Lawyers Drop One Murder Charge Against Boy
Other Murder Charge Remains; Move Could Signal Cracks In Prosecution's Case
-
Play CBS Video
Video
8-Year-Old Suspect Coerced?
Police claim a video of an 8-year-old murder suspect shows him confess to a double homicide while defense lawyers say the boy was coerced. Bill Whitaker reports and a legal analyst weighs in.
-
Video
8-year-old's murder confession
New video released shows the apparent confession of an 8-year-old Arizona boy suspected in the murder of his father and another man. Bill Whitaker reports.
-
-
Photo
"There was blood all over his face, I think," the unidentified boy charged with murdering his father said in the video, referring to his father. "And I think I touched him." (CBS)
-
Photo
This photograph taken Nov. 8, 2008, shows the house where Vincent Romero, 29, and Timothy Romans, 39, of San Carlos, Ariz were found fatally shot in St. Johns, Ariz. Police have charged Romero's 8-year-old son with the killings. (AP Photo/Dana Felthauser)
-
-
Interactive
Guns In America
State-by-state gun laws and death rates, maps of recent school and workplace shootings and facts on who's at risk.
-
Interactive
Crime Beat
Statistics and specifics on crime in America.
The motion filed late Friday seeks the dismissal of the first-degree murder charge stemming from the death of the boy's father, 29-year-old Vincent Romero. The boy is also charged with first-degree murder in the death of 39-year-old Tim Romans, Romero's roommate.
The motion explicitly allows the refiling of the charge if it is granted.
The prosecutor's office wouldn't explain its actions. The boy's defense attorney, Benjamin Brewer, declined to comment Friday, citing a gag order in the case.
Police in the small eastern Arizona town of St. Johns allege that the boy killed both men with a .22-caliber rifle in their home on Nov. 5.
A well-known Arizona defense lawyer not involved in the case said there could be many reasons why a charge would be dismissed.
"There's some reason legally or factually that they don't want to proceed with that murder at this time - and that normally means there's something they need to investigate further - the case is not ready to proceed," Tucson attorney Mike Piccarreta said.
Romero and Romans were found dead Nov. 5.
Police say the boy confessed to the killings. But he gave conflicting accounts of the shootings in an hourlong video of his interview with authorities in St. Johns.
A 12-minute segment of the video was posted Nov. 17 on Phoenix television station KTVK's Web site. The station said it got the video from the prosecutor's office in Apache County, where the shootings occurred.
But a legal analyst on CBS' The Early Show Thursday called the police interrogation "absurd."
"What we know is that children under 12 are especially susceptible to questioning by an adult," legal analyst Lisa Bloom said.
"I think I shot my dad because he was suffering, I think," the boy said toward the end of the hour-long interrogation, though Bloom notes that the admission comes only after repeated officer questioning.
"Children tell authority figures what they think the authority figure wants to hear," said Bloom. "This child was not Mirandized; there was no attorney for him in that room; there was no parent or legal guardian. He was simply answering questions by two police officers in uniforms with guns."
A defense attorney, Benjamin Brewer, has said police overreached in their questioning of the boy, who was not represented by a family member or lawyer during the interview.
This child was not Mirandized; there was no attorney for him in that room; there was no parent or legal guardian. He was simply answering questions by two police officers in uniforms with guns.
Lisa Bloom, legal analystSt. Johns police Chief Roy Melnick has said he would push for the boy to be tried as an adult, though some analysts think even a juvenile court trial would be too much.
"Children this age believe in the tooth fairy, they believe in magic … it's absurd," said Bloom. "This child should not be in juvenile court or adult court, in my opinion. He should be a ward of the family court and get some social service attention."
Authorities and the defense attorneys have been unable to answer questions about the case since the court issued a gag order.
A status conference in the case has been scheduled for Dec. 8.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Don''t assume he is guilty when questioned by people untrained in working with children.....He IS A CHILD!
The murder weapon was a .22 pistol taken by the killers when they fled the scene in the car the boy claims to have seen leaving when he discovered the bodies.
The sad thing in we will never see these Bozos on "Cops". Maybe it''s time for a new series, "Keystone Cops -- America`s Most Wanting"
So, the idiots are retrenching; they will announce that they have determined that the boy had an accomplice who used a pistol to kill one victim while the boy used his .22-caliber rifle to kill the victim whose fatal bullet cannot be traced to any specific weapon.
Barney Phife strikes again.
But if this kid did use his rifle, he`s GOOD. It`s a single shot. No magazine. Each round must be placed by hand in the breach.
Ah yes, nothing beats the steady hand, a sharp eye of youth.
Except the the wisdom of an elder, with fuzzy eyesight, and unsteady hand.
We have to put real penalties in place when police and district attorneys commit these atrocities against children. If they know they are facing a stiff penalty, they may think twice about violating a child''s civil rights.
-
by conspiracygirl
November 24, 2008 7:48 PM PST
- I have to wonder if the interrogators deliberately chose to interrogate this kid without an attorney present SO that the case would be tossed out....
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 15 CommentsI mean, any police officer knows better than that!
The prospect of trying a child is an adult is obscene. The reason we try kids as kids is because they do not have the same capacity for reason as adults. You can''t just arbitrarily claim a kid does have such capacity when the crime is an especially bad one. This child obviously did not have much capacity for reason.