DETROIT, Nov. 21, 2008

GM Slashing Production In Fight To Survive

Cash-Starved Auto Giant Tries To Save Money As Future Of Federal Bailout Hangs In Balance

  • Tom Landwehr loads new 2009 Chevrolet Traverse vehicles at the General Motors Spring Hill Manufacturing Plant in Spring Hill, Tenn., Oct. 3, 2008.

    Tom Landwehr loads new 2009 Chevrolet Traverse vehicles at the General Motors Spring Hill Manufacturing Plant in Spring Hill, Tenn., Oct. 3, 2008.  (AP Photo/Bill Waugh)

  • Play CBS Video Video Big Three Blowing In The Wind

    Congressional leaders have admitted there's no overwhelming support for an auto bailout because of the disastrous results of the $700 billion economic bailout. Sharyl Attkisson has more.

  • Video Nissan CEO On Auto Bailout

    Nissan CEO, Carlos Ghosn, tells CBS News "limited" and "temporary" help to US automakers is "acceptable" but would put the Big 3 at an "uneven" advantage.

  • Video Romney To Big 3: Fold

    Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney tells Maggie Rodriguez the auto industry should restructure after filing for bankruptcy instead of receiving a check to continue failed policy.

Should the federal government bail out the Big Three automakers?
 Yes
 No
 Not Sure

(CBS/AP)  General Motors Corp. will extend its holiday shutdown or make other production cuts at five factories at as it deals with a continued U.S. auto sales slump and fights to stay solvent.

Also Friday, the company announced changes at five other factories that could increase production of some models, all based on a volatile U.S. auto market that has slumped to a 25-year low.

The changes won't be the last as cash-starved GM tries to conserve as much money as possible while awaiting Congressional action on a bailout loan package for Detroit's three automakers.

"Market demand is usually the prevailing criteria," said spokesman Chris Lee. "We're looking at this much more frequently than I've ever seen us as far as making minor adjustments. And I suspect that will be the norm going forward."

It was a busy, but ultimately disappointing week for the Big Three automakers, having appeared twice before Congressional committees seeking a $25 billion lifeline to save their struggling businesses from failure. Faced with stiff resistance from the White House on using bailout funds to aid the auto industry, Congress put off a vote on any rescue package.

Democratic leaders did, however, begin laying out conditions Friday that they say the three automakers need to meet before Congress will consider giving them the emergency loan.

GM said it will cancel a down week starting Dec. 8 at its Wentzville, Mo., factory that makes full-size vans, and will keep or restore overtime at factories in Delta Township, Mich., near Lansing; Spring Hill, Tenn.; Arlington, Texas; and Fort Wayne, Ind.

But factories facing cuts include a plant in Lordstown, Ohio, where workers were told that the normal two-week holiday shutdown will be extended until Jan. 20. The sprawling factory complex stamps parts for and assembles the Chevrolet Cobalt and Pontiac G5 small cars.

Also affected is a car plant in Oshawa, Ontario, which will see an additional week of closure starting Jan. 12 on the Chevrolet Impala assembly line. The holiday shutdown will be extended until Jan. 12 at a car-making plant in Orion Township, Mich., near Pontiac, and until Jan. 20 at a car assembly plant in Kansas City, Kan., GM said.

GM also plans to close the Oshawa, Ontario, truck plant sooner than planned. The company had said in June it would close the pickup truck plant by 2010; the new closure date was not available. In addition, GM will slow assembly line speeds at two of the factories.

The automaker normally shutters its plants for two weeks around the Christmas and New Year's holidays, reopening them the first week in January. But with U.S. auto sales down 15 percent and GM sales off 20 percent for the first nine months of the year, the closings were extended.

Workers will get holiday pay for the first two weeks, then go on layoff and get unemployment benefits and supplemental pay from the company.

At Lordstown, the last scheduled workday will be Dec. 23, although production will start to wind down before that, said Dave Green, president of a United Auto Workers local at the complex.

Quote

I think we'll come back, and then if production warrants, or demand wanes, maybe there will be a little more down time. It's all driven by the market, so it's really out of our hands.

Dave Green, president of a United Auto Workers local
Green said that after Jan. 20, the Lordstown complex will keep operating around the clock, but assembly line speed will be reduced from the current 62 vehicles per hour to 46.5 vehicles. The Lordstown complex, located about 50 miles southeast of Cleveland, employs about 4,200 production workers.

Earlier this year the company added workers to the plant as demand for its small, fuel-efficient cars increased. But since then the bottom has fallen out of sales industrywide, and GM later announced it would lay off up to 1,100 of the plant's workers starting Jan. 20.

Green said he's optimistic that GM will resume production as scheduled on Jan. 20, although at the slower assembly line speed.

"I think we'll come back, and then if production warrants, or demand wanes, maybe there will be a little more down time," he said. "It's all driven by the market, so it's really out of our hands."

GM has announced thousands of factory layoffs so far this year and is cutting its salaried staff in order to pare expenses and conserve cash. The company has said it could run out of cash by the end of this year.

GM also announced that it was reducing the number of corporate jets available for executive travel, from five to two. The company started the year with seven jets.

Some in Congress pounced this week on what they view as the hypocrisy of auto executives flying on corporate jets to Washington to ask for public help.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Democrat from Nevada, said in Washington that "these guys flying in their big corporate jets doesn't send a good message to people in Searchlight, Nev., or Las Vegas or Reno or anyplace in this country."

Corporations insist riding on private planes is not a lavish perk, but rather a necessary security requirement for top officials that also helps them be more efficient.

"For a lot of CEOs, the risk of kidnapping is a real risk," said Paul Lapides, a corporate governance expert at Kennesaw State University in Georgia.

He noted that risk has been heightened of late in some parts of the world. "I mean, heck, people are kidnapping entire oil vessels," he said, referring to piracy in the seas around Africa.

About 11,000 U.S. companies operate jets or powerful prop planes, and more use smaller planes, said Ed Bolen, president and CEO of the National Business Aviation Association. He said companies like their chief executives to be productive and to have access to phones and e-mail during flights. And if, say, the CEO and chief financial officer are flying together to meet with investors, they can talk about their company's books without worrying they'll be overheard, he said.

© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Add a Comment See all 151 Comments
by presjfk November 24, 2008 3:13 PM EST
Hey GM! make a plug in electric for $18,000 and you will own the auto industry worldwide...feel free to send me a million bucks for this billion dollar advice.
Reply to this comment
by jsd330 November 23, 2008 2:03 AM EST
wrmscvsuv but you only worked 8 1/2 months out of the year, plus twice as many holidays and that was your career choice to be a teacher. The big 3 were hiring up until the late 90''s.
The prices I have seen on comparable vechicals Japanese and American are pretty close to the same. Fords quality is right up there with Toyota''s according to JD Powers.
Reply to this comment
by wrmscvsuv November 23, 2008 12:21 AM EST
I don''t feel sorry for them. Most GM workers I know make more money in one year than I made the first ten years I taught in public schools.

Make a comparable car to the Japanese or Koreans that we can afford, and we might start buying cars again.
Reply to this comment
by hennighg November 22, 2008 7:50 PM EST
Typical corporate thinking. How about making good affordable cars? Wouldn''t that help them to survive, too?
Reply to this comment
by wnbear-2009 November 22, 2008 7:17 PM EST
I donot know how much the ceo make but not near wht people are claming.Let congres just give back the fed income taxes paid by gm and me since 1958.If Gm goes then Chrysler will go,and in 10 years are less no cars will be made in US. Ford will be in Canada and Mexico all the *** plants will go elsewere.Gm will make cars in china and india
Reply to this comment
by asamiller November 22, 2008 7:14 PM EST
Bail out the big 3 ONLY IF:

They fully open their books
Executives take drastic pay cuts
No wage cuts or contract concessions are asked of labor, they''ve given enough over 30 years only to face the same management mistakes over and over
The taxpayers get a share, in other words theirs public ownership proportional to the investment (not a loan)so they can participate in management along with labor
The companies commit to building ecologically sound vehicles and agree to substantial conversion to mass transit priorities

Reply to this comment
by wnbear-2009 November 22, 2008 6:52 PM EST
I can not believe the hate or whatever it is that comes through thes comments. small business man do you have any GM workers or retirees as customers.Ask the congress people how many times in last two years theyflew on a corporate jet.As a retiree I will lose about 50 percent of my pension of under 1100 a month.This is after taking a hit of about serveral dollars a year in health care costs.
Reply to this comment
by wnbear-2009 November 22, 2008 6:51 PM EST
I can not believe the hate or whatever it is that comes through thes comments. small business man do you have any GM workers or retirees as customers.Ask the congress people how many times in last two years theyflew on a corporate jet.As a retiree I will lose about 50 percent of my pension of under 1100 a month.This is after taking a hit of about serveral dollars a year in health care costs.
Reply to this comment
by jsd330 November 22, 2008 3:38 PM EST
Why does everybody want the big three to file for chapter 11. Let them file for chapter 7. It seems like the majority of people in the US want them to go under , so no reorginization under chapt. 11, shut them down completly. That way no CEO''s, no union, no high priced poor quality cars to whine about. That should make the majority of the people happy.

I read in the paper this morning an article by AP news, that walmart is going to concentrate on overseas growth. They must not be making enough money in th US. I guess walmart will be asking for a bailout, so they can build more stores overseas.
Reply to this comment
by tigerrram9 November 22, 2008 3:25 PM EST
No bail out for the BIG 3 auto makers. Let their CEOs bail out their own companies. They make millions on their salaries and probably millions more on bonuses. Let them fall and restructure themselves to compete in the free market...free market. NO BAIL OUT! Let the unions also negotiate a more affordable contract...stop killing the hand that feeds you.
Reply to this comment
by andylance1 November 22, 2008 2:59 PM EST
Presidential candidate Ralph Nader got his start by writing a book about a GM car called the Corvair: Unsafe At Any Speed.

GM bosses told the engineers they had to sell the car for less than $2000, so they had to put extra small tires on the Corvair and take out the stabilizing bar which would have cost an extra $15. Car and Driver magazine called it one of the nastiest-handling cars ever built.

GM bosses were convinced that the main problem was not building it too cheaply, but by building a small car in the first place. This kind of attitude is still prevalent in the midget brains of GM bosses. They still think that there just isn''t enough profit in small cars.
Reply to this comment
by mikezembill November 22, 2008 2:05 PM EST
Most big business are top heavy with people that do not make anything. And does anyone think that the top CEO would ask the worker that does the job eight to ten hours a day what he thinks would help and the answer is no. The top CEO''S think they they have all the answers if the workers owned the company it would be time to kick a-s-s and take names makes no difference how smart you think you are the guy next to you knows something you don''t.
Reply to this comment
by helloall34 November 22, 2008 2:04 PM EST
The fact that executives are earning 400 times the average worker is indicative of a problem. You want to solve this type of problem and reinstate a middle class? Make a law that the difference between the highest paid person and lowest paid person in any company can not exceed ~100x. The wealth will be "automatically" distributed with such a law. Wealth can still be wealthy, and yet a middle class can exist and grow.
Reply to this comment
by excoachken November 22, 2008 1:35 PM EST
I would suggest they strat by slashing the position of CEO, since those guys can''t seem to make a decent car or even a plan that sounds reasonable. At the least, it would really cut back on transportation costs.
Reply to this comment
by walt1944-2009 November 22, 2008 1:35 PM EST
GM has announced that it is cutting back production to survive.

How about a BETTER idea.

How about all the highly-paid, highly-perked, totally-GREEEDY, absolutely-stupid corporate executives at GM, Ford, and Chrysler, and any other company that''s in trouble, take a pay CUT and actually have to WORK for their living!!!!

It''s a startling concept to have a corporate executive actually WORK for their pay, just like the people who have to make the product do, but if you REALLY want Ford, GM, and Chrysler or any other company to survive, the EXECUTIVES have to make SACRIFICES like we all poor people have to!

Unfortunately, as long as we have a "confidence man" like the Great Emperor Bush around until mid-January, the average, poor taxpayer will continue to pay for GREEED and STUPIDITY by throwing taxpayer money at it!!!

SIG HEIL, I''M THE GREATEST CROOK THAT EVER LIVED AND PROUD OF IT!!!, BUSH!!!!
Reply to this comment
by slim1h2o November 22, 2008 1:13 PM EST
America...you don''''t kick a man when he''''s down. posted by kassandra,

Ha! What nether world do you belong to?
That''s all Americans do now-a-days...
Just look at the teenager that commited suicide on line.

Reply to this comment
by renonv5 November 22, 2008 1:12 PM EST
GM Slashing Production In Fight To Survive

I think they are finally "getting" it.
Reply to this comment
by BeyondGreen November 22, 2008 12:54 PM EST
WE meed to use some of the billions in bail out money and or stimulus checks and perfect electric cars and other alternative energy sources, make them affordable. They are so ahead of the times and will set a precedence in this country that is badly needed. I say, go California, Go Arnold, Go Better Place, And come on America, get off your duff and go too! The gas prices this past year have seriously damaged our economy and society. We must get on with becoming energy independent.We can''t take another year like this past. Jeff Wilson has a wonderful new book out about the energy crisis and what it would take for America to become energy independent. It covers every aspect of oil, what it''s uses are besides gasoline, our reserves, our depletion of it. Every type of alternative energy is covered and it''s potential to replace oil. He even has proposed legislative agenda''s that would be necessary to implement these changes along with time frames. This book is profoundly informative and our country needs to become more informed and move forward with becoming energy independent. It is called The Manhattan Project of 2009 Energy Independence NOW.

Reply to this comment
by presjfk November 22, 2008 12:49 PM EST
GM has the first plug in electric car announced to hit the market in 2010. Guess what? They don''t have a battery for the car that works. You heard right, GM has announced the introduction of the Chevy Volt that it does not have the technology to produce. Maybe they will create such a battery in time, maybe they won''t.

I can remember so many f-n-stupid products from GM that this is just the newest tragedy yet to unfold. Remember the V8-6-4 that automatically turned off cylinders of the car? Yeah, that was a bomb. How about the V8 289 engine, a real piece of junk that would blow up around 70,000 miles. It''s not nice replacing an engine in the first 2 years of having a car. How about the Chevy Vega? Yeah, it was the piece-o-sh** of the decade when it came out. Then there were the tens of million of GM cars that were painted with such a low quality of paint that the cars started losing their color and then paint altogether in a few short years.

Who is to blame for this and other failures at GM. Not the workers people! These decisions were made by the idiots at the top. GM and the other 2 are suffering because they made *** for a long, long time.
Reply to this comment
by presjfk November 22, 2008 12:40 PM EST
"Just think of it . . . Detroit could be sitting on top of the automotive world . . . if they had invested more in the electric vehicle technology they used to produce the EV-1 and Ford''''s light truck back in the 1990s, instead of opting out for the tax breaks for gas-guzzling SUV''''s (which they, along with Big Oil, lobbyied long and hard for).

Short-sighted greed has been their downfall -- and they still don''''t get it. They''''re still trying to F-over their retirees (except at the boardroom level, of course!) and union employees, by shipping jobs to the cheapest dirtbag countries they can find, and refusing to manufacture vehicles that aren''''t engineered for planned obsolescence -- or use clean, renewable energy sources to power them. Hubris has a way of punishing those that ignore it. It''''s payback time -- that''''s all. Posted by imprisonrove"

Good post. You nailed it. :-)
Reply to this comment
See all 151 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Sarah Palin's Book: The Fact Check

    (333 recent comments)

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: