TEHRAN, Iran, Nov. 26, 2008

Iran Further Flouts Nuclear Sanctions

Country's Nuclear Energy Chief Boasts 5,000 Centrifuges Now Churning Out Uranium

  • Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad tours the Natanz nuclear facility in this April 8, 2008 file photo. Photo

    Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad tours the Natanz nuclear facility in this April 8, 2008 file photo.  (ISIS)

  • Timeline The U.S. And Iran

    Key events in once friendly, now contentious relationship between Washington and Tehran.

  • Fast Facts Iran

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

(CBS/ AP)  Iran now has more than 5,000 centrifuges operating at its uranium enrichment plant, Iran's nuclear chief announced Wednesday, in the Persian country's latest defiance of U.N. demands that Tehran halt the controversial program.

The Iranian official, Gholam Reza Aghazadeh, said Iran will continue to install centrifuges and enrich uranium in order to produce nuclear fuel for the country's future nuclear power plants.

Uranium enriched to low levels is used to produce nuclear fuel. Further enrichment makes it suitable for use in nuclear weapons.

"At this point, more than 5,000 centrifuges are operating in Natanz," said Aghazadeh, who is head of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran. He spoke to reporters during an exhibition of Iranian nuclear achievements at Tehran University.

The United States and some of its allies accuse Iran of seeking to build nuclear weapons. Tehran denies the claim and insists it has the right under the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty to enrich uranium and produce reactor fuel.

The new number of working centrifuges is a significant increase from the 4,000 Iran said were up and running in August at the plant in the central Iranian city of Natanz.

In terms of enrichment, Iran is currently producing about 2.2 kilograms of LEU (low-enriched uranium - which is not weapons grade) per day. In spite of an apparent increase in centrifuges, Iran is feeding in lower amounts of uranium hexafluoride (the precursor to weapons grade) than in previous IAEA documents, reports CBS News correspondent Sheila MacVicar.

The IAEA does not know why Iran has failed to increase its LEU output, and there is speculation in the arms control community that it still faces considerable technical obstacles.

However, the key number is when Iran will have accumulated enough LEU to have a stockpile sufficient to quickly produce sufficient weapons-grade uranium for a nuclear weapon. In this scenario, Iran would feed the LEU into its cascades, shortening production time, MacVicar reports.

It is widely agreed, says MacVicar, that at current rates of enrichment to LEU, Iran will have sufficient material for a single device in 4 to 12 months.

The U.N. Security Council has already imposed three rounds of sanctions on Iran for its refusal to freeze the uranium enrichment program.

In the process, uranium gas is spun in a series of centrifuges to purify it. Lower levels of enrichment produce reactor fuel - which Iran says is the sole purpose of the program - but higher grades can build a weapon.

At the exhibition, Iran for the first time put on public display one of its P-1 centrifuges and officials at the exhibition explained various parts of machine to visitors.

The P-1 centrifuge is the workhorse of Iran's enrichment program. It's run in cascades of 164 machines.

In February, Iranian officials confirmed that they have started using the IR-2 centrifuge, which can churn out enriched uranium at more than double the rate of P-1.

Iran has said it plans to move toward large-scale uranium enrichment that will ultimately involve 54,000 centrifuges.

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Video and Galleries from World

Add a Comment
by cariboubarbi November 26, 2008 9:42 AM PST


Why isn''t Bush doing anything about this?



Reply to this comment
by mdmo1 November 26, 2008 10:33 AM PST
why cant you go back to IRAN
Reply to this comment
by kretosdav November 26, 2008 11:10 AM PST
IAEA has declared iran nuclear programme is peaceful
Reply to this comment
by clathrate November 26, 2008 12:45 PM PST
It''s obvious Iran is just going to move forward with this, and to hell with the consequences.

I say let them have their little nuke. Just do periodic thermonuke tests in the Persian Gulf to remind them what they face should they decide to try something funny.
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 November 27, 2008 2:14 PM PST
let them make their toys, it will cost them billions. (and they can''t use them against anybody, ever, without becoming a country of glassy plains.)
If Alky Aida thinks they can get away with using one, they will get the worst surprise of their lives.
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 November 27, 2008 10:54 PM PST
I may never agree with anything else you say but that is the truest statement I have ever seen you make. A country doesn''t have to use missiles to destroy you, simply set them off where they are (UP-WIND) of you and they get everybody, guaranteed!!! Right now only Muslims want to do that. They think M.A.D. is a joke. If there had ever been one scenario that Russia could have used to ''nuke'' us during the ''Cold War'' they would have used it, and so would we. Radical Religion does not care. Thats enough to scare you spit-less.

"Published earlier"
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 November 27, 2008 10:57 PM PST
(Corrected post)

THERE IS NO DEFENSE AGAINST NUCLEAR WEAPONRY!
Posted by Agnim at 04:14 PM : Apr 27, 2007



I may never agree with anything else you say but that is the truest statement I have ever seen you make. A country doesn''t have to use missiles to destroy you, simply set them off where they are (UP-WIND) of you and they get everybody, guaranteed!!! Right now only Extremist Muslims want to do that. They think M.A.D. is a joke. If there had ever been one scenario that Russia could have used to ''nuke'' us during the ''Cold War'' they would have used it, and so would we. Radical Religion does not care. Thats enough to scare you spit-less.

"Published earlier"
Reply to this comment
by mrmeatspin November 28, 2008 12:42 PM PST
Why isn''''t Bush doing anything about this?




Posted by CaribouBarbi at 09:42 AM : Nov 26, 2008
+ report abuse

*****

and what do you want him to do about it??
Reply to this comment
by mrmeatspin November 28, 2008 12:43 PM PST
I predict a very lucrative year for terrorism next year..
Reply to this comment
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs