GM: Bankruptcy Not A Viable Option
Board Of Directors Feels Chapter 11 Would Not Address Fundamental Issues Facing Automaker, Says Spokesman
-
(AP)
-
Play CBS Video Video Big Three Blowing In The Wind Congressional leaders have admitted there's no overwhelming support for an auto bailout because of the disastrous results of the $700 billion economic bailout. Sharyl Attkisson has more.
-
Video Nissan CEO On Auto Bailout Nissan CEO, Carlos Ghosn, tells CBS News "limited" and "temporary" help to US automakers is "acceptable" but would put the Big 3 at an "uneven" advantage.
-
Video Romney To Big 3: Fold Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney tells Maggie Rodriguez the auto industry should restructure after filing for bankruptcy instead of receiving a check to continue failed policy.
-
In-Depth Q&A: Big Three Bailout? Why Detroit's automakers might get a rescue package
Century-old GM, an icon of American manufacturing, has been battered by a plunge in car sales as American consumers tighten their belts and shift away from the big moneymaking pickup trucks and SUVS that have long been the staples of GM's lineup.
GM, which has slashed jobs and closed plants since early in the decade, has warned that it could run low on cash by the end of the year unless it gets a taxpayer-funded rescue from the government.
"The board has a responsibility to keep all options open considering the circumstances," said Vice President of Communications Tony Cervone. "Chapter 11 protection is not a viable option because it doesn't fundamentally address the issues at hand today."
The board, which has been meeting regularly by teleconference since the company's finances worsened, agrees with Chairman and CEO Rick Wagoner that bankruptcy would be disastrous for the company, Cervone said.
Wagoner has said it would scare away customers who would not make a big-ticket purchase from an automaker that is under court protection.
Instead, Cervone said the board supports Wagoner's strategy to seek congressional approval of low-interest government loans, getting the company through its liquidity problems until the U.S. auto market recovers and it can be profitable again, Cervone said.
"The board continues to support management and has continued to express support for management," Cervone said.
Wagoner, in testimony to the Senate Banking Committee on Tuesday, said that independent research shows 80 percent of consumers would not consider buying a car from GM if it were in bankruptcy.
Bankruptcy experts say the company may not be able to pay all its bills, and that some parts suppliers may start demanding cash from GM upon delivery. GM, though, may be able to negotiate terms from suppliers whose fates depend largely on the company's success.
Wagoner, Ford Motor Co. CEO Alan Mulally and Chrysler LLC CEO Robert Nardelli appeared before Congress this week seeking $25 billion in low-interest loans, but were drubbed by criticism from members of House and Senate committees.
Instead of leaving Washington with a commitment for the bailout loans, the three headed back to Detroit empty-handed, rebuffed by lawmakers who were upset that the trio flew to the nation's capital in separate private jets to ask for aid.
Lawmakers also criticized the CEOs for appearing without a solid plan and for allowing high labor costs that put them at a disadvantage with their Japanese competitors.
In a letter to the auto executives released Friday afternoon, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid demanded a detailed accounting by Dec. 2 of the companies' financial condition and short-term cash needs, as well as their plan to achieve long-term viability.
The Democrats also called on the automakers to show how they would ensure that the government would be reimbursed and share in future profits, eliminate dividends and lavish executive pay packages, meet fuel-efficiency standards, and address their health care and pension obligations if they get the federal help.
The Bush administration sharply criticized the Democrats for departing Washington for a congressional recess without acting on a rescue for the car makers.
GM is considered by many to be in the worst financial shape of the three automakers. The company spent $6.9 billion more than it took in during the third quarter and has warned that it could reach the minimum amount of money needed to run the business by year-end.
GM already has cut expenses and has delayed for two weeks reimbursements to dealers for sales incentives such as rebates.
By AP Auto Writer Tom Krisher
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie."





- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 10
- next
See all 184 CommentsNo "bailout". Period.
The auto industry whose inept management has only been interested in their own salaries and bonuses, and has been losing billions for years building poor quality cars and trucks that don''t sell well now looks to be bailed out by the taxpayers.
Something is very wrong with that scenario.
Gimme a break. "Bailout", what hooey.
We need universal health care in this country for multiple reason. At the top of the list of reasons is that it''s the right thing to do.
Workers are now responsible for their own retirement, but they essentially have to foot the bill for the current retirees (until they die off). If the company declares bankruptcy one thing we are doing is throwing these retirees to the wolves.
The accounts which pay retired auto workers should already be fully funded.
Republicans and other groups who hope to profit by *** American workers so that they make no more than illegal immigrants are pushing some double counting double talking BS about American worker compensation. Despicable slime.
I know it''s only pocket change in the grand scheme of things but they represent their arrogance and lack of understanding of their situation and THEY MUST BE SOLD!!!!!!
Game over.
We in the west invented the free enterprise system, showed others how it worked, and now we''ve been beaten.
Taxpayers should not be forced to subsidize the incompetence and uncompetitiveness of any company.
The Big Three auto makers have dug their own grave with their huge pensions to retired UAW workers, excessive compensation for employees and management alike.
Without US automakers, the foriegn trade deficiets would have tripled and devalued the US Dollar to even lower levels estimated to be $2.60 to one Euro Dollar.
Unemployment would have entered the double digit values not seen since Ronald Reagan was president in 1982.
If we can''t save the very same economic system that fuels credit, houses, transports the citizens of this nation, then who can we save? What is next? Will Medical Insurers announce insolvency?
GOP robbed the USA of wealth, jobs and a healthy middle class.
The UAW and the automakers have not kept pace and build sub-standard products. The workers are way over paid. 30 years after the first OPEC embargo we should all be driving cars that get a minimum of 30mpg.
If the capitalism works then let the automakers fail and we''ll see what happens. If we bailout the automakers then why not Circuit City or any other group going through hard times?
Posted by whitemale08 at 06:02 PM : Nov 23, 2008
Thanks to the UAW - the diff is about $78 an hour.
The UAW would rather see GM Ford & Chrysler go bankrupt than accept a logical wage for unskilled blue-collar jobs.
Makes simple sense. Compete or pack your bags.
***********************
Yes it is - break the UAW rather than taxpayers.
Another disappearance of a 100 year old industry such as ''auto manufacturing''.
What else would it take to you stupid ''globalists'' to see that we are committing SUICIDE???
What is the difference between the United States and a poor 3rd world country like Haiti if we have no "auto-manufacturing"???
NOTHING!!!!
Then there will FINALLY be a majority who has a reason to be against "free trade," and we can get rid of it once an for all.
As long as the ringmasters keep playing smoke and mirrors to keep the voters employed, nothing is going to change.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
... - 10
- next
See all 184 Comments