Iraq Lawmakers Postpone Vote On Troop Pact

Parliamentarians Will Now Decide Thursday Whether To Extend U.S. Military Presence For 3 More Years

(CBS/AP)  Iraqi lawmakers have postponed a vote on a U.S.-Iraqi security pact that would allow American troops to stay in the country for three more years, if it passes.

The vote in Iraq's parliament was scheduled to take place in Wednesday's session, but was put off until Thursday as the pact's supporters scrabbled to secure more votes among skeptical lawmakers.

Proponents of the agreement, which only reached parliament after weeks of arduous negotiations between Iraqi and U.S. officials, argue that the Americans are still needed to maintain recent security gains.

CBS News correspondent Elizabeth Palmer reports from Baghdad that the ruling Shiite and Kurdish parliamentary blocs have enough votes to approve the agreement, but the government wants it to win by a convincing margin - in part because one of this country's most influential Shiite clerics, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, has said he can accept the agreement, provided it has broad public support.

Shiite Lawmaker Ridha Jawad Taqi told the Associated Press the government's Shiite and Kurdish blocs, which account for about 140 seats, or a slight majority in the legislature, were willing to hold a national referendum on the deal in 2009. That amounts to a concession to many Sunni Arab legislators, who have said they would support the security pact Wednesday if it was put to a nationwide vote next year.

So the deal, if approved in the parliamentary vote, could still be rescinded if it fails in the popular referendum.

A referendum would give the Iraqi people a chance to evaluate "whether their interests have been achieved," said Alaa Makki, a member of parliament's biggest Sunni Arab bloc, the 44-seat Iraqi Accordance Front.

A senior al-Maliki aide confirmed the concession by the Kurdish and Shiite blocs. Speaking to the AP on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject, he said a draft bill containing provisions for the referendum and a package of political reforms demanded by the Sunnis would be voted on separately in parliament, also on Wednesday.

In a reminder of the still-tenuous security situation, Iraqi officials said Wednesday that at least two civilians were killed and four others wounded in a roadside bombing in central Baghdad, just hours ahead of the crucial vote.

Police and hospital officials said the blast targeted a minibus and that those killed were passengers.

The explosion happened in the Firdous Square area where thousands of followers of anti-U.S. cleric Muqtada al-Sadr rallied last week to protest the deal. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to release the information.

America is also still paying a high price for involvement in the fight to secure Iraq. Two American troops were killed Tuesday after a gunman in an Iraqi army uniform opened fire while they were distributing humanitarian aid in northern Iraq, the U.S. military said.

The security pact is meant to replace a United Nations mandate which grants coalition forces permission to remain in Iraq until the end of this year.

CBS News correspondent Charlie D'Agata reports that Prime Minister Nouri al Maliki's Cabinet overwhelmingly approved the deal last week, but the parliament gets the final say.

Only the Sunni lawmakers could stand in the way of the measure's passage, reports Palmer. They have been holding out for political concessions from the government, including an insistence that large number of prisoners be released. It was unclear Wednesday mourning whether any of the Sunni demands had been met.

More hard-line Sunni opponents, and some Shiites, including lawmakers allied with al-Sadr, have refused to adopt any policy which grants American soldiers an extended stay in the country, reports D'Agata.

If the security pact does not pass muster with politicians, officials in Washington and Baghdad worry there will be little time left in 2008 to hammer out details on an alternative.

Palmer reports that the U.S. would still have the option of going back to the United Nations and getting a extension of the Security Council mandate for Coalition forces. That would raise the possibility of a veto, but the Russians have indicated recently that they're unlikely to do that.

If that option fails, U.S. forces could be forced to return to their bases and cease all operations in Iraq. American officials have painted that as the worst case scenario, says Palmer, pointedly spelling out a wide range of activities they would no longer carry out, including providing security for Iraqi government officials.

[motown67usa]

Iraq got almost everything they wanted out of this agreement from the Americans because they knew that Bush wanted this before he left office. The Sunnis also appear to have been appeased, so the bill will probably pass in Iraq%u2019s parliament. The problem is the referendum that seems to be part of the deal. The UN mandate that authorizes the presence of US forces ends on 12/31/08, but the referendum is gong to be July 09. What happens if it%u2019s rejected? Does that mean the U.S. forces will all have to pack up immediately and leave? For more see: http://musingsoniraq.blogspot.com/

[daffy64]

I like your nik, "Daffy". It fits.

---

So, you have no effective counter argument. You just chose a shaming tactic.

[daffy64]

Perhaps YOU feel guilty about wiping out a few hundred thousand kameljockeys and their terrorist fiends, but I DONT.
IF you want to pay, go right ahead...
Me? I back my President, and as for the ''''war on terror'''', those baztirds havent touched us on our shores since President Bush promised they wouldnt!!!

---

As a Christian, I believe killing is wrong unless it''s in self defense. You call me a degrading name, but they''re God''s children too. We''re talking humans, not "collateral damage".

And September 11 happened on Bush''s watch, didn''t it? When he finally stopped reading that "My Friend the Goat" book he went off and attacked the wrong country.

Oops.

[earache4]

So you cant back up your claim that people live for eternity, and will eventually die like us atheists? Posted by IwasHungry68



You are correct! I cant prove it at all.
Posted by DaVicar1 at 12:14 PM

You guys should watch T.A.P.S. (Joe the plumber is on it)....

[earache4]

wow, what a racist you are!! you are saying only black welfare recipients talked the way i was....and your lib friends on here said it was grade school.....you are such a racist
Posted by jamesm12341 at 12:04 PM :

HEY! James is back. Who wants at him first?

[earache4]

As soon as he is slapped with irrefutable proof, and he is exposed as a true moron, he runs like he''s on fire.
Thanks for playing little Jimmy!!
Posted by IwasHungry68 at 11:58 AM

I think his train of thought derailed...forgot who he was trying to insult....

[earache4]

And james is gone again.... :(

[earache4]

Really?

Please tell us WHO lived past the age of, let''''s say 120 years old?
Posted by IwasHungry68 at 11:50 AM

McCain?

[earache4]

....you and everybody else on here knows what group i am talking about...
Posted by jamesm12341 at 11:44 AM

Enlighten us james, who are you talking about?

[earache4]

let me axe you this then...know what im sayin....you are saying that people talk like this....know what im sayin....have the education level of grade school? know what im sayin
Posted by jamesm12341 at 11:35 AM : Nov 26, 2008

I don''t know, I haven''t met your whole family.

[earache4]

let me axe you this then...know what im sayin....you are saying that people talk like this....know what im sayin....have the education level of grade school? know what im sayin
Posted by jamesm12341 at 11:35 AM : Nov 26, 2008

james, you are unique. You are the only person I know that talks like that while typing like that....

[earache4]

let me axe you a question....know what im sayin....what is wrong with the way i am talking?...know what im sayin
Posted by jamesm12341 at 11:32 AM

You actually talk while you type? Wow, a multi-tasker...

[earache4]

let me axe you all a question....know what im sayin....who was president....know what im sayin...when the uss cole and the world trade center was bombed? know what im sayin
Posted by jamesm12341 at 11:31 AM

Did your parents have any kids that lived?

[earache4]

Sorry - as usual, no one understands what you''''re saying.

Good luck in high school!!
Posted by IwasHungry68 at 11:29 AM

GRADE school!

[earache4]

Hopefully a member of this administration - at the end of a rope.
Posted by IwasHungry68 at 11:26 AM

:)

[boatdocster]

They didn''''t touch us at all when Clinton was Prez. Bush gets elected had he reads "my pet goat" upside down while the terrorists attack us. What a loser.

Posted by FloydZeppd at 11:20 AM : Nov 26, 2008

Thank you!!! Succinct and to the point...

W - Worst Ever

[earache4]

i axed a simple question, know what im sayin....why wont you libs answer it....know what im sayin
Posted by jamesm12341 at 11:23 AM

What does your question have to do with this story?

[earache4]

When you say:
tj let me axe you a question, know what im sayin....would obama be president elect right now....know what im sayin...if he were raised by his father instead of his mother? know what im sayin
Posted by jamesm12341 at 10:49 AM : Nov 26, 2008

Do you mean:

you should probably apologize to your parents for growing up such a loser
Posted by jamesm12341 at 07:00 PM

[earache4]

Who will be the last to die for a lie?

[takebackusa]

simple question....it is a yes or no. that is sad that someone asking a simple question makes you feel inferior.

posted by jamesm12341 at 11:08 AM : Nov 26, 2008
+ report abuse


Then try asking a question in proper English. Perhaps something that has to do with the topic !Maybe your worship of GW Bush and Sarah Palin has clouded YOUR perception of how to speak properly.