Where'd The Bailout Cash Go? It's A Secret
After Getting Billions In Taxpayer Money, Banks Hush-Hush On Money's Fate
-
Photo
(CBS / iStock Photo)
-
Timeline
Credit Crunch
Feeling the squeeze? Here's a look at actions and statements from key players in Washington.
-
Interactive
Eye On The Economy
In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.
After receiving billions in aid from U.S. taxpayers, the nation's largest banks say they can't track exactly how they're spending it. Some won't even talk about it.
"We're choosing not to disclose that," said Kevin Heine, spokesman for Bank of New York Mellon, which received about $3 billion.
Thomas Kelly, a spokesman for JPMorgan Chase, which received $25 billion in emergency bailout money, said that while some of the money was lent, some was not, and the bank has not given any accounting of exactly how the money is being used.
"We have not disclosed that to the public. We're declining to," Kelly said.
The Associated Press contacted 21 banks that received at least $1 billion in government money and asked four questions: How much has been spent? What was it spent on? How much is being held in savings, and what's the plan for the rest?
None of the banks provided specific answers.
"We're not providing dollar-in, dollar-out tracking," said Barry Koling, a spokesman for Atlanta, Ga.-based SunTrust Banks Inc., which got $3.5 billion in taxpayer dollars.
Some banks said they simply didn't know where the money was going.
"We manage our capital in its aggregate," said Regions Financial Corp. spokesman Tim Deighton, who said the Birmingham, Ala.-based company is not tracking how it is spending the $3.5 billion it received as part of the financial bailout.
The answers highlight the secrecy surrounding the Troubled Asset Relief Program, which earmarked $700 billion - about the size of the Netherlands' economy - to help rescue the financial industry. The Treasury Department has been using the money to buy stock in U.S. banks, hoping that the sudden inflow of cash will get banks to start lending money.
There has been no accounting of how banks spend that money. Lawmakers summoned bank executives to Capitol Hill last month and implored them to lend the money - not to hoard it or spend it on corporate bonuses, junkets or to buy other banks. But there is no process in place to make sure that's happening and there are no consequences for banks that don't comply.
Meanwhile, banks that are getting taxpayer bailouts awarded their top executives nearly $1.6 billion in salaries, bonuses, and other benefits last year, an Associated Press analysis revealed.
"It is entirely appropriate for the American people to know how their taxpayer dollars are being spent in private industry," said Elizabeth Warren, the top congressional watchdog overseeing the financial bailout.
But, at least for now, there's no way for taxpayers to find that out.
Pressured by the Bush administration to approve the money quickly, Congress attached nearly no strings to the $700 billion bailout in October. And the Treasury Department, which doles out the money, never asked banks how it would be spent.
"Those are legitimate questions that should have been asked on Day One," said Rep. Scott Garrett, R-N.J., a House Financial Services Committee member who opposed the bailout as it was rushed through Congress. "Where is the money going to go to? How is it going to be spent? When are we going to get a record on it?"
Nearly every bank AP questioned - including Citibank and Bank of America, two of the largest recipients of bailout money - responded with generic public relations statements explaining that the money was being used to strengthen balance sheets and continue making loans to ease the credit crisis.
A few banks described company-specific programs, such as JPMorgan Chase's plan to lend $5 billion to nonprofit and health care companies next year. Richard Becker, senior vice president of Wisconsin-based Marshall & Ilsley Corp., said the $1.75 billion in bailout money allowed the bank to temporarily stop foreclosing on homes.
It is entirely appropriate for the American people to know how their taxpayer dollars are being spent in private industry.
Elizabeth WarrenCongressional panel overseeing bailout
Some said the money couldn't be tracked. Bob Denham, a spokesman for North Carolina-based BB&T Corp., said the bailout money "doesn't have its own bucket." But he said taxpayer money wasn't used in the bank's recent purchase of a Florida insurance company. Asked how he could be sure, since the money wasn't being tracked, Denham said the bank would have made that deal regardless.
Others, such as Morgan Stanley spokeswoman Carissa Ramirez, offered to discuss the matter with reporters on condition of anonymity. When AP refused, Ramirez sent an e-mail saying: "We are going to decline to comment on your story."
Most banks wouldn't say why they were keeping the details secret.
"We're not sharing any other details. We're just not at this time," said Wendy Walker, a spokeswoman for Dallas-based Comerica Inc., which received $2.25 billion from the government.
One didn't even want to say they wouldn't say.
Heine, the New York Mellon Corp. spokesman who said he wouldn't share spending specifics, added: "I just would prefer if you wouldn't say that we're not going to discuss those details."
The banks which came closest to answering the questions were those, such as U.S. Bancorp and Huntington Bancshares Inc., that only recently received the money and have yet to spend it. But neither provided anything more than a generic summary of how the money would be spent.
Lawmakers say they want to tighten restrictions on the remaining, yet-to-be-released $350 billion block of bailout money before more cash is handed out. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said the department is trying to step up its monitoring of bank spending.
"What we've been doing here is moving, I think, with lightning speed to put necessary programs in place, to develop them, implement them, and then we need to monitor them while we're doing this," Paulson said at a recent forum in New York. "So we're building this organization as we're going."
Warren, the congressional watchdog appointed by Democrats, said her oversight panel will try to force the banks to say where they've spent the money.
"It would take a lot of nerve not to give answers," she said.
But Warren said she's surprised she even has to ask.
"If the appropriate restrictions were put on the money to begin with, if the appropriate transparency was in place, then we wouldn't be in a position where you're trying to call every recipient and get the basic information that should already be in public documents," she said.
Garrett, the New Jersey congressman, said the nation might never get a clear answer on where hundreds of billions of dollars went.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 99 CommentsOh my gawd.....This is getting hillarious! Americans are soooooo stupid!
The Bush administration told us that if we didn''t write them a blank check as soon as possible that it would be "economic Armageddon".
Looks like it was just a last ditch effort to steal more money from the American tax payers.
I feel that we tax payers have gotten hosed by the government and these financial institutions. Congress played games with the auto industry even though millions would lose their jobs should the sector fold. Yet, they couldn''t throw money at the banks fast enough and with no accountability. Why can%u2019t we trust our elected officials to do things in moderation instead of going to extremes one way or the other?
As far as I can tell Ford Motor that opted out of the bailout doesn%u2019t have a dog in the hunt with regard to these Bush connected investment groups which makes me want to hold my nose even harder than the last time I had to vote for President Bush.
Are you asking yourselves some hard questions right now? I am. I learned of this from Michael Savage on one of the talk radio shows that may soon be silenced by the so called "Fairness Doctrine". I did some research myself as well, links provided below. http://www.cerberuscapital.com/news_press_release.html
http://www.vicepresidentdanquayle.com/biography.html
As the economist Dr. Stuart Crane was fond of saying, Things in the monetary world don%u2019t just happen to happen. They happen because they were planned to happen.
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power of money should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs." Thomas Jefferson 1743-1826 3rd U.S. President.
By this means [printing money] government may secretly and unobserved, confiscate the wealth of the people, and not one man in a million will detect the theft. John Maynard Keynes 1883-1946 British economist
And I assure you that quite a bit of that money will find its way back to the congressmen who voted for it.
What goes around comes around, and congress and the bank executives richly deserve the big bonuses and campaign contributions they get for skrewing you over so royally.
This country has really gone to he77.......
(1) pay no attention to Paulson. He is looking out for the interests of the banks exclusively. (2) no more funding from the remaining $350Billion no matter the hue and cry. (3) demand an immediate detailed accounting as to where the doled out $350 billion went to and provide a deadline, (4) if the banks do not comply or if the reasons given are not satisfactory, then somehow divert the remaining $350 billion to folks who are behind in their mortgage payments.
The manner in which this bailout was a popup emergency and then the relief doled out with such little oversight or rules is an absolute CRIMINAL ACT.
The $700 Billion TARP has been a total failure - the money has gone principally to Wall Street pals of Paulson (aside from the inept d-crat congress, who couldn''t have seen that coming?) And the marxist drug-addict plans to waste another TRILLION on "public works" - most likely a narcissist''s dream: monuments to himself on every street corner.
And, if you can''t figure out who will actually pay for all this, your head must also be up bailout fantasy land.
What is the "bailout exit strategy"?
"Irrational exuberance" has been replaced by "bailout insanity".
Ever
Let
Republicons
into
Washington
AGAIN!
If they were as patriotic & sensible as they are greedy we''d all be secure home owners by now looking forward to our guaranteed pensions!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by endrepubs at 05:57 PM : Dec 22, 2008
And STILL have enough to feed the hungry, shelter the homeless and much much more, all in this country. Good luck people!
Nice idea, but then how would city traders afford their gold plated, diamond encrusted mobile phones?
Have you no compassion at all?
Posted by TheMajority1
Good for you, at least you admit to being in the "minority" of the Bush cult!
The first step is admitting the errors of your ways, next is doing something about it.
Maybe we should just keep our paychecks in real money and starve the vampires.
Posted by jbrown88881
What do you think happens when you deposit your check in the bank? Think it sits there and waits for you to come get it? Not hardly, the banks invest it. So starving the vampire as you say would mean closing your bank accounts and using cash only.
Posted by DebinOK1 at 06:43 PM : Dec 22, 2008
-----------------------------------
Which we will be getting to soon, hiding $ under mattresses, burying in the back. Circa 1930''s...
This is enough to make a person physically ill. WHAT THE H*LL IS GOING ON HERE??!! The highest unemployment rate in more than 25 yrs. (people going hungry without heat, etc., etc.) yet these banking officials make off like high-way robbers! As we all just sit back & go on about our lives, turning a blind eye to everything. Like pure FOOLS...
It seems Ford Motor that opted out doesn%u2019t seem to have a connection. All this makes me want to hold my nose even harder than the last time I had to vote for President Bush.
Are you asking yourselves some hard questions right now? I am. I learned of this from Michael Savage on one of the talk radio shows that may soon be silenced by the so called "Fairness Doctrine". Checked myself, Ref. below
http://www.cerberuscapital.com/news_press_release.html http://www.vicepresidentdanquayle.com/biography.html
Meanwhile, I''m off to the mattress store to choose my new bank.
There''s been a Financial Coup of the Government by the Banks and Wall Street in broad daylight, and there WILL BE Worldwide uprisings by the people.
It''s all gone too far and can''t be reversed or fixed by Obama or anyone else. It''s going to be the Second Revolutionary war.
http://www.infowars.com/
wonder how much of this secret cash filtered back to Bush,Cheney & their cronies ??
Posted by IamHungry68 at 08:45 PM : Dec 22, 2008
-----------------------------
Yes, we Americans turn a blind eye to things until it BLOWS UP in our stupid faces. Out of sight, out of mind. Until we start paying up the nose for this in our taxes. Then it will be waaah waaaah waaaaaaaaah!
Posted by pgorey at 09:07 PM : Dec 22, 2008
------------------------------
BRAVO & well said.
------------------ (Don''t know why. The ABC News has blocked my ids from posting comments on its site. They also deleted some of my comments. And they refuse to tell me why. I read the CBS news more often now. Guess the freedom of speech is no longer in ABC News'' vocabulary.)
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 99 Comments