Contaminated Baby Formula Fears Hit U.S.
CBS Evening News: The FDA Says Baby Formula Contains A Deadly Chemical, But Swears The Amounts Are Safe
-
Photo
The FDA came under fire recently for failing to set safety standards after large doses of melamine, as much as 10,000 parts per million, caused the deaths of three infants in China and made 50-thousand others sick. But late last week, administration set a safe threshold for either melamine and cyanic acid at 1 part per million - higher than the amounts they found in U.S. brands. (CBS)
-
Play CBS Video
Video
China's Milk Scandal Spreads
Tainted Chinese baby formula containing the chemical melamine has been pulled from store shelves as officials investigate its origin. 6,000 infants have already been sickened. Celia Hatton reports.
-
Video
Baby Formula Recall In China
One death has been reported from a recalled baby formula in China tainted with a chemical used to make plastic, Celia Hatton reports.
-
Video
Formula Fears
Two best selling baby formula brands in the U.S. have tested positive for trace amounts of melamine, an industrial chemical, or cyanuric acid. Michelle Miller reports.
Three-year-old Michael Feliciano was raised on baby formula.
"Throughout the first year he had Infamil LIPILwith Iron," says Jasmine Feliciano, Michael's mom. "I never breast-fed or anything."
Michael's formula is one of two best-selling brands that the Food and Drug Administration said tested positive for trace amounts of either the industrial chemical, melamine or a similar one called cyanuric acid.
They are Mead Johnson's Enfamil LIPIL with Iron and Nestle's Good Start Supreme Infant Formula with Iron. Abbott Laboratories, whose brands include Similac, independently reported that it had detected trace levels of melamine in its formula.
"Those three are like the number one formulas that they tell you to give to your kids if you are not going to breast feed," says mom Barbara Newsome.
The FDA came under fire recently for failing to set safety standards after large doses of melamine, as much as 10,000 parts per million, caused the deaths of three infants in China and made 50-thousand others sick. But late last week, administration set a safe threshold for either of the chemicals alone at 1 part per million - higher than the amounts they found in U.S. brands. The FDA insists the formulas are safe.
"That's a grain of sand in the beach," says Dr. Daniel Rauch, a pediatrician at New York University's Langone Medical Center. "That's a very, very small amount."
But is that very small amount safe?
"We think it's safe," Dr. Rauch says. "But the bottom line is that we don't really know, and zero would be best."
The FDA said it believes the contamination may occur because melamine is contained in a cleaning solution used on some food processing equipment.
Parents looking for an alternative might consider this: about 90 percent of all infant formulas produced in the U.S. are made by the three companies whose products tested positive for contaminants.
"For my next baby, I will breastfeed," says Jasmine Feliciano
The non-profit consumer advocacy group Consumers Union told CBS News it is not satisfied with the FDA tests and is calling for a recall of formula containing any melamine or cyanuric acid.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Video and Galleries from CBS Evening News
- Latest in CBS Evening News
- National Mall Showing Its Age
- Fans Clamor for Jackson Memorial Tickets
- America's First Conservationist



- 1
- 2
- next
See all 59 CommentsMelamine in pet food, lead in toy paint, contaminated heparin, do we really need to import everything from China?
You idiot, these are made in U.S.
[Re: kjgp1
You idiot, these are made in U.S]
I don''t generally call people an idiot but you my friend are not only an idiot but uninformed. Do you not know what a precursor ingredient is? I think kjgp1 made an excellent point and asked a question that needs to be answered. Let me educate you on something, just because it is made in the US does not mean that all parts or ingredients were produced in the US. Please educate yourself before you go name calling, you IDIOT!
Sounds muck like what the EPA was saying about the safety of the air in NYC after 9-11.
Do you trust these government agencies? Well do ya?
I don''t.
The products that are the subject of this report contained less than 1 ppm of melamine, so the situations are not comparable and the products are probably safe.
It is not possible to remove all traces of toxic substances from food, either raw or prepared. All food contains detectable traces of lead, mercury and arsenic, for example.
If you keep foods in plastic containers in your refrigerator, your food at home probably has more melamine than this baby formula.
The baby formula probably picks up more melamine from contact with plastic baby bottles and soft plastic baby bottle nipples.
This is nothing but a journalistic scare designed to create hysteria and sell more news.
Posted by kjgp1 at 11:22 PM : Nov 30, 2008
No, we don''t. But the Wal-mart crowd insists, and now they''re killing people for low prices. So it''s no surprise they''re killing our economy.
Creating hysteria over melamine in baby formula is as absurd as the hysteria over hydrogen in dirigibles after the Hindenberg disaster. It wasn''t really the hydrogen that burned, it was the highly flammable paint that was used on the fabric covering of the exterior skin of the Hindenberg - used because it was lighter and it saved fuel.
But then, the public believed the hydrogen hysteria for fifty years...
Posted by FloydZeppd at 06:32 AM : Dec 01, 2008
Up yours. This is about babies, not about your personal political agenda of Bush bashing.
So, your advice to new mothers would be:
"Don`t breast-feed your baby, because all breast milk contains detectable traces of the toxic heavy metals, lead, mercury and arsenic"
Gentile-Americans outnumber Jewish-Americans by about 50-to-1.
Gentiles outnumber Jews worldwide by about 400-to-1.
Gentile-Americans outnumber Jews worldwide by almost 20-to-1.
So, if Jews are controlling what goes into the food we eat, why are weak, ineffective, limp-wristed, schickerer Yocks like yourself unable to do anything about it?
posted by txgrouch;
Sorry Grouch, hate to disagree with you on this one, but just saw a show on this very thing, not more than two days ago.
This what they said on the matter, Due to over maneuvering, which caused stress on the ship, caused a support wire to break loose and puncture Hydrogen tank no. 4. And that covering you spoke about? Actually caused static electricity to form and caused the ignition of the escaping fuel. Which in turn caused a chain reaction to the other tanks.
You were right that the covering used was lighter, and hence, saved fuel..
We might as well go back to the hunting gathering method of living. The women folk stays home and takes care of the home-fires, and us men can go out and kill wild game with out sticks, clubs and anything else we can get our hands...
At least we''d more healthier.....
The stomach flora in different populations around the world is also different and contributes to the various thresholds of what is considered toxic and what is safe.
The FDA already acknowledges that one toxicity standard does not fit all populations.
A recent endicronologist report published that hormones from different animals taken together with meat (protiens) of those same animals offer effective treatment at lower concentrations and enhance liver health.
Posted by lady_organs
Oh my yes I agree wholeheartedly! And I think you should lead the way by feeding your kids formula from China just to show all those nasty atheists how wrong they are!
I think you are more stupid than anyone else here. I just want to educate you too that when melamine is found in US made formula doesn''t mean that there must be some precursor ingredient made in China.
If you put baby formula in a plastic bottle with a soft plastic nipple, you''re putting more melamine in it than it gets in the factory.
Posted by slim1h2o at 07:21 AM : Dec 01, 2008
I just read that, too. The ground crew heard a "crack" sound.
There''s no proof that a wire broke. There IS ABOUNDANT proof in the newsreel footage that the fire WAS NOT a hydrogen fire.
First, ALL the fabric burned on the tail fins. The tail fins had no hydrogen.
Second, after the nose section fell to the ground, the hydrogen cells are clearly visible inside. You can see the cells melting open and releasing hydrogen directly into the blaze. And yet, there is no visible flare-up of the flames that are visible in the footage. Instead, it appears that some intert gas is coming out of the cells, because the gas has no visible effect at all on the fire.
I read the entire Wikipedia entry, and I can answer all objections. The "crack" noise was the spark of static electricity that touched off a fire in the fabric on top. The rest was a chain reaction from the fabric fire.
Posted by txgrouch2007 at 10:38 AM : Dec 01, 2008
I don''t ever look up anything on Wikipedia, the info tends not to be very accurate from what I hear.
But the TV program I seen, was on the history channel, and was updated version with computer graphics, that I had never seen before when they have showed segments on the same subject in years past.
In other words, they re-investigated the case, and found out what really happened.
And now it''s new version of what happened. When the wire broke(the crack you mentioned) or cable, it sliced into the covering and Hydro. tank #4, and at the same time, static electricity was building up on the covering, and ignited the escaping fuel, which in turn ignited the covering like you said. But the covering was not the source of the fire itself, according to the show. Like I said, it was updated investigation of the incident.
Maybe they still have it wrong, but it was a plausible theory.
Posted by slim1h2o at 11:06 AM : Dec 01, 2008
I don''t see any convincing evidence of a broken wire in the newsreel footage.
A broken wire would cause visible twisting wrinkles in the fabric, or a control surface moving out of alignment. None of that is visible.
It''s a remotely plausible theory. But no solid evidence to support it.
It''s like the JFK conspiracy theory. People can make up wild stories all day. But at the end of the day, the enhanced Zapruder film ON THE CONSPIRACY THEORY SITE leaves no room for doubt that Oswald fired the fatal shot. Any conspiracy theory is pure speculation.
Posted by slim1h2o at 11:06 AM : Dec 01, 2008
Wikipedia presents the broken wire theory, along with about half a dozen half-baked theories and refutations of what''s clearly visible in the newsreel film.
You can''t deny what''s clearly visible. And my conclusion is fully supported by other GENUINE evidence that was found in Germany years later.
It was the paint. Ignited by a spark of static electricity. That''s it.
If you put baby formula in a plastic bottle with a soft plastic nipple, you''''re putting more melamine in it than it gets in the factory.
Posted by txgrouch2007
You really are a moron... Melamine is a HARD plastic (look it up). Those soft plastic containers your refering to do not contain melamine. (Nice try)
Also, if the traces originated from manufaturing then why is it that some samples contained it and others showed no trace???
So now the FDA came up with some guidelines regarding Melamine... After all this time where they couldn''t decide on a "safe" amount, they come up with it (of course its higher than what they found in the samples) Have to protect the companies at all cost...
Posted by cbscrash072
Don''t know, care to try some and let us know?
Posted by cbscrash072
Well, dead is dead and given that the items you talk about are nto meant to be consumed, I think mayb e it ought NOT to be in baby formula.
So are you SURE that NONE of the plastic containers in your house has ANY melamine in it?????
How about hard plastic BABY BOTTLES. Any MELAMINE there???
The trace quantities detected would come from CONTACT with a plastic item that contained melamine, or from contact with a surface that had been cleaned with a cleanser that contained melamine.
If it''s NOT present in some samples, it means there was little or no melamine on the surface when they contacted it.
Other samples came in contact with a surface when it did have melamine on it.
NONE of the sampled indicated that someone intentionally poured melamine in the formula.
This is a news media scare, pure and simple.
If any baby got sick I HOPE PEOPLE WILL SEEK A MURDER TO CEO''S......
Posted by txgrouch2007
Da mn I hope you don''t have babies at home... I bet you''d let them play in the street because the risk of being hit by a car is overrated...
The same with candy from Mexico. They still use lead in their products but for some reason the Media won''t report on that.
Who here trusts the FDA? Who here is willing to take this risk on their children?
So are you SURE that NONE of the plastic containers in your house has ANY melamine in it?????
How about hard plastic BABY BOTTLES. Any MELAMINE there???
The trace quantities detected would come from CONTACT with a plastic item that contained melamine, or from contact with a surface that had been cleaned with a cleanser that contained melamine.
If it''''s NOT present in some samples, it means there was little or no melamine on the surface when they contacted it.
Other samples came in contact with a surface when it did have melamine on it.
NONE of the sampled indicated that someone intentionally poured melamine in the formula.
This is a news media scare, pure and simple.
Posted by txgrouch2007 at 12:20 PM : Dec 01, 2008
So you are willing to let your newborn or grandbaby to drink the stuff with melamine in it?
I doubt that you would. Why take any risk with a youngn''?
Maybe this is a contributing factor in the Autism outbreaks!
Posted by cbscrash072
Don''''t know, care to try some and let us know?
Posted by jtdev1 at 12:08 PM : Dec 01, 2008
This chemical is in your kitchen cabinets. Its also what those MR. Clean magic erasers are made off. How dangerous can it be?
Posted by cbscrash072
Well, dead is dead and given that the items you talk about are nto meant to be consumed, I think mayb e it ought NOT to be in baby formula.
Posted by hatesthecolt at 12:13 PM : Dec 01, 2008
I think that "cbscrash072" was just joking. I can''t imagine that he/she is that stupid.
I could be wrong though.
Not surprising.
Posted by MatrixRX2003 at 02:45 PM : Dec 01, 2008
It isn''t just food that is the problem. Everything needs to be banned from China.
The FDA is beyond repair.
First the FDA says, "there is no threat of contamination in the domestic supply of infant formula," now they are retracting their words! Even a trace amount is too much, we are putting our babies health at stake here! I work for WIC (Womens, Infants and Children) a federally supplemental nutrition program for low-income families administered across the country through grants from USDA. WIC is the biggest supplier of infant formula in the country. More than half of all babies born in the US are on WIC-can you imagine the amount of babies that have come in contact and will come in contact with this contaminated formula? WIC claims to be a big proponent of breastfeeding but fails because of the rebates it gets from formula companies for each can of formula sold. We are compromising the health of our nation and selling our future short!
Smart parents should try breast feeding and forgo the chemically tainted--virtually non tested baby formulas. The government for this and toy testing is in the pocket of business--there is NO watchdog for the public anymore. PROTECT YOURSELF.
- 1
- 2
- next
See all 59 Comments