Bush Set To Ease Endangered Species Rules
Policy Would Exclude Input Of Scientists; Rush To Enact It To Prevent Obama Reversal
-
Photo
President Bush is seeking to change Department of the Interior rules protecting endangered species, like this Kirtland's warbler, found in Michigan. The new rules would exclude the input of wildlife scientists in approving federal highway and dam projects. (AP)
-
Photo Essay
Endangered Macaws
Scarlet and gold birds nurtured, taught to adapt to the wild
The rules must be published Friday to take effect before Obama is sworn in Jan. 20. Otherwise, he can undo them with the stroke of a pen.
The Interior Department rushed to complete the rules in three months over the objections of lawmakers and environmentalists who argued that they would weaken how a landmark conservation law is applied.
A Nov. 12 version of the final rules obtained by the Associated Press has changed little from the original proposal, despite the more than 250,000 comments received since it was first proposed in August.
The rules eliminate the input of federal wildlife scientists in some endangered species cases, allowing the federal agency in charge of building, authorizing or funding a project to determine for itself if it is likely to harm endangered wildlife and plants.
Current regulations require independent wildlife biologists to sign off on these decisions before a project can go forward, at times modifying the design to better protect species.
The regulations also bar federal agencies from assessing emissions of the gases blamed for global warming on species and habitats, a tactic environmentalists have tried to use to block new coal-fired power plants.
Tina Kreisher, an Interior Department spokeswoman, could not confirm whether the rule would be published before the deadline, saying only that the White House was still reviewing it. But she said changes were being made based on the comments received.
"We started this; we want to finish this," said Kreisher.
If the rules go into effect before Obama takes office, they will be difficult to overturn since it would require the new administration to restart the rule-making process. Congress, however, could reverse the rules through the Congressional Review Act - a law that allows review of new federal regulations.
It's been used once in the last 12 years, but some Democratic lawmakers have said they may employ it to block the endangered species rules and other midnight regulations by the Bush administration.
Rep. Nick Rahall, D-W.Va., chairman of the House Natural Resources Committee, said Wednesday that he and other Democrats were committed to "the change that is needed."
Drew Hammill, a spokesman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the House will be looking at ways to overturn the endangered species rules and other midnight regulations.
[We] will review what oversight tools are at our disposal regarding this and other last minute attempts to inflict severe damage to the law in the waning moments of the Bush administration
Drew Hammill, spokesman for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.The Bush administration has made no secret of its intent to complete the endangered species changes quickly.
When the proposal was first announced in August, the public was initially given 30 days to comment. That period was later doubled after Democratic lawmakers pressed for more time.
Then, last month, the head of the endangered species program corralled 15 experts in Washington to sort through 200,000 comments in 32 hours.
"This is definitely lightning quick," said John Kostyack, executive director of the National Wildlife Federation's Wildlife Conservation and Global Warming initiative. "I would be surprised that they spent all this time rushing it through if it wasn't greased."
If successful, the Bush administration will accomplish through rules what conservative Republicans have been unable to achieve in Congress: ending some environmental reviews that developers and other federal agencies blame for delays and cost increases on many projects.
Supporters of the changes also expected it to be finalized later this week.
The Pacific Legal Foundation, which advocates for property rights, urged that the rules be approved.
"Litigious activists have used the Endangered Species Act to fight projects," Reed Hopper, the foundation's principal attorney, said in a statement. "The administration's current proposal is a step toward curbing these abuses."
TIMELINE:
In one of the quickest turnarounds for rewriting federal regulations, the Bush administration is changing a rule to cut out government wildlife experts in some endangered species decisions. The new rule has to be published by Friday to deny President-elect Barack Obama the ability to reverse it when he takes office.
Aug. 15: Proposed rule appears in the Federal Register with 30-day public comment period.
Sept. 11: Interior Department announces 30-day extension of public comment period.
Oct. 15: Public comment period ends. Interior receives about 300,000 comments.
Oct. 16: Bryan Arroyo, the chief of the endangered species program, sends e-mail asking for help to review comments in 32 hours.
Oct. 27: Department releases draft analysis of rule's environmental impacts, giving public 10 days to comment.
Nov. 6: Comment period on draft environmental impact statement ends.
Nov. 13: Rule submitted to White House Office of Management and Budget for final review.
Sources: Interior Department, Office of Management and Budget
© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 114 CommentsGeorge W. Bush belongs before an international war crimes tribunal. I see no reason why proceedings cannot begin promptly at 1:00 p.m. on January 20, 2009.
Gee Whiz, is that stupid?
Or maybe just Evil.
He''ll be remembered - every time I step on something in the yard.
Dear God in Heaven, stop this man and let him fade into oblivion, with his only legacy being a mention in history books that he was the worst president we''ve ever had. And don''t let him benefit from his actions once he''s out of office. Amen.
keepin mind the people behind him...they are just as bad.
....
OMG!
the madness just never ends, does it?
It''s hard to believe this guy is real, it''s so nightmarish sometimes it is just beyond belief what a human wrecking-ball Bush is..
What a ^%&*(* moron..
Bush has forever proven himself to be a man child, incapable of doing anything magnanimous or benevolent. Instead, he is simply a tool of some very mentally deranged special interest groups.
What a pathetic legacy. Shame on Bush and all of his moronic, amoral lackeys.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h9PvQtj8plxTnRZS7hHmJap_Rt2AD94ICFU00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by enlightenu
Have faith. Mother nature has a way of killing off the stupid amoung a species.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/12/30/AR2005123001326.html
Posted by sesanders1 at 01:22 AM : Nov 20, 2008
agreed 100%
Posted by cbsfan7331 at 12:08 AM : Nov 20, 2008
Ol scooter dawg is at the top of the list fer keepin his mouth shut!
George Bush displays all the characteristics of the sociopath.
http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html
---
James Hansen, NOAA scientist, courageously exposed the censorship Bush tried to apply when Hansen first sounded the alarm about global warming, based on incoming scientific data.
As it turned out, Bush political appointees with no scientific credentials actually censored and changed wording on reports from the federal scientific community on this issue.
To the last, Bush symbolizes the politics of greed, monied special interests and sheer deceit, at one time, even claiming he is an environmentalist.
Bush''s last gasp is to *** the public interest in species preservation so developers can continue to pave over America with shopping malls. Bush has no concept of science at all, nor any interest in the idea of passing a natural resources legacy to posterity.
Fortunately, Bush is one species soon to become extinct-- and should.
---
Your quip doesn''t fly, won''t even taxi. And the reason you lack another site for an orphanage is your builder "heroes" took all the choice land for themselves, to pave over for shopping malls.
You deceitfully (and lamely) suggest the choice is preservation of wildlife or orphans-- a halfhearted attempt at evading the issue.
You must be GOP-- and you bozos have a heavy burden of shame to carry. Eight years of greed, corruption and incompetence, in a continuous litany of national disasters.
Liberal DUMMIES can''t see that Democrat vs. Republican DOES NOT EXIST--THEY''RE ALL THEIVES!!
Could it be that he and his other ''free trade'' buddies are trying to remove any/all obstacles that they may expect to encounter in the building of that superhighway going from Texas to Canada to haul China imports from Mexico City port to Canada? Or, has it been cancelled/held up by the citizens who will lose their land along the planned route via use of this Endangered Species Act, (probably now in litigation)?
You can bet your bootie that some rich developer somewhere is being ''repaid'' for a campaign contribution, or lots of money will be made in a future transaction. Follow the money trail.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 114 Comments