Nuke Facility Raid An Inside Job?
Eyewitness Talks To 60 Minutes About Brazen Assault On South African Nuclear Facility
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Assault On Pelindaba
Scott Pelley investigates the boldest assault ever on a facility containing weapons-grade uranium, a still-unsolved crime that could have had calamitous consequences.
-
Video
Thwarting The Assualt
Meet Anton Gerber, the man who thwarted the boldest assault ever on a nuclear facility that contained bomb-grade uranium.
-
Video
Vive Les Nukes!
In Full: As the process to make energy continues to cause global warming, America may need to reconsider nuclear energy, like the French, who depend almost entirely on it. Steve Kroft reports.
-
Photo
(CBS)
-
Fast Facts
South Africa
Learn about the people, economy and history.
-
Interactive
Nuclear Armed World
The world's nuclear weapons powers, missile defense and a history of the nuclear weapons age.
- Stories
- Pelindaba: Finding Anton Gerber
Pelindaba is nestled in the African bush, not far from the capital of South Africa. It is where the former Apartheid regime secretly built nuclear weapons. In the 1990s, South Africa chose to disarm. The bombs were dismantled, but the highly enriched uranium, known as HEU - the fuel for the bombs - is still there. South Africa assures the world that Pelindaba is a fortress. But, last year, on the night of Nov. 7, it was the scene of the boldest raid ever attempted on a site holding bomb grade uranium.
"It happened just after one o’clock at night. We heard a sound inside the building," remembers Anton Gerber, who has worked at Pelindaba for 30 years and is the chief of the plant’s emergency control center.
He was in the control room when masked men broke in. "There's a crack in the door. And I looked through this and I saw this four armed gunmen entering the passages is coming straight to us in the control room."
Gerber says all four were armed.
The men had breached a 10,000 volt fence, passed security cameras, and walked three quarters of a mile to the control room that monitors alarms and responds to emergencies. Gerber called the security office, just three minutes away.
"I immediately said to them they must come and help us. We're under attack. There's four armed men inside our building. The first guy who stepped into the office, he said to me, 'Why do you phone?' He was shouting at me, 'Why do you phone? Why do you phone?'" Gerber remembers. "And I was still so surprised, you know. My first words to them, 'Is this a joke?'"
The only other employee in the control room was Ria Meiring. "And he grabbed me at my hair and pull me out. And he put a gun to my head while the other three guys were fighting with Anton," she remembers.
But the attack on the control room was just the start. A second group of gunmen, on the other side of the plant, was cutting through the fence and opened fire on a guard.
Asked if he thinks the gunmen were after the HEU, Matthew Bunn of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government tells correspondent Scott Pelley, "That's certainly the most valuable single thing that's at that site."
Bunn has studied the attack and has written a classified report for the government on atomic security. He says highly enriched uranium is extremely difficult to make, and would be worth millions of dollars on the black market. And if terrorists get a hold of it, it would not be hard to build a crude atomic bomb. "Making a nuclear bomb with highly enriched uranium basically involves slamming two pieces together at high speed. That's really all there is to it," he explains.
Asked how much highly enriched uranium a terrorist group would need to build a weapon, Bunn says, "The amount of highly enriched uranium metal would basically fit into the cans of a six pack."
And handling the material, according to Bunn, isn’t very dangerous. "Unfortunately not. Highly enriched uranium is only very weakly radioactive. You can handle it with your hands."
Pelindaba holds more than a thousand pounds of HEU, and it uses some of it to make medical products. South Africa calls the plant is a "national key point," a facility with the highest security.
"This is the first time that this has ever happened on site," says Ari Van Der Bijl, the general manager.
Van Der Bijl brought 60 Minutes to the place where the gunmen got through the electric fence.
Produced by Graham Messick and Michael Karzis
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Which immediately makes me consider the possibility that it was a fake - to cover up the sale of uranium to some entity that would displease one power or another.
The purpose is to control or maniplutate public sentiment especially critics of the Iraq War who want to pull out troops.
Nuclear safety is an ongoing issue and has been since the 1950''s. Break-ins and attacks used to be highly classified, but are now seemingly publicized.
Four masked gunman could walk out of a nuclear facility with handfuls of high grade uranium, but to do it safely, would require more than they could carry on foot. A safety containment device for high grade uranium is heavy and impractical for any sizable quantities. Radiation burns would kill unprotected humans in less than 3 days.
Under the scenario where one steals urannium and builds a bomb, and attempts to detonate one, the results are highly unlikely to do more damage than conventional explosives, but will leave a radiation residue that would require a significant containment effort to remediate.
A news team from the USA was actually able to meet the new independant leaders of the republics and requested to see the "Nuke Button" and some were granted their request and shown the "Nuke Button" while the journalists had their cameras rolling. They were also able to see the handbag that carried the classified arming codes. It was passed off as a casual event that angered the KGB and GRU to no end. Back in the USA, the jaws of the CIA and NSA operatives fell to the floor at the sight of journalists seeing what few intelligence employees ever could.
The current challenge for the USA and Russian relations is keeping Bush 41 and Putin as far away from accessing political control as possible. Those two are the greatest threat that all people in the world should be wary of. They both advocate use of force and war making efforts for certain scenarios.
Former Presidents are entitled to current intelligence reports under the current guidelines. I seriously believe that Obama should find ways to put an end to that practice. Bush 41 is not a man to be trusted with any political power, much less, any intelligence reports.
Little physics here, folks.
ALL reactor fuel, with "added purification", can be used in a nuclear weapon.
It is the "added purification" which is the issue.
Is Iran actually doing "Added purification"? The IAEA says no. And it is not as trivial as the article implies. Nuclear fuel (what Iran is making) is enriched to 3%. Weapons-grade uranium needs to be enriched to 95% or higher. The required equipment, energy, and time needed to go from 3% to 95% is enormous, orders of magnitude larger than that needed for reactor fuel. And impossible to conceal (except under the Dimona reactor, which is, unlike Iran, safe from IAEA inspections.
---
Thanks for a vital post, and warning to those who believe Bush 43 and his damage is over.
Putin, for example, put Medvedev in power and keeps him there, but for only appearances. Putin runs the show, and none in this "KGB rogue state" will challenge Putin on any grounds. Legally and effectively, there are few left.
Likewise, while Bush busies himself cleaning out his desk drawer, he also is pushing bales of taxpayer dollars toward his friends in Wall Street circles as fast as he can.
Meanwhile, this "environmental president" has spent the last three months or so gutting the scant remaining protections against drilling around our national parks.
As if that were not enough, Bush also is in process of nullifying the federal species protection act. By removing requirement for expert scientific commentary from agency recommendations, no Bush federal agency will be required to consult biologists in regard to any threatened species.
As far back as 2004, America''s "Bush problem" was apparent to many in the federal community. Nation Magazine depicted the consensus of many in US military and intel circles regarding Bush and his handling of national security. It has become only worse, since then. See http://www.thenation.com/doc/20040628/kvh
Posted by timothyone at 06:50 AM : Nov 21, 2008
It would be nothing less than you deserve to have the Arabs in the Palestenian territory be your neighbors. If we could do a swap where all the people that live there vacate and I could go live there I would. Israel is a wonderful, vibrant country and they could then annex the Gaza and West Bank and make it wonderful too.
As far as your situation, your property values would immediately plummet and you could live in intimidation and fear as they lob rockets into your backyard on a daily basis.
In about 10 to 20 years, we will see that solar is the way to go because it will be cheaper than nuclear, it will employ heat retention systems to produce power overnight, it will be far too decentralized to suffer much from terrorist activity, and it will produce no dangerous waste of any kind. Wind will be viable as a cheaper supplement.
What''s ironic is that all the fuss of the environmentalists will not be the key to widespread use of solar and wind for power. It will be simple economics.
Wind is cheaper than nuke power? That''s a no brainer. But how much land must be peppered with windmills to create the output of one nuke plant.
You are also forgetting the environmentalists refusal to compromise on ANYTHING. They will not tolerate windmills all over our mountains, and open plains. They won''t allow anything that isn''t perfect in their eyes.
Who wants to see windmills all over the place anyways.
Nuke power is still the best way to go. But the enviros put a stop to that back in the 70''s.....
Is it somehow safer if random criminals have radioactive materials?
You`re assuming that the were there to steal radioactive materials.
Maybe they came there just to shoot this Gerber fellow.
I would look at those that specialize in false flag attacks - Israel and the US.
I would look at those that specialize in false flag attacks - Israel and the US.
Posted by AntiZion at 01:10 PM : Nov 21, 2008
And away we go with the conspiracy theories! Idiot!
It would not be allowed that a ''Black'' African nation have access and control over nuclear weapons. It is also no suprise that 98% of the employees at the facility are still white Afrikaaners.
It would not be allowed that a ''Black'' African nation have access and control over nuclear weapons. It is also no suprise that 98% of the employees at the facility are still white Afrikaaners.
It would not be allowed that a ''Black'' African nation have access and control over nuclear weapons. It is also no suprise that 98% of the employees at the facility are still white Afrikaaners.
He seems willing to claim just about anything for his Israeli and corporate masters.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by MikeTotten1
Right....nuke facility housing HEU is raided by gang of armed men who defeat multiple layers of security and they get away with God knows what. Right, nothing to be concerned about at all...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jbrown88881
Actually it sounds more like a Russian mob plot to steal the stuff and sell to the highest bidder, whoever that may be. They''ve tried for years inside their own country, what''s to prevent them from going international?
Is it really necessary that the news media report every aspect of what they consider news? Don''t you care that anti-Americans watch your reports? To think that you actually showed where they could get in the fencing, how they got in and told them that the alarm had to be shut off and then even proceeded to tell them how much uranium is needed and how it can be used to blow most of us off the face of the earth. I think there are times that the public does not need to know every detail and have it explained to them. This is not the first time or for that matter the only station that I have seen present things of unfavorable taste.
How''bout the girl bringing her boyfriend in to the facility to keep her company.
Roy Hall
-------
I''m not concerned, I live in America -- not Africa. Even if I live next door to Pelindaba, I still wouldn''t worry.
You can''t just take enriched uranium, throw it at someone, and have any real damage other than from the weight of Uranium-235. Uranium-235 alpha decays.
No need to discuss the virtual impossibility that a ''gang,'' that had to steal it''s enriched uranium from someone else, could build a device (bomb) to make Uranium-235 go prompt supercritical.
Now I watch and wonder "what was the reason for that piece of propaganda?
Now I watch and wonder "what was the reason for that piece of propaganda?
I would look at those that specialize in false flag attacks - Israel and the US. "--Posted by AntiZion
And since Israel and the US can both produce all the fissionable materials they want without accounting to anybody, why would they need to steal it from South Africa? Duh?
Sound more like desperate Muslims hoping to see those 72 virgin boys they''''re promised when they kill.
******************************************
Funny thing about an isotope, they are like a fingerprint and quite traceable. Hope that answers your stupid question/comment.
-------------------
Hi again.
The answer to your question is Physics.
You operate from a false premise. While how to build a nuclear bomb is a relatively simple process, actually doing it is complex, exacting, and expensive. The reality is that an entity (countries) with the wherewithal to build an atomic bomb that will actually detonate can enrich its own uranium.
That is why the, alleged, Russian Mob plots are to steal an Atomic Bomb, NOT fissile material.
How did "they know what they were doing"?
Why do S.A. officials react so passively?
Why do our officials react so little?
---
Either, it was an attempt to test their security,
(I dontblivet),
or, it was a "friendly" nation that bungled the job.
Noticed nobody got killed? Trade Mark of Friendlies.
Did S.A. test an Atom bomb already?
I expect they upgraded security, even if we pay for it, like we did for Russia and elsewhere.
Scott Pelley spends the entire segment trying to prove that it would take sophisticated terrorists to pull off an invasion of a weapons-grade nuclear facility, while all the South Africans keep saying that any yokel could do it. Weren%u2019t rolls reversed?
It%u2019s very scary if well-funded and well-organized terrorists can come so close. It is fill-your-underpants, call-the-State-Department TERRIFYING if some hicks can drive by and say %u201Cbet there%u2019s something valuable behind that fence over yonder; let%u2019s rob it%u201D and almost succeed. The South Africans made the strongest case for why they shouldn%u2019t have highly enriched uranium.
Armed Burglars tring to steal laptops and copy machines, break into two teams and move to take out the command center after disabling sophisticated security systems.
riiiggghht
They would have been better off just saying no comment... as my mother used to say better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than open it and remove all doubt?
Sincerely,
NRC Moron
Until you die very slowly twenty years later from cancer caused by exposure from the uranium. Too many people in this country are learning science from movies like the incredible Hulk.
Posted by usnrcmoron
Bu11sh*t, NO local police have "AUTOMATIC" access to a nuclear plant or facility. They may have responsibilities in case of an incident or attack at or near the facility but blanket or automatic access is not given to ANYBODY!!! Cops/police do not even have "automatic" or "blanket" access to military installations and a nuclear facility has even more restriction.
-
by bear8819-2009
November 26, 2008 11:05 PM PST
- Regarding the disabling or the fence controller alarm by "cutting the cable", sophisticated alarms constantly communicate with sensors, so cutting or shorting will trigger the alarm. They can only be defeated by monitoring the communication and building something to emulate it. Clearly not possible in this case, suggesting security is primitive.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 46 Comments