In America, Millions Breathe Too Much Soot
EPA Adds 15 Cities To Sooty Air List, Brings Total To 46; Environmentalists Critical Of Lax Standards
-
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive Air Pollution Explore air pollution throughout the US and and find out which cities have the worst air quality.
-
Interactive Eye On The Environment Find out how global warming, air pollution and alternative forms of energy impact our world.
The EPA added 15 cities to the sooty air list, mostly in states not usually thought of as pollution-prone, such as Alaska, Utah, Idaho and Wisconsin. That probably is because of the prevalence of wood stoves in western and northern regions, a top EPA official said.
But environmentalists said the EPA was doing only half its job on soot-laden areas, letting off the hook some southern cities with long-term soot problems, such as Houston, Texas.
The EPA notified elected officials in 211 counties in 25 states that their air violated newly tightened daily standards for fine particles of pollution from diesel-burning trucks, power plants, wood-burning stoves and other sources. Those particles, often called soot, can cause breathing and heart problems.
These lists of what EPA calls "nonattainment areas" are important because regions that have air that is too sooty must develop plans by 2012 to show they plan to clean it, and then do so by 2014. When old power plants and factories in these areas expand or do major refurbishing, they have to show EPA that it would not further pollute the air. It could mean also controls on vehicle emissions and regions having to take pollution into effect when they build new roads.
Fifty-four counties that didn't violate soot standards in 2004, the last time EPA put out a list, do now. They include areas around Fairbanks and Juneau, Alaska; Nogales, Arizona on the Mexican border; Logan and Pinehurst, Idaho; Davenport and Muscatine, Iowa; Klamath and Oakridge, Oregon; Provo and Salt Lake City, Utah; Seattle, Washington; and Green Bay, Madison and Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
The air is getting cleaner, but the daily soot standards were made nearly 50 percent tougher in 2006, said Robert Meyers, the principal deputy assistant administrator for air and radiation at EPA.
Since 2006, EPA has had two sets of soot standards and this list looks only at one of them. There are daily air quality standards and long-term yearly standards. The Bush Administration tightened the daily standard, but not the long-term one, despite EPA's science advisers' recommendation to do so.
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
- It is not soot that is the issue. It is all them cars running the roads. They are the issue not soot. We had pretty blue skys and very few cars years ago.
Ye don''t ''member Three Mile Island they had a parial meltdown. I was in Portland Me at the time. The out of control govt that is the problem. - Reply to this comment
- terrapin: Nuclear waste becomes more dangerous each year because environmentalist prevent it from being carefully stored. These storage areas would cover much, much less area than toxic mine and industrial wastes now cover. Over time radiation subsides, mercury and other toxic metals last for ever.
- Reply to this comment
- 60 years ago, we heated our home with wood and coal. That was the fuel for centuries before that. It has been accumulating for decades. Maybe we need to stop and reverse, but there is nothing new out there. Just more testing of the atmosphere.
- Reply to this comment
- "It has been discovered that citizens in the USSA have been breathing in too much soot that has been pumped into the air we breathe by those industries still burning coal, primarily the coal-burning energy industry."
If you want to turn this into a political thing, its the democrats that support the environmentalists...unconditionally. And its the enviros that have prevented nuclear power plants from being built since the 70''''s.
Geee, wonder if we would have this global warming issue if we could have replaced the 100''''s of coal burning plants with few nuke plants 20 yrs ago?
Posted by markavelli2 at 10:35 AM : Dec 23, 2008
Well, al Qaeda would probably have gotten the plutonium they want to use against us if we had more nuclear power plants.
The nuclear waste is the problem besides the risk of meltdowns. - Reply to this comment
- And for the uninformed, southern Missouri now has a smog index and a new coal plant that is no where near any coal deposits planned. That shows you how bad this is getting to be.
- Reply to this comment
- Subtitle: In America, Millions will not live long enough to retire. I guess that will ease the social security dilemma?
- Reply to this comment
- "It has been discovered that citizens in the USSA have been breathing in too much soot that has been pumped into the air we breathe by those industries still burning coal, primarily the coal-burning energy industry."
If you want to turn this into a political thing, its the democrats that support the environmentalists...unconditionally. And its the enviros that have prevented nuclear power plants from being built since the 70''s.
Geee, wonder if we would have this global warming issue if we could have replaced the 100''s of coal burning plants with few nuke plants 20 yrs ago? - Reply to this comment
This is in keeping with the Great Emperor Bush''''s "relaxing" of restrictions on the coal industry and those utility companies operating coal burning plants.
posted by walt1944
Yup, but what do most of the government types focus on?
Yup, that''s right,,, cigarette smokers! What good does it do to get rid of the smokers when people are breathing in air that''s far more harmful.
It''s worrying about your neighbors toothpicks, before worrying about your own 2 by 4''s- Reply to this comment
- Lower the air quality standards then cry we are breathing poluted air. Just what one would expect from the crazy environmentalists. Will this ever stop?
- Reply to this comment
- Without a doubt, the absolute most senseless, useless, pea-brained crackpot self-bloating, out-of-control remnant of Nazi America is the penny-ante EPA.
Its long past due time we crushed this 600-pound Dinosaur with a comet or something.
Posted by DaVicar3
--------------
Just like we did with stock market regulations - Reply to this comment
- It has been discovered that citizens in the USSA have been breathing in too much soot that has been pumped into the air we breathe by those industries still burning coal, primarily the coal-burning energy industry.
This is in keeping with the Great Emperor Bush''s "relaxing" of restrictions on the coal industry and those utility companies operating coal burning plants.
After all, the Great Emperor is more concerned with the "health" of the coal industry and those utilities using coal-operated power plants than he is about the health of the citizens of the USSA, which includes not just evil, cowardly Whimpo-crats, but those still-stupidly loyal neocon Fascist Nazi Republicans who breathe the same air we do (and will get CANCER, the same way we will!)!!!
SIG HEIL, WHO CARES ABOUT THE "LITTLE GUY"!!!, BUSH!!! - Reply to this comment
- Yeah like soot is a huge problem. Just take a ride through the tunnels in Boston sometime, or imagine the amount of carbon dioxide the jets are producing. Now multiply that by about a gozillion. Now we''re talking good old fashioned pollution.
Take you soot story and stick it up your smokestack. Like my fellow commenter said, just another ''smokescreen''. - Reply to this comment
- I HOPE THE DAY THE EARTH STOOD STILL HAPPENS IN REAL LIFE!!!!!!!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- The oil giant ExxonMobil has admitted that its support for lobby groups that question the science of climate change may have hindered action to tackle global warming. In its corporate citizenship report, released last week, ExxonMobil says it intends to cut funds to several groups that "divert attention" from the need to find new sources of clean energy.
Posted by troutfisher4
Yes I have seen that, my question is why? they dont cut their own throats for no reason.
Posted by DebinOK1 at 10:04 PM : Dec 22, 2008
Could it be that they are now engaged in the process of trying to divert their own business models so they take a lead in alternate energy to get ahead of everyone else so they might control alternate energy as well? - Reply to this comment
- Sorry I make soot with my woodstove. I can''t help it I can''t afford oil in this northern climate anymore. I went back to wood 3 years ago. There is still way too much garbage burning and the burning of things like the plastic wraps that are around those giant haybales. The people burning carpet and other things like that is still high in most rural areas. They do that even though they can go to a landfill with these items.
- Reply to this comment
- Soot???.....How about spraying of Toxins in the form of Micro-Capsules on unsuspecting American Citizens, Men, Women, and Children???:
"Nothing brings home the comprehension of the New World Order depopulation agenda than the realization that you and your family are also on the "useless eaters" (Henry Kissinger) elimination list"...
Posted by slinginrich at 10:43 PM :
Thank you! Soot is the least of our worries. Another smoke screen report (no pun intended). The public has no idea how much the government/military is doing right now in our atmosphere. I see chemtrail spraying almost every day here on the Central Coast of California. It is horrible and the government keeps denying it. We are a nation in denial of the genocide that is happening in our own backyards. - Reply to this comment
- global warming my schwantz, too much soot my schwantz....Posted by dewbug2 at 11:50 PM
Whatever rationalizing makes you feel better and sleep more soundly pal. If you really read the report you would see that it is related to increase in population and wood burning stoves use because of this. Maybe we should relax our regulations to the point of China''s or Russia''s. Kids over there have asthma bad. You can''t even see youre hand in front of your face in China. Or, maybe we can just send you over there. - Reply to this comment
- In these last weeks Bush has signed Presidential orders that will allow more soot and noxious emissions from the worst polluters: coal power plants.
There is a old old coal power plant across the River from the Capital. Documentation shows its sulfuric acid emissions is attacking the national monuments and prematurely rusting exposed steel beams in local buildings. Metal screen windows dissolve in less than a years time.
This power plant is emitting tons of soot into the air annually, and the EPA hasn''t tried to fix it, even though its in their back yard. - Reply to this comment
- The best part about mankind destroying itself is that when the love of money throws the final straw that breaks the camel''s back on our environment, the greed mongers that won''t stop polluting will be just as dead as the rest of us.
- Reply to this comment
- The current mess is an ideal "before" snapshot which reflects stupidity in governance.
Obama is no fool. his changes will show a remarkably improved "after" snapshot in eight years.
Hopefully voters will take it to heart and keep intelligence in the White House. - Reply to this comment
Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.




