Did Contractor Expose Troops To Toxin?
CBS Evening News Exclusive: American Soldiers Are Dying Of Lung Cancer - And May Have Been Knowingly Exposed
-
Play CBS Video Video KBR Accused In Toxic Scandal The controversial military contractor firm KBR is being accused of putting U.S. soldiers at risk from inhaling a chemical at their facilities in Iraq. Armen Keteyian reports.
-
James Gentry commanded a battalion in Iraq starting in 2003 - and now he's dying of a rare form of lung cancer he believes is linked to the KBR facility his soldiers in Iraq worked around. (CBS)
-
Photo Essay Week In Iraq Photos A daily diary with scenes of the latest attacks and snapshots from the effort to rebuild a nation.
-
Interactive Military 101 Basic training to learn all about America's fighting force.
In April of 2003, James Gentry of the Indiana National Guard arrived in Southern Iraq to take command of more than 600 other guardsmen. Their job: protect KBR contractors working at a local water plant.
"We didn't question what we were doing, we just knew we had to provide a security service for the KBR," said Battalion Cmdr. Gentry.
Today James Gentry is dying from rare form of lung cancer. The result, he believes, of months of inhaling hexavalent chromium - an orange dust that's part of a toxic chemical found all over the plant.
At least one other Indiana guardsman has already died from lung cancer, and others are said to be suffering from tumors and rashes consistent with exposure to the deadly toxin.
"I'm a nonsmoker. I believe that I received this cancer from the southern oil fields in Iraq," he said.
Now CBS News has obtained information that indicates KBR knew about the danger months before the soldiers were ever informed.
Depositions from KBR employees detailed concerns about the toxin in one part of the plant as early as May of 2003. And KBR minutes, from a later meeting state "that 60 percent of the people … exhibit symptoms of exposure," including bloody noses and rashes.
Gentry says it wasn't until the last day of August in 2003 - after four long months at the facility - that he was told the plant was contaminated.
"We would never have been there if we would have known," Gentry said.
A new internal Army investigation obtained exclusively by CBS News says the Army's medical response was "prompt and effective."
But even after a briefing Monday, Indiana Sen. Evan Bayh says that KBR has a lot to answer for.Read the report on the internal Army investigation.
Read an Indiana court complaint against KBR, including evidence and images.
"Look, I think the burden of proof at this point is on the company," Bayh said. "To come forward and very forthrightly explain what happened, why we should trust them, and why the health and well-being of our soldiers should continue to be in their hands."
In a statement, the company told CBS News: "We deny the assertion that KBR harmed troops and was responsible for an unsafe condition."
The company says it notified the Army as soon as it identified the toxin.
Still, some Indiana guardsmen say they only just learned of the risk.
"I didn’t know I was exposed to a deadly carcinogen until five years later when I received a letter," said Indiana National Guardsman Jody Aistrop.
This is far from the first time the multi-billion dollar contractor has been accused of questionable conduct at Iraq. In addition to convictions for bribery, it's alleged KBR provided contaminated water to troops. The company denies all charges.
"It's going to cost American lives, I'm afraid," Gentry said. "I love them. I love my men so much."
So much so Gentry says he will urge each and every one of them get tested for the cancer that he fears is taking his life.
If any Indiana National Guardsmen want more information on whether or not they were exposed in Southern Iraq to sodium dichromate, they should call this Indiana National Guard hotline: 1-800-237-2850, ext. 3128.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Read the report on the internal Army investigation.
The secrets of tennis legend 




- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 80 CommentsJust to let people know before they shed alligator tears while reading this CBS report.
Gen. Charles H. Krulak Commandant USMC
There is a great battle that rages inside me.
One side is a soaring eagle.
Everything the eagle stands for is good and true and beautiful.
It soars above the clouds.
Even though it dips down into the valleys, it lays its eggs on the mountain tops.
The other side of me is a howling wolf.
And that raging, howling wolf represents the worst that is in me.
He eats upon my downfalls and justifies himself by his presence in the pack.
Who wins this great battle?
The one I feed.
Quote above says it all. As voters we need to know moral feeding habits of our legislators.
We are either part of the problem or part of the solution.
US citizens should not lie, steal, or cheat, nor tolerate any US politician among us who does.
President and all elected politicians irrespective of party affiliation ultimately serve public as national leaders, role models, guardians and stewards, torch bearers for how Americans put into practice integrity, liberty, and justice.
How elected legislators support or tolerate tax funded contract support of those honorable citizens and veterans who had enough courage to voluntarily step forward or obey call up orders to defend our nation during peace, war, and every operation other than war is the ultimate test of national character.
A nation worth defending; is a nation led by those who exemplify good old fashion fidelity.
The fact that these callous criminals were not impeached years ago when it became apparent that the Bush administration was nothing more than a gigantic thieving machine with the sole purpose of stealing all they possibly could at every level for as long as they possibly could, is a mark of shame our nation will have to bear for many decades.
As the chairperson in charge of the Military Construction Appropriations subcommittee from 2001 through 2005, the senator funneled military projects to her husband''s companies.
Now, in the most ironic twist of all: Feinstein is in charge of the Senate Rules Committee, the "ethics" arm of the U.S. Senate.
Will she charge herself with ethics violations?
Wonder how many folks they killed or placed in harm''s way.
Bad Dems.....!
Bad Dems....
What do you do?
ANSWER: You shoot that SOB Cheney twice.
War is an ugly beast - but it''s not the soldiers who are to blame for war.
To a large extent our administration should be accountable - but our administration could not have made the decisions that were made, and our soldiers would not have been in a position to have to go to war if it were not for the people who turned the other way while their leadership made decisions in their name.
My husband served in Iraq. My husband was an American soldier. My husband saw the horrors of war, but he also so the humanitarian nature of the people of Iraq and the soldiers he served with.
If you have not served - especially in a combat zone - you really cannot understand.
Soldiers paid, and continue to pay, a heavy price for their role in this war.
What price shall the rest of America pay for not having stood to stop the war from happening???
Although they are "programmed" to accept and embrace every Bush/Cheney decision, they can''''t possibly believe that the Halliburton thing is anything but CORRUPT!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by CitizenUSA at 09:19 AM : Dec 23, 2008
This dangerous compound is/was being ignored right here in the U.S. Erin Brockovich''s case was in 1993, and the Davenport, California case is current. Where are all the stringent laws concerning this toxin? Did Clinton enact any? Jeez, safeguards aren''t up to standards here and people think they are top priority in Iraq within the first months of the war?
If I follow everyones reasoning here, then I''m going to blame the Clinton Administration for not doing anything for those U.S. residents in California. There was no war going on, what was their excuse for allowing these toxins to poison these people?
If I were to support the war in Iraq I would never use that argument because it sounds as if you''re denigrating the value of a soldier''s life.
I suspect this is the kind of mentality with many private contractors in Iraq. If you get harmed working for them, well, that''s part of the deal, isn''t it?
Although they are "programmed" to accept and embrace every Bush/Cheney decision, they can''t possibly believe that the Halliburton thing is anything but CORRUPT!
During tests conducted from June 10th to August 5th, 2008, the Monterey Bay (California) Unified Air Pollution Control District reported high airborne levels of chromium(VI) at an elementary school and fire department in Davenport, California. The substance apparently originated from dust emitted by the Cemex Cement plant in Davenport. The levels of chromium(VI) were eight times the air district''s acceptable level at Pacific Elementary School and 10 times at the Davenport Fire Department. Both are located less than a half-mile from the Cemex plant. [8] The levels detected did not exceed EPA limits. However, the air samples taken by the air district from June to August at the elementary school and fire department in Davenport registered measurements of hexavalent chromium that were up to 10 times higher than allowed by California environmental standards.
For the last seven years, chromium(VI) may have been unwittingly produced at the Cemex plant in Davenport. It''s "highly possible" that chromium(VI) continues to be produced across the country as an accidental, previously unknown byproduct of the cement-making process-
This is happening here! I certainly don''t believe they would be on top of this in the beginning stages of war in Iraq.
Do these ''soldiers'' think of what they are doing to other people''s (the enemy) lives, their homes and their country? Wars only make some folks richer and others die.......which category do they wish to be in?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 80 Comments