Blackwater Guards Indicted For Shooting
Five Indicted, One In Plea Negotiations, But Charges Won't Be Revealed Until Monday; Use Of Drug Law In Question
-
Photo
Contractors working for Blackwater USA take part in a firefight as Iraqi demonstrators attempt to advance on a facility being defended by U.S. and Spanish soldiers in this April 4, 2004 file photo from the city of Najaf. (AP Photo/Gervasio Sanchez)
-
In The Spotlight
Under Fire
A look at Blackwater USA, the State Department's top private security contractor.
-
Blog
Court Watch
CBSNews.com Legal Analyst Andrew Cohen's new blog on the big issues and analyzes important cases of the day.
Prosecutors obtained the indictment late Thursday and had it put under seal until it is made public, perhaps as early as Monday. All who discussed the case did so on condition of anonymity because the matters remain sealed.
Six guards have been under investigation since a convoy of heavily armed Blackwater contractors opened fire in a crowded Baghdad intersection on Sept. 16, 2007. Witnesses say the shooting was unprovoked but Blackwater, hired by the State Department to guard U.S. diplomats, says its guards were ambushed by insurgents while responding to a car bombing.
Young children were among the victims and the shooting strained relations between the U.S. and Iraq. Following the shooting, Blackwater became the subject of congressional hearings in Washington and insurgent propaganda videos in Iraq.
The exact charges in the indictment were unclear, but the Justice Department has been considering manslaughter and assault charges against the guards for weeks. Prosecutors have also been considering bringing charges under a law, passed as part of a 1988 drug bill, that carries a mandatory 30-year prison sentence for using a machine gun in a crime of violence.
Drugs were not involved in the Blackwater shooting, but the law being considered allows prosecutions for using machine guns to commit violent crimes of any kind, drug-related or not.
“This is a big stretch under federal law," said CBS News legal analyst Andrew Cohen. "And judges, especially appeals court judges, are not always keen on approving the creative ways in which prosecutors go after defendants.
“Even if somehow this law applied to these facts it is not at all clear that the guards could be prosecuted here anyway because of where the alleged crimes occurred. So there are layers of problems for the feds,” he said.
The Justice Department has ordered five of the six guards to surrender Monday to the FBI, but details of where and precisely what time were still being worked out Friday, according to those people close to the case.
The remaining guard has been negotiating to reduce the charges against him in return for cooperation. If completed, such a deal could provide prosecutors with a key witness against the other five. Others in the convoy have already testified before a federal grand jury about the shooting.
Justice Department spokesman Dean Boyd declined comment.
This is a big stretch under federal law. And judges, especially appeals court judges, are not always keen on approving the creative ways in which prosecutors go after defendants.
Andrew CohenCBS News legal analyst
Regardless of the charges they bring, prosecutors will have a tough fight. The law is unclear on whether contractors can be charged in the U.S., or anywhere, for crimes committed overseas. The indictment sends the message that the Justice Department believes contractors do not operate with legal impunity in war zones.
Based at a sprawling compound in Moyock, North Carolina, Blackwater itself is not a target of the FBI investigation. Company officials have cooperated with the investigation.
To prosecute, authorities must argue that the guards can be charged under a law meant to cover soldiers and military contractors. Since Blackwater works for the State Department, not the military, it's unclear whether that law applies to its guards.
Further complicating the case, the State Department granted all the Blackwater guards limited immunity in exchange for their sworn statements shortly after the shooting. Prosecutors will need to show that they did not rely on those statements in building their case.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 65 CommentsDefending people who shoot the innocent.
So thirty for some individual killers seems reasonable.
If a bomb explodes in Baghdad and CNN isn`t there to report it, does anyone get kill?
Wouldn''t suprise me at all if they aren`t also training the pirates
There`s always the War Crimes Act. Wide open. Besides, the Fed never has difficulty in stretching laws when it comes to people carrying large amounts of cash, doctor-assisted suicide and medical marijuana, even civil rights.
So lump it!
Posted by AmJoe
I would hardly call this bunch of mercenary''s our fighting men!!! They are well paid thugs!!!! This is not a cheap way to conduct a war. They can use their war profits to defend themselves in court.
Why do so many of you like to associate Blackwater with President Bush? Blackwater was founded and received their first contracts under the Clinton Administration. In addition, I am sure that if any one of you were to visit Iraq you would request them to be your guards. Remember they have not lost a single person they were paid to protect. That includes many of our Congressional leaders that are now against them.
Posted by ArmySGT1 at 10:03 AM : Dec 05, 2008
It''s the Way that Bush used them and how they turned into paid thugs. How would you feel to have foreigners jump out of a truck, gun down a bunch of civilians including your wife and 3 year old son. My opinion, 30 years is light.
Do you support companies like Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin? They get paid to make the planes that are designed to kill. Does that mean they are also thugs
jh6379again
I am sure at one time or another you have flown on a plane that a defense contractor built. Boeing, Northrop, and Lockheed all make civilian transportation. So by flying you are supporting them.
The folks in Bush administration who broke laws on the prohibition against hiring mercenary should do time. They hired these thugs they should be responsible for their action.
US outspends every nation on earth so we can have best military so why did we need hire these criminals anyway?
The pawn in the crime gets 30 years.
The mastermind behind the crime planning to build his 2.5 million dollar home in Dallas, right next to his presidential library and the cemetery with over 4200 headstones of the American troops he killed in his illegal war.
It seems as though they know it, and are complicit with the defense..
What is the difference between these guys and our fighting men and wemen in uniform? They are all in the fight and truing to react to a dynamic environment where the ENEMY can come from anywhere!! Just like Vietnam when the Viet-cong would use children and wemen as suicide or unknown bombers to kill our troops. All of you crybabies that are against what we are doing... why dont you go over there and try to give these suicide bombers a hug and kiss...then you might find out what it is like, YOU BUNCH OF COWARDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The pawn in the crime gets 30 years.
The mastermind behind the crime planning to build his 2.5 million dollar home in Dallas, right next to his presidential library and the cemetery with over 4200 headstones of the American troops he killed in his illegal war.
Posted by jerr11
-----------------------------
so so true. Sigh.
Posted by sonomafrog at 04:16 PM : Dec 05, 2008
In the "real" world, we would not have started the war in Iraq!
Posted by sonomafrog at 04:16 PM : Dec 05, 2008
Contractors are a disgrace to the military. If you serving so much be a patriot for your country, not the almighty dollar. All those bums should be out of a job. Mercenaries have never worked and never will.
Posted by doctajim at 08:28 PM : Dec 05, 2008
Are you saying that only christian southerners committed atrocities? If you are, then I call you a knowing liar. You are exhibiting the same mentality as those that did these horrible things. Please show me that I am mistaken.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by rudy6543
Rudy, you continue to amaze me with your stupidity and ignorance
And now they want to protect ships from Pirates! I don''t think so.
We should outsource these murdering mercenaries, and make them go live in other countries.
Sure it absolutely does apply, they were carrying weapons, committing military activities, and killing people. Seeing as how the military serves the government, which includes the State Department, any failure to prosecute valid evidence using semantic games as a justification is corruption and cover-up.
With an Obama DOJ just weeks away, that may be the idea of this eleventh-hour prosecution-- but all of us should hope it is not.
Has the US foreign service any credibility left after Bush and Rice?
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 65 Comments