June 26, 2009 5:18 PM
- Text
Israel Lands On Obama's Front Burner
This story was written by Ben Smith And Harry Siegel.
Israel's continuing attacks on Gaza serve as a reminder that President-elect Barack Obama and his nominee to be secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, will not get to choose the world they inherit January 20.
The incoming administration had planned to focus on the economic crisis and recalibrating U.S. policy in Iraq and Afghanistan in its early months - but the Israeli assault on Hamas may have instantly changed that calculus.
"It could involve the administration very early," Levy said.
Obama's views on the Israeli action remain opaque. Even as the attack continued into its third day Monday, with a Palestinian death toll topping 300 and Israel threatening a ground invasion, Obama had yet to say a word about the crisis, on the grounds that President Bush (who has also been silent) must take the lead.
There were growing signs Monday that the air strikes - which came in response to increased rocket fire from Gaza, which is governed by Hamas - could be accompanied by a ground incursion. Israel's leaders signaled that this could be an extended conflict, while emphatically denying any intention of reoccupying the independently governed territory.
Though both sides in the Middle East are intensely aware that this battle will establish facts on the ground in the region for the new administration, Obama's advisors have sent only vague signals, with David Axelrod on "Face the Nation" Sunday calling Israel a "great ally" and citing America's "special relationship" with the Jewish state.
In a visit this summer to Israel, Obama did appear to give implicit approval to such a strike, saying that, "If somebody was sending rockets into my house where my two daughters sleep at night, I'm going to do everything in my power to stop that. And I would expect Israelis to do the same thing."
When Obama does speak, his words will be carefully parsed - particularly by decision makers in Jerusalem weighing how long to continue the offensive in the face of worldwide calls for a ceasefire.
"His choices will be pretty clear: He can either say he supports Israel in its efforts to neutralize Hamas in the Gaza Strip or he can say that he emphasizes restraint on both sides, which puts the onus on both sides and attempts to bring both sides back to the table," said Jonathan Schanzer, the director of policy at the Jewish Policy Center in Washington.
A well-worn geopolitical cliché holds that every crisis contains an opportunity. But for Obama - a president-in-waiting who faces daunting dilemmas across the domestic and foreign policy spectrum - the Israeli crackdown on Hamas seems unlikely to do anything but complicate his approach to a region that he had clearly hoped to keep low on his to-do list for awhile.
Israeli leaders see the faint possibility that, on one hand, the attack could weaken and further isolate Hamas and its sponsor Iran, paving the way for a return of its more moderate rivals. But that was also one of the goals in the 2006 invasion of Lebanon - an action many believe only served to strengthen Hezbollah.
Some observers who are more sympathetic to the Palestinian cause think the conflict could clarify the depth of Hamas's support and lead Obama or his allies to bring them to the negotiating table. But the early consequence of the attack has been the collapse of peace negotiations between Israel and both the Palestinian Authority and Syria, and analysts on both sides say the likeliest consequence is an increasingly bitter and intracable conflict.
The Politico Israel's continuing attacks on Gaza serve as a reminder that President-elect Barack Obama and his nominee to be secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, will not get to choose the world they inherit January 20.
The incoming administration had planned to focus on the economic crisis and recalibrating U.S. policy in Iraq and Afghanistan in its early months - but the Israeli assault on Hamas may have instantly changed that calculus.
"For all the talk of putting the (Middle East) conflict on the back burner, it's going force itself onto the front burner," said Daniel Levy, a fellow at the New America Institute. Levy said that if the conflict in Gaza is still ongoing when Obama takes office, he will face regional and international pressure to broker a settlement.
Hotsheet Blog: Obama's Many Defenses Of Israel
"It could involve the administration very early," Levy said.
Obama's views on the Israeli action remain opaque. Even as the attack continued into its third day Monday, with a Palestinian death toll topping 300 and Israel threatening a ground invasion, Obama had yet to say a word about the crisis, on the grounds that President Bush (who has also been silent) must take the lead.
There were growing signs Monday that the air strikes - which came in response to increased rocket fire from Gaza, which is governed by Hamas - could be accompanied by a ground incursion. Israel's leaders signaled that this could be an extended conflict, while emphatically denying any intention of reoccupying the independently governed territory.
Though both sides in the Middle East are intensely aware that this battle will establish facts on the ground in the region for the new administration, Obama's advisors have sent only vague signals, with David Axelrod on "Face the Nation" Sunday calling Israel a "great ally" and citing America's "special relationship" with the Jewish state.
In a visit this summer to Israel, Obama did appear to give implicit approval to such a strike, saying that, "If somebody was sending rockets into my house where my two daughters sleep at night, I'm going to do everything in my power to stop that. And I would expect Israelis to do the same thing."
When Obama does speak, his words will be carefully parsed - particularly by decision makers in Jerusalem weighing how long to continue the offensive in the face of worldwide calls for a ceasefire.
"His choices will be pretty clear: He can either say he supports Israel in its efforts to neutralize Hamas in the Gaza Strip or he can say that he emphasizes restraint on both sides, which puts the onus on both sides and attempts to bring both sides back to the table," said Jonathan Schanzer, the director of policy at the Jewish Policy Center in Washington.
A well-worn geopolitical cliché holds that every crisis contains an opportunity. But for Obama - a president-in-waiting who faces daunting dilemmas across the domestic and foreign policy spectrum - the Israeli crackdown on Hamas seems unlikely to do anything but complicate his approach to a region that he had clearly hoped to keep low on his to-do list for awhile.
Israeli leaders see the faint possibility that, on one hand, the attack could weaken and further isolate Hamas and its sponsor Iran, paving the way for a return of its more moderate rivals. But that was also one of the goals in the 2006 invasion of Lebanon - an action many believe only served to strengthen Hezbollah.
Some observers who are more sympathetic to the Palestinian cause think the conflict could clarify the depth of Hamas's support and lead Obama or his allies to bring them to the negotiating table. But the early consequence of the attack has been the collapse of peace negotiations between Israel and both the Palestinian Authority and Syria, and analysts on both sides say the likeliest consequence is an increasingly bitter and intracable conflict.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
-
Brian Montopoli Brian Montopoli is the senior political reporter at CBSNews.com.
Follow on Twitter »
40 Comments +
Popular Now in Politics
- Fox News under fire for anti-Obama video
- Warren: I provided schools with info on ancestry
- The map: How Obama or Romney could win
- Obama to host Bush at White House
- Ex-Justice Stevens keeps Citizens United doubts
- Florida Dems push back against voter purge
- Poland urges "explicit reaction" on death camp gaffe
- Poll: Obama, Romney neck-and-neck in 3 key states
- Romney camp fixes "Amercia" iPhone app gaffe
- Why Wisconsin's recall election matters
- Obama "misspoke" on Nazi death camps in Poland
- Debt has increased more under Obama than Bush
- Planned Parenthood rolls out anti-Romney campaign
- Obama camp opens new attack against Romney
- GOP primary: Why the media hype was justified
- Health Care Bill: What's In It?
