After Rescue, Bonuses Still Flow At AIG
The Early Show: Insurance Giant Offers Top Employees "Retention Payments" To Keep Them
-
Play CBS Video
Video
AIG 'Bonus' Outrage
AIG says it needs to make retention payments to certain employees for company value, but to Congress the cash looks like year-end bonuses, reports Priya David.
-
Photo
Even though there are more layoffs every month, AIG says its top talent is being recruited to rival companies. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)
-
In-Depth
Q&A: AIG
Answers to some key questions about the insurance giant's latest bailout boost.
-
In-Depth
Meltdown Primer
Questions and answers regarding various aspects of the current economic crisis.
AIG's new CEO is only taking a single dollar for his compensation this year and the top 60 executives won't be getting bonuses. But that hasn't stopped AIG from finding a creative way to keep some of their top employees in what they're calling "retention payments," reports CBS News correspondent Priya David.
To some it seems like business-as-usual end-of-the-year bonuses.
On Wednesday, lawmakers grilled Assistant Treasury Secretary Neel Kashkari about AIG's bonus plan. Rep. Donald Manzullo, R-Ill., asked if a $3 million bonus was too much.
"It is excessive for a failing institution, yes," said Kashkari.
But so far, no one's stopping AIG from paying millions to some employees in its new retention program. The company has told 168 employees they'll receive between $92,500 and $4 million per individual if they stay with the company for one year. That angers some on Capitol Hill.
"These so-called retention payments are nothing less than bonuses," Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, D-Md., told CBS News. He sent letters to AIG, demanding details of the retention program.
"No one is indispensable, particularly when you've got tens of thousands of people being laid off from Wall Street and financial firms every day," Cummings said.
Nicholas Ashooh, AIG's senior vice president of communication, acknowledges that the perception of his company has taken a hit.
"Oh, it's terrible, it's terrible," he told CBS News.
Ashooh said the retention program does not include anyone in the firm's financial products business, the tiny arm of the company that torpedoed AIG with its high-risk, bad loans.
"We know that this is not a popular thing. A lot of people just won't accept it, but if you think about it, it's a calculated decision to keep businesses intact so that we can sell them and pay back taxpayers what we owe them," he said.
Whatever you call it, it's still money in the pocket of AIG managers.
"It's very unfortunate, but a culture of entitlement has emerged among Wall Street executives," said Peter Morici, a University of Maryland economist. "They're paid far too much money and they're trying to find ways around the rules."
Even though there are more layoffs every month, AIG says its top talent is being recruited to rival companies. In fact, the company says two of its top people just left this week, despite being offered big retention payments. AIG says it needs its best people to keep its healthy businesses profitable until it can sell them and the company plans to sell 65 percent of its businesses to repay its federal loan and get back on track.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 7
- next
See all 330 Commentstop Talent at what?
Posted by william3361
They may not be entirely responsible for the financial problems of this country but recieving or handing out bonuses for a failing business is ridiculous and when it is on the tax payers dime it should be criminal.
top Talent at what?
Posted by Biblethumpar
Considering all the layoffs on wall street it shouldn''t be too hard to somebody else to do bad work.
You just know that in all of this, somewhere, at some time, there was a gov`t employee standing in a parking garage with two suitcases full of $100s and he just handed them over to some guy.
Had to have happened.
In 1886, . . . in the case of Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that a private corporation is a person and entitled to the legal rights and protections the Constitutions affords to any person. Because the Constitution makes no mention of corporations, it is a fairly clear case of the Court''s taking it upon itself to rewrite the Constitution.
I can only surmise by the above ruling that I also then have the same rights as a corporation.
Since times are tough, and my finances are taking a battering...I shall be calling on my congressman for a bailout.
What''s sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander and all that...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by mrs_premise ..
LOL......
Big Three is also looking for a handout. I am broke, have a worthless job, need to pay my creditors, but hey what''s another $100K out-of-pocket to me. I guess when they come and demand that I pay what I owe I think I will tell them to ask the govt. for it. Seems that the govt has all the $$ they need. I will pay the govt. back, some day, and not give myself a "retention bonus."
All of this is past rediculous and is/has become absurd and disgraceful. We the taxpayer are footing the bill so the rich and powerful can remain the rich and powerful while we remain in serfdom.
The election is over. The politicians and banks don''t give a flying rat''s boonkie about what we think... we really just don''t matter.
Posted by mrs_premise at 08:35 AM : Dec 11, 2008
________________
Good Morning GOP. Glad to see you are here trolling again today. See you have gotten a few bites already.
Henry Paulson along with others at the Treasury Dept. can take the blame for that. After all they administered the loans to AIG.
What I have a difficult time understanding is AIG could not be allowed to fail, but with the auto companies bailout it seems alright for many in the Senate who still oppose it. In the case of the auto industry, millions of job would be loss, whereas far less would have be loss if AIG failed. You don''t think that Paulson thought it more important to help his buddies on Wall St than in Detroit or elsewhere?
Posted by mrs_premise at 08:43 AM : Dec 11, 2008
_______________
And we all know that it is more improtant to keep the incompetent during times of a failing business model that to hire new thinkers who might improve the bottom ine.
Posted by william3361 at 08:49 AM : Dec 11, 2008
_______________
No, that would violate their current failing business model and not allow the CEOs to get their "retention bonuses." You have it all wrong. You can''t milk the system without first having the taxpayer cow. You are trying to get rid of the cow.
Retention Payments?
JUst where is an employee going to go, if he/she decides not to take these payments?
No where, there''s no jobs out there to be had, they''ll take that bonus money and stay.
Of course...
Their corporate executives have used that money to have weekend jaunts at plush resorts, and now plan on awarding their executives "bonuses" for all the mistakes they have made, under the guise of calling it "retention pay"!
This, of course, is all to be expected under the plan of the 3 "stooges" of finance (The Great Emperor Bush II, Hank "Old Baldy" Paulson, and Ben "Fuzzy Face" Bernanke) which simply reads "I CHEAT ''EM AND HOW!!!"
In this case, it is the average taxpayer which has been "swindeled" by both the 3 stooges and Finance America. When you have both the government and Finance America PLOTTING AGAINST YOU, what can you do????
And now we are being asked to bailout the automakers!
The American consumer could use a "bailout" too, but don''t count on it!!!!
SIG HEIL, I''M THE KING OF THE CON MEN!!!, BUSH!!!
Posted by william3361
Something tells me the porno business is doing just fine these days. H3ll, the prono industry could bail out the banks.
And I am your little huckleberry.
Good god. The looting of the Treasury by the powerful and connected continues.
Paulson and the rest of the Bushit thieves won''''t even tell us where $300,000,000,000 of our money went! They gave it away in secret.
Otherwise, we might not have confidence in the Bushits.
News for you bushits--that bird flew away a long time ago.
Posted by jbrown88881 at 09:02 AM : Dec 11, 2008
The bailout is a dem thing--wipe the drool from your chin.
wrong mellon brain, it all started with bonehead bush,americas worst president ever. all your lies and smearing wont wash the nightmare, that you supported away clown.
Posted by usadvisor101 at 09:22 AM : Dec 11, 2008
Who controls Congress, *********?
Posted by Evian_Ycnan at 08:28 AM : Dec 11, 2008
My Honda was made in the US. My neighbor''s Ford was made in Mexico.
His is constantly in the shop and mine only goes for oil changes and other basics. Nuff said?
WOW!! Only in America can you get rewarded for trashing your company! In Russia they shoot you!!
Posted by adasher1 at 09:27 AM : Dec 11, 2008
uhhhhh......they VOTED on it, didn''t they?
Where are these top employees going to go if they don''t get their "retention payments" courtesy of the U.S. taxpayers?
Where are these employees going to go? Last I checked, there are hardly any jobs out there.
Well, looks like they''ll just blow through the money and expect another handout.
Congrees handed over 700 Billion with no strings attached, No oversite, no nothing...
This is nothing more than Corporate Welfare, one that dwarfs social welfare that everyone complains about.
Posted by mrs_premise at 09:37 AM : Dec 11, 2008
No, but I enjoy spitting on John McCain''s picture!
Posted by IamHungry68
Ditto! That money is supposed to be used to bail them out of trouble...and here they are perpetuating it. They need to go to some sort of bankruptcy class that teaches you how to spend smartly. This is very DUMB! And the government is letting them get away with it. They should have made a Bank Czar to watch over their lousy spending habits.
People: This "person" (and I use that term very loosely) mrs_premise is gop-will-win and all the other "gop"s---she/it is a serious loser and should be ignored. A "non-person" that doesn''t deserve my time to read its posts. And this "person" is supposed to be a "good Christian"--that''s a laugh and a half!
It`s like giving a 10-year-old $100/week allowance...do you think he is gonna spend the money on school supplies and haircuts?
Force such a deal on the var companies and I wonder how anxious they would be to have tax payer''s money?
What kind of idiots are negotiating the bailouts?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 7
- next
See all 330 Comments