By

CBSNews /

CBS/ February 11, 2009, 1:54 PM

Cheerleaders' Nude Photos Spark Dispute

Two cheerleaders at Bothell High School, near Seattle, were suspended from the squad after school officials learned nude cell phone pictures of the girls were circulating throughout the student body, via text message.

Now, the girls' parents are suing the Northshore School District, alleging school officials acted inappropriately while reprimanding the cheerleaders and failed to go after the students who actually sent the photos. One was suspended for 30 days and the other for the whole school year.

One teen's mother, whose name CBS News is withholding because her daughter is a minor, told us, "If she had been caught taking illegal drugs twice, she would not have been punished this severely. The school has arbitrarily taken away the one thing that my daughter loves most. She will never get that back again."

The school district says it stands by its disciplinary action.

Matthew King, an attorney representing the two families, told co-anchor Maggie Rodriguez on The Early Show Tuesday the teens "admit that what they did was an incredible error in judgment. The issue is not whether or not the photos were improper. The issue is what happened after the administration learned of the photos.

"Initially, they (school officials) did not report these to the police until after one of my clients' mothers discovered the photos were floating around and contacted the police herself. In addition, they have done absolutely no investigation into who transmitted these photos, where they came from, how many people had them, those kinds of things."

School administrators say they gave both girls a chance to appeal their discipline to the school board and the disciplinary committee and "everybody across the board thought it was the right thing to do," Rodriguez pointed out.

"Again," King responded, "it's not the issue of the discipline of the girls necessarily as much as it is the lack of discipline. There is an implied 'boys will be boys' sort of mentality here, where none of the boys who had these photos on their phones were ever punished. That's a problem, we feel."

King concedes that, "The student code of the conduct does say that athletes are held to a higher standard. The problem that we have -- one of my clients took the photo back when she was 13, before she even was a student at the school and the photo, unfortunately, has been following her around from grade level to grade level. As a result, I find it difficult to believe she can be punished for something violating a code of conduct that she simply had no knowledge of until after she got into high school."

His clients, King added, "certainly know this is an inappropriate thing to do. They know that, even though it may sounds like a fun and sort of frivolous idea, it can have serious impacts for the rest of their lives."

King says the families aren't seeking monetary damages, but want the record corrected. "They do not want this to affect college admission," he told CBS News, "and they are asking for school district to apologize for the improper way investigation was handled. They also want the legal fees paid for."
MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved
Copyright 2009 CBS. All rights reserved.
226 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
itsyoureternalsoul says:
If laws were broken, the police needs to get involved. Parents are hounding the school administration to see if they can sue them for ignorant actions of their OWN CHILDREN.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
frankothemountain says:
Rah rah CBS, promoting kids who get undressed. Shameful journalism when there are REAL stories to report. Also the reason that the punishment was severe.

Kiddie porn Trolls
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
permitqueen57 says:
All the arguments are nice, but the bottom line is this: without these skanky girls taking naked pictures of themselves, there would BE no naked pictures to circulate.
Leave the blame where it lies and stop trying to deflect it, you parents. You should be ashamed of what you've raised.
reply
frankothemountain replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
You're a blowhard
linkicon reporticon emailicon
JayJBow says:
Where are the photos? j/k all you angry conservatives.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
willgolden says:
The case that protects "nudity without more", i.e. innocent naked images is

355 U.S. 372
78 S.Ct. 365
2 L.Ed.2d 352
SUNSHINE BOOK COMPANY and Solar Union Naturisme, Inc., petitioners,
v. Arthur E. SUMMERFIELD, Individually and as Postmaster General of the United States.
No. 587. Supreme Court of the United States, January 13, 1958
precedent: Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 (1957)

In principle I agree with this.

But hold it there.......

As a naturist, I see naked children and adults weekly. It never crosses my mind that either are "sexual", thereby "obscene", not even the adults. Although I am celibate, this goes equally for the more regularly sexually orientated members of my naturist community, which is incidentally the only community in US and UK society which is not driven by sex and perversion. This last view is actually logical.

The criticism of nude images is solely because the majority, no less than 95% of the US and UK populations I believe, considers the naked body "obscene". In which way is it obscene?

Is it obscene ....in the shower? No!
....whilst asleep on the bed? No!
....at the doctor's, being examined? No!
....whilst changing clothes? No!

In absolute fact, the only context in which the naked body can be "obscene" is a SEXUAL context.

What this means is that every time these critics see nudity, their mindset defaults to sex. They are incapable of seeing nudity without thinking of it. This is the ultimate perversion! In a moral society this would be considered abnormal!

Yes these people, the critics of nudity, are the real perverts!

Moreover if they cannot see a naked body without thinking of sex .....they are a danger bathing their own children! Think about it!

Sadly this implicates the vast majority of our two depraved nations. This is why the US and the UK lead the world in incest.

You people steal your kids' childhood off them, a crime against humanity. You dress them up in provocatively adult attire instead of as kids. Why are they not allowed to be children? Because they do not fit into your incestuous sex games.

You have redesigned your mass media into a pornography juggernaut. There are hardly any longer social venues that are not driven by sexual obsession. All your favourite songs are based around the letter "F". You all go to a therapist if you are not getting laid every night, by as many people as possible. If you are celibate, as I am, you are considered insane.

It is the perverts in dressed society, who have to wear clothes because they cannot be trusted without them, who are to blame for misdemeanours resulting from nudity.

Yours is a sick society!

And this is where the irony comes in.

The problem with naked images, both of children or adults is this; it is the self-styled righteous mainstream perverts who are the danger not those who take the images.

If a female walks naked through a naturist environment she is safe and respected.

If she does the same in clothed society there is hardly one male alive in the US and the UK who would not feel the urge to rape her. That probably goes equally for any teenage girl too.

So....... where does my overall view on public naked images of women and children lie now?

Quite simply, children and women are safe in naturist society, both in images and even live.

But you may be surprised to hear that I OPPOSE the exposure of naked images of our moral lifestyle to a mainstream society, hiding behind clothes, that is morally bankrupt to a man. Most of you people out there are not psychiatrically fit to see them.

Most naturists want to spread their moral gospel, but I want to keep you lot out apart from the few enlightened percent!

I believe it is imperative that, to protect the safety of our naturist women and children, your depraved majority is not even aware we exist.

So there you are..... a commited moralistic naturist is opposed to the public broadcast of images of the naked body. .....and it is you people, a clothed society of rapists & perverts, who are to blame!

What an endgame in the face of blasphemy of God's greatest creation, the naked human body!
reply
pcgate replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Perv. Lol J/K
linkicon reporticon emailicon
ArwanCrow says:
Ok, I have read and heard enough about all of this from all points of view. I Usually stay out of things that don't concern me or my family. I was raised a nudist and a christian one at that. However I also have a son and daughter and I don't run around nude in front of them, nor do I allow them to run around nude. I believe it is to each their own. I don't agree that CHILDREN should be allowed to take photos of them selves or other children nude. Much less send them out to other people. In this day of advanced phones, and cameras it makes it especially hard to stop it. Yes most people just figure boys will be boys, I don't agree to that either. I believe in complete equality though and if the girls are going to get punished then so should everyone involved. CHILD PORN IS ILLEGAL NO MATTER OF AGE OR WHO, OR WHAT YOU DO. I have seen on news how they have arrested foreign officials for collecting it. They didn't arrest, or punish the girls that took the photos. If a person is caught with it they get arrested, so why don't they arrest the people who are sending the photos as well as the people taking them. I think they all need to be punished.

Also I read about this on another news sight and people are trying to blame the schools or the teachers. Since when is it the teachers job to raise our kids? I think a lot of these parents need a swift kick in the rear and a good smack across the head to get their brains working. Take responsability, (yeah maybe a typo), for your own children and quite trying to blame everyone else. Maybe if you raised your children with higher standards and morals they wouldn't do these things.

I know that my children are going to act up but I hope never in these type of ways and if so then they better get prepared. The bible itself says "spare the rod not the child". My daughter is 1 and when I tell her to go to bed she lays down and goes to bed. My son is 3 and when I tell him to do something he listens. I believe that if more parents start them out young instead of thinking they have 18 years to try and fix it maybe their kids would grow up proper and correct.

YOU PARENTS THAT HAVE KIDS THAT ARE DOING THESE THINGS OR KIDS THAT ARE SENDING THIS STUFF, YOU NEED TO LOOK IN THE MIRROR SAME AS ANYONE CONDONING IT.

ALSO AS FOR THE 1 AMENDMENT IT ONLY APPLIES TO ADULTS, OR HAVEN"T YOU NOTICED THAT YOU HAVE TO BE 18 TO USE THEM YET?

I tried to use the constitution in my favor when I was 16 and it is clearly stated that you have no rights till 18 years of age. That's why there are parents.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
momoftwoboy1 says:
sorry about the reposting
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
momoftwoboy1 says:
Well from my understanding of the situation, it is not that they were punished, its the fact that 3 additional girls were not. Yes there are 3 more girls involved from what I heard and they received no punishment at all. And yes the school knew apparently since june and did nothing till sept. I think all involved, boys and girls alike should be punished equally.

CHECK ALL CELLS PHONES (like locker searches) FOR EVIDENCE of the pictures. if they got it then there should be a punishment, if they resent it an even bigger punishment.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
momoftwoboy1 says:
Well from my understanding of the situation, it is not that they were punished, its the fact that 3 additional girls were not. Yes there are 3 more girls involved from what I heard and they received no punishment at all. And yes the school knew apparently since june and did nothing till sept. I think all involved, boys and girls alike should be punished equally.

CHECK ALL CELLS PHONES (like locker searches) FOR EVIDENCE of the pictures. if they got it then there should be a punishment, if they resent it an even bigger punishment.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
momoftwoboy1 says:
Well from my understanding of the situation, it is not that they were punished, its the fact that 3 additional girls were not. Yes there are 3 more girls involved from what I heard and they received no punishment at all. I think all involve, boys and girls alike should be punished equally.

CHECK ALL CELLS PHONES (like locker searches) FOR EVIDENCE of the pictures. if they got it then there should be a punishment, if they resent it an even bigger punishment.
reply
See all 226 Comments
Scroll Left Scroll Right