Dec 29, 2008
Israel Lands On Obama's Front Burner
Politico: Violence Means Obama And Clinton Will Have To Address Middle East Problem Early, Despite Other Challenges
-
President-elect Barack Obama stands with Secretary of State-designate Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y.; right, at a news conference in Chicago, Monday, Dec. 1, 2008. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
-
Play CBS Video Video Israel Expands Hamas Attack Israel claims to go after military targets in its air campaign, but human casualties are piling up, reports Mark Phillips. Israel's Foreign Minister tells Maggie Rodriguez it's not retaliation.
-
Video On The Ground In Israel "Only On The Web": CBS News' Mark Phillips reports from the Israeli-Gaza border where he explains rockets are still falling in a campaign Israel has yet to call a success.
-
Video Israeli Ambassador Reacts Israel's campaign targeting Hamas continues in the Gaza Strip. Some 300 air strikes since Saturday have wreaked destruction, reducing entire buildings to rubble. Israeli Ambassador to the United Nations, Gabriela Shalev offers her reaction.
-
Photo Essay Gaza Air Assault Israel's air force targets symbols of Hamas power as its assault on Gaza Strip continues.
-
Timeline Barack Obama Key events in the life of the president-elect
Israel’s continuing attacks on Gaza serve as a reminder that President-elect Barack Obama and his nominee to be secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, will not get to choose the world they inherit January 20.
The incoming administration had planned to focus on the economic crisis and recalibrating U.S. policy in Iraq and Afghanistan in its early months - but the Israeli assault on Hamas may have instantly changed that calculus.
"For all the talk of putting the (Middle East) conflict on the back burner, it's going force itself onto the front burner," said Daniel Levy, a fellow at the New America Institute. Levy said that if the conflict in Gaza is still ongoing when Obama takes office, he will face regional and international pressure to broker a settlement.Hotsheet Blog: Obama's Many Defenses Of Israel
"It could involve the administration very early,” Levy said.
Obama’s views on the Israeli action remain opaque. Even as the attack continued into its third day Monday, with a Palestinian death toll topping 300 and Israel threatening a ground invasion, Obama had yet to say a word about the crisis, on the grounds that President Bush (who has also been silent) must take the lead.
There were growing signs Monday that the air strikes - which came in response to increased rocket fire from Gaza, which is governed by Hamas - could be accompanied by a ground incursion. Israel’s leaders signaled that this could be an extended conflict, while emphatically denying any intention of reoccupying the independently governed territory.
Though both sides in the Middle East are intensely aware that this battle will establish facts on the ground in the region for the new administration, Obama’s advisors have sent only vague signals, with David Axelrod on “Face the Nation” Sunday calling Israel a “great ally” and citing America’s “special relationship” with the Jewish state.
In a visit this summer to Israel, Obama did appear to give implicit approval to such a strike, saying that, "If somebody was sending rockets into my house where my two daughters sleep at night, I'm going to do everything in my power to stop that. And I would expect Israelis to do the same thing.”
When Obama does speak, his words will be carefully parsed - particularly by decision makers in Jerusalem weighing how long to continue the offensive in the face of worldwide calls for a ceasefire.
“His choices will be pretty clear: He can either say he supports Israel in its efforts to neutralize Hamas in the Gaza Strip or he can say that he emphasizes restraint on both sides, which puts the onus on both sides and attempts to bring both sides back to the table,” said Jonathan Schanzer, the director of policy at the Jewish Policy Center in Washington.
A well-worn geopolitical cliché holds that every crisis contains an opportunity. But for Obama - a president-in-waiting who faces daunting dilemmas across the domestic and foreign policy spectrum - the Israeli crackdown on Hamas seems unlikely to do anything but complicate his approach to a region that he had clearly hoped to keep low on his to-do list for awhile.
Israeli leaders see the faint possibility that, on one hand, the attack could weaken and further isolate Hamas and its sponsor Iran, paving the way for a return of its more moderate rivals. But that was also one of the goals in the 2006 invasion of Lebanon - an action many believe only served to strengthen Hezbollah.
Some observers who are more sympathetic to the Palestinian cause think the conflict could clarify the depth of Hamas’s support and lead Obama or his allies to bring them to the negotiating table. But the early consequence of the attack has been the collapse of peace negotiations between Israel and both the Palestinian Authority and Syria, and analysts on both sides say the likeliest consequence is an increasingly bitter and intracable conflict.
By Ben Smith And Harry Siegel
Copyright 2008 POLITICO


Hotsheet Blog: Obama's Many Defenses Of Israel
The secrets of tennis legend 




- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 41 CommentsPosted by LordSunTzu at 10:06 PM : Dec 29, 2008
The Gaza Bombshell
After failing to anticipate Hamas''s victory over Fatah in the 2006 Palestinian election, the White House cooked up yet another scandalously covert and self-defeating Middle East debacle: part Iran-contra, part Bay of Pigs. With confidential documents, corroborated by outraged former and current U.S. officials, the author reveals how President Bush, Condoleezza Rice, and Deputy National-Security Adviser Elliott Abrams backed an armed force under Fatah strongman Muhammad Dahlan, touching off a bloody civil war in Gaza and leaving Hamas stronger than ever.
######
Oh yes - there are Bush and Rice fingerprints and DNA present...
Posted by LordSunTzu at 10:06 PM : Dec 29, 2008
You don''t think Bush and you Fascist suffered MUCH more by forcing the People of this nation to endure him to the bitter end? Right now he nor the "Party" couldn''t be elected Dog Catcher!
"When Sharon invaded Palestinian territory without being provoked the Palestinians were justified in launching the infitada."
Justified, my @ss!!!
The infitada began when Ariel Sharon had the unspeakable gall to commit the unpardonable crime of WALKING PAST A MOSQUE on the Temple Mount.
Christians don`t throw rocks at me when I walk past their churches every day.
It`s about time the whole world treated Palestinians for what they are -- feral, primitive, animalistic, medieval thugs.
If that little blonde lady who is Israel''s foreign minister doesn''t want to do that then let her figure it out for herself or go back to Europe where she''s from and tell the British to stop selling weapons to both Israel and Hamas.
Posted by impeach___w at 05:52 PM : Dec 29, 2008
+ report abuse
**********
and this time you cannot blame bush.....what happened to the impeachment process??
Now America is the sacrificial lamb for the god of war
and when it comes it will be as the surreal of insane madness & Confusion
Posted by pythoncharly
-------------------------
Isn''t it wierd that those who most fervently wrap thimselves in the flag turn out, in the end, to be the most unAmerican of all. When the truth finally comes out, that is.
Name one thing... just one thing that Rice has accomplished.
Posted by nowaymcgoo
---------------------
The "free and fair" election in Palestine that got Hamas elected comes to mind.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 41 Comments