featured Blogs