Dec. 4, 2008

Obama Team Looks To Grass-Roots For Help

Washington Post: Policymakers Are Asking Network Of Supporters To Weigh In On Health-Care Issues

  • Photo

    Former senator Thomas A. Daschle is President-elect Barack Obama's point person on health care and is likely to be his nominee for secretary of health and human services.  (AP)

  • In-Depth Obama's Cabinet

    The latest names and status of posts within Obama's new administration.

From Our Partner:
(Washingtonpost.com)  This story was written by Ceci Connolly.


Barack Obama's incoming administration has begun to draw on the high-tech organizational tools that helped get him elected to lay the groundwork for an attempt to restructure the U.S. health-care system.

Former senator Thomas A. Daschle, Obama's point person on health care, launched an effort to create political momentum yesterday in a conference call with 1,000 invited supporters culled from 10,000 who had expressed interest in health issues, promising it would be the first of many opportunities for Americans to weigh in.

The health-care mobilization taking shape before Obama even takes office will include online videos, blogs and e-mail alerts as well as traditional public forums. Already, several thousand people have posted comments on health on the Obama transition Web site.

"We'll have some exciting news about town halls, we'll have some outreach efforts in December," Daschle said during the call. And tomorrow, when he appears at a health-care summit with Sen. Ken Salazar (D-Colo.) in Denver, Daschle said, "we'll be making some announcements there."

It is the first attempt by the Obama team to harness its vast and sophisticated grass-roots network to shape public policy. Although the president-elect is a long way from crafting actual legislation, he promised during the campaign to make the twin challenge of controlling health-care costs and expanding coverage a top priority in his first term.

Daschle, who is expected to become the next secretary of health and human services, is waging the outreach campaign by marrying old-fashioned Washington-style lobbying and cutting-edge social-networking technologies. Although he has yet to be formally nominated, he has already met with more than 100 insiders, ranging from union leaders and the seniors group AARP to hospital executives and representatives of corporate America.

"In the last three days I've exchanged three sets of e-mails with him," said Ron Pollack, executive director and vice president of the advocacy group Families USA.

The Obama team, which recruited about 13 million online supporters during the presidential campaign and announced its vice presidential selection via text message, is now moving to apply those tools to the earliest stages of governing.

"This is the beginning of the reinvention of what the presidency in the 21st century could be," said Simon Rosenberg, president of the center-left think tank NDN. "This will reinvent the relationship of the president to the American people in a way we probably haven't seen since FDR's use of radio in the 1930s."

In seeking to translate its political skills to policymaking, the incoming administration faces potential legal and political pitfalls. It is not clear, for instance, whether Obama can legally use his list of campaign supporters in the White House; the database would probably become government property. So far, the transition team has gotten around that issue by encouraging people to register on its Web site, Change.gov. Those names and e-mail addresses go into a new database, which can be tapped to generate activities such as house parties, YouTube videos and viral discussions to rally support.

Daschle's telephone call, which was not open to the news media, and his speech in Denver tomorrow provide hints as to how the new administration might tackle major health-care legislation.

"President-elect Obama believes that change really comes from the ground up, not from Washington," Salazar said in an interview. "The drumbeat for change is one which goes across every single state -- red, blue and purple. That kind of a drumbeat will be very effective in achieving the change needed on health care."

The Obama team chose to begin its high-tech grass-roots experiment on the issue of health care because "every American is feeling the pressure of high health costs and lack of quality care, and we feel it's important to engage them in the process of reform," said spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter.

It started with a simple 63-second video posted on Change.gov, in which health advisers Dora Hughes and Lauren Aronson posed the question "What worries you most about the health-care system in our country?"

That triggered 3,700 responses, from personal tales of medical hardship to complaints about "socialized medicine." The cyber-conversation was interactive, allowing individuals to reply to one another and rate responses with a thumbs up or down. The top-scoring comment, a pitch for a "paradigm shift" toward prevention, had 82 thumbs up.

The Obama technology gurus then built a "word cloud" showing the 100 most frequently used words in the responses. The cloud's biggest words -- indicating those used most -- include "insurance," "system," "people" and "need."

"The Obama administration has learned that listening may be even more important than talking, because it diffuses opposition," said Andrew Rasiej, co-founder of Personal Democracy Forum, a nonpartisan Web site focused on the intersection of politics and technology.

Obama used the same strategy during the campaign, Rasiej said. When many of his most liberal supporters became enraged that he voted in favor of a surveillance law, Obama assigned staffers to monitor and respond to comments posted on the campaign's Web site. After a sort of cyber-catharsis of complaints, the controversy died down, Rasiej observed.

"It will be a lot easier to get the American public to adopt any new health-care system if they were a part of the process of crafting it," he said.

By moving early, Daschle and Obama are also applying a central lesson learned in past failed efforts to overhaul the health system, said Andrew Stern, president of the Service Employees International Union.

"This is an opportunity to deepen the education work and build the ultimate coalition for change before it's demonized or people try to oppose it," he said.

After the first health comments poured in to the transition Web site, Aronson made a second video, this time with Daschle, seated in shirt sleeves and a tie.

"We want to make sure you understand how important those comments and your contributions are," Daschle says into the camera. "Already we've begun to follow through with some of the ideas."

Daschle praises the suggestion of creating a "Health Corps" of volunteers, modeled after President John F. Kennedy's Peace Corps.

Aronson, who was a congressional health aide to incoming White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, then recounts the story of a small businesswoman struggling to provide affordable health insurance to her workers.

Says Daschle: "When I was in the Senate, it was stories like that, probably more than all the factual information, that really moved you to want to act."

Research director Lucy Shackelford contributed to this report.

By Ceci Connolly
© 2008 The Washington Post Company

Add a Comment See all 38 Comments
by bjcone8559 December 4, 2008 11:29 AM PST
What we are seeing is the dawning of a 21st century administration. After Obama, never again will a president and vice-president get away with operating in the shadows like we have seen with the Bush/Cheney regime.

Obama is pulling wisdom from the masses! What an incredible move in the direction of democracy! Once again we will see a government of, by and for the people.

Having said that, concerning the topic of healthcare.

My wife is a board certified Nurse Practioner. We have been watching carefully as more and more ''urgent-care, walk-in clinics'' are opening. This is the wave of the future in family medical care. Nurse Practioners are competitent to provide normal family care and are paid less than doctors.

Imagine if the insurance companies were taken out of the equation and instead we had a system in place which would direct people to walk-in clinics for basic care instead of making the emergency room the only option for tens of millions of Americans. Think of the money that would be saved. Rather than writing off a $500 ER visit, the cost per visit would be about $60.

You''re paying for it now, folks, with your tax dollars, obscene insurance rates, higher hospital costs etc. Why not a single-payer plan that will save every one of us thousands each year?
Reply to this comment
by credibility2 December 4, 2008 11:45 AM PST
Unfortunately, far too many of the masses Obama will be relying upon for "help" aren''t exactly the brightest bulbs in the socket. More attempts at a socialistic society where the "many" continue to demand and have their hands outstretched just because they feel it''s their right to do so. Grass-roots translates to those who aren''t self-motivated, self-accountable, self-reliant or independent from a government that does everything and anything for them. The gravy train in forming right now; all aboard!
Reply to this comment
by bjcone8559 December 4, 2008 11:46 AM PST
Besides that, I don''''t want my records online available to anybody that wants to look at them, include insurance companies. What''''s between my doctor and myself is protected under confidentiality laws...and I want to choose what doctor I visit...I don''''t want to be sent to whatever doctor they tell me to go to....skrew that.

Who does this commie bastward think he''''s kidding?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by RowdynTex


Afraid your church will find out about your multiple abortions?
Reply to this comment
by bjcone8559 December 4, 2008 11:48 AM PST
Unfortunately, far too many of the masses Obama will be relying upon for "help" aren''''t exactly the brightest bulbs in the socket.

Posted by Credibility2


And you are??
ROFLMAO!!!!
Reply to this comment
by sandy19731 December 4, 2008 11:59 AM PST
Besides that, I don''''t want my records online available to anybody that wants to look at them, include insurance companies. What''''s between my doctor and myself is protected under confidentiality laws...and I want to choose what doctor I visit...I don''''t want to be sent to whatever doctor they tell me to go to....skrew that.

Who does this commie bastward think he''''s kidding?

Posted by RowdynTex at 11:43 AM : Dec 04, 2008

You don''t want the people in charge of paying for your medical treatment to know what your medical treatment is?
How does that work?


Reply to this comment
by tx4obama December 4, 2008 12:14 PM PST
Why can''t United States have a healthcare plan like Canada does (which is free to everyone)? Why can''t we have a health care plan that when you need a simple surgery, like gallblader, all you have to pay is $8.00 like Canadians paying right now?

Ok, you may have to choose only from a small list of doctors, but heck, that''s what HMO and DMO doing right now.

Can''t wait until Jan 20, 2009. It''s the day that we celebrate end of an error.
Reply to this comment
by cariboubarbi December 4, 2008 12:46 PM PST


American companies are at a disadvantage because they have to pay for employees health care and their competitors abroad don''t. All the other major industrialized nations in the world have national health care.







Reply to this comment
by Sandymarie December 4, 2008 1:30 PM PST
My medical providers recently uploaded all of their files into a ''national medical database''. They have pictures of all patients and ALL medical information physical, mental, substance abuse, etc. I was provided a form to opt out of the national database (even tho my records were already uploaded). Upon requesting, in writing & verbally, that my records be removed from the database, I was told that I would not be allowed to see a doctor. As I was in for lab results and prescription renewals, I felt I had no choice but to comply. I believe this method of medical record-keeping is insecure and inaccurate. The medical personnel sit nose-to-monitor and I interact with whichever ear is facing in my direction. I would not be surprised to find that this system is also being used as a time-management watchdog to monitor the performance of medical personnel. Physicians and staff have been nervous and pre-occupied since all this came about. I feel violated and no longer confident in the care that is being provided. Too many people are ''locked into'' situations by pre-existing conditions, preferred provider lists and limited or no insurance coverage.
Reply to this comment
by bjcone8559 December 4, 2008 1:58 PM PST
Too many people are ''''locked into'''' situations by pre-existing conditions, preferred provider lists and limited or no insurance coverage.




Posted by yia50yia at 01:30 PM


American companies are at a disadvantage because they have to pay for employees health care and their competitors abroad don''''t. All the other major industrialized nations in the world have national health care.












Posted by CaribouBarbi at 12:46 PM

Why can''''t United States have a healthcare plan like Canada does (which is free to everyone)? Why can''''t we have a health care plan that when you need a simple surgery, like gallblader, all you have to pay is $8.00 like Canadians paying right now?

Ok, you may have to choose only from a small list of doctors, but heck, that''''s what HMO and DMO doing right now.

Can''''t wait until Jan 20, 2009. It''''s the day that we celebrate end of an error.


Posted by TX4Obama at 12:14


The solution to all of these concerns is a ''single-payer'' plan that takes the insurance companies out of the equation. If Obama is serious about culling out the lobbyists he might get it done.
Reply to this comment
by bjcone8559 December 4, 2008 2:03 PM PST
Time, as they say, is on my side now.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by thgdriver1



Sorry pal... you republicans are out of time! You are a thing of the past, a relic, a dinosour. The republican party will be mentioned briefly in history books along with the Whigs.
Reply to this comment
by bjcone8559 December 4, 2008 2:05 PM PST
What a load of socialist bull *****. Socialized medicine does not work. Tax rates would have to be so high to cover the expenses of socialized medicine that it would be too burdonsome for the tax payers. Obama''''s plan to sit down with the medical industry and get them to lower healthcare cost won''''t work either.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by redbds



You''re not very bright, and you don''t pay attention either.
Reply to this comment
by bjcone8559 December 4, 2008 2:07 PM PST
Maybe you should move your socialist asz to Canada.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by redbds


See what I mean? Sorry, of course you don''t.
Reply to this comment
by redbds December 4, 2008 2:08 PM PST
The solution to all of these concerns is a ''''single-payer'''' plan that takes the insurance companies out of the equation. If Obama is serious about culling out the lobbyists he might get it done.

Posted by nowaymcgoo at 01:58 PM : Dec 04, 2008

What the hell is this "single payer" plan you are talking about?
Reply to this comment
by bjcone8559 December 4, 2008 2:08 PM PST
What the hell is this "single payer" plan you are talking about?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by redbds


Wow, I sure nailed that one!
Reply to this comment
by redbds December 4, 2008 2:15 PM PST
These people can''''t be this stupid. They''''ve got to be people fooling around. Although a lot of them did voter for George "The Moron" Bush, and Sarah "Trailer Park Trash" Palin.
The number one quality required to be a republican is stunning gullibility. Stupidity is number two.
They go well together.

Posted by johndevinejr at 02:11 PM : Dec 04, 2008

You can continue to call names all you want. The fact is that Obama is slowly backing out of all the promises he made to buy votes. He is starting to sound more like John McCain and George Bush than the original versions. He isn''t even the President yet. But, I am giving him the benefit of the doubt. After all he is actually much less liberal than he convinced all of you he was.
Reply to this comment
by redbds December 4, 2008 2:21 PM PST
Posted by TX4Obama at 12:14

Freeeeeeeeeeee???? You are stupid enough to believe it''''s FREEEEEEEEEE!!!!! OMG! Now that''''s hilarious!

Posted by RowdynTex at 02:18 PM : Dec 04, 2008

Liberals just don''t get it. If the government is paying for it then it isn''t free. Unless you are a liberal welfare hag that doesn''t pay taxes. In that case it would be free.
Reply to this comment
by redbds December 4, 2008 2:26 PM PST
I''''m making a list of all the free stuff I want

Posted by jgg0003 at 02:24 PM : Dec 04, 2008

Yeah. I can''t wait until after Jan 20 either. I heard that my mortgage and car payments would be paid by the government.
Reply to this comment
by cariboubarbi December 4, 2008 2:42 PM PST


Wingnuts,


Your country voted overwhelmingly for change. The time for petty partisan hate is over. If you can''t help, just get out of the way.




Reply to this comment
by chitown4716 December 4, 2008 2:52 PM PST
Liberals just don''''t get it. If the government is paying for it then it isn''''t free. Unless you are a liberal welfare hag that doesn''''t pay taxes. In that case it would be free.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by redbds

Yeah sure, lets continue that MYTH that ALL republicans have jobs and are law abiding productive citizens.

The truth is that most republicans are middle to lower class to desperately poor.
Reply to this comment
by seriously121 December 4, 2008 3:16 PM PST
Give him a chance guys. He''s doing an incredible job. I say we all go down to Washington and help Bush move out of the White House tomorrow so Obama can go ahead and work it out.

Brother''s Gonna Work It Out!!!
Reply to this comment
by nolle61 December 4, 2008 3:25 PM PST
What happened to all the "Change", Mr. Obama? It looks as if you''re forming another Clinton administration.

You''re going to get a bad case of whiplash trying to please all those who helped you raise over three quarters of a Billion dollars (that''s $750,000,000.00 for those with mathematical deficits). How many homeless people could have had a nice Thanksgiving dinner with that kind of cash, huh?

How much do you "owe" Move On dot Org and your not so exclusive buddy, Oprah?

All I can say is good luck trying to please everyone in your new congress.
Reply to this comment
by nolle61 December 4, 2008 3:28 PM PST
I must remind you "Seriously", that President George W. Bush is still our leader (hence the "President" part). He''s not going anywhere.

It is ridiculous to even suggest that a sitting President resign because you''re eager for the next guy to step in. This is not Burger King!!

Now, get back to work. Someone wants fries with that.
Reply to this comment
by seriously121 December 4, 2008 3:36 PM PST
Please excuse me nolle61. I try to make the day go by with a joke in there. But obviously there''s a stick somewhere up there this afternoon. But I truly hope you enjoy the rest of your day. Don''t forget getting them a large soda when you serve them.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 December 4, 2008 3:42 PM PST
As I read through the post I noticed one thing neo cons are really desparte now a days. They see change and yet they keep saying see no change. They are going to be suprised when Obama and teams hit the ground running and change takes them head over heals. But then they want him to fail because their king did. Don''t worry neo cons you little babies will be crying for a generation becuase that is how long it is going to take to get over the mess you left us in just 8 years.

Now that said go cry yell but we swing voters decided the election not the deciders like the nut case neo cons who must have though that 2006 was a fluke. Still think that way when we say jump you jump then ask how high.

That said if Obama and the Democrats do as they are told it will be a long time before you see any power again.
Reply to this comment
by seriously121 December 4, 2008 3:45 PM PST
Ditto antoniof123. Well said!!!
Reply to this comment
by seriously121 December 4, 2008 3:48 PM PST
jgg0003 Now that''s funny!!! But guess what, that''s the joke...THEY CAN!!! And can''t NOBODY say a word. Even if they have a cookout on the White House lawn serving fried chicken, potato salad and watermellon aint a darned thing anybody can say. That''s the part that''s so beautiful.
Reply to this comment
by seriously121 December 4, 2008 3:52 PM PST
You and me both!!! LOL
Reply to this comment
by seriously121 December 4, 2008 3:54 PM PST
For the love of Pete...It was a joke, lighten up everybody. We are coming to the close of a long day. Chill!!!
Reply to this comment
by questionnews December 4, 2008 3:58 PM PST
That said if Obama and the Democrats do as they are told it will be a long time before you see any power again.

Posted by antoniof123 at 03:42 PM : Dec 04, 2008

Who is telling Obama & the Democrats what to do? Is there an elected office higher & with more power than the POTUS?
Reply to this comment
by walt1944-2009 December 4, 2008 3:58 PM PST
There is an old saying that you can please some of the people, some of the time, but you could never please ALL the people, ALL the time!

Very true, as Obama is discovering!

Progressives and Liberals are upset that Obama''s cabinet picks haven''t been "liberal" enough and that he is "back peddling" on campaign promises he made, mostly on tax issues. They feel cheated!

Neocon Fascist Nazi Republicans and Corporate and Financial America are smiling that Obama is doing exactly what the Great Emperor Bush II would do, thus giving us the nightmare prospect of a 3rd term of George W. Bush!!! They feel vindicated!!!

It might be reminded that the Great Emperor Bush II pleased only 20% of the people in the 8 years of his rule, while 80% cursed and grumbled (and still are!).
If Obama doesn''t watch it, his approval rating could go in the tank with George Bush''s.

Still, it could always be worse. Remember, like bird dung, there are more "Bush''s" out there, especially one named Jeb who will be looking to "improve" on his father''s and brother''s "legacy"!

SIG HEIL, YOU''LL NEVER BE RID OF A BUSH!!!, BUSH!!!
SIG HEIL, HOW ABOUT IF I PLEASE SOME OF THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME???, OBAMA!!!
Reply to this comment
by berniew4 December 4, 2008 4:06 PM PST
OBAMA is doing great. OHH YEAHH Someone tell me one thing he is doing. Since his election the economy is getting worst which he loves so it can be at bottom when he is inaugurated and drive it further down !! BUT he has the greatest excuse of all . No matter what happens JUST BLAME BUSH
Reply to this comment
by bjcone8559 December 4, 2008 5:00 PM PST
Hey wingnuts!!

I''ll tell you who is going to tell whom what to do!!

We''re going to tell YOU what to do!!

We have the majority!!

We have the Whitehouse!!

We have Congress!!

Soon we will have the supreme court!!

OH YEAH! We''re going to tell all you neocons what to do for at least the next eight years, by then your precious republican party will be nothing but a bad memory!

SOOOO... SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP!!!



LOL!
Reply to this comment
by bekumbokem December 4, 2008 6:13 PM PST
Hey! nowaymcgoon. How do you propose that is gonna happen? You and hussein gonna outlaw democracy in the US? We conservatives ain''t afraid of your threats. hussein & all the other lazy a**ed liberals are gonna be run out of office within the next two years. He is a loser. Oh, he may occupy the WH until the end of his term but he will be moot. Lazy loser liberals cannot pull this depression of a hat with giveaways. You is gonna eat them words!
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10000 December 4, 2008 6:15 PM PST
nowaymcgoo said, "We''re going to tell all you neocons what to do for at least the next eight years... SOOOO... SIT DOWN AND SHUT UP!!!
---

As a supporter of Obama, I am careful to remember Obama, himself, speaks of American politics in our near-future as "post-partisan".

Another way of putting that is partisan gloating is really off the mark-- starting November 4, 2008.

Obama has reached out to all members of congress and to the American people for unity in a time of great national crisis-- two wars, a ruined economy, a decayed infrastructure, a flagging sense of direction and partisan bickering.

If a true national consensus about constructive action and vigorous recovery benefits all Americans, then we should put away our campaign hats and confetti, and realize we must work with our fellow Americans.

The time for gloating is long past. It is time to go to work for our country.
Reply to this comment
by alphaa10000 December 4, 2008 6:22 PM PST
bekumbokem said, "... Lazy loser liberals cannot pull this depression of a hat with giveaways..."
---

You do not have to be a Democrat to understand the conservative push begun by Newt Gingrich and the GOP in 1995 is well past.

But tea and sympathy from Faux News Network will not give you much direction for the future-- Faux News certainly misjudged this country and the American people.

There is now a new consensus on what it means to be American. Eventually, you must get off your wooden horse, and realize partisan cant will not pull your wagon, anymore.
Reply to this comment
by papabc December 4, 2008 6:31 PM PST
Say not the State ordered and run Healthcare

Encourage Healthcare that is
1. Free Market
2. Reasonable in price
3. Even the lowest Income can afford to take part.

Reply to this comment
by questionnews December 4, 2008 6:39 PM PST
I see the CBS censor is in full God mode today. What''s with deleting posts that were on subject, no foul language, legitimate points (even those that are partisan) and expressed some diverse points of view.
I noticed there seems to be a pattern of deleting the back & forth posts between people. Do they expect people not to respond to another people?? That''s half the fun as long as it''s civil!!
I also expect them to delete this post, but it''s out there for a couple minutes.
Reply to this comment
by wardoglrs December 5, 2008 3:47 AM PST
WMR has learned from knowledgeable Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) sources that the Bush administration is putting the final touches on a plan that would see martial law declared in the United States with various scenarios anticipated as triggers. The triggers include a continuing economic collapse with massive social unrest, bank closures resulting in violence against financial institutions, and another fraudulent presidential election that would result in rioting in major cities and campuses around the country.
Webmaster''s Commentary:

I am starting to wonder if this issue over Obama''s Birth Certificate is the mechanism by which Bush plans to trigger riots allowing him to declare a national emergency.
Reply to this comment
See all 38 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs