Bush To Ease "Mountaintop Mining" Rule
Environmental Groups Furious At "Gift" To Coal Mining Industry In Waning Days Of Bush Administration
-
-
Photo
In this Feb. 14, 2008 file photo, demonstrators rally against mountaintop removal coal mining on the Capitol steps in Frankfort, Ky. The protesters urged lawmakers to pass a bill that could curb what they say is a devastating form of coal mining that obliterates mountaintops and ruins the environment. Now the Bush administration is moving to ease enviornmental protections related to mountaintop mining. (AP Photo/Ed Reinke)
-
Photo
A mountaintop removal coal mining site at Kayford Mountain, W.Va. with Coal River Mountain, left, in the background. In the controversial practice, forests are clear cut and holes are drilled to blast apart rock. Massive machines, some with buckets big enough to hold 24 compact cars, scoop coal from the exposed seams. (AP Photo/Jeff Gentner)
-
Photo
A dump truck moves dirt and rock from a mountaintop removal coal mine near Hazard, Ky., in this Dec. 9, 2005 file photo. Environmental groups are furious about a rule change being issued in the waning days of the Bush administration that would ease stream protections near mountaintop mining sites. (AP Photo/Roger Alford)
-
-
In The Spotlight
West Virginia Mining Tragedy
Video Coverage: Stunned West Virginia town where joy turned to despair after news of all, except one, trapped miners are dead.
North Carolina-based Appalachian Voices and other groups blasted Tuesday's Environmental Protection Agency decision to endorse the mining rule as the death of freshwater streams and the likely start of a new surge in mountaintop removal surface mining across Virginia, West Virginia, Tennessee and Kentucky.
Although the regulation would apply nationwide, mountaintop removal operations are of special interest in Appalachia, where surface mines now outnumber those underground.
An EPA study estimated 400,000 acres of forest were wiped out and nearly 724 miles of streams buried between 1985 and 2001 by mountaintop mining, in which forests are clear cut and holes are drilled to blast apart rock. Massive machines, some with buckets big enough to hold 24 compact cars, scoop coal from the exposed seams.
The rock and dirt left behind is dumped into adjacent valleys, changing the natural shape of the earth, lowering the height of the mountain and covering streams.
The rule, proposed by the federal Office of Surface Mining and expected to take effect next month, would govern how mining companies can encroach into a buffer zone designed to protect streams. The Bush administration finalized the rule Wednesday and it will be published in the Federal Register later this month.
West Virginia attorney Joe Lovett, who has filed several lawsuits over mountaintop removal mining, said the rule essentially handicaps Obama, taking away a tool his administration could use to rein in the practice.
"For the industry, this is a parting gift," Lovett said.
But the National Mining Association says environmentalists are misrepresenting the rule as a free pass for Big Coal. It argues operators will have to conduct even more rigorous, time-consuming analyses of their disposal plans before mining begins.
"The rule does not make it easier to conduct mining activities within the stream buffer zone," said NMA spokeswoman Carol Raulston.
Dumping excess rock and soil has always been allowed, she said, as long as operators comply with federal water quality laws.
"Enforcing a law and removing a law are two different things," countered Naoma resident Vernon Haltom, co-director of Coal River Mountain Watch, an environmental group trying to stop a mountaintop mine and preserve the site for a wind farm.Read the Office of Surface Mining's comparison of the old and proposed new rules governing mountaintop mining and waste disposal.
"To me," he said, "it's the difference between having traffic cops that are sleeping on the job and having no speed limit."
Lawmakers and the governors of Kentucky and Tennessee had urged the EPA to block the regulation.
At issue is how to interpret regulatory language that says surface mining operations can't disturb land within 100 feet of a perennial or intermittent stream.
Kentucky Coal Association President Bill Caylor said that if mining operations had to stay back 100 feet from every ephemeral stream - one that grows when it rains and dries up when it doesn't - there would be no place to put leftover rock and dirt.
"The environmentalists are misleading the public into believing that this regulation will allow us to dump waste into rivers and dam up rivers," Caylor said. "I don't know how to respond to that. It's just not true."
But Appalachian Voices, which maintains the ilovemountains.org Web site, estimates 470 mountains have already been destroyed.
EPA's action this week is "absolutely egregious," said Appalachian Voices program director Matt Wasson. "It's just an exclamation point on what we've been seeing for the last eight years.
"It's about making it easier for a few coal companies to engage in mountaintop removal."
Wasson's group launched a campaign Wednesday urging Obama to stop mountaintop mining during his first 100 days. Comments posted through ilovemountains will go directly to the Obama Transition Team Web site.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Read the Office of Surface Mining's comparison of the old and proposed new rules governing mountaintop mining and waste disposal.



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 89 Comments**************************************
What does Bush care that children and animals are poisoned by toxic waste. He has got to be the most evil person that has ever graced the halls of the Whitehouse. Fortunately, the next administration can undo most of his damage.
Some shepherd of our resources. He herds our future off a cliff.
EVIL. DESPICABLE. CLUELESS. And ultimately, a gift to Democrats. Republican politicians are a plague on America.
Any person of conscience would immediately leave that party and repent.
Don''t expect to see much of it.
Do not collect a dime.
***************
It really makes you wonder if they truly care about the unborn.
In the past years, Bush revealed his flaws inadvertently, but prolifically.
Now, he exposes he royal posterior deliberately. Is there any real difference?
How the man can live with himself?
Why doesn''t he take one of those really long vacations until Jan. 20th?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jedi23231 at 01:44 AM
Wow. We must be doing just swell under Bushy''s leadership according to you.
A destroyer of anything and everything in America and around the world. That is Bush''s legacy and Rove can try to white wash it, but people will still see through it.
Bog down military in illegal war. (check)
Cripple economy. (check)
Destroy Landscape. (check)
Mountain top mining has reduced jobs. Many miners have lost their jobs because of this method of mining. The big machines do most of the work.
Correction: It is a hate rating of George at 81%.. George Bush has no conscience, he is a threat until he leaves office.
For amber waves of genetically altered grain
For strip mined mountains majesty
Above the flooded plain
Amerikastan, Amerikastan, God shed disgrace on thee
And reels in pain with great distain
From sea to oily sea.
Posted by tonic12345 at 08:07 AM : Dec 04, 2008
______________________
Excellent point, I totally agree.
Just like McCarthy did to the Republicans so will Bush do but McCarthy was only a senator and Bush a President.
Think about how long you will pay for his mess.
He refused to answer.
Evil in the flesh, he will continue to destroy as long as possible.
The George Tennet Room, Complete with a 4%u2019 basketball hoop for easy %u2018slam dunks%u2019.
The Environmental Conservation Room, still empty, but very warm.
The Scooter Libby Room, (Pardon the mess, we%u2019ll have him clean it up for you)
The ''''Decider Room'''' complete with dart board, magic 8-ball, Ouija board, dice, coins, and straws.
The U.S. Constitutional shredder room, Closed to the public until January 21, 2009.
The museum will have an electron microscope to help you locate the President''s accomplishments.
They even have %u2018My Pet Goat%u2019 on tape so you can pause if something important comes up.
Admission: Republicans free; Democrats - $1000 or three Euros. You%u2019ll never wonder %u201CIs our children learning%u201D at the GWB Library, children get in FREE!!! (Our %u2018no child left behind%u2019 offer is valid for children with school vouchers only)%u2026.
The Hurricane Katrina Room, which is still under construction.
The Alberto Gonzales Room, where you won''t be able to remember anything.
The Texas Air National Guard Room, tours optional.
The Walter Reed Hospital Room, where they don''t let you in.
The Guantanamo Bay Room, where they don''t let you out.
The Weapons of Mass Destruction Room, which no one has been able to find.
The National Debt room which is huge and has no ceiling.
The ''''Tax Cut'''' Room with entry only to the wealthy.
The Donald Rumsfeld Room, Not the room you would want to visit, or room wish you had visited%u2026
The ''''Economy Room'''' which is in the toilet.
The Iraq War Room. After you complete your first tour, they make you go back for a second, third, fourth, and sometimes fifth tour.
The *** Cheney Room, in the famous undisclosed location, complete with shotgun gallery.
(cont.)
Posted by lady_organs at 08:38 AM : Dec 04, 2008
------------------------------
While it may be true that one can be arrested for threatening the President, criticism is allowed. It''s called freedom of speech.
This is America, you know.
Posted by lady_organs at 08:38 AM
You''re going to be busy today....
Posted by lady_organs at 08:38 AM : Dec 04, 2008
Oh shove it MORON! You freaks and your "Liberals" BS have gone on for far to long and have done way to much harm. Now go POUND SAND and let people express themselves as they see fit. That Pathetic piece of HUMAN Trash YOU call a President stopped being that a LONG LONG time ago.
Posted by mr22587 at 08:43 AM : Dec 04, 2008
This is our major problem in this nation today. People with a 6th grade education that can''t read or understand the problem. They are easy pray for those who are so greedy they will destroy EVERYTHING. This poor uneducated loser doesn''t have a clue what''s being talked about, he has NEVER once even read the Regulations... he''s just someone who never progressed far enough to thing for himself so he allows those, who HE thinks are strong, to think for him. They are very very sad and should be looked upon in that way. VERY SAD!!
Posted by mr22587 at 08:43 AM
What about electric customers on wind, solar, hydro-electric and nuclear power? Will they die to? Do you have something to scare them with? Can they share in your paranoia?
Posted by jaqmaq
No - it''s wrong to do that as well. It''s because of careless, ceaseless development in wilderness ares of So. Cal. that fires, floods and mudslides have become more destructive over the years.
You choose... Posted by mr22587
-----------
Typical of the binary logic employed by the Limbaughs, Hannitys, Palins and Coulters of this world. Also similar to the analytical processes employed by two-year-olds.
Well done!
You choose...
Posted by mr22587 at 09:11 AM
OR....Get wind, it blows....or how about.....Get geothermal, it rocks....or.....go with the flow, get hydro?
Posted by usclimey
You are right on usclimey! We can have development of malls and highways but there is a right way and a wrong way and a place for all if done with care and concern. It will cost more in the short term but will save countless dollars in the long run. If you know anything what-so-ever about environmentally sound construction methods and practices, you would know it benefits us all now and in the future. If not, take a look at New Orleans and other development in flood plains or absent ocean buffers and tell me how much of you''re paycheck willing to fork over to fix the damage now and forever.
Thanks, Bu$$$h.
Posted by lady_organs
Yes, I am ashamed for alot of reasons but not about my freedom of speech, expression or thoughts. Would you take that away from me too? I would consider you to be an anti-American for criticizing and theatening those who express their disdain for our current dministration.
What''s next?
Bush seems to be on a ''Scorched Earth'' mission.
I''m convinced that the ''Monkey-Boy'' will not be happy until he leaves the Whitehouse smouldering.
Why can''t he occupy himself torturing small animals or squashing bugs for the next 47 days?
-rukus888-
Posted by lady_organs at 08:32 AM : Dec 04, 2008
You''re such a flaming TROOOOOOOOOOOLLLLLLLLLL!!!!!!!!!
But he is making all of the wrong moves. History will judge this Administration EXTREMELY HARSHLY. And these last minute Executive Orders will seal the deal as Worst President Ever!
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 89 Comments