Nov. 21, 2008

Clinton To Accept Secretary Of State Job

Adviser To N.Y. Senator Tells CBS News She Will Accept Offer To Join Former Rival's Cabinet

  • Video Rumors Fly Over Clinton

    Rumors that Hillary Clinton does not want to take the top post of secretary of state in Barack Obama's administration are false, says correspondent Chip Reid.

  • Video Hillary's Dilemma

    Chris Wragge speaks to President Bill Clinton's former press secretary Joe Lockhart about Sen. Hillary Clinton's chances for Secretary of State.

    • Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton step off his campaign plane in Florida last month.

      Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton step off his campaign plane in Florida last month.  (AP)

    • In this Friday, Nov. 14, 2008 file photo, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., speaks at a New York Public Transit Association conference in Albany.

      In this Friday, Nov. 14, 2008 file photo, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., speaks at a New York Public Transit Association conference in Albany.  (AP)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Photo Essay United Front

    Rivals turned allies Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton make show of unity ... in Unity.

  • Photo Essay Hillary Clinton

    A look at a life and career full of firsts.

(CBS/ AP)  CBS News has confirmed that Sen. Hillary Clinton has decided to accept the offer to join President-elect Barack Obama's cabinet as Secretary of State, according to a senior Clinton adviser.

The adviser told CBS News that Obama formally told Clinton earlier in the week the job was hers if she wanted it.

However, a Clinton spokesman on the record said reports that this is a done deal are "premature."

"We're still in discussions, which are very much on track. Any reports beyond that are premature," said Philippe Reines, a senior adviser to the New York senator.

Earlier, it was reported that Mr. Obama was on track to make the nomination official after Thanksgiving, barring any unforeseen problems, according to an aide to the transition.

"In many ways this pairing would seem the most unlikely of the new administration, especially given the often bitter primary battle between the two," said CBSNews.com senior political editor Vaughn Ververs. "But the President-elect has emphasized his desire to bring former opponents into his administration and there’s not a better example of this 'team of rivals' approach than this. Whether it works out in the long run is the $64,000 question."

The transition aide told The Associated Press that the two camps have worked out financial disclosure issues involving Clinton's husband, former President Bill Clinton, and the complicated international funding of his foundation that operates in 27 countries. The aide said Mr. Obama and Hillary Clinton have had substantive conversations about the secretary of state job.

Clinton is reported to have been mulling the post for several days, but the transition aide's comments suggested that Mr. Obama's team does not feel she is inclined to turn it down.

Some Democrats and government insiders have questioned whether Clinton is too independent and politically ambitious to be an effective secretary of state. But Mr. Obama is said to admire her talents and experience, as do many other Democrats.

A senior adviser to Mr. Obama said the president-elect believes Clinton would bring instant stature and credibility to U.S. diplomatic relations and that the advantages to her serving far outweighed potential downsides.

Meanwhile, some of Mr. Obama's economic team began to take shape on Friday. A senior Democratic official told the Associated Press that Mr. Obama is likely to name Timothy Geithner, president of the New York Federal Reserve, as Treasury Secretary.

Also, CBS News has confirmed that New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson is a serious contender to be tapped for Commerce Secretary. (Read more)

It was not clear when Mr. Obama intended to make a formal announcement of any of his picks. He has largely stayed out of public view since his election on Nov. 4, preferring to work quietly in a suite of offices in downtown Chicago.

©MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 145 Comments
by sly_64 November 24, 2008 4:12 PM EST

Oh please help us, I don''t want to put up with her arrogance and dog face for 4 years.
Reply to this comment
by armydog2 November 24, 2008 10:27 AM EST
Obama will be the one in charge whoever he appoints to his cabinet. That is how he ran his campaign and that is how he will run his presidency.He needs folks with experience and who know how to get the job done. So far all of his choices have proven that. Give the guy a chance, look at the f@cking mess he is walking into courtesy of bush and his republican friends.
Reply to this comment
by libra217 November 24, 2008 1:38 AM EST
We didn''t want her to be active during her husbands presidency but she was, trying to take over health care in secret meetings.

Posted by armandbeni at 09:42 PM : Nov 23, 2008

You should remember that you are only expressing YOUR opinion here. You shouldn''t pretend to speak for others.

By the way, she didn''t "try to take over health care". She was assigned that job by the President and hundreds of people worked with her on it.

Eighteen MILLION enthusiastic supporters voted for her in the primaries. They should not be summarily dismissed. Evidently, President-elect Obama feels she will be an excellent SOS. So do I !
Reply to this comment
by armandbeni November 24, 2008 12:42 AM EST
There is just no getting rid of her. We didn''t want her to be active during her husbands presidency but she was, trying to take over health care in secret meetings. She lost the primary....voted down by her own party, and now she is going to be forced down our throats once again.
The country would be better served if we hired people for their qualifications. This isn''t change, they are the same old political hacks playing their same old political game! The same old faces, owned by the same special interest groups.
Reply to this comment
by antoniof123 November 24, 2008 12:29 AM EST
Let me see he is selecting Democrats because he is a Democrat and the neo cons are saying no fair.

Hey neo cons he does have some others working with him like McCain remember not in his administration because he would take it. But it is not over yet and knowing Obama he will do a great job.

By the way the Clinton administation was successful but as I recall well no we are still living it the Bush administration is a failure.

So please take a seat and wait until after he is President.
Reply to this comment
by cfin5 November 23, 2008 8:36 PM EST
Her post as Secretary of State could better be said "President of Foreign Policy".....That should cool the heals of the PUMA''s. Got a feeling that the Ahmablahblahblah''s over there are gonna fall for anything now. Haven''t seen any policy except the CFR''s triumph since WW2. I''ll be watching for news media to puff their image the next few years.
Reply to this comment
by cheteunice November 23, 2008 3:12 PM EST
For this job: No experience. No knowledge. Too much Bill. No Hillary!
Reply to this comment
by chitown4716 November 23, 2008 9:47 AM EST
We need change and change we can depend on. I voted for change and was disappointed. I will vote for change again.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by BoandCo

Yes, I would encourage you NOT to vote for things YOU cant understand....
Reply to this comment
by boandco November 23, 2008 8:32 AM EST
Obama appointments follow a clear pattern of blue states and no red states. Very few fresh faces, just old Clinton cronies in sheeps clothing and plenty of Clinton sleaze. However, during the campaign, rhetoric of change resonated with the American people. For decades the US administration has lacked a fresh approach and a non-partisan and bipartisan perspective. However the need for change has now been identified and is stronger than ever. We need change and change we can depend on. I voted for change and was disappointed. I will vote for change again.
Reply to this comment
by standlee5 November 23, 2008 3:51 AM EST
Oh gee, was there ever any doubt. She''s been envious of Condoleezza Rice from day one.
Reply to this comment
by hatesthecolt November 22, 2008 11:50 PM EST
She lost because she didn''''''''t hire enough rock bands and teenie boppers waving signs at the camera "Heil Obslime-a!"...

Posted by Rowdydfw


You know you''re staying in a texas motel, when you call up the front desk to say you gotta leak in the sink, and the guy says, "Go ahead."

Reply to this comment
by libra217 November 22, 2008 10:44 PM EST
What the heck happened with the Change We Can Make Obama. He is appointing all the Clinton crowd.

Posted by cattieJ at 09:40 PM : Nov 21, 2008

So you are surprised he is appointing Democrats ? He is a Democrat. Aside from Clinton, when was the last time we had a Dem. administration ? A long time ago. If he wants to appoint people who are Dems and are knowledgable about government, it stands to reason that they were active in government during the Clinton administration. Where else would you find them ?
Reply to this comment
by cheteunice November 22, 2008 9:53 PM EST
metsobitso, I wouldn''t call Monica a little girl by any stretch of the imignation. Neither would I say that she was molested.
Reply to this comment
by cheteunice November 22, 2008 9:48 PM EST
Exactly what experience does she bring to the new job?
Reply to this comment
by roach9703 November 22, 2008 9:09 PM EST
If these apparent cabinet appointments prove true, including Hillary, then it is safe to say that Obama will represent an end of an era that began in 1960 based in T.V.,media manipulation, Watergate, Iran Contra, Wood Stock, Monica and Bill,etc., Carl Rove, etc. Then, after this mess, will we be able to continue with the twenty-first century?
Reply to this comment
by metsobitso November 22, 2008 7:38 PM EST
This is a perverts dream ticket. Bill Clinton will be able to travel the world with Hillary, at taxpayers expense, molesting young girls around the world at will. If there is any push back, he can claim diplomatic immunity.
Reply to this comment
by brundage3 November 22, 2008 6:28 PM EST
Folks...

To change a thing, one must be fully immeresed in it, know it, AND be thorough in thinking from afar as well. A combination of ideas is a key in staffing the Presidency. Check the most successful Presidents. Start with Lincoln. HIS cabinet was full of vpponents"and he listened to them often.

If a person has worked in Washington DC they cannot be for "change?" So, it takes a name I have not heard of, or a person from anywhere but Washington DC OR a state Capitol OR a Courthouse in the County seat to be a "change" person? A person with experience, just can''''t be an agent of "change!"

THAT thinking,,, that "ALL new" is required. That doesn''t fit anywhere but on tv promo''s.

Reply to this comment
by miamiderick November 22, 2008 6:15 PM EST
d7767w says "He has shafted his backers". We have been fooled, never again by this guy.
Reply to this comment
by cheteunice November 22, 2008 4:57 PM EST
Will she be as successful with this as she was with the health reform effort?
Reply to this comment
by cheteunice November 22, 2008 4:38 PM EST
I hear that Obama will flip flop and announce that his name is really Bill Clinton!
Reply to this comment
See all 145 Comments
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: