Despite Big 3 Pleas, Auto Bailout Stalling
CEOs Berated On Capitol Hill; Congressional Leaders Say Deal Is Unlikely Before Year End
-
-
Photo
Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., right, greets Ron Gettelfinger, president of the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 19, 2008, prior to a House Financial Services Committee hearing on the automotive industry bailout. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
-
Photo
Chevrolet salesman Philip Jordan, center, assists Charlotte Olson, right, who's looking to buy a car for her 18-year-old daughter, Kari Olson, left, Nov. 12, 2008, in downtown Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Ric Francis)
-
Photo
Auto industry executives, from left, General Motors Chief Executive Officer Richard Wagoner; Chrysler Chief Executive Officer Robert Nardelli; Ford Chief Executive Officer Alan Mulally; and Ron Gettelfinger, president of the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, testify on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 19, 2008, before a House Financial Services Committee hearing on the automotive industry bailout. (AP Photo/Gerald Herbert)
-
Photo
Auto executives, from left, Ron Gettelfinger, president of the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America; General Motors Chief Executive Officer Richard Wagoner; Chrysler Chief Executive Officer Robert Nardelli; Ford Chief Executive Officer Alan Mulally, listen to testimony on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 19, 2008, during a House Financial Services Committee hearing on the automotive industry bailout. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
-
Photo
From left, Ford CEO Alan Mulally, Chrysler CEO Robert Nardelli, GM CEO Rick Wagoner, and University of Maryland School of Business professor Peter Morici testify during a Senate hearing on the state of the auto industry on Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2008, in Washington. (AP)
-
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Big 3 Looking For A Lift
Executives from GM, Ford and Chrysler asked for a loan, while Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson faced lawmakers to explain why he won't buy failed mortgage assets with the $700B, reports Bill Plante.
-
Video
Big 3 Collapse 'Ripple Effect'
Financial journalist Vera Gibbons describes to Harry Smith the 'ripple effect' of a potential auto industry collapse.
-
Video
Big Three In Need
American automakers GM, Ford And Chrysler are running on empty and hoping that the government will come to their rescue with a bailout. Jim Axelrod reports.
-
In-Depth
Q&A: Big Three Bailout?
Why Detroit's automakers might get a rescue package
-
Interactive
Eye On The Economy
In-depth features on U.S. markets, taxes, employment and the Federal Reserve.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada sought to lower expectations of reaching a deal on the $25 billion proposal before Congress quits for the year.
While he told the Senate he still hoped lawmakers could agree to an auto deal in the "next day or two" of the current lame-duck session, he added: "If we can't do it here legislatively, I would hope that the secretary of Treasury would listen loud and clear because they could take this into their own hands and do what I think is appropriate from their perspective."
Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd, D-Conn., was even more downbeat, calling the possibility of reaching agreement "remote."
"I don't see how in the next few days this is going to move forward," Dodd said. Still, he added, "That does not mean that there are not opportunities." He suggested that the Federal Reserve could possibly step up to the job.
The difficulties of striking a deal on the package before a new president and a new Congress with expanded Democratic majorities take office appeared to be too great to overcome. The deadlock persisted even as the heads of General Motors, Ford and Chrysler returned to Capitol Hill Wednesday to ask skeptical lawmakers for a $25 billion lifeline to keep their crippled industry from collapsing.
General Motors Corp. CEO Rick Wagoner told the House Financial Services Committee that collapse of the U.S. auto industry could lead to a loss of 3 million jobs within the first year and ripple throughout communities around the nation.
In sometimes contentious testimony, Wagoner was pressed on when GM would run out of money if the loans weren't extended.
He said he couldn't say precisely, but estimated that the company now was burning through "$5 billion each month."
But, as CBS Evening News correspondent Bob Orr reports, the auto executives seemed to undercut their own "desperate times" pitch when lawmakers learned they flew separately to Washington on three expensive corporate jets.
"It's almost like seeing a guy show up at the soup kitchen in high hat and tuxedo," Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y., said.
The Big Three executives were ridiculed for asking taxpayers to pay for years of production and management mistakes. As Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Tx, put it, "How do I know that you will not become the next AIG: $25 billion next month, $25 billion the month after that?"
CBS News asked the same question in an interview with GM CEO Rick Wagoner late Wednesday.
"We've really substantively restructured the cost side of the business and fed out a bunch of new models that are being well received," Wagoner said. But asked if he could promise taxpayers that he wouldn't be back for more money, he said, "I can't promise anybody because I don't know what's going to happen to the economy."
For General Motors, the goal is to limp to 2010, Orr reports. That's when new lower-cost labor contracts take effect, and when a revolutionary new electric car capable of going 40 miles with no gas will hit the market.
With the $25 billion emergency package, "We think we have a good shot to make it through this," Wagoner said. He said he anticipated that, if the package is approved, GM would qualify for about $10 billion to $12 billion of the money.
President George W. Bush and Republicans in Congress have been reluctant to use the Treasury Department's $700 billion financial bailout program to finance the loans. And White House press secretary Dana Perino has said Congress should draw the funds from an Energy Department program established by law last year to encourage production of fuel-efficient cars.
Earlier Wednesday, Sen. Richard Shelby, the senior Republican on the Banking Committee, said Wednesday he doesn't believe there will be a turnaround in the troubled U.S. auto industry until its top management is ousted and the manufacturing model sacked.
At a House hearing Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., pointedly suggested that Congress is betraying a classist bias by intervening to help white-collar bankers but not blue-collar auto workers.
It's almost like seeing a guy show up at the soup kitchen in high hat and tuxedo.
Rep. Gary Ackerman D-N.Y., on Big Three CEOs arriving in private jets to ask for a $25 billion bailoutA Senate vote on an automotive bailout plan, which would also extend jobless benefits, could come as early as Thursday, but it currently lacks the support to advance.
In an op-ed essay in Wednesday's editions of The New York Times, Mitt Romney, a candidate for this year's Republican presidential nomination, wrote: "If General Motors, Ford and Chrysler get the bailout that their chief executives asked for yesterday, you can kiss the American automotive industry goodbye. It won't go overnight, but its demise will be virtually guaranteed."
The financial situation for the automakers grows more precarious by the day. Cash-strapped GM said Tuesday it would delay reimbursing its dealers for rebates and other sales incentives and could run out of cash by year's end without government aid.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 171 CommentsIn his taped report, ABC''s Brian Ross points out that Wagoner''s round-trip on the company G4 cost approximately $20,000. A first class, round-trip commercial ticket from Detroit would have instead cost around $900 (multiplied by however many people Rick had in his entourage). Ross questioned Wagoner about his using the jet as he was leaving the hearing. The GM CEO replied that it was used only for "urgent situations." Alan Mulally also flew private, presumably on the same Ford-owned jet that ferries him and his wife home to Seattle on the weekends. No details were given on Nardelli''s travel specifics, other than that he too arrived on a private jet.
They can be bailed out later, if necessary, after they perform that good-faith gesture.
both quotes: http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/
I hear it argued that we must save the automakers to save jobs. But the total number of jobs provided by automakers and those dependent upon services to automakers account is only 846,000 positions. Yes this sounds big, but Walmart alone has 1.4 million employees. And furthermore, yesterday the automakers stated auto sales will be down to 10 million annually (from the 15 million last year). That to me says job losses/consolidation regardless of whether they get the money. And furthermore, they stated this money will only get them through March. Why are we not investing in our roads, alternative forms of energy, etc....each which would create millions of jobs?
Any bailout should be spent on fixing the housing crisis or it won''t matter if GM/Ford/Chrysler survive. If you can''t afford your mortgage payment, you surely aren''t going to buy a car.
If we don''t stop this bailout, this will set a precedent for the airlines to be next, then hotels/travel industry, then restaurants, etc. It''s got to stop.
Contact Congress and tell them to vote no.
http://www.emailthecongress.com
Thank you, Bush for all you have done for this nation''s wealthy.
I realize that use of a vehicle is part of their compensation package. But they just don''t get it. Smaller vehicles? More fuel efficiency? Nope, the bigger the better. Every time I see a car come out of that garage, hubris is the word that comes to mind. That and over-compensation.
Posted by: rebellious on November 19, 2008 at 2:18 PM
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/
http://www.emailthecongress.com
I completely agree. If they get the bailout it will be business as usual.
"Bankruptcy will allow the Big 3 to reorganize, and would be the best thing for them."
It is my hope that it will "force the Big 3 to reorganize" .
"GM''''s Wagoner parked his G4 private jet at a nearby airport....."
This is a fundamental flaw in our whole economy/society. Executives flaunt their wealth at the expense of their employee''s and customers. It''s sickening.
CEO%u2019s in similar fashion to actors and professional athletes need to get their salaries in line with the rest of the population. It%u2019s insane that a baseball player, for example is poorly paid by only making $10,000,000 a year. What a sad statement about our society.
It%u2019s not possible to rationalize an explanation for why an actor, athlete or CEO deserves to make as much in a day as the rest of us make in a year.
Frank is quoted, "Frank also said bankruptcy could mean abrogation of labor contracts. "We already have too much union busting," said Frank."
Rep. Frank has to get real. When the weighted labor cost of a UAW worker is around $78 versus $45 for a non union auto plant worker (who also has benefits), the latter will always outlast the UAW shop. The problem is that in today''s world, any union leader who urges his members to accept less to be competitive will be ousted in a NYC minute. The choice is be competitive or no jobs.
Hey GM, Ford, or Chrysler;
I have a design for an Electric car. If you guys don''t fail, give me a call. This car would be capable to run coast to coast, without it being charged up every night.
It would be capable to do that in case of an emergency, but would be self sufficient.
why is it a death trap? cuz a big *** gm truck or suv w/some idiot that is driving will smack into you.
its those that cause the death traps..
buy a honda.
I have a design for an Electric car. If you guys don''''t fail, give me a call. This car would be capable to run coast to coast, without it being charged up every night.
It would be capable to do that in case of an emergency, but would be self sufficient.
And let me add this; I don''t know why you guys didn''t come up with this...
I say Chapter 11 is the best way to go. Get lost Nardelli, you f-ed up Home Depot, now you''ll take down Chrysler. What a loser.
Then why are you driving your Hummer? Go out and get yourself the far safer M1 Abrams battle tank. Not only is it safer but you can blow away anyone who cuts you off.
ahhh mitt, nobody said you have to just give them the money.
what you do is give them the money w/ conditions ... the conditions that they change their model ... that they drastictly restructure. conditions like producing a certain number of efficient cars ... conditions like only a certain percent of vehicles can be over a certain weight ... conditions like the unions must provide some concessions.
apparently being in born in detroit, and having a father who was in the industry doesn''t really mean a thing.
I hear it argued that we must save the automakers to save jobs. But the total number of jobs provided by automakers and those dependent upon services to automakers account is only 846,000 positions. Yes this sounds big, but Walmart alone has 1.4 million employees. And furthermore, yesterday the automakers stated auto sales will be down to 10 million annually (from the 15 million last year). That to me says job losses/consolidation regardless of whether they get the money. And furthermore, they stated this money will only get them through March. Why are we not investing in our roads, alternative forms of energy, etc?....each which would create millions of jobs?
Any bailout should be spent on fixing the housing crisis or it won''t matter if GM/Ford/Chrysler survive. If you can''t afford your mortgage payment, you surely aren''t going to buy a car.
If we don''t stop this bailout, this will set a precedent for the airlines to be next, then hotels/travel industry, then restaurants, etc. It''s got to stop.
Contact Congress and tell them to vote no.
http://www.emailthecongress.com
[Posted by rightbehind at 03:20 PM : Nov 19, 2008]
knight in armor? try late 19th century, early 20th century when the labor abuses were systemic. go look up andrew carnegie and homestead for some history on the role of unions and why they came about.
if the job called for a 13 year old working 16 hours a day in unsafe conditions ... should they be fired for not complying? this is only one of the changes put in place as a result of their efforts.
you should be thanking the unions for your 40 hour work week, your disability insurance, the unemployment insurance, and a multitude of other benefits provided by many employers today.
There are plenty of venture capitalists out there who would back a NEW auto manufacturer focused on automobile technology of the 21st century. It would be a hard lesson to learn for all of us, but in the end we could be a stronger country because of it. Notice how quickly the Chevy Volt was announced after gas prices skyrocketed! That''s because the technology had been sitting there for years--just watch ''Who killed the electric car?''.
The money normally given to executives for ''severance'' pay should instead be distributed to all of the companies'' blue collar workers.
I say good riddance! Maybe new American auto manufacturers would pay more attention to quality and efficiency!
[Posted by IMaVOTER2 at 03:41 PM : Nov 19, 2008]
not a bad idea. maybe something indirect ... like taking the tax revenue from increses in gas taxes to help out the auto industry.
And what do we got an SUV, TRUCKS , BITHUMMER , AND A BUNCH OF MORON''S RUNNING THE COMPANIES AND BEG FOR TAX MONEY..
"We want to continue the vital role we''ve played for Americans for the past 100 years, but we can''t do it alone," Wagoner told the Senate Banking Committee.
While Wagoner testified, his G4 private jet was parked at Dulles airport. It is just one of a fleet of luxury jets owned by GM that continues to ferry executives around the world despite the company''s dire financial straits.
"This is a slap in the face of taxpayers,"
After the hearing, Wagoner declined to answer questions about his travel.
Ford CEO Mulally''s corporate jet is a perk included for both he and his wife as part of his employment contract along with a $28 million salary last year. Mulally actually lives in Seattle, not Detroit. The company jet takes him home and back on weekends.
Mulally made his case Tuesday before the committee saying he''s cut expenses, laid-off workers and closed 17 plants.
"We have also reduced our work force by 51,000 employees in the past three years," Mulally said.
Yet Ford continues to operate a fleet of eight private jets for its executives. Just Tuesday, one jet was taking Ford brass to Los Angeles, another on a trip to Nebraska, and of course Mulally needed to fly to Washington to testify.
The blueprint needs to be in place first. "Big Three" tell us how you are helping to switch us over to electric?
I''m still seeing TV commercials for big SUV''s getting only 23 MPG. Sorry folks but for me to buy a new car it must be partially electric powered and at least look like new technology. Not a Model T powered vehicle! I''d rather help out some of the newer electric start up companies.
(ABC)
GM and Ford say that it is a corporate decision to have their CEOs fly on private jets and that is non-negotiable, even as the companies say they are running out of cash.
Private jet travel is perhaps the greatest perk of all for CEOs, who say it allows them to travel more efficiently and safely, even in a recession.
AIG, despite the $150 billion bailout, still operates a fleet of corporate jets. The company says it has put two out of its seven jets up for sale and is reviewing the use of others. Though there are no such plans by GM or Ford.
[Posted by JJMurray9889 at 03:52 PM : Nov 19, 2008]
they would sell here if people really had to pay for their selfishly ignorant habits.
if you want a big vehicle that guzzles gas and has accomodations for 20 passengers ... even though you drive around 90% of the time w/ just you ... pay for it ... and pay dearly ... with a huge tax on the car that funds programs geared toward efficiency and conservation.
when the habits of consumers start contributing to issues of national security ... economic stability ... and long term success for the country ... then it''s time for those consumers who want to contribute to those conditions pay the price for the problems their creating.
and it''s time for the leadership in this country to do what they were elected to do ... lead ... and that doesn''t mean author legislation that helps whatever lobbying group has their ear ... and their wallet.
I have a design for an Electric car. If you guys don''''''''t fail, give me a call. This car would be capable to run coast to coast, without it being charged up every night.
It would be capable to do that in case of an emergency, but would be self sufficient.
And let me add this; I don''''t know why you guys didn''''t come up with this idea.....
(AP)Sherman and Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y., told the auto executives they were having a hard time justifying to their constituents bailing out companies whose chiefs fly around in expensive private jets.
The UAW is a criminal...
Recipients of eight-figure bonuses in 2007, the corporate cowboys used their executive perks %u2014 which for GM''s Rick Wagoner include the run of a $36 million Gulfstream IV jet %u2014 to arrive in style as they went begging before Congress.
Wagoner, whose flight reportedly cost $20,000 round-trip %u2014 about 70 times more than a commercial airline ticket %u2014 told Congress he expected about $10-$12 billion from the requested bailout.
"This is a slap in the face of taxpayers,"
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- next
See all 171 Comments