Dow
     -89.23
12801.23
-0.69%
|
     -9.31
1342.64
-0.69%
|
     -108.90
14000.51
-0.77%
|
     -23.35
2903.88
-0.80%
|
     -1.03
53.27
-1.90%
|
     +1.09
116.27
+0.95%
|
     +0.01
2.01
+0.42%
April 17, 2009 4:01 PM

Wage Demands Sink Auto Bailout In Senate

(CBS/AP)  A $14 billion emergency bailout for U.S. automakers collapsed in the Senate Thursday night after the United Auto Workers refused to accede to Republican demands for swift wage cuts.

The collapse came after bipartisan talks on the auto rescue broke down over GOP demands that the United Auto Workers union agree to steep wage cuts by 2009 to bring their pay into line with Japanese carmakers.

"We were about three words away from a deal," said Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee, the GOP's point man in the negotiations, referring to any date in 2009 on which the UAW would accept wage cuts.

Majority Leader Harry Reid said he hoped President George W. Bush would tap the $700 billion Wall Street bailout fund for emergency aid to the automakers. General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC have said they could be weeks from collapse. Ford Motor Co. says it does not need federal help now, but its survival is far from certain.

Reid called the bill's collapse "a loss for the country," adding: "I dread looking at Wall Street tomorrow. It's not going to be a pleasant sight."

GM said in a statement it was "deeply disappointed" that the bipartisan agreement faltered. "We will assess all of our options to continue our restructuring and to obtain the means to weather the current economic crisis," the company said.

Earlier in the day, in a move that signaled their lack of confidence in a bailout, GM and Chrysler hired teams of bankruptcy attorneys, reports CBS News correspondent Sharyl Attkisson.

The White House said it was evaluating its options in light of the breakdown.

"It's disappointing that Congress failed to act tonight," a White House statement said. "We think the legislation we negotiated provided an opportunity to use funds already appropriated for automakers and presented the best chance to avoid a disorderly bankruptcy while ensuring taxpayer funds only go to firms whose stakeholders were prepared to make difficult decisions to become viable."

The Senate rejected the bailout 52-35 on a procedural vote - well short of the 60 required - after the talks fell apart.

"I think [the Senators] are calling their bluff, but I think they felt the American people were at greater risk," Peter Morici, a University of Maryland economist, told CBS' The Early Show.

The implosion followed an unprecedented marathon negotiations at the Capitol among labor, the auto industry and lawmakers who bargained into the night in efforts to salvage the auto bailout at a time of soaring job losses and widespread economic turmoil.

The group came close to agreement, but it stalled over the UAW's refusal to agree to wage cuts before their current contract expires in 2011. Republicans, in turn, balked at giving the automakers federal aid.

"This is a colossal failure in leadership," Lansing Mayor Virg Bernero said on The Early Show. "It puts the economy closer to the cliff and I think we see that already in the reaction."

World markets plunged following news of the bailout's failure and most expect a rough day on Wall Street.

(AP Photo/Paul Sancya)
(Left: Workers leave the Chrysler Truck Assembly plant in Warren, Mich., Dec. 11, 2008.)

Alan Reuther, the UAW's legislative director, declined comment to reporters as he left a meeting room during the negotiations. Messages were left with Reuther and UAW spokesman Roger Kerson.

"I believe the president of the UAW, Ron Gettelfinger, was too unrealistic and too selfish," Morici said on The Early Show.

But some are taking Congress to task for expecting too much from the union.

"I find it highly ironic to have Congress people lecturing the UAW about cutting their wages," Bernero told the The Early Show. "Why don't we put Congress people and senators on merit pay and see what they would be making. What has their productivity been? Give me a break."

Aid the automakers gained urgency last week when the government reported the economy had lost more than a half-million jobs in November, the most in any month for more than 30 years.

The stunning disintegration was eerily reminiscent of the defeat of the $700 billion Wall Street bailout in the House, which sent the Dow tumbling and lawmakers back to the drawing board to draft a new agreement to rescue financial institutions and halt a broader economic meltdown. That measure ultimately passed and was signed by Bush.

It wasn't immediately clear, however, how the auto aid measure might be resurrected in a bailout-fatigued postelection Congress, with Mr. Bush's influence at a low ebb.

Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called Senate Republicans' refusal to support the White House-negotiated bill irresponsible and also urged the Bush administration and the Federal Reserve to provide short-term relief for the automakers. "That is the only viable option available at this time," she said.

Congressional Republicans were already in open revolt against Mr. Bush over an auto bailout deal the White House negotiated with congressional Democrats, passed by the House passed on Wednesday.

The developments unfolded after Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky joined other GOP lawmakers in announcing his opposition to the White House-backed rescue bill passed by the House on Wednesday.

He and other Republicans said wages and benefits for employees of Detroit's Big Three should be renegotiated to bring them in line with those paid by Japanese carmakers Toyota, Honda and Nissan in the United States.

Hourly wages for UAW workers at GM factories are about equal to those paid by Toyota Motor Corp. at its older U.S. factories, according to the companies. GM says the average UAW laborer makes $29.78 per hour, while Toyota says it pays about $30 per hour. But the unionized factories have far higher benefit costs.

GM says its total hourly labor costs are now $69, including wages, pensions and health care for active workers, plus the pension and health care costs of more than 432,000 retirees and spouses. Toyota says its total costs are around $48. The Japanese automaker has far fewer retirees and its pension and health care benefits are not as rich as those paid to UAW workers.

Republicans also bitterly opposed tougher environmental rules carmakers would have to meet as part of the House-passed version of the rescue package and the Senate dropped them from its package.

Some Senate Democrats joined Republicans in turning against the House-passed bill - despite increasingly urgent expressions of support from the White House and President-elect Barack Obama for quick action to spare the economy the added pain of a potential automaker collapse.

The House-passed bill would have created a Bush-appointed overseer to dole out the money. At the same time, carmakers would be compelled to return the aid if the "car czar" decided the carmakers hadn't done enough to restructure by spring.

McConnell said that measure "isn't nearly tough enough."

Supporters had an uphill battle pressing the rescue package on a bailout-fatigued Congress - particularly a measure designed to span the administrations of a lame-duck president and his successor. Before the late-day negotiations, patience had begun wearing thin at the Capitol as lawmakers looked ahead to adjourning for the holidays.

The House approved its plan late Wednesday on a vote of 237-170. Supporters cited dire warnings from GM and Chrysler executives, who have said they could run out of cash within weeks.

A pair of polls released Thursday indicated that the public is dubious about the rescue plan.

Just 39 percent said it would be right to spend billions in loans to keep GM, Ford and Chrysler in business, according to a poll by the nonpartisan Pew Research Center. Just 45 percent of Democrats and 31 percent of Republicans supported the idea.

In a separate Marist College poll, 48 percent said they oppose federal loans for the struggling automakers while 41 percent approved.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 1203 Comments
by jsd330 December 15, 2008 1:12 PM EST
If you think chapter 11 is going to get rid of the uaw,go back a few years when the airlines went chapter 11 they still have unions and they will probobly be the next ones looking for a bailout.
Reply to this comment
by faletinme December 15, 2008 4:23 AM EST
Don''t worry Smithville. Once the Big 3 go Chapter 11 the assets will be sold to a buyer who will be unencumbered by the unconscienable inflated union contracts. (Hint: it takes less skill to screw lug nuts on all day than it does to work at a McDonald''s). With labor costs in the $12/hr range the Big3 should do just fine.

It''s funny how unions always want pay hikes when the company is profitable, but never want to give back when the companies are losing money. With the monkeys on the assembly lines being paid monkey wages for monkey work things will be fine. Oh except the monkeys wont live like doctors anymore.
Reply to this comment
by smithville01 December 14, 2008 4:07 PM EST
It is clear who Corker sides with - foreign automakers. He is ready to throw Detroit under the bus in order that his state gets more low paying jobs from non-American producers.

Key - if one of the big three fails - just wait and see how much you will pay for your Toyota. At minimum, due to supply and demand consumer will pay at least 30% more. This would average out to be approximately $9000 more due to lack of competition.

Note: GM is still the largest producer of cars in the world, with Toyota being second. People tend to forget what happens when you take 9 million vehicles out of the supply chain. There is no possible way for these other vehicle makers to bring this type of volume to the table. Therefore, prices will rise dramatically and goes to the highest bidder.
Reply to this comment
by jsd330 December 13, 2008 10:56 PM EST
USgeneral You say the uaw wages are non competitive, the detroit free press reports toyota workers make $30 per hour uaw workers make $29.00 and change. That sounds pretty competitive to me. And you should deny retirees health coverage,for most of them the companys are probobly only paying for the medicare supplement. And the last time I checked most unions have a healthcare plan for their retirees, as do federal, state, county, and city governments and they are all hurting for money to. So are all of them cancer to?
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 December 13, 2008 9:39 PM EST
The UAW is a CANCER on the American auto industry that has been eating away at the foundation of this industry for decades. The greed of this group is unprecedented and reaches CEO levels.

The UAW would have the American auto industry collapse, rather than give up one penny of excessive, non-competitive salaries and gold-plated health benefits - that are provided even to non-working union members (which is probably the majority.)

This CANCER must be eradicated, before it kills the patient.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by USGENERAL at 05:22 PM : Dec 13, 2008
+ report

Oh yes, the CEO''s make millions go on retreats that eat up the money , if fired get a golden parachute to beat the band, yep the unions who fight for the worker is just eating up the profits of the industry
Reply to this comment
by usgeneral-2009 December 13, 2008 8:22 PM EST
The UAW is a CANCER on the American auto industry that has been eating away at the foundation of this industry for decades. The greed of this group is unprecedented and reaches CEO levels.

The UAW would have the American auto industry collapse, rather than give up one penny of excessive, non-competitive salaries and gold-plated health benefits - that are provided even to non-working union members (which is probably the majority.)

This CANCER must be eradicated, before it kills the patient.
Reply to this comment
by peetrerb December 13, 2008 7:56 PM EST
get real UAW. you are so overpaid while we bail your azzes out!

I hope you all enjoy unemployment!. Asian CEO do make less... It costs less to live there!
Reply to this comment
by dralex999 December 13, 2008 4:20 PM EST
I''m with starleo14672, let GM go into bankruptcy and give the whole mess to the UAW. I bet they would be willing to take pay cuts then.

Reply to this comment
by psp190 December 13, 2008 1:43 PM EST
please get things straight. You interviewed Congressman Sander Levin from DETROIT, MICHIGAN. He is not the democratic from Mississippi. He has to much class to be from the South. He was standing in front of the GM Ren Cen. What a stupid error.
Don''t insult the people of Michigan this way. We have had enough
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 December 13, 2008 12:58 PM EST
Get your facts straight.

http://www.thenation.com/doc/2
0081110/dreier_atlas


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by ofbyfor3 at 11:25 PM : Dec 12, 2008

Well this is so informative, and I appreciate this comment, we are so easy to blame this one, or that one, and we never go to the very ones who are at fault.I can not tell you what I have read in these comments, It is all Barney Frank, it is all the UAW c''mon folks we wrote a blank check of our taxpayer money to a bunch of greedy no accounts, and the blame starts there and they should be punished by law every last one of them.NO, Secretary Paulsen saw fit to give these greedy nothings every penny alloted to save there behinds, and use it to a point that if any more is needed they have to go back to congress. Do you really believe Bush will do anything, he has been late and a dollar short for 8 years, and how he can show his face at all is beyond me, and how he has gotten away with everything is beyond me.
Reply to this comment
See all 1203 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook