January 23, 2010 12:32 PM

Blackwater Indictment Alleges Grisly Tale

(CBS/AP)  U.S. prosecutors say Blackwater Worldwide security guards used machine guns and grenade launchers in an attack on unarmed Iraqi civilians, some of whom had their hands up.

Prosecutors unsealed a 35-count indictment against the five guards Monday for a 2007 shooting in Baghdad. The guards surrendered in Utah, where they will argue the case should be tried.

The Justice Department charged the men with manslaughter, attempted manslaughter and using a machine gun in a crime of violence. The latter charge carries a 30-year mandatory prison sentence.

A sixth guard for the U.S. contractor admitted in a plea deal to killing at least one Iraqi in the shooting. His guilty plea, likewise, was unsealed Monday.

"The government alleges in the documents unsealed today that at least 34 unarmed Iraqi civilians, including women and children, were killed or injured without justification or provocation by these Blackwater security guards," national security prosecutor Pat Rowan said. Blackwater protects U.S. State Department personnel.

Witnesses said the heavily armed U.S. contractors opened fire unprovoked at a crowded intersection. Blackwater, the largest security contractor in Iraq, says its guards were ambushed by insurgents while responding to a car bombing.

"Prosecutors allege that the men shot and killed Iraqis 'upon a sudden quarrel or heat of passion' - that's the language in the indictment," writes CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen. "But it also tells us what the defense is likely to be - that this was an accident triggered by scared young guards who were in over their heads in Iraq."

"We think it's pure and simple a case of self-defense," Paul Cassell, a Utah attorney on the defense team, said Monday as the guards were being booked. "Tragically people did die."

Hassan Jaber was wounded that day - shot in the arm and back as he tried to escape, reports CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer from Baghdad. A year later, he says that today's arrests are a step in the right direction - but not justice. He says there were more than five guards firing that day.

Jaber, like other wounded victims, got $7,500 compensation from the U.S. Embassy in Iraq, which he used to pay for medical care. But, Palmer reports, his body is still full of shrapnel.

Though the case has already been assigned to U.S. District Judge Ricardo M. Urbina in Washington, attorneys want the case moved to Utah, where they would presumably find a more conservative jury pool and one more likely to support the Iraq war.

Read The Indictment
Facts In Ridgeway Guilty Plea
Information On Ridgeway Case

"This is going to be a very dense, technical case with a ton of pre-trial issues that will have to be resolved before the first witness is called," writes Cohen. "The defendants are going to raise jurisdiction and venue questions and seek a ruling from the court that these domestic charges can't be brought against them for conduct in Iraq."

An afternoon court hearing was scheduled on whether to release the guards. Defense attorneys were filing court documents challenging the Justice Department's authority to prosecute the case. The law is murky on whether contractors can be charged in U.S. courts for crimes committed overseas.

The guards face the prospect of 30-year mandatory prison terms under the anti-machine gun law passed during the height of the crack cocaine epidemic.

The indicted guards are Donald Ball, a former Marine from West Valley City, Utah; Dustin Heard, a former Marine from Knoxville, Tenn.; Evan Liberty, a former Marine from Rochester, N.H.; Nick Slatten, a former Army sergeant from Sparta, Tenn.; and Paul Slough, an Army veteran from Keller, Texas.

The sixth guard was identified as Jeremy Ridgeway.

The case is complicated by the circumstances involving the Iraq war, which could affect legal strategy.

"The judge is going to have to be very careful not to allow this trial to become a trial about the larger U.S. role in Iraq," writes Cohen "I think defense attorneys would want to go in that direction and prosecutors of course want to separate out this event from all the other security issues in and around the Green Zone in Baghdad."

The shooting strained relations between the U.S. and Baghdad. The fledgling Iraqi government wanted Blackwater expelled from the country. It also sought the right to prosecute the men in Iraqi courts.

"The killers must pay for their crime against innocent civilians. Justice must be achieved so that we can have rest from the agony we are living in," said Khalid Ibrahim, a 40-year-old electrician who said his 78-year-old father, Ibrahim Abid, died in the shooting. "We know that the conviction of the people behind the shooting will not bring my father to life, but we will have peace in our minds and hearts."

Defense attorneys accused the Justice Department of bowing to Iraqi pressure.

"We are confident that any jury will see this for what it is: a politically motivated prosecution to appease the Iraqi government," said defense attorney Steven McCool, who represents Ball.

Based in Moyock, N.C., Blackwater is the largest security contractor in Iraq and provides heavily armed guards for diplomats. Since last year's shooting, the company has been a flash point in the debate over how heavily the U.S. relies on contractors in war zones.

© 2010 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 234 Comments
by niceface19 December 10, 2008 1:22 PM EST
(CBS/AP) U.S. prosecutors say Blackwater Worldwide security guards used machine guns and grenade launchers in an attack on unarmed Iraqi civilians, some of whom had their hands up.


This is Bush''s doctrine.
Reply to this comment
by godi70 December 10, 2008 1:58 AM EST
That is not the first time that this kind of accusation are made public ignoring what means to be military and terrible is to observe like civil people like the Judge and lawyers mike splinter-wood of professional American soldat. I do not understand what is the glory to be a military when the world made heroes or criminals from them.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 December 9, 2008 3:30 PM EST
Posted by notblue

Of the 19 hijackers who allegedly committed the attack on 9/11, 17 were Saudis, one was Bahrainian, and one Qatari.

It is easy enough to know who was behind the attacks when one knows even a bit of the local history of Saudi Arabia, and the perversion of the rather Luddite concept of Wahabism under Bin Laden.

Thus, it is a simple matter to tell the Saudis that unless they keep bin Laden within their own borders, and otherwise stop him from his dealings with the CIA, and other organizations that further his agenda, (and that of the CIA) we will have to respond with the only logical answer.

Of course dealing with the CIA should not be left out, they were the ones who "created", armed, funded, and trained Bin Laden.

And again, invading Iraq and wasting life and money there is definitely not the way to answer the attach from 17 Saudis, one Bahrainian, and one Qatari.
Reply to this comment
by notblue December 9, 2008 3:10 PM EST
brianbwb, when the enemy that attacked America has no specific allegiance to abny specific country then the premise for defense you argue is false. When fighting an evil ideologythat is present through out the middle east and greater world your opinion driven "rules" of engagement are irrelevant. Those "rules" are used as tool by the enemy who play by no rules.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 December 9, 2008 2:55 PM EST
brianbwb,...If we fought this war with any means at outr disposal, which the enemy does, then the nukes would have landed some time ago and the middle east would be an ashtray..." Posted by notblue

If there is a reason for us to go to war at all, the only reason is that we are attacked, and our defense should be immediately nuclear, and we should state that policy plainly for the world to know, as it is the final answer to an unavoidable conflict.

In short, I don''t answer punch for punch, I take out the puncher totally. If I am not going to do that, then it is not worth fighting, and it is only because those who plot to attack us (if, as has not yet been proven, the attack plotters were not amongst ourselves)know we don''t have the stomach to use the most logical and effective defense, that they do so.

Wasting lives making war against those who have not attacked us is even more stupid than wasting lives against those who have.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 December 9, 2008 2:44 PM EST
"brianbwb, I love how you people like to compare christians with the RADICAL MUSLIMS, you couldn''''t be MORE WRONG, the comparison is ludicrous at best. By the way how would you describe those that commit these savage acts in the name of Radical Islam? How would like them characterized? LOL!" Posted by notblue

I would characterize them in the same way I would those who advocate making war on anyone else simply because of their choice of religion, as either suckers dying for their pimps, or pimps ordering suckers to their death, Christianity, Islam, and secularists all have an equal share of such.
Reply to this comment
by endurorob December 9, 2008 2:43 PM EST
brianbwb, I love how you people like to compare christians with the RADICAL MUSLIMS, you couldn''''t be MORE WRONG, the comparison is ludicrous at best. By the way how would you describe those that commit these savage acts in the name of Radical Islam? How would like them characterized? LOL!


Also see "Sabra and Shatila massacre".
Reply to this comment
by endurorob December 9, 2008 2:41 PM EST
brianbwb, I love how you people like to compare christians with the RADICAL MUSLIMS, you couldn''''t be MORE WRONG, the comparison is ludicrous at best. By the way how would you describe those that commit these savage acts in the name of Radical Islam? How would like them characterized? LOL!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by notblue

it''s easy to compare Christians to Muslim radicals "Srebrenica massacre" among others.
Reply to this comment
by notblue December 9, 2008 2:40 PM EST
brianbwb, while your "list" describes the way the militants operate, to compare how the U.S operates is again completley wrong. If we fought this war with any means at outr disposal, which the enemy does, then the nukes would have landed some time ago and the middle east would be an ashtray. While America uses great care and strategic strikes to midigate collateral damage and minimize killing innocent civilians your brothers in Jihad puposely target them. There is no comparison and your lame attempts are false and idiotic
Reply to this comment
by notblue December 9, 2008 2:37 PM EST
brianbwb, I love how you people like to compare christians with the RADICAL MUSLIMS, you couldn''t be MORE WRONG, the comparison is ludicrous at best. By the way how would you describe those that commit these savage acts in the name of Radical Islam? How would like them characterized? LOL!
Reply to this comment
See all 234 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook