August 2, 2009
Expert: TSA Screening Is Security Theater
TSA Head Disputes Claim, Tells 60 Minutes Measures Are Necessary Because "This Is A War"
-
Play CBS Video Video Screening The TSA Are the hassles passengers endure at airport security checkpoints really making them safer? The TSA says they are, but a security adviser who has advised them says those measures are "security theater." Lesley Stahl reports.
-
(CBS/AP)
-
Interactive America On Guard The Homeland Security Department, the terror alert system, preparedness quiz and more.
If your summer vacation includes travel by airplane, you may be dreading the long lines and intrusive searches that a trip through an airport checkpoint can mean these days.
Since 9/11, $40 billion has been spent to beef up airport security, with most of it going to hire 50,000 screeners who enforce rules often considered annoying and arbitrary.
But as 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl first reported last December, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has launched an effort to remake its image with a public relations campaign to convince the public that there's a good reason for the inconveniences and indignities.
Read more about the TSA's high-tech full body scanning program, which has some privacy advocates crying foul.
Go to a checkpoint and you'll find passengers bellyaching about the undressing, the unbuckling, and the taking off of their shoes - which they don't have to do in Europe or even Israel, where airline security is especially tight.
There's a lot of stress, and griping about having to pack their little liquids into baggies. They resent that each and every traveler is treated like a possible terrorist.
When Stahl asked Kip Hawley, the outgoing head of TSA, if all this is really necessary, he wanted us to know that the terrorist threat has not gone away.
"This is war. These people are trying to kill us. They got on the planes in September 11th, 2001, killed 3,000 people. And they will do it again as many times as they can," Hawley said.
"There's been a lot of criticism about people who clearly are not terrorists. The 90-year-old little old lady. …My mother, in fact…was patted down, and pulled aside. It doesn't make any sense. It's not common sense," Stahl remarked.
"You can't say to al Qaeda, 'If you give us somebody who looks like they're 90 years old or nine months old, you're going to get a free pass.' Because I guarantee you, they are watching. They notice it. And that's where they'll come," Hawley warned.
It's on the TSA's "watch floor" that analysts track thousands of flights, especially when there is a passenger on board that TSA suspects has links to terrorist groups.
At the time of Stahl's visit, Hawley said the analysts were tracking two such individuals in the air, fully aware which aircraft they were traveling on. "And we know what they were carrying with them. We know the whole scoop. Do they know? Maybe not," Hawley said. "And I think the public doesn't realize that this is for real. And that this happens every day."
But the TSA has a record of tracking and stopping innocent passengers, which has contributed to the agency's overall credibility problem. In focus groups, travelers questioned the TSA's ability to keep us safe and also complained about "pointless" security measures and rude and incompetent screeners.
"We're not out there to be fake security guards," said Ladonta Edwards, who like Gary Wilkes works at a Washington D.C. area airport.
They say screeners feel the public's hostility every day. Wilkes said he had never had anybody throw something specifically at him, but has seen objects thrown.
Passengers can be so surly, screeners feel abused and frazzled.
The TSA is sending every one of its 50,000 screeners back for retraining in how to treat the flying public. But from what 60 Minutes heard about how the public treats them, it's no wonder these guys need anger management.
"You hear, 'Well, I have a flight to catch. Hurry up. Do this, do that.' You know, you're taking your time to be nice and courteous to them, because that's your job, and they don't appreciate it," one screener told Stahl.
"Sometimes it can be so paralyzing, you can't do anything. You just want to bury your head somewhere," another said.
"The perception is we yell back. We scream. We get in combative mode. We're ready to fight," Ladonta Edwards commented.
"You're human!" Stahl pointed out.
"What do we do to change that perception?" Edwards asked.
"We're teaching people not to react to their emotions. Actually smile, still be pleasant, and send your positive emotions to that individual," Gary Wilkes added.
The price tag for all this retraining is $35 million. Then there are the new police-style uniforms to give the screeners a more authoritative look. It's all meant to help screeners deal with the challenges of the job.
"What's the most bizarre thing that you've seen someone put in their carry on and go through the screener?" Stahl asked.
"I can tell you the most bizarre [thing] that has gone through the x-ray machine. Passengers that have actually by mistake sent pets through and children, by accident," Wilkes said. "We…actually had to put signs on the machine….'Don't put your children through the x-ray machines.'"
"Infants in the carriers, they just take the whole carrier in, send it through," Edwards added.
Produced by Karen Sughrue
© MMIX, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right


- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 12
- next
See all 232 CommentsWhen will our congress have enough gonads to put a stop to this idiotic nonsense?
We the people, ARE FED UP ! (no pun intended)
Thank you..
Bob Baldridge, RobertBaldridge@Comcast.Net, Nashville, TN. 37215
Posted by mljohns00
----------------------------------------------
It''s also saved many thousands of lives and hundreds of buildings...not to mention firemen and police. Since when did protecting the population become a bad thing?
There should be two flights for each route. One for those who don''t have a problem with security, and the other for those who do. Which plane will you board?
Volume: It''s the volume, stupid. Limited volume (3oz) limits the potential outcome from an evil doer. Larger containers create larger results.
The baggie is simply a measuring tool. You are limited to as many 3 oz containers that you can put in a qt size bag. Volume, stupid.
C-Pap: If you knew each one was being tested for explosives, would you try to bring one in. It''s not just finding, it''s preventing! How do you train for a random pull? Security theater? I''d say security magic. Let the security (expert?) find a real job. Good Day!
Their facial reading is thwarted by a valium. Their "war" is a war on Freedom. Simply ... this is all an elaborate cover for LOOTING THE PUBLIC TREASURY. The politicians are invested in the companies that provide the equipment.
99.999% of us are generally peaceful folk who just want an uneventful trip to our destination. Many of us would even help subdue a wrongdoer. Some have.
We are in this together Mr/Ms TSA person. We don''t want the bad guys to cause harm any more than you. Don''t treat us like we do.
The reality: 9/11 occurred because the rules for pilots at that time were: Cooperate with hijackers. Do as they say, fly them where they want to go, and make sure the passengers are not harmed.
Since 9/11 the rules have changed. As noted in the article, the pilots now sit behind bulletproof, locked doors in the cockpit. The instructions to pilots and crew are clear: Do not cooperate. Do not obey the terrorists. Never give up the aircraft. Under ANY circumstances.
Little known factoid: Federal Air Marshals are not on the plane to protect the passengers. They are there to defend the cockpit.
As a consequence, the possibility of a 9/11-style hijacking is very nearly 0%, and has been since 9/12. The measures at check-in security are now predominantly about 1) protecting the aircraft from attack (NOT hijacking) and 2) cosmetics (security theater).
Keep in mind, the PERCEPTION of security is of value, also as noted in the story. Still, $40 Billion might seem a little excessive, but heck, its a jobs program.
The TSA is blackmailing thousands of Citizens, everyday, into "Voluntarily Abandoning Property" (VAP)
liquid, gel, and aerosol, worth millions of dollars.
The alledged reason is these MIGHT be dangerous, toxic, explosive, poisonous, chemicals.
Do you know what is happening to this treasure?
The TSA geniuses are taking these "dangerous, toxic, explosive, poisonous, chemicals" and,
tossing them into big bins, sorted by THE LABEL, and , UNTESTED or CRITICALLY EXAMINED,
storing them.
Gee. What if I was a "terrorist" (are there any?) and made a bomb that LOOKED like a common flammable item.
Yes, you are right. The TSA morons would acommadatingly take it from me,
put it in their pile of OTHER FLAMMABLES, and store it until MY bomb ignited the items it is stored with.
The TSA would have ABSOLUTELY NO IDEA who GAVE them the bomb, because they don''t record such things.
TSA "officers" around the country are drinking "VAP" pop, water, etc.
(and accepting "gifts" of food, drink)
GEE, what if someone injected some hallucinogens? well ..... how would we be able to tell if THAT happened?........
Same as with the stored items.
The TSA reached a mind-boggling new low in customer service this week when it was revealed that one agent had single-handedly absconded with over $200,000 worth of travelers'' belongings, primarily cameras and laptops, and proceeded to unload his booty on eBay. His latest haul: A near-$50,000 camera that an HBO employee had been traveling with.
The culprit is one Pythias Brown, a New Jersey resident who worked in the TSA department at Newark Liberty Airport. Finally busted, police discovered an inventory of 66 cameras, 31 laptops, assorted jewelry, and more when they searched his home. How''d he finally get caught? Brown snagged a camera belonging to CNN, and they found it for sale on eBay, where Brown had been converting the gear into cash.
Regional Director of Homeland Security Arrested for harboring illegal alien
Lorraine Henderson, the Boston regional director of Homeland Security, Customs, and Border Protection, was arrested Friday at her home in Salem, MA. She was charged with harboring an illegal alien and ordered released on $25,000 unsecured bond during an initial appearance in federal court. She was expected to appear in federal court in Boston later Friday on a charge of harboring an illegal alien.
If convicted, Henderson faces up to 10 years in prison. She declined to comment after her court appearance.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 12
- next
See all 232 Comments