Nov. 30, 2008

U.S. Key To Curbing South Asia Terror

Zakaria, Woodward Among Authors Discussing Obama Administration Foreign Policy On Face The Nation

  • Play CBS Video Video Obama's National Security Team

    Bob Schieffer talks with a panel of political authors about the terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India, Barack Obama's national security team and his presidential future.

  • Video An Obama Economy

    Bob Schieffer talks with a panel of political authors about bank bailouts and the economic future under a Barack Obama administration.

  • Video Face The Nation, 11.30.08

    Bob Schieffer talks with a panel of political authors about the attacks in India, Barack Obama's national security team and what's next for the economy.

  • Fareed Zakaria, editor of Newsweek International, on Photo

    Fareed Zakaria, editor of Newsweek International, on "Face The Nation."  (CBS)

  • In-Depth Obama's Cabinet

    The latest names and status of posts within Obama's new administration.

(CBS)  In the wake of the tragic Mumbai attacks this past week, the United States is in a unique position to help South Asian countries combat terrorism - but only if they can see beyond their own national security.

So said Fareed Zakaria, editor of Newsweek International, who appeared with other noted political authors on CBS' Face The Nation.

"What's happening now is, the problems of Pakistan, Afghanistan and India are bleeding into one another," Zakaria said, "so that what you have is a kind of South Asian terrorism, where these groups are feeding off each other, finding pockets where they can train in lawless parts of the country," including areas where governments have not maintained control for 200 years.

Zakaria, author of "The Post-American World" (Norton), said that the Pakistanis rationalization that while some militants are bad others are good (including those groups which the Pakistani military has created, trained and sustained for three decades) if they serve Pakistan's national security interests.

"The Pakistani military used to feel the good militants are the ones that destabilize India and Afghanistan, which is good for Pakistan, and the bad ones are the ones that kill Pakistani citizens. The problem is they're all blurring into one another."

Zakaria said the Pakistani government seems more understanding of this reality, but that it might take America - and its purse strings - to affect change.

"We've given Pakistan $10 billion of aid over the last five or six years. We have close relations with the military. If any outside player can play a role here, it's us. And I think it would be to try to make the Pakistanis understand that, you know, it is not in their interest that Afghanistan be unstable, that India be on edge, that they will prosper as a nation. It's a sort of broader, you know, economic understanding of national security than a narrow, competitive political-military one.

"And there's a really interesting question of, can you get the Pakistani military to see their national security in this broader way?"

Joining in the discussion of U.S. foreign policy in the upcoming Obama administration was investigative reporter Jane Mayer, author of "The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How The War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals" (Doubleday).

(CBS)
Meyer (left) said, contrary to the Bush-Cheney administration, Obama is dividing his national security portfolio rather than giving it over to the vice president, as President Bush did. "Obama so far seems to be so much more involved in the details and in kind of wanting to command the policies all the way up and down," she said.

"Another difference that is very important is that both the president coming in and the vice president are lawyers. And one of the things that happened in the last administration was neither of them were, they were not constitutional scholars. And they enacted policies, including legalizing torture for all purposes, that really were not constitutional. And I don't think we're going to see that again.

"And the secretary of state is also a lawyer now," she added, referring to Obama's selection of Sen. Hillary Clinton. "These people respect the law, I think."

(CBS)
Washington Post journalist Bob Woodward (left), author of "The War Within: A Secret White House History 2006-2008" (Simon & Schuster), concurred that the new administration will represent "a whole new center of gravity for the news media, for the world."

Calling Obama's national security team "amazing," he likened it to Goldilocks and the Three Bears: "You've got 'too cool,' which might be - or at least 'appropriately cool' - General Jones as the national security adviser; Gates is kind of 'just right,' in the middle; and Hillary Clinton, 'hot.'"

Referring to Obama's pick of Hillary (of whom he said, "She never goes away"), Woodward said that Obama's choice reflects, perhaps, the notion that because the deep economic crisis will require so much of his time, "go ahead and give Hillary and Bill the world."

Zakaria said that while Hillary may "get the world," and she will certainly be doing her share of traveling, the appointment of Marine General James L. Jones (a former NATO commander, aide to Defense Secretary Bill Cohen, and critic of Rumsfeld's handling of the Pentagon) as National Security Adviser "suggests that Iraq and Afghanistan will be managed out of the White House."

In addition to foreign policy, the standing of America abroad due to the election of Barack Obama will mark a sea change, said Michael Eric Dyson, author of "April 4, 1968: Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Death and How It Changed America" (Basic Civitas).

(CBS)
Dyson (left) said that because Obama was following in the tradition of civil rights battles but was not implicated in internecine skirmishes, he is not blemished by the wounds of civil right battles when he talks about race. "I think that gives him a kind of moral purchase in the broader world," he said.

He also said his background teaching constitutional law and working in poor communities will shape how he approaches the work of the administration. "It may not be his race as much as his community organizing background that will play a significant difference here, because a person who has organized poor people, who has attempted to get their interests and concerns as part of his bailiwick, will exert a profound influence over those issues when it comes to the economy, when it comes to making America safe, when it comes to protecting borders, and when it comes to trying to articulate ideas that will resonate not simply with African-Americans but more broadly."

Mayer agreed: "To the rest of the world, it sends a tremendous signal, I agree, especially at a point where we're being accused in this country of not living up to our ideals because of things like Guantanamo and black site prisons.

"And so to have an election where it shows that democracy really works and there's a meritocracy in the country and racism isn't going to stop somebody from getting to the top, I think has been a tremendously, liberating moment for the country - and for the rest of the world.

"It's totally discomfited al Qaeda, among others," she added. "You have got these bizarre sort of statements from Ayman Zawahiri, the spokesman for al Qaeda, trying to sort of readjust himself and say that, you know, America is still a racist country. He's kind of at a loss for how to deal with this. So it's been very helpful."


Read the full "Face the Nation" transcript here.

By CBSNews.com producer David Morgan.

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Video and Galleries from Face The Nation

Add a Comment See all 33 Comments
by dave_p5 November 30, 2008 4:09 PM PST
Thank God we''ll have a competent administration dealing with this kind of stuff soon.
Reply to this comment
by likeitis5050 November 30, 2008 4:44 PM PST
Muslims are counting on the simple fact that we are too politically correct and bound by laws that allow criminals to breed freely to be able to fight them. They are scum...and they fully intend to destroy us but we have the ACLU ready to fight for their right to kill us...based on civil rights that declares them right any time any one questions their intentions. It is sickening and about the only good thing to come out of having our own government toppled will be the end of the ACLU. These self-righteous bunch of anti-Americans need to be shipped to the middle east and let them eek out a living off muslim trash.
Reply to this comment
by thegoodtexan November 30, 2008 4:56 PM PST
Clinton as secretary of state would be a terrible setback to U.S. diplomacy and an insult to our standing in the world.

Bill and Hillary are known around the world for their underworld and shady dealing.

The Clinton presidency had a history of the white water type real estate scams, firing staff and hiring family members for the travel office, mysterious deaths of key witnesses connected to their dealings, and well published dysfunctional family relationships. In the closing days of their white house they were selling pardons for profits.

After leaving office they have stashed millions in offshore Turks and Caicos bank accounts and continue with their shady dealing. The Clintons have alledged ties to Columbian drug cartels dating to their connection with Arkansas Mena Airport drug trafficing and lobbying for the Columbian government. As chairperson for the India Caucus, Hillary was intrumental in outsourcing millions in US jobs to India.

These kinds of people do not have the respect of world leaders.
Reply to this comment
by centerfall94 November 30, 2008 5:08 PM PST
Clinton as secretary of state will be a tremendous boost to the state of world politics and bring America out of the international rut it''s been in since Bush II took office.

Bill and Hillary are known around the world for their deep understanding of international affairs and world politics. Really, after Bush II, it''s hardly possible to do WORSE. The world knows this.
Reply to this comment
by irmcvet97 November 30, 2008 5:16 PM PST
One thing became painfully clear during the 60''s and the fight we had as a nation against our OWN Religious Terrorist, they can be defeated but you must be willing to do things differently and NOT be conservative. You must also be able to gain the support of Moderates associated with or in the same area as the Terrorist Groups. IF you can cut off the Radical''s ability to attract the young you can and will WIN. The existence of this fine Young President we have is LIVING Proof of that point.
Reply to this comment
by centerfall94 November 30, 2008 5:16 PM PST
Thank God we''''ll have a competent administration dealing with this kind of stuff soon.
Posted by Dave_P5 at 04:09 PM : Nov 30, 2008
==============

You keep blaspheming the Holy Spirit in such a manner and you might wind up with a lightening bolt rammed up your poop chute.

Posted by DemsSUK2 at 05:14 PM

Oh look, another religious terrorist.

Why do you people hate America so much?
Reply to this comment
by irmcvet97 November 30, 2008 5:20 PM PST
I suggest they might just go ahead, drop their pants, bend over and grab their ankles!!

Cause NObama isn''''t coming to your rescue.

Posted by DemsSUK2 at 05:10 PM : Nov 30, 2008


LOL You know this how? You poor Losers aren''t even funny anymore. You and your line has gotten so old and so tired, EVERYONE knows what you are going to say BEFORE you say it and you NEVER have any REASON for the FAILURE of the Republican Party... Well it''s just so foolish... Maybe in a couple of DECADES you clowns will have the creditability to get someone other than the Uneducated Gapped Toothed Trailer Dwellers to believe you again. I will take THAT long at least for people to have George W. Bush fade from their minds. LOL Good luck with the Sour Grapes though... LOL
Reply to this comment
by babooph November 30, 2008 5:46 PM PST
After 8 years of a weak ,cowardly ,failed administration,there will be no quick fix.
Reply to this comment
by qutlaw104 November 30, 2008 5:55 PM PST
The US was the key to starting all this terrorisum all over the world. We could be the key to stopping it , if its not to late but we won''t. Quit supporting Iseral would be a start.
Reply to this comment
by dkhorse1 November 30, 2008 6:25 PM PST
Terrorists, religious extremists, whatever you want to call them will always use diplomacy to rebuild and strengthen their forces. That''s what I''d do if i was in their position.

Western influence will always be in the middle east, you can''t undo globalization and that''s what extremists hate, so they will never quit hating the west.

Reply to this comment
by tucano2 November 30, 2008 7:08 PM PST
The posters all seem to be expecting far too much, far too quickly.
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 November 30, 2008 7:42 PM PST
After 8 years of a weak ,cowardly ,failed administration,there will be no quick fix.

Posted by babooph at 05:46 PM : Nov 30, 2008



That is because there is another ''Woman'' (Hillary) dictating ''policy'' to ''Muslim'' men. Might as well pee in their Tea.
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 November 30, 2008 7:45 PM PST
clean up the rats nest.
Posted by seis-6-seis at 07:30 PM : Nov 30, 2008



That doesn''t get rid of ''all'' the Muslims.
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq November 30, 2008 7:47 PM PST
"And there''s a really interesting question of, can you get the Pakistani military to see their national security in this broader way?"


NO YOU CANT

No one is seeking to see "in a broader way", i.e. intelligently and rationally..
Thats the problem.
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq November 30, 2008 7:49 PM PST
I will tell you what will undo globalization, the collapse of the food chain.


Posted by curse914 at 06:33 PM : Nov 30, 2008


AAAHaahahahahahahahaa

LOL
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 November 30, 2008 7:56 PM PST

Posted by curse914 at 06:33 PM : Nov 30, 2008



That would pretty well end everything, wouldn''t it?
Reply to this comment
by mariedevine November 30, 2008 8:01 PM PST
"When a man''s ways please the Lord, it causes even his enemies to be at peace with him." There is one Supreme God, the Hindus are in agreement. The One God who is also the God of the Christians, Jews and Muslims has commanded all people to follow the word of God He gave their prophets. It will be found to be the same message. Forbidden pictures and images have blinded us to the same message. They also acknowledge that He is a God who destroys evil so that His way will be exalted and we can live in peace.

In Leviticus 26 (book of Moses, Law, Torah) God promises "rain in due season," abundance in food and health, and peace in the land for those who follow His ways. For rejecting His laws, He promises to appoint over us terror and 4 x 7 curses that He outlines. (Also Deuteronomy 28). He cannot lie; its for our benefit.

The best way to make change is not violence; it is by lifting up the word of God and calling for holiness for the people. Jesus (Isa, Krishna) said, "first take the beam out of your own eye, then shall you see clearly to take the beam out of your brother''s eye." He said to live by every word of God. The prophet Muhammad was told to tell the people to follow the whole Bible and be not divided therein. It is the central message throughout the whole Qur''an. That is agreement. All faiths need to purify themselves because we are now receiving the result of our choice and we need to change to receive the blessings while they are still available.
Reply to this comment
by breadline1 November 30, 2008 8:49 PM PST
Ah, ***! let the ********** kill each other. the''re bankrupting this country. they hate our guts, no matter what we do to befriend them. they would kill every last one of us given the chance. let them nuke each other into oblivian. maybe we''ll get lucky and all the leftover radiation will blow into china, afganastan and a few other places and solve those problems too. why should we support any country like pakastan that supports the terrorists that kill our soldiers that are trying to help them. why should we give them billions of dollars so they can subsidize poppy fields for smak and opium, and coke? all they know how to do is overbreed and blame the rest of the world for there problems. nukes will end there problems once and for all in 25 minutes. let ''em kill each other.
Reply to this comment
by flsunjnky November 30, 2008 9:51 PM PST
I agree with you mortal3, but hang on to your shorts, we are gonna see something very different than what has been going on for the past 8 years, that''s for sure, and that is why he was elected.
Reply to this comment
by November 30, 2008 10:03 PM PST
As a simple step, US could ask Pakistan to let the US verify and then eliminate the terrorist bases in POK and Karachi. If the Pakistan government cannot do it, US should be able to do it with Pakistan%u2019s agreement. They can start with verifying the telephone numbers in Pakistan that the terrorists were said to have been contacting. By inspecting the logs, they can find out who else was in contact with the base.
Reply to this comment
by flsunjnky November 30, 2008 10:39 PM PST
Maybe we already know that, I think we do. But, how long did it take Bush to respond to the message that we were under attack? He sat there and continued to read to school children before he got his head together, wasting precious time. I don''t think we will see that kind of uncertainty in this administration.
Reply to this comment
by flsunjnky November 30, 2008 10:51 PM PST
Your really right, Mike, I''m glad you said that.
Reply to this comment
by tschrunk November 30, 2008 10:54 PM PST
Let the metric be; "If it''s wrong for them to do it, it''s wrong for us to do it.
Reply to this comment
by papabc December 1, 2008 12:23 AM PST
Sounds like US is always the KEY until 4 - 8 years have passed then the KEY changes. Terrorist know this so will wait as they have for many years.

The next weak point will be the target of attack.

Maybe it is time for other None Terrorist nations to step up and join in. How many None Terrorist supporting nations can you count on your left hand? Will they spill over to your right?
Reply to this comment
by grandesign December 1, 2008 12:24 AM PST
"We''ve given Pakistan $10 billion of aid over the last five or six years."

So, we use more than that much in one month for our U.S. Forces in Iraq--about $11 Billion a month.

Reply to this comment
by grandesign December 1, 2008 12:39 AM PST
All faiths need to purify themselves because we are now receiving the result of our choice and we need to change to receive the blessings while they are still available.
Posted by MarieDevine at 08:01 PM : Nov 30, 2008

Oh that''s why. How simple is that.

Did everyone get that?
Reply to this comment
by grandesign December 1, 2008 12:47 AM PST
Let the metric be; "If it''s wrong for them to do it, it''s wrong for us to do it.
Posted by tschrunk at 10:54 PM : Nov 30, 2008

Religious people are often hypocrits. They say one thing and do another. The Muslims believe that they can commit any sin, i.e., murder, steal, adultry, etc., on any infidel. They have a different perception of wrong.
Reply to this comment
by December 1, 2008 2:12 AM PST
For myself, the most significant aspect of all this is also the most underdiscussed and undereported.
That is: the golden, once-in-a-century, opportunity we had following the tragedy of 9/11.
The whole world was solidly behind us and on our side.
The recruiting offices were packed with courageous, patriotic young Americans willing to fight for this country (they can''t buy a recruit now).
We couldn''t have HAD any more in terms of resources to fight these murderin'' fanatics.
And the cowardly neocons (not a one of ''em ever served in the military) lied and crookedly hijacked it all to go off after oil profits.
I don''t see how anyone who wants to call himself an American could NOT be after their hides.

Now, we''re gonna have to go back and deal with the fanatics. And now, it''s gonna be several orders of magnitude more expensive (in lotsa different currencies), more difficult, and more deadly.
All because of traitors in high places.
Reply to this comment
by lindh4 December 1, 2008 2:21 AM PST
Actually, the US is no longer a "key" to anything. It has spent itself into a third rate power in terms of diplomacy, finance, manufacturing and scientific standing. Add that to the fact that its military is exhausted and you have what is called a "has been" nation, something akin to Austria''s status after WWI.
Reply to this comment
by juwboy December 1, 2008 6:18 AM PST
MikeTotten1:

When Hitler came to power, one of his first acts was the elimination of his political opponents -- Socialists, Communists, Marxists, Trotskyites, labor leaders and other left-wingers.

Next he turned his attention to the group he considered the gretest threat to the purity of his glorious German master-race.

It wasn`t the Jews.

Or the gipsies.

Or homosexu@ls.

It was the mentally-retarded and feeble-minded.

Idiots, imbeciles, half-wits, simpletons, morons and cretins.

People just like you, MikeTotten1.

Reply to this comment
by drsam8 December 1, 2008 7:59 AM PST
This horrible crime in India%u2019s premier commercial center is the direct result of President Bush%u2019s adventurism in Iraq and as such he is accountable. For, without the unnecessary Iraq war, Terrorism would have dealt a significant if not crippling blow by now. Al-Quada would have been defeated in Pakistan and Afghanistan and their satellite terrorist organizations and connections would have been defeated. Even after more than seven years since 9/11, we still are unable to find major Al-Quada leaders like Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahri. Nor have we been able to cripple Al-Quada. This is a major stain on the Bush legacy. This is the price we have paid for Bush''s adventurism in Iraq. This President foolishly focused his gaze and resources on Iraq while Al-Quada continued to grow and cause trouble using Afghanistan and Pakistan as its staging ground and home states.
Reply to this comment
by bjcone8559 December 1, 2008 8:14 AM PST
This horrible crime in India%u2019s premier commercial center is the direct result of President Bush%u2019s adventurism in Iraq and as such he is accountable. For, without the unnecessary Iraq war, Terrorism would have dealt a significant if not crippling blow by now. Al-Quada would have been defeated in Pakistan and Afghanistan and their satellite terrorist organizations and connections would have been defeated. Even after more than seven years since 9/11, we still are unable to find major Al-Quada leaders like Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahri. Nor have we been able to cripple Al-Quada. This is a major stain on the Bush legacy. This is the price we have paid for Bush''''s adventurism in Iraq. This President foolishly focused his gaze and resources on Iraq while Al-Quada continued to grow and cause trouble using Afghanistan and Pakistan as its staging ground and home states.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by DrSam8


What you have stated is an obvious truth. Can someone please explain why so many followers of the republican party deny this?
Reply to this comment
by forparity December 2, 2008 3:30 PM PST
Where in the world, and how in the world does such jibberish stand?

Woodward and Fareed Zakaria both presenet that there were huge surpluses/$5.4 trillion in Jan. 2001. There were a couple of nice little surpluses - the big ones were silly projected surpluses which were fictional once the Clinton era bubble collapsed in March of 2000. Would have been the same for Gore - or worse.

And the world was in a state of crisis in late 2000, by the way. The 1990''s were marked by historic genocides, civil wars, starvation, nuclear scares, terrorism, and HIV/Aids running unchecked.
Reply to this comment
See all 33 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs