The Real Price Of The Auto Bailout
Some Estimates As High As $75 Billion-$125 Billion To Save Industry, Reports CBS' Sharyl Attkisson
-
-
Photo
General Motors Chief Executive Officer Richard Wagoner testifies on Capitol Hill, Thursday, Dec. 4, 2008, at a Senate Banking Committee hearing on the proposed $34 billion bailout of American automakers. (CBS)
-
Photo
Auto executives, from left, General Motors Chief Executive Officer Richard Wagoner, UAW President Ron Gettelfinger, Ford Chief Executive Officer Alan Mulally, and Chrysler Chief Executive Officer Robert Nardelli, testify on Capitol Hill in Washington, Dec. 4, 2008, before a Senate Banking Committee hearing on the auto industry bailout. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
-
Photo
Jim Press, president and vice chairman of Chrysler, addresses a town hall rally at the AMPORTS ATC Terminal, Tuesday Dec. 2, 2008, in Baltimore. (AP)
-
Photo
Hummers are lined up at the Huber Cadillac, Hummer and Saab dealership in Omaha, Neb. in this March 26, 2007 file photo. Hummer parent General Motors and the other Detroit automakers are clamoring for a $34 billion bailout. But they're facing resistance from lawmakers critical of the companies' management and past decisions — like pushing the Hummer line. (AP Photo/Nati Harnik)
-
Photo
United Auto Workers members listen to UAW President Ron Gettelfinger speak at a news conference at a meeting of UAW officials in Detroit, Dec. 3, 2008. (AP Photo/Paul Sancya)
-
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Will $34 Billion Be Enough?
The CEOs of Detroit's Big Three automakers returned to Capitol Hill in an effort to get an emergency $34 billion from Congress. As Sharyl Attkisson reports, this bailout may not be enough.
-
Video
UAW Offers Help To Big Three
The CEO's of the big three auto makers are on the road in an effort to sway Congress towards a bailout while the United Auto Workers Union offers support to save the Big Three. Susan Roberts has more.
-
Video
A Tale Of Two Factories
An Ala. Hyundai plant is seeing success during tough economic times for the auto industry, while employees at a GM plant in Detroit are on pins and needles. Mark Strassmann reports.
-
In-Depth
Q&A: Big Three Bailout?
Why Detroit's automakers might get a rescue package
-
Fast Facts
GM Moves
General Motors announces cuts to salaried jobs, production, dividend to raise turnaround cash.
After the six-hour hearing before the Senate Banking Committee, General Motors Corp. CEO Rick Wagoner said he's optimistic that Congress will reach an agreement to help his company survive its critical cash shortage.
Wagoner said he's encouraged that Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn., expressed an interest in staying in Washington until a rescue plan can be crafted
But with time on the current Congress running out, opposition to the bailout appeared to be as strong as last week - before Detroit's Big Three auto chiefs returned to Congress with more detailed plans on how they would spend the money.
And congressional analysts said one bailout plan under consideration would fall short of what the carmakers want.
Several lawmakers in both parties are pressing the automakers to consider a so-called "pre-packaged" bankruptcy in which they would negotiate with creditors in advance and downsize, then file for Chapter 11 protection in hopes of emerging quickly as stronger companies. The Big Three have publicly shunned the notion, saying it would kill sales by destroying customers' confidence - but executives have indicated in recent days that it might ultimately be necessary.
The executives all agreed in Thursday's hearing that a multibillion-dollar bailout deal would include a supervisory government board that could order major restructuring of the companies if deemed necessary for survival - similar to the results in many reorganizing efforts under bankruptcy law.
Perhaps the harshest dose of reality came from economist Mark Zandi, reports CBS News' Sharyl Attkisson
"The $34 billion in loans requested by the Big Three will not be sufficient for them to avoid bankruptcy at some point in the next two years. They would ultimately need, in my view, somewhere between $75 billion and $125 billion to avoid this fate."
The automakers may know that. CBS News dug into the numbers and found they're actually seeking way more money than they appear to be:
In addition to the $34 billion at issue today - $18 billion for GM, $7 billion for Chrysler and $9 billion for Ford - each company has applied for billions of dollars in federal funds from the Department of Energy, another $8 billion for GM, $8.5 billion for Chrysler and $5 billion for Ford. On top of that, they're seeking a piece of the $700 billion bailout fund aimed at Wall Street, though they haven't publicly disclosed the amounts.
That puts the real taxpayer sticker shock somewhere above $55.5 billion.
United Auto Worker union President Ron Gettelfinger, aligned with the industry in pressing for the aid, told senators at that any kind of bankruptcy, even a pre-packaged one, was not "a viable option." Gettelfinger said consumers would not buy autos from bankrupt companies, no matter the terms of the arrangement.
He also warned that in the absence of action by Congress: "I believe we could lose General Motors by the end of this month." He said the situation was dire and time was of the essence.
Meanwhile, Rep. Barney Frank, a Democrat, who has been dealing with both the financial bailout and the auto rescue proposal as chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said President-elect Barack Obama needs to play a more significant role on economic issues.
"He's going to have to be more assertive than he's been," Frank said at a Consumer Federation of America conference in Washington. "At a time of great crisis with mortgage foreclosures and autos, he says we only have one president at a time. I'm afraid that overstates the number of presidents we have. He's got to remedy that situation."
At the Capitol building, the Big Three chief executives told the senators they hoped to make amends for past blunders. "We made mistakes, which we're learning from," General Motors chief executive Rick Wagoner said. Ford chief executive Alan Mulally also acknowledged big mistakes, saying his company's approach once was "You build it, they will come."
Chrysler CEO Bob Nardelli made similar comments in an interview with CBS News anchor Katie Couric Thursday.
"We produced more vehicles than our customers wanted, then slashed prices," he said. But as a result of these past mistakes, "we are really focused," he said.
I believe we could lose General Motors by the end of this month.
Ron Gettelfinger, president, United Auto WorkersBut congressional budget analysts have privately told top Democrats that tapping that program wouldn't come close to covering the $34 billion that carmakers now say they need to survive.
It would yield only $10 billion to $15 billion in short-term loans, the analysts claimed, according to congressional officials who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to disclose the analysis.
The Big Three executives made the trip from Detroit in new-model hybrid autos made by their respective companies, two weeks after a botched appeal for $25 billion in which they were chided for flying on private jets to beg for money.
Nardelli promised that his company, recipient of a previous government-subsidized rescue loan in the 1970s that it repaid, would repay taxpayers by 2012 and would devote itself to manufacturing "fuel-efficient cars and trucks that people want to buy."
The Big Three executives said they would be willing to work under a federal oversight board as a condition for receiving financial aid from the government.
Dodd and several others on the panel asked them if they would agree to a setup like the one established for the U.S. bailout of Chrysler Corp. in 1979.
Sen. Mike Crapo, a Republican, said such an oversight board would be "basically a federal restructuring trustee" with some of the same powers as a bankruptcy court.
"I did not hear any objection from any of the three of you to the establishment of an oversight board or whatever we call it, of a federal oversight entity that has the literal authority to impose restructuring conditions and to enforce those as a matter of law as these dollars are utilized. Am I correct?" Crapo asked.
The three answered in the affirmative, although Ford's Mulally said, "I probably need to think about that a little bit. It sounds right, but I just don't know all of the implications of that."
Sen. Richard Shelby, the senior Republican on the panel, complained that the pricetag on the package had jumped since the trio last appeared just two weeks ago. He pressed the automakers to explain why, and to justify how such aid would not simply "prop up a failed business model for a few months ... and how are you going to pay it back to the taxpayers?"
Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd, a Democrat, supports helping the industry, but said that detailed plans submitted earlier this week on how the companies would use low-cost federal loans to reorganize still left a lot of questions unanswered.
But Dodd also said that doing nothing "plays Russian roulette with the entire economy of the United States."
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 12
- next
See all 596 Commentscrawled the last 5 miles on their knees barefooted, holding a picture of the Virgin mary in one hand and
hitting their backsides with a heavy piece of waterhose,
that wouls show humility.
CBS laying off the proofreaders?
Is this a bailout or a loan that will be paid back?
It is still full of greedy and corrupt politicians except that a larger majority are now Democrats.
When will ignorant Americans really understand their power to protest?
Better known as:
Dumb, Dumber, Dumbest, Dumberer, Dumbest of all.
In no particular order.
They all speak as if the know what they are doing.
Children should not play with dangerous weapons nor should Politicians be given any money to dole out to their contributors.
They are all thieves.
Good investment on their part, they get billions in free loans which they will never pay back.
The money went to those who are deciding if they get the loans.
This is pure criminal and Dodd is the ring leader.
They should all be arrested....
What a joke this is...
It''s survival of the fittest, not intelligent design.
These democrats are getting to be as dumb as their republican counterparts.
At least they drove to this meeting in brand new cars instead of flying. That''s a small lesson in humility.
At least they drove to this meeting in brand new cars instead of flying. That''''s a small lesson in humility.
Posted by daffy64 at 11:25 AM : Dec 04, 2008
Its called seliing their stock options, they have millions of them. Govt. gives them their money, stocks go up in value and wham they start selling them.
We are idiots if they get any money. This is criminal.
It is still full of greedy and corrupt politicians except that a larger majority are now Democrats.
When will ignorant Americans really understand their power to protest?
----------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------
Posted by BailThisOut at 11:08 AM : Dec 04, 2008
Just in case you don''''t understand. Right this minute the President of the United States is George Bush. No new Democratic Congressmen or Senators have taken their seats.
It is the same government as it was on November 1, 2008, Nothing will change until January 20, 2009.
So the question must be asked; How far IS your head up your A$$ ?
Posted by johndevinejr at 11:26 AM : Dec 04, 2008
Oh please, are you mentally challenged, Obama was for change because the lemmings wanted to hear that. Now he is on power and brought in all of the same old.
It was all a lie, but the left is clueless because they hated President Bush so much, they don''t really care nor can they state matter of factually what "change" is.
Are we out of IRAQ earlier? No
The list is very long.
The new "Change" is "Same"
If it weren''''t for the workers I would say to let them all go down the tubes. At the very least the entire management of these companies should be replaced.
And NOBODY deserves the salaries these guys get.
Posted by johndevinejr at 11:30 AM : Dec 04, 2008
Management needs to fired and the UAW disbanded.
Congress is leaving town in a few days, when they return, it''s a new game, new boss.
Too bad.
------------------------------------
This is an impossible situation. As long as the $73/$44 inbalance remains, there is no way the big 3 can survive even with federal assistance.
Chapter 11 would give the big 3 the chance to bring the inbalance more in line with non-Detroit producers and thereby be competitive. Congress needs to make the big 3 demonstrate how, by using present day cost cutting and UAW approved concessions this imbalance can be cured. Failing that, there is no cure.
Finally, exactly the truth.
Republicans have been trained to revile and hate the middle class and they will go to any ends to destroy it - including killing America. Why? Because they believe that if you were really worthy you''d be rich, but since most Republicans aren''t rich they need someone to blame for their "failure" - and that means others of their own class. The real rich benefit greatly from this belief system so they encourage it.
The UAW (and unions in general) are symbols of middle class stability and non-corporate power, so of course they companies want to destroy them. But since unions have been declining into oblivion for at least the last 50 years and are really no longer a force in society the mindless shilling of the renojmc''s of the world become increasingly bizarre and out of context.
Either way we go in this debacle we (and by "we" I mean the US) lose: we gave away a whole bunch of our taxdollars to the rich OR GM goes out of business and millions of jobs are lost.
It''s a Republican wet dream.
America can BUY this company for 5.5 billion, install competent leadership for a reasonable salary and produce electric vehicles with the EV technology they buried in 1995 and tell the sheiks to lube with their oil and pound sand, putting MILLIONS of Americans to work on new and innovative industry, all for a fraction of the LOAN amount.
Problem solved.
NEXT!
Socialized medicine.
There, solved it for you.
Inferior designs %u2013 No stability, reliability, and safety
Inferior engineering %u2013 Built in obsolescence, poor performance, and mileage
Management %u2013 Bureaucratic and Intellectual gridlock
Union %u2013 Intellectual gridlock
Employees - Drive foreign cars
Marketing %u2013 Primordial
Sales %u2013 Conmen, alcoholics, drug addicts, criminals, tough-guys, and ego maniacs
There, solved it for you.
Posted by jumkey at 11:50 AM : Dec 04, 2008
and whose tax dollars should go to paying for the health care for the poor and unemployed? Not mine, i already have Blue Cross coverage though my job and my rates are very low. Why should I help pay for someone elses health care when I''m doing just fine on my own. Besides we have a population problem.
Morons - businesses run selfishly and stupidly are the reasons for our economy problems.
One way or the other, you''re paying.
Wouldn''t it be smarter to find an organized way to make sure you''re NOT paying for the spillover costs?
all the workers could go out of the country to work in foreign factories and send thier checks back home.
Bring down the cost of the new 2008-2009 cars already built - sell them ALL and see where that takes them before taxpayers and good workers take the hit.
about the "multiplier effect" of either up or down economies and remind you that you wanted the Big 3 underwater. How come $700 billion for paper masterbaiters with no strings and nothing for those who work with their hands who have to provide business plans to CONgress. Now there''s a group that knows nothing of business!!
Posted by lady_organs at 11:54 AM : Dec 04, 2008
good idea, go and get one of those home imporvemnt books and you can fix just about anytihng in your house. I have not hired a repair person in years and everything in my house is maintained just fine.
Posted by lady_organs
Rewarding failure is not socialism ...moron. I''m no a "liberal either" Sticks and stone may break my bones but words will never harm me. Get a brain
ou should have your medical insurance taken away. Its a cost to the employer!
Posted by lady_organs at 11:57 AM : Dec 04, 2008
Then I would leave and go somewhere else. There is still demand for what I do even in a recession. Besides the company could not afford to lose the amount of revenue i generate each year, heck I''m at 109% for the year so I am just basically killing time coming in here everyday my year is finished. What they pay for my families health care is a drop in the bucket compaired to what I generate for our shareholders.
Posted by lady_organs at 12:00 PM : Dec 04, 2008
Why, when you could instead keep all of your money by doing a little work? This way the illegals go home and place a burden on their govt''s, where the burden belongs, and I have more money.
That should have been followed by "and because of our mistakes, our organizations are facing bankruptcy. So we''re replacing all upper management, and each of us is resigning."
Perhaps UAW president should resign first,then all other Moron''s CEO.
She is the troll gop_will_win, gophockeymom, gop_4ever, paidgopschill, and others.
Don''t respond, she is the epitomy of the hypocritical Christian.
let these 3 bloated dinosaur *** makers die off,
its better for competition.
Thia guy is an IDIOT. He will run the U.S. down the drain. The U.S. will go broke with him running the Banking Committee. He must GO.
Posted by bm6005 at 11:59 AM : Dec 04, 2008
You are so right and Pauly is allowing it to be business and usual. He has not used any of the power to watch over the wall street crowd and neither has Bush.
They will rape us right up until the end then Bush will grant pardons like we have never seen before.
Don''t forget this it was the worst in American history the first 8 years of this century.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
...
- 12
- next
See all 596 Comments