NEW YORK, Dec. 24, 2008

Investor Suicide Sign Of Things To Come?

Hard-Luck Investor Tells The Early Show That He Expects More Madoff-Related Tragedy

    • Rene-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet

      Rene-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet  (SIPA PRESS/DAVID X PRUTTING)

    • People walk out of 509 Madison Ave. were Rene-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet had an office on Dec. 23, 2008 in New York. Authorities found de la Villehuchet, the founder of an investment fund that lost millions with Bernard Madoff, at 7:50 a.m. with no pulse at his office of Access International Advisors.

      People walk out of 509 Madison Ave. were Rene-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet had an office on Dec. 23, 2008 in New York. Authorities found de la Villehuchet, the founder of an investment fund that lost millions with Bernard Madoff, at 7:50 a.m. with no pulse at his office of Access International Advisors.  (AP PHOTO)

    • Bernard L. Madoff

      Bernard L. Madoff  (AP/New York Times)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Play CBS Video Video Eye To Eye: Madoff Scam

    "Only On The Web": Alleged Wall Street scam artist Bernard Madoff supposedly swindled billions from investors. Larry Leif, a one time Madoff investor, discusses his alleged fraud.

  • Video More Investment Scams To Come?

    The Securities and Exchange Commission may have dropped the ball in Bernard Madoff's alleged $50 billion scam and there may be more scams not yet exposed.

  • Video SEC Dropped Ball On Madoff

    Securities and Exchange Commission officials have revealed that government auditors repeatedly failed to properly investigate accused Wall Street scam artist, Bernard Madoff. Bob Orr reports.

  • In-Depth Meltdown Primer

    Questions and answers regarding various aspects of the current economic crisis.

  • Timeline Financial Meltdown

    Track major events that lead to one of the most tumultuous times in Wall Street's history.

(CBS/AP)  The suicide of a investor who lost more than $1 billion of his clients' money as a result Bernard Madoff's alleged ponzi scheme may be just the beginning, says a fellow hard-luck investor who predicted such incidents shortly after news of the scandal broke.

"It was kind of an easy prediction to make," Robert Chew, who lost $1.2 million in Madoff's fund, told CBS' The Early Show Wednesday. "I'm afraid that this is just the beginning of this kind of devastation and tragedy. It's just going to continue."

In a column Chew wrote for Time Magazine nine days ago, he said the scandal was "the kind of news that's been known to cause shortness of breath, sudden cardiac arrest, revolvers pulled from bedside drawers."

On Tuesday, the body of Rene-Thierry Magon de la Villehuchet was discovered in his Madison Avenue office after he apparently swallowed sleeping pills and slashed his wrists with a box cutter, police said.

No suicide note was found, said NYPD spokesman Paul Browne.

The bloody scene marked a grisly turn in the Madoff scandal in which money managers and investors were ensnared in an alleged $50 billion Ponzi scheme. De la Villehuchet is believed to have lost about $1.4 billion to Madoff.

But de la Villehuchet was just one of many investors now facing severe losses to savings and retirement accounts.

"Mr. Madoff really sort of set off a financial neutron bomb here," said Chew. "[Investors are] sitting in their nice homes with their nice cars, with their nice artwork, but the reality is they only have two or three months of cash available and then it's over."

De la Villehuchet, 65, was an esteemed financier who tapped his upper-crust European connections to attract clients. It was not immediately clear how he knew Madoff or who his clients were.

Follow the Madoff Money Trail
A look at the people and institutions that have lost millions in the alleged Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme.
He grew increasingly subdued after the Madoff scandal broke, drawing suspicion among janitors at his office Monday night when he demanded that they be out of there by 7 p.m.

A partner in the firm asked a security guard later in the evening to check and see if De La Villehuchet was still there, but the door was locked, Police Commissioner Raymond Kelly said.

When a guard came into the 22nd-story office suite the next morning, less than 13 hours later, the Frenchman was dead, Browne said. There were several cuts "to his arm, to his wrist and also to his bicep area," Kelly said.

His death came as swindled investors began looking for ways to recoup their losses. Funds that lost big to Madoff are also facing investor lawsuits and backlash for failing to properly vet Madoff and overlooking red flags that could have steered them away. It's not immediately known what kind of scrutiny de la Villehuchet was facing over his losses.

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 70 Comments
by wardoglrs December 26, 2008 1:20 PM EST
We dont need more regulation we need fraud enforcement
Reply to this comment
by hetup-2009 December 25, 2008 4:46 PM EST
To DannyInSoCal

Keep your money

Stay in Southern California you were made for it

**********
Reply to this comment
by emperorlotku December 25, 2008 12:43 PM EST
The scary part of the Madoff scandal is that if he got away with it for so long, there are probably hundreds of other investor scams running around the world investment community. That the Madoff scandal could even happen is due to the lack of oversight by out governmental regulators. Don''t blame either Party because they are both equally guilty for not doing their jobs. The next candidate I vote for is the candidate that spends the least ammount in his campaign. That proves to me he''s capable of running a fiscally responsible tenure as an elected official. The latest run for the Presidency cost both parties over 1.3 billion dollars (an obscene ammount). This is what you can count on. The candidate that spends the least, owes the least to the least ammount of corporate intirests. Our politicians are all bought off, corrupt to the soul, and owe their allegiances to the corporations not to the voters. That is how the Madoff scam was allowed to go on as long as it did, and that''s why there is hundreds more scams out there that will come out. It would be intiresting to find out who Madoff contributed to politically.
Reply to this comment
by cheetah-man7 December 25, 2008 12:09 AM EST
Don''''t worry Richie - Those of us Republicans with wealth have already protected it from your Obama messiah and the blathering sheep that follow him.

I personally USED to contribute about $25k year to various charitities. Not any more.

I will simply respond to each request "Please contact your local Democratic Politician for all further donations." And in my social circles - I''''m not the only one doing so either...

I''''m having a very Merry Chirstmas with my investments safe and secure - Richie, You be sure to enjoy your day off from Walmart. And thanks for collecting those carts. You are doing a great job...

DannyInSoCal



YOU are a classic example of what is wrong in this country. Your arrogance and your greed are what distinguishes you as a Repulican. I am grateful that I voted for Obama this time around and even more grateful that your smug attitude will come back and bite you on the a$$. Trust me, your wealth is NOT as safe as you think. When you lose it all, you will certainly be the fist in line at the local soup kitchen pushing all the other folks aside thinking that you deserve to eat first. You and your type disgust me and so many others in this nation.
Reply to this comment
by wl7bzh December 24, 2008 7:35 PM EST
Its true, women and men attempt suicide at similar rates, but statistically men are much more successful

Posted by legacyABQ at 11:28 AM : Dec 24, 2008

Men feel they don''t have a way out. With women there is alimony.
Reply to this comment
by shanev137 December 24, 2008 7:21 PM EST
The world would be a better place if these ripoff artists offed themselves.
Reply to this comment
by mahdeealoo December 24, 2008 7:05 PM EST
Hey out there. Remember, it is only money. Money is not your life. There is always more money but once your life is taken, there is nothing left for those who love you. Reach down inside of yourself and HOLD ON. Tomorrow is a better day...Merry Christmas!
Reply to this comment
by andrew_693 December 24, 2008 6:18 PM EST
the reason why republicans have money is basically because they robbed other people and never worked for an honest living like the majority of them. They use the military morons to provide them with free gas, and other goods and to kill anybody in the world that opposes their greed.
Reply to this comment
by noloyalisti December 24, 2008 6:08 PM EST
Maybe we can do assisted suicide for the greed stricken CEOs as they go to the bank or to their yachts or their 4th vacation houses.
Reply to this comment
by dannyinsocal December 24, 2008 5:52 PM EST
Typical Dem response RichieNJ.

If you have more wealth than me - You must deserve to lose it.

If you are happier than me - You deserve to be unhappy.

Pathetic example of redistribution theory at its finest.

Don''t worry Richie - Those of us Republicans with wealth have already protected it from your Obama messiah and the blathering sheep that follow him.

I personally USED to contribute about $25k year to various charitities. Not any more.

I will simply respond to each request "Please contact your local Democratic Politician for all further donations." And in my social circles - I''m not the only one doing so either...

JThom is correct on the CRA issue. Billions of $$ worth of bad loans were forced by the Dem''s who kept increasing the REQUIRED mortgages be given to "disadvantaged" borrowers. So much for phase one of Democratic redistribution...

I''m having a very Merry Chirstmas with my investments safe and secure - Richie, You be sure to enjoy your day off from Walmart. And thanks for collecting those carts. You are doing a great job...

DannyInSoCal
Reply to this comment
by credibility2 December 24, 2008 5:42 PM EST
The so-called poor of this nation have it better than the vast majority living in the world today. Let''s keep things in their perspective. Too many today have had it too good for too long, living off of credit cards and getting into greater levels of debt. It wasn''t the Repubs that told these types to go and keep charging things they really didn''t need in the first place. Oh, and I''m sick and tired of seeing many going into food pantries, smoking, using cell phones and driving better cars than I have. They''re hypocrites and frauds.
Reply to this comment
by credibility2 December 24, 2008 5:39 PM EST
Ah yes, the ole'' gleeful bit for losses to the wealthy. The ones who help to create jobs, give vast amounts to charitable organizations, hospitals, foundations or universities. The ones whose losses are still painful. Let''s not be too smug to think that just because someone who wasn''t wealthy lost something that somehow they are better human beings for being an average work-a-day person. Many of the wealthy also work, too. Are some this gleeful when a wealthy sports or entertainment figure has a flop at the box office, or whose team loses big time and continue to be paid their egregious and unearned salaries? Probably not. The arrogance of some!
Reply to this comment
by richnj1 December 24, 2008 5:22 PM EST
I feel sorry for the millionaires who lost their savings to a fraud, but I don''t feel MORE sorry for them than I do for the MILLIONS of factory workers or store clerks who have lost their jobs because of the Bush economy.

Even if you WERE a millionaire, you can still work at WalMart, get a small apartment, and eat three meals a day. We don''t throw people in debtors'' prison anymore, so they''d be free. And in our legal system, no matter how much you owe, your debtors have to leave you with a reasonable sum for living expenses. These ex-wealthy people wouldn''t even be in poverty (and poverty in the U.S. still means being richer than most of the world).

If you decide you''d rather not live at all than live in the lower middle-class of the richest country in the world ... well, I guess that defines Republicans.
Reply to this comment
by jthomp79 December 24, 2008 5:14 PM EST
Madoff was a big Democrat supporter, and donated a lot of money to political campains of the Democrats. Many of his investors were Democrats as well.
Reply to this comment
by dpu3jwallace December 24, 2008 5:02 PM EST
And, the BIG QUESTIONS ARE: A) Is Madoff Still Out On A BAIL That Is Only 1/5,000th of What He Admittedly Stole -- Or, 1/50,000th of What He Admittedly Stole (If He Was Allowed To Put Up Only 10%)?; and, B) Does Anyone Else Think That Maybe a Major Payoff Might Have Taken Place in Coordination With This "Bail" Deal?
Reply to this comment
by hunterdon6 December 24, 2008 4:44 PM EST
The guy should of took Madoff out first. No jury in the US would of convicted him.
Reply to this comment
by rkkirch December 24, 2008 4:44 PM EST
It seems like he was a man of honor, of which it seems we have to few now.
Reply to this comment
by edward1975-2009 December 24, 2008 4:31 PM EST
I guess the stress was more than he could bear.
Reply to this comment
by jthomp79 December 24, 2008 4:17 PM EST
Goverment tries economic stimulus programs, and none of them work. People still think the goverment knows what it''s doing and let it run its foul course.
Market tanks. Jobs get cut. Investors sell off in anticipation on Obama increasing the capitol gains taxes to a rediculus number. Remember when Regan lowered the cap gains tax the goverment actually brought in more money, and the economy grew.
People see what is going on, and tell Madoff I want my money out of the fund. He tries to get new suckers to cover the losses, but to no avail. Now he comes out with the news... it was all a scam.

Now people are poorer than they ever have been before.

I heard this quote on the radio last night, "You may be flying in a gulfstream tonight, but never forget how to ride the donkey with a blanket on you back."
Reply to this comment
by jthomp79 December 24, 2008 4:17 PM EST
I''ll make this short.
The market is in trouble due to bad mortgages, and mortgage backed securities. Of course these loans were started to be dolled out by the Community Re-Investment Act of the I believe Jimmy Carter Years. Clinton years it expanded banks were threatened to have their charters revoked if they did not serve underserved communities. Bush mark 2 acted more like a liberal democrat than a conservative republucan, and expanded the home ownership dream. Grab bag mortgages artificially inflate home values. Making homes affortable for everyone makes them affordable to no one. Economy is robust for a while, but then the price of oil skyrockets, at about the same time that peoples balloon payments come due. People start spending less and less money.
Reply to this comment
See all 70 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.
Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: