Nov. 23, 2008

Nuke Facility Raid An Inside Job?

Eyewitness Talks To 60 Minutes About Brazen Assault On South African Nuclear Facility

  • Play CBS Video Video Assault On Pelindaba

    Scott Pelley investigates the boldest assault ever on a facility containing weapons-grade uranium, a still-unsolved crime that could have had calamitous consequences.

  • Video Thwarting The Assualt

    Meet Anton Gerber, the man who thwarted the boldest assault ever on a nuclear facility that contained bomb-grade uranium.

  • Video Vive Les Nukes!

    In Full: As the process to make energy continues to cause global warming, America may need to reconsider nuclear energy, like the French, who depend almost entirely on it. Steve Kroft reports.

  •  (CBS)

  • Fast Facts South Africa

    Learn about the people, economy and history.

  • Interactive Nuclear Armed World

    The world's nuclear weapons powers, missile defense and a history of the nuclear weapons age.

(CBS)  They picked a spot in the bottom of a ravine, far below the perimeter road where the security guards would be traveling. The guards couldn’t see them from up there. Once they got to the fence, one of the men used plastic clips to raise the bottom of the fence just several inches above the ground. He spent about 20 minutes shimmying under the electrical wire and once inside, he made straight for the box that controls the electricity, and shut the whole thing down.

"So the box has an alarm on it, they disabled that. It has a communications cable to warn the security office, they cut that. And then they shut the fence down. They knew what they were doing," Pelley remarks.

"They knew what they were doing. Definitely," Van Der Bijl acknowledges.

It was a fluke that the man who stopped the plot was in the control room at all. The attack came on the night of a plant holiday party. The employee who was supposed to be on duty is a paraplegic in a wheelchair, but he got drunk. Meiring filled in at the last moment. Anton Gerber is her fiancé and he decided to keep her company. That left him facing the intruders, who came at him with an iron bar.

Why did he decide to fight the four armed gunmen?

"I don't know," Gerber says. "For the first moment, I thought maybe I must just put hands in the air and said, 'Listen, what do you want?' But I think the moment they hit me with that piece of iron, it was all over. I start fighting."

Gerber says he knocked two of them down and turned to a third man. "I grabbed him. But the moment before I can take this guy he fired the shot, you know. And I was still fighting. I didn't know that there was, he shot me through the, through the chest."

"And after they shot him, it was terrible. They hit him over and over and over and over again," Meiring remembers. "After they shot, while he was lying on the floor."

Gerber was seriously wounded, waiting for the security force. He says it should have taken about three minutes for security to respond; instead, he says it took 24.

Meiring says she wondered the entire time where security was, while she was on her knees with a gun to her head.

After they shot Gerber, the gunmen fled and had plenty of time to get away. The second team of gunmen also vanished. And it seemed that South African officials wanted to make our questions disappear as well.

"After the first team got in, what was happening with the second team?" Pelley asks.

"You are talking about teams as if they are related. We don’t think they are related," Van Der Bijl says

"If these were sophisticated terrorists, Anton Gerber wouldn't be alive to tell his tale today," says Rob Adam, the CEO of the Nuclear Energy Corporation of South Africa. He runs Pelindaba. "I think that it was a piece of random criminality, frankly, having looked at it."

Asked what he means by "random criminality," Adam tells Pelley, "Well, I don't think that there was any concerted attack of a nuclear nature. You had one technically sophisticated individual with some friends."

Adam says he doesn't know what the intruders were after.

Continued



Produced by Graham Messick and Michael Karzis
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Recent Segments
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Add a Comment See all 45 Comments
by bear8819-2009 November 27, 2008 2:05 AM EST
Regarding the disabling or the fence controller alarm by "cutting the cable", sophisticated alarms constantly communicate with sensors, so cutting or shorting will trigger the alarm. They can only be defeated by monitoring the communication and building something to emulate it. Clearly not possible in this case, suggesting security is primitive.
Reply to this comment
by rgheard November 26, 2008 1:34 PM EST
As these sort of armed robberies are common in South Africa I think that it is stretching the point to try and link the invasion of the perimeter fence with nuclear terrorism. The probable reason for heading for the Emergency Centre is that there are many computers there and the theft of large numbers of computers from Corporate organisations is very common.
Reply to this comment
by mrvolleyba11 November 24, 2008 10:15 PM EST
Any small town ''''Barney Fife'''' can have automatic access to a nuke plant under 10 CFR 73.
Posted by usnrcmoron

Bu11sh*t, NO local police have "AUTOMATIC" access to a nuclear plant or facility. They may have responsibilities in case of an incident or attack at or near the facility but blanket or automatic access is not given to ANYBODY!!! Cops/police do not even have "automatic" or "blanket" access to military installations and a nuclear facility has even more restriction.
Reply to this comment
by inketolstoy November 24, 2008 4:27 PM EST
And handling the material, according to Bunn, isn%u2019t very dangerous. "Unfortunately not. Highly enriched uranium is only very weakly radioactive. You can handle it with your hands."

Until you die very slowly twenty years later from cancer caused by exposure from the uranium. Too many people in this country are learning science from movies like the incredible Hulk.
Reply to this comment
by usnrcmoron November 24, 2008 2:23 PM EST
This could easily happen to a U.S. commercial nuclear power plant or other commercial plant such as the 2 which make heu navy fuel. The vulnerability which the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission fails to address is that the local police, who ultimately have responsibility and jurisdiction to neutralize and/or apprehend the intruders, are not subject to adequate background psychological, drug and alcohol checks. Any small town ''Barney Fife'' can have automatic access to a nuke plant under 10 CFR 73, the NRC nuclear security regulations. And for that matter, any domestic terrorist like McVeigh can join the local police force.
Sincerely,
NRC Moron
Reply to this comment
by sensiblejack November 24, 2008 2:20 PM EST
maybe we should all pitch in and pay for a communications class for the South African government maybe something like "How to not look like a complete idiot when trying to deny the patently obvious"

Armed Burglars tring to steal laptops and copy machines, break into two teams and move to take out the command center after disabling sophisticated security systems.

riiiggghht

They would have been better off just saying no comment... as my mother used to say better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than open it and remove all doubt?
Reply to this comment
by shakehill November 24, 2008 11:10 AM EST
Anton Gerber is a hero who is being ostracized by his government. How sad. Why didn''t 60m ask him who he thought it was, what nationality, what dialect? He fought with 4 of them, he knows. Once again, not politically correct. SA''s arrogance appalls me.
Reply to this comment
by bear8819-2009 November 24, 2008 7:26 AM EST
Regarding the disabling or the fence controller alarm by "cutting the cable", sophisticated alarms constantly communicate with sensors, so cutting or shorting will trigger the alarm. They can only be defeated by monitoring the communication and building something to emulate it. Clearly not possible in this case, suggesting security is primitive.
Reply to this comment
by bear8819-2009 November 24, 2008 6:59 AM EST
Regarding the disabling or the fence controller alarm by "cutting the cable", sophisticated alarms constantly communicate with sensors, so cutting or shorting will trigger the alarm. They can only be defeated by monitoring the communication and building something to emulate it. Clearly not possible in this case, suggesting security is primitive.
Reply to this comment
by bear8819-2009 November 24, 2008 6:57 AM EST
Regarding the disabling or the fence controller alarm by "cutting the cable", sophisticated alarms constantly communicate with sensors, so cutting or shorting will trigger the alarm. They can only be defeated by monitoring the communication and building something to emulate it. Clearly not possible in this case, suggesting security is primitive.
Reply to this comment
by tsc307 November 24, 2008 6:43 AM EST
Hilarious and Disturbing

Scott Pelley spends the entire segment trying to prove that it would take sophisticated terrorists to pull off an invasion of a weapons-grade nuclear facility, while all the South Africans keep saying that any yokel could do it. Weren%u2019t rolls reversed?

It%u2019s very scary if well-funded and well-organized terrorists can come so close. It is fill-your-underpants, call-the-State-Department TERRIFYING if some hicks can drive by and say %u201Cbet there%u2019s something valuable behind that fence over yonder; let%u2019s rob it%u201D and almost succeed. The South Africans made the strongest case for why they shouldn%u2019t have highly enriched uranium.
Reply to this comment
by janetla November 24, 2008 3:42 AM EST
This is not only extremely disturbing, but the South African Gov. seems to be trying to treat this as if it is "no big deal" we are counting on them to help protect the entire world from terrorists getting hold of this very dangerous uranium. They not only should be embarrassed, and ashamed, but should swallow their pride and allow the US to aid in protecting it. Oh, and one more thing, I completely believe there were those on the inside being paid off...otherwise it wouldn''t have even been attempted by only 4 people to get through the first security point...my guess is the person paid off for the second security check point decided against being a traitor and decided against endangering the entire world...good reporting 60 minutes and please...keep up the uncomfortable pressure on the South African Government.
Reply to this comment
by rwsmith29456 November 24, 2008 2:54 AM EST
Why should anyone listen to a reporter and a couple of eyewitnesses? It was just like the S. African officials said, "It depends on how you interpret this". Makes a lot of sense to me. Heh, heh, heh. What that really means is "We don''t have to tell anyone about this."
Reply to this comment
by mikesarcbs November 24, 2008 1:57 AM EST
Why was it never a Headline in my newspaper?
How did "they know what they were doing"?
Why do S.A. officials react so passively?
Why do our officials react so little?
---
Either, it was an attempt to test their security,
(I dontblivet),
or, it was a "friendly" nation that bungled the job.
Noticed nobody got killed? Trade Mark of Friendlies.
Did S.A. test an Atom bomb already?
I expect they upgraded security, even if we pay for it, like we did for Russia and elsewhere.
Reply to this comment
by mikezembill November 24, 2008 12:59 AM EST
THE REPUBLICANS ARE AT IT AGAIN
Reply to this comment
by robaldrich November 23, 2008 11:46 PM EST
clathrate wrote: ''Actually it sounds more like a Russian mob plot to steal the stuff and sell to the highest bidder, whoever that may be. They''''ve tried for years inside their own country, what''''s to prevent them from going international?''
-------------------

Hi again.

The answer to your question is Physics.

You operate from a false premise. While how to build a nuclear bomb is a relatively simple process, actually doing it is complex, exacting, and expensive. The reality is that an entity (countries) with the wherewithal to build an atomic bomb that will actually detonate can enrich its own uranium.

That is why the, alleged, Russian Mob plots are to steal an Atomic Bomb, NOT fissile material.
Reply to this comment
by btreib November 23, 2008 11:42 PM EST
Give me a break, we''re supposed to believe no weapons grade material was taken? They went to all that trouble and then just walked away?
Reply to this comment
by wizardjuan November 23, 2008 11:26 PM EST
Yeah..South Africa has always been truthful about what their military has been doing-NOT. I am less worried about S. Africa than what is our country doing about security at Nuclear Power Plants. The state I live in wants to import waste from around the world
Reply to this comment
by antizion November 23, 2008 11:21 PM EST
"Sounds like an intelligence service wanted an untraceable source of nuclear material for a false flag terror attack and the plant operator was involved.
I would look at those that specialize in false flag attacks - Israel and the US. "--Posted by AntiZion



And since Israel and the US can both produce all the fissionable materials they want without accounting to anybody, why would they need to steal it from South Africa? Duh?

Sound more like desperate Muslims hoping to see those 72 virgin boys they''''re promised when they kill.

******************************************

Funny thing about an isotope, they are like a fingerprint and quite traceable. Hope that answers your stupid question/comment.
Reply to this comment
by cbswhiteout November 23, 2008 11:20 PM EST
I grew up watching Walter Cronkite and 60 minuets with my dad. I believed it all.

Now I watch and wonder "what was the reason for that piece of propaganda?
Reply to this comment
See all 45 Comments
60 Minutes RSS Feed