Betrayal
A Computer Genius, His Russian Bride, The KGB, Intrigue And Murder
-
Play CBS Video Video Betrayal In Full: The twisted case of a computer scientist and the death of his Russian bride. 48 Hours correspondent Maureen Maher reports.
-
Video Stunning Twist In exclusive video obtained by "48 Hours Mystery," D.A. Paul Hora describes how convicted murderer Hans Reiser led police to the buried body.
-
Video Hans Reiser Phone Call Hear a condensed version of Hans Reiser's phone call to his mother Beverly Palmer.
-
Hans and Nina Reiser (CBS)
Days later, he told police and a trained therapist about the last time he saw his mother. "She asked us to give her a hug. And then she drove her car somewhere, but I don't know where 'cause I wasn't there," he said.
Rory’s testimony could help his father, but a jury may never hear from Rory because Nina’s mother has taken Rory far away from Oakland -- to Russia - possibly forever.
48 Hours traveled to St. Petersburg when Ellen Doren was visiting.
Asked if the children ask or talk about their mother, Ellen says, "Rory is asking more than Nio, 'cause he's older and he’s very sad that he didn’t tell Nina enough how much he loved her."
"Does Rory think that Hans had anything to do with Nina’s disappearance?" Maher asks.
The grandmother, Irina, shakes her head indicating yes.
The defense claims this is all part of Nina’s grand scheme to move herself and her children to Russia to get away from Hans. "All I know is that two months before she disappeared, she got citizenship for her oldest son, who is now in Russia with his sister," Dubois says. "The children can’t be brought here by any treaty or any legal means whatsoever."
And Dubois says they can't be forced to testify. "They have to come of their own free will and the Russians have informed us so far they have no intention."
And with Hans’ murder trial about to begin, Dubois believes Nina is having the last laugh back in Russia.
"We could make a strong case that she is there now and that she is, as we’re speaking here, sitting on the Black Sea somewhere having a Stolichnaya, no doubt, and finding it humorous that Hans is looking at spending the rest of his life in prison."
A year after Nina's disappearance, the trial of her husband begins. Hans' lawyer remains confident, but admits that having an ornery genius as a client is "challenging."
"We are apprehensive to a certain degree because we don’t know how he will come across because of his intellect," Dubois says.
Produced by Paul LaRosa, Gayane Keshishyan and Allen Alter
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- you can't predict what is in a persons heart....and you'll never know what will push anyone to kill....
- Reply to this comment
- The sad moral to this story is as follows. Men bring an insane phsycial passion for the woman they marry or live with, and once that man's feelings and/or love is betrayed, that love and passion turns to the same level of hate. If I was 2/3 the size of a man, and only 2/3 strong as a man I certainly would not want to test his temperment by openly betraying him. Nina played an extremely dangerous game. She not only betrayed him, but then wanted full custody of the kids which only made Hans more angry.
- Reply to this comment
- Insane? Pretend you''re him. Your best buddy marries this great lady and doesn''t treat her so good. You try to help and wind up in love with her. She files for divorce and wants to marry you, but she''s scared of losing the kids so she drops you for someone he might hate less. Then she disappears. You guess the worst. You know your old buddy''s smart, and he''s gonna try to pin it on you. You''re told you have to testify. You want to be left alone, but no chance. Your phone rings all day and all night, it''s driving you
insane? - Reply to this comment
-
- Surely, you jest by calling Nina a great lady. She betrays one husband, and them marries and stays with another husband who is a sado-maschchist. She had enough money coming in that she didn't have to be desperate and marry the first rich guy she met. She had less substance than the man who killed her.
- Insane? Think about it. You grow up with a guy, he''s like your brother, but he''s a jerk. He marries this wonderful woman. He makes the wedding a joke and asks you to help. He doesn''t treat her so good. You try to help and wind up in love with each other. She files for divorce.
Your old buddy now hates you. He''ll never accept you raising his kids. She''s so scared of losing them she hooks up with another guy that hubby might not hate so much.
Then she disappears. You know in your gut he killed her. You''re a wreck. You know how smart he is. He''s going to try to pin it on you. They want you to testify. You want to be left alone, but that''s not going to happen. Your phone rings all day and all night. The whole thing is driving you
Insane? - Reply to this comment
- This man is definitely a cold blooded killer. Just so cold that he murdered the mother of his children while they were in the house. He gives me the chills watching him and especially when he spoke in the courtroom. I think he is still a dangerous man. The other man that she went out with, creepy. He is actually a madman. I can see why he would be a suspect also. She must have been scared of him, I think. Why do these women always put themselves in danger. She was afraid of him, so why go to a secluded place with her kids. This madman would find a way to kill you, because he is desperate to do so. It happens time and again, just go over some of the 48 hour cases and it is a repeat. The guy that said he killed 7.5 people, a madman and he could have. Did you see his eyes, creepy ,creepy, creepy. Her husband is just where he should be, behind bars.
- Reply to this comment
- This guy planned it. If he got caught he would make a plea deal to show the prosecutors where his ex-wife''s body was. It worked. He got a second degree conviction instead of first degree.
But, in time this guy is going to pay for what he did. What gets me is, if he was such a Genius. Why did he take the witness stand? He made a fool of himself. That spelled guilty right there.
That poor Russian woman. These American men she went with were sick and demented. The supposed best friend was just insane. Insane! - Reply to this comment
-
- Juries always want to her from the accussed, especially in a ambiguous case. His testimony did not convict, but his son's testimony did. Nina was a Doctor, who should have stuck to being a doctor and mother instead of trying to find a rich
American husband. if a woman betrays one man, she will certainly betray another. She played a most dangerous game and payed for it with her life.
- Juries always want to her from the accussed, especially in a ambiguous case. His testimony did not convict, but his son's testimony did. Nina was a Doctor, who should have stuck to being a doctor and mother instead of trying to find a rich


