Dec. 4, 2008
Obama Team Looks To Grass-Roots For Help
Washington Post: Policymakers Are Asking Network Of Supporters To Weigh In On Health-Care Issues
-
Photo
Former senator Thomas A. Daschle is President-elect Barack Obama's point person on health care and is likely to be his nominee for secretary of health and human services. (AP)
-
In-Depth
Obama's Cabinet
The latest names and status of posts within Obama's new administration.
From Our Partner:
Barack Obama's incoming administration has begun to draw on the high-tech organizational tools that helped get him elected to lay the groundwork for an attempt to restructure the U.S. health-care system.
Former senator Thomas A. Daschle, Obama's point person on health care, launched an effort to create political momentum yesterday in a conference call with 1,000 invited supporters culled from 10,000 who had expressed interest in health issues, promising it would be the first of many opportunities for Americans to weigh in.
The health-care mobilization taking shape before Obama even takes office will include online videos, blogs and e-mail alerts as well as traditional public forums. Already, several thousand people have posted comments on health on the Obama transition Web site.
"We'll have some exciting news about town halls, we'll have some outreach efforts in December," Daschle said during the call. And tomorrow, when he appears at a health-care summit with Sen. Ken Salazar (D-Colo.) in Denver, Daschle said, "we'll be making some announcements there."
It is the first attempt by the Obama team to harness its vast and sophisticated grass-roots network to shape public policy. Although the president-elect is a long way from crafting actual legislation, he promised during the campaign to make the twin challenge of controlling health-care costs and expanding coverage a top priority in his first term.
Daschle, who is expected to become the next secretary of health and human services, is waging the outreach campaign by marrying old-fashioned Washington-style lobbying and cutting-edge social-networking technologies. Although he has yet to be formally nominated, he has already met with more than 100 insiders, ranging from union leaders and the seniors group AARP to hospital executives and representatives of corporate America.
"In the last three days I've exchanged three sets of e-mails with him," said Ron Pollack, executive director and vice president of the advocacy group Families USA.
The Obama team, which recruited about 13 million online supporters during the presidential campaign and announced its vice presidential selection via text message, is now moving to apply those tools to the earliest stages of governing.
"This is the beginning of the reinvention of what the presidency in the 21st century could be," said Simon Rosenberg, president of the center-left think tank NDN. "This will reinvent the relationship of the president to the American people in a way we probably haven't seen since FDR's use of radio in the 1930s."
In seeking to translate its political skills to policymaking, the incoming administration faces potential legal and political pitfalls. It is not clear, for instance, whether Obama can legally use his list of campaign supporters in the White House; the database would probably become government property. So far, the transition team has gotten around that issue by encouraging people to register on its Web site, Change.gov. Those names and e-mail addresses go into a new database, which can be tapped to generate activities such as house parties, YouTube videos and viral discussions to rally support.
Daschle's telephone call, which was not open to the news media, and his speech in Denver tomorrow provide hints as to how the new administration might tackle major health-care legislation.
"President-elect Obama believes that change really comes from the ground up, not from Washington," Salazar said in an interview. "The drumbeat for change is one which goes across every single state -- red, blue and purple. That kind of a drumbeat will be very effective in achieving the change needed on health care."
The Obama team chose to begin its high-tech grass-roots experiment on the issue of health care because "every American is feeling the pressure of high health costs and lack of quality care, and we feel it's important to engage them in the process of reform," said spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter.
It started with a simple 63-second video posted on Change.gov, in which health advisers Dora Hughes and Lauren Aronson posed the question "What worries you most about the health-care system in our country?"
That triggered 3,700 responses, from personal tales of medical hardship to complaints about "socialized medicine." The cyber-conversation was interactive, allowing individuals to reply to one another and rate responses with a thumbs up or down. The top-scoring comment, a pitch for a "paradigm shift" toward prevention, had 82 thumbs up.
The Obama technology gurus then built a "word cloud" showing the 100 most frequently used words in the responses. The cloud's biggest words -- indicating those used most -- include "insurance," "system," "people" and "need."
"The Obama administration has learned that listening may be even more important than talking, because it diffuses opposition," said Andrew Rasiej, co-founder of Personal Democracy Forum, a nonpartisan Web site focused on the intersection of politics and technology.
Obama used the same strategy during the campaign, Rasiej said. When many of his most liberal supporters became enraged that he voted in favor of a surveillance law, Obama assigned staffers to monitor and respond to comments posted on the campaign's Web site. After a sort of cyber-catharsis of complaints, the controversy died down, Rasiej observed.
"It will be a lot easier to get the American public to adopt any new health-care system if they were a part of the process of crafting it," he said.
By moving early, Daschle and Obama are also applying a central lesson learned in past failed efforts to overhaul the health system, said Andrew Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union.
"This is an opportunity to deepen the education work and build the ultimate coalition for change before it's demonized or people try to oppose it," he said.
After the first health comments poured in to the transition Web site, Aronson made a second video, this time with Daschle, seated in shirt sleeves and a tie.
"We want to make sure you understand how important those comments and your contributions are," Daschle says into the camera. "Already we've begun to follow through with some of the ideas."
Daschle praises the suggestion of creating a "Health Corps" of volunteers, modeled after President John F. Kennedy's Peace Corps.
Aronson, who was a congressional health aide to incoming White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, then recounts the story of a small businesswoman struggling to provide affordable health insurance to her workers.
Says Daschle: "When I was in the Senate, it was stories like that, probably more than all the factual information, that really moved you to want to act."
Research director Lucy Shackelford contributed to this report.
By Ceci Connolly
© 2008 The Washington Post Company
|
|
Obama is pulling wisdom from the masses! What an incredible move in the direction of democracy! Once again we will see a government of, by and for the people.
Having said that, concerning the topic of healthcare.
My wife is a board certified Nurse Practioner. We have been watching carefully as more and more ''urgent-care, walk-in clinics'' are opening. This is the wave of the future in family medical care. Nurse Practioners are competitent to provide normal family care and are paid less than doctors.
Imagine if the insurance companies were taken out of the equation and instead we had a system in place which would direct people to walk-in clinics for basic care instead of making the emergency room the only option for tens of millions of Americans. Think of the money that would be saved. Rather than writing off a $500 ER visit, the cost per visit would be about $60.
You''re paying for it now, folks, with your tax dollars, obscene insurance rates, higher hospital costs etc. Why not a single-payer plan that will save every one of us thousands each year?
Who does this commie bastward think he''''s kidding?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by RowdynTex
Afraid your church will find out about your multiple abortions?
Posted by Credibility2
And you are??
ROFLMAO!!!!
Who does this commie bastward think he''''s kidding?
Posted by RowdynTex at 11:43 AM : Dec 04, 2008
You don''t want the people in charge of paying for your medical treatment to know what your medical treatment is?
How does that work?
Ok, you may have to choose only from a small list of doctors, but heck, that''s what HMO and DMO doing right now.
Can''t wait until Jan 20, 2009. It''s the day that we celebrate end of an error.
American companies are at a disadvantage because they have to pay for employees health care and their competitors abroad don''t. All the other major industrialized nations in the world have national health care.
Posted by yia50yia at 01:30 PM
American companies are at a disadvantage because they have to pay for employees health care and their competitors abroad don''''t. All the other major industrialized nations in the world have national health care.
Posted by CaribouBarbi at 12:46 PM
Why can''''t United States have a healthcare plan like Canada does (which is free to everyone)? Why can''''t we have a health care plan that when you need a simple surgery, like gallblader, all you have to pay is $8.00 like Canadians paying right now?
Ok, you may have to choose only from a small list of doctors, but heck, that''''s what HMO and DMO doing right now.
Can''''t wait until Jan 20, 2009. It''''s the day that we celebrate end of an error.
Posted by TX4Obama at 12:14
The solution to all of these concerns is a ''single-payer'' plan that takes the insurance companies out of the equation. If Obama is serious about culling out the lobbyists he might get it done.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by thgdriver1
Sorry pal... you republicans are out of time! You are a thing of the past, a relic, a dinosour. The republican party will be mentioned briefly in history books along with the Whigs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by redbds
You''re not very bright, and you don''t pay attention either.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by redbds
See what I mean? Sorry, of course you don''t.
Posted by nowaymcgoo at 01:58 PM : Dec 04, 2008
What the hell is this "single payer" plan you are talking about?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by redbds
Wow, I sure nailed that one!
The number one quality required to be a republican is stunning gullibility. Stupidity is number two.
They go well together.
Posted by johndevinejr at 02:11 PM : Dec 04, 2008
You can continue to call names all you want. The fact is that Obama is slowly backing out of all the promises he made to buy votes. He is starting to sound more like John McCain and George Bush than the original versions. He isn''t even the President yet. But, I am giving him the benefit of the doubt. After all he is actually much less liberal than he convinced all of you he was.
Freeeeeeeeeeee???? You are stupid enough to believe it''''s FREEEEEEEEEE!!!!! OMG! Now that''''s hilarious!
Posted by RowdynTex at 02:18 PM : Dec 04, 2008
Liberals just don''t get it. If the government is paying for it then it isn''t free. Unless you are a liberal welfare hag that doesn''t pay taxes. In that case it would be free.
Posted by jgg0003 at 02:24 PM : Dec 04, 2008
Yeah. I can''t wait until after Jan 20 either. I heard that my mortgage and car payments would be paid by the government.
Wingnuts,
Your country voted overwhelmingly for change. The time for petty partisan hate is over. If you can''t help, just get out of the way.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by redbds
Yeah sure, lets continue that MYTH that ALL republicans have jobs and are law abiding productive citizens.
The truth is that most republicans are middle to lower class to desperately poor.
Brother''s Gonna Work It Out!!!
You''re going to get a bad case of whiplash trying to please all those who helped you raise over three quarters of a Billion dollars (that''s $750,000,000.00 for those with mathematical deficits). How many homeless people could have had a nice Thanksgiving dinner with that kind of cash, huh?
How much do you "owe" Move On dot Org and your not so exclusive buddy, Oprah?
All I can say is good luck trying to please everyone in your new congress.
It is ridiculous to even suggest that a sitting President resign because you''re eager for the next guy to step in. This is not Burger King!!
Now, get back to work. Someone wants fries with that.
Now that said go cry yell but we swing voters decided the election not the deciders like the nut case neo cons who must have though that 2006 was a fluke. Still think that way when we say jump you jump then ask how high.
That said if Obama and the Democrats do as they are told it will be a long time before you see any power again.
Posted by antoniof123 at 03:42 PM : Dec 04, 2008
Who is telling Obama & the Democrats what to do? Is there an elected office higher & with more power than the POTUS?
Very true, as Obama is discovering!
Progressives and Liberals are upset that Obama''s cabinet picks haven''t been "liberal" enough and that he is "back peddling" on campaign promises he made, mostly on tax issues. They feel cheated!
Neocon Fascist Nazi Republicans and Corporate and Financial America are smiling that Obama is doing exactly what the Great Emperor Bush II would do, thus giving us the nightmare prospect of a 3rd term of George W. Bush!!! They feel vindicated!!!
It might be reminded that the Great Emperor Bush II pleased only 20% of the people in the 8 years of his rule, while 80% cursed and grumbled (and still are!).
If Obama doesn''t watch it, his approval rating could go in the tank with George Bush''s.
Still, it could always be worse. Remember, like bird dung, there are more "Bush''s" out there, especially one named Jeb who will be looking to "improve" on his father''s and brother''s "legacy"!
SIG HEIL, YOU''LL NEVER BE RID OF A BUSH!!!, BUSH!!!
SIG HEIL, HOW ABOUT IF I PLEASE SOME OF THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME???, OBAMA!!!
I''ll tell you who is going to tell whom what to do!!
We''re going to tell YOU what to do!!
We have the majority!!
We have the Whitehouse!!
We have Congress!!
Soon we will have the supreme court!!
OH YEAH! We''re going to tell all you neocons what to do for at least the next eight years, by then your precious republican party will be nothing but a bad memory!
SOOOO... SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP!!!
LOL!
---
As a supporter of Obama, I am careful to remember Obama, himself, speaks of American politics in our near-future as "post-partisan".
Another way of putting that is partisan gloating is really off the mark-- starting November 4, 2008.
Obama has reached out to all members of congress and to the American people for unity in a time of great national crisis-- two wars, a ruined economy, a decayed infrastructure, a flagging sense of direction and partisan bickering.
If a true national consensus about constructive action and vigorous recovery benefits all Americans, then we should put away our campaign hats and confetti, and realize we must work with our fellow Americans.
The time for gloating is long past. It is time to go to work for our country.
---
You do not have to be a Democrat to understand the conservative push begun by Newt Gingrich and the GOP in 1995 is well past.
But tea and sympathy from Faux News Network will not give you much direction for the future-- Faux News certainly misjudged this country and the American people.
There is now a new consensus on what it means to be American. Eventually, you must get off your wooden horse, and realize partisan cant will not pull your wagon, anymore.
Encourage Healthcare that is
1. Free Market
2. Reasonable in price
3. Even the lowest Income can afford to take part.
I noticed there seems to be a pattern of deleting the back & forth posts between people. Do they expect people not to respond to another people?? That''s half the fun as long as it''s civil!!
I also expect them to delete this post, but it''s out there for a couple minutes.
-
by wardoglrs
December 5, 2008 6:47 AM EST
- WMR has learned from knowledgeable Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) sources that the Bush administration is putting the final touches on a plan that would see martial law declared in the United States with various scenarios anticipated as triggers. The triggers include a continuing economic collapse with massive social unrest, bank closures resulting in violence against financial institutions, and another fraudulent presidential election that would result in rioting in major cities and campuses around the country.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 38 CommentsWebmaster''s Commentary:
I am starting to wonder if this issue over Obama''s Birth Certificate is the mechanism by which Bush plans to trigger riots allowing him to declare a national emergency.