ANNAPOLIS, Md., Nov. 18, 2008

Vets Group: Repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"

More Than 100 Retired Generals And Admirals Call For Repeal Of Military's Policy On Gays

  • Play CBS Video Video Don't Ask, Don't Tell

    With the military struggling to recruit and retain soldiers, gay soldiers claim that commanders are reluctant to discharge key personnel ? even those openly gay - in the middle of a war, despite the don't ask, don't tell policy. Lesley Stahl reports.

  • Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., walks from the West Wing of the White House Photo

    Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., walks from the West Wing of the White House  (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

  • Interactive Same-Sex Marriage Debate

    State-by-state coverage, opinions, history, photos and a look at the amendment process.

  • Interactive Gay In The U.S.A.

    State-by-state laws on gay issues, the marriage debate and photo essays.

(AP)  More than 100 retired generals and admirals called Monday for repeal of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy on gays so they can serve openly, according to a statement obtained by The Associated Press.

The move by the military veterans confronts the incoming administration of President-elect Barack Obama with a thorny political and cultural issue that dogged former President Bill Clinton early in his administration.

"As is the case with Great Britain, Israel, and other nations that allow gays and lesbians to serve openly, our service members are professionals who are able to work together effectively despite differences in race, gender, religion, and sexuality," the officers wrote.

While Mr. Obama has expressed support for repeal, he said during the presidential campaign that he would not do so on his own - an indication that he would tread carefully to prevent the issue from becoming a drag on his agenda. Mr. Obama said he would instead work with military leaders to build consensus on removing the ban on openly gay service members.

"Although I have consistently said I would repeal 'don't ask, don't tell,' I believe that the way to do it is make sure that we are working through a process, getting the Joint Chiefs of Staff clear in terms of what our priorities are going to be," Mr. Obama said in a September interview with the Philadelphia Gay News.

Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for Mr. Obama's transition team, declined comment.

The issue of gays in the military became a flash point early in the Clinton administration as Mr. Clinton tried to fulfill a campaign promise to end the military's ban on gays. His efforts created the current compromise policy - ending the ban but prohibiting active-duty service members from openly acknowledging they are gay.

But it came at a political cost. The resulting debate divided service members and veterans, put Democrats on the defensive and provided cannon fodder for social conservatives and Republican critics who questioned Mr. Clinton's patriotism and standing with the military.

Retired Adm. Charles Larson, a four-star admiral and two-time superintendent of the U.S. Naval Academy who signed the statement with 104 other retired admirals and generals, said in an interview that he believed Mr. Clinton's approach was flawed because he rushed to change military culture.

Larson said he hoped Mr. Obama would take more time to work with the Pentagon. Joining Larson among the signatories was Clifford Alexander, Army secretary under former President Jimmy Carter.

"There are a lot of issues they'll have to work out, and I think they'll have to prioritize," Larson said, noting that the new administration will immediately face combat-readiness issues and budget concerns. "But I hope this would be one of the priority issues in the personnel area."

The list of 104 former officers who signed the statement appears to signal growing support for resolving the status of gays in the military. Last year, 28 former generals and admirals signed a similar statement.

Larson, who has a gay daughter he says has broadened his thinking on the subject, believes a generational shift in attitudes toward homosexuality has created a climate where a repeal is not only workable, but also an important step for keeping talented personnel in the military.

"I know a lot of young people now - even people in the area of having commands of ships and squadrons - and they are much more tolerant, and they believe, as I do, that we have enough regulations on the books to enforce proper standards of human behavior," Larson said.

The officers' statement points to data showing there are about 1 million gay and lesbian veterans in the United States, and about 65,000 gays and lesbians currently serving in the military.

The military discharged about 12,340 people between 1994 and 2007 for violating the "don't ask, don't tell" policy, according to the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, a military watchdog group. The number peaked in 2001 at 1,273, but began dropping off sharply after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Last year, 627 military personnel were discharged under the policy.

Political observers say that even though the issue may not be as controversial as it was when Mr. Clinton addressed it, it's impossible to forget what happened then.

Larry Sabato, a political scientist at the University of Virginia, said Mr. Obama is unlikely to tackle the issue early on. Sabato said he expects Mr. Obama to focus on economic recovery and avoid risking the spark of a distracting "brush fire" controversy at the outset.

"I can't imagine that he will do this right in the beginning, given the Clinton precedent," Sabato said.

Aaron Belkin, who has studied the "don't ask, don't tell" policy as director of the Palm Center at the University of California at Santa Barbara and organized the officers' statement, said how Mr. Obama addresses the issue will be the first test for the new president on gay rights.

"Everyone is going to be interested to see how he responds," Belkin said.

© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Video and Galleries from Politics

Add a Comment See all 36 Comments
by kaylag04 November 18, 2008 10:13 AM PST
The "Don''t Ask, Don''t Tell" policy is an indicator of the disconnect between modern politicians and the military. A Commander gives an order; either "The services will allow openly homosexual personnel" or, "The services will not allow openly homosexual military personnel". Don''t Ask Don''t Tell is hippie, PC, civilian garbage. Sometimes I think that Harry Truman was the last Democrat who could actually make a declarative statement.
Reply to this comment
by questionnews November 18, 2008 10:24 AM PST
That''s right. We need our armed forces to be flaming. Maybe change that green & tan camouflage fatigues for something mauve & pink. Maybe something with a few rhinestones & some glitter! Also, get rid of all that heavy equipment. All real men need for battle is a canteen, rubber gloves & a jar of Astro-Glide. And forget all that marching. Several intense & well choreographed rehearsals of West Side Story will get all those men is shape in no time. Yes, we are going to have awesome army.
Reply to this comment
by jmdintpa November 18, 2008 10:44 AM PST
kind of funny that our military cant work as a unit like every other country in nato. why is our military so lacking in discipline? get over homophobe , i was in the military for 14 yrs and gay. there are so many *** if they ran them all out there wouldnt be enough people to fight off the girl scouts. get over grow up and stop being so scared of everything and everybody that is different than you.
Reply to this comment
by questionnews November 18, 2008 10:56 AM PST
kind of funny that our military cant work as a unit like every other country in nato. why is our military so lacking in discipline? get over homophobe , i was in the military for 14 yrs and gay. there are so many *** if they ran them all out there wouldnt be enough people to fight off the girl scouts. get over grow up and stop being so scared of everything and everybody that is different than you.

Posted by jmdintpa at 10:44 AM : Nov 18, 2008


So the Army is like Fire Island for you guys?
A very funny Army promotion commercial just came to mind. I''ll work on it.
Reply to this comment
by bailthisout November 18, 2008 10:58 AM PST
These same fear tactics were also used when IGNORANT people said Blacks and Women could not serve in the military. I would more weary of Cathloics serving because of their cult like attitudes and behaviors.
Reply to this comment
by nvorr November 18, 2008 11:00 AM PST
I''m sure that you all have stood up for your country and served and aren''t just on the sidelines spewing negativity. Anyone capable and willing to do the job should be allowed to. Non-heterosexuals should be held to the same standards of workplace and social standards that heterosexuals are. If you''re not hypocritical then I''m sure you''d agree. And before you ask, I''m happily married for 23 years to a member of the opposite ***, with children and I served 20 years on active duty in the military.
Reply to this comment
by luvny-2009 November 18, 2008 11:08 AM PST
I would more weary of Cathloics serving because of their cult like attitudes and behaviors. -
BailThisOut

Wow are you ignorant, Catholics are not at all cult like.
Reply to this comment
by midvale3 November 18, 2008 11:28 AM PST
Repeal it and allow them to serve. They can''t get enough boots on the ground as it is.
Reply to this comment
by questionnews November 18, 2008 11:46 AM PST
And no more saluting!!
When Army personnel greet they hold up their pinkie and say "Oh you silly goose" and then go about their tasks.
Reply to this comment
by bikerb54 November 18, 2008 11:51 AM PST
I am so sick of the citizens of this nation spouting the slogan "freedom of choice" and then agreeing with it only if it means their choice is free. If you disagree with the Christians, straights, whites, white-collar workers and such, then your choices are wrong.

Christianity is not the only choice, white collar are not the only jobs worth larger salaries, white is not the only race and straight is not the only sexual preference on this earth. Stop the prejudice on making choices.

If a person enlists in the military, can do the job and is willing to fight for his/her rights and freedoms and ours, then sexual preference should not even matter. I know alot of "straights" that refuse to fight for our country and it''s way of life. That''s wrong, in my eyes. I was military for 17 years, I have marched in the civil rights movement, and I am straight. I served with ***, blacks and I am a woman. If you don''t like my choices-not my fault, not my problem. You deal with your choices and don''t force them on me!
Reply to this comment
by berkshirerez November 18, 2008 12:08 PM PST
The California representative Leslie Stahl interviewed is an example of how ignorant some Americans are. Every single thing he said about *** was stereotypical. The military doesn''t really seem to care what someone''s religious beliefs are and yet they discriminate based on the religious belief that homos*e*x*uality is immoral. The fact that the US govt is refusing to separate church and state in this way is deplorable. I''m embarrassed that we continue to legally discriminate in any way, shape or form. I''m hopeful though that our new president will reverse this and many other backwards policies so our country can continue to embrace the diversity which made it such a great country to begin with.
Reply to this comment
by questionnews November 18, 2008 12:09 PM PST
Questionnews-

Just curious. Did your sorry asss serve in the military?

Posted by rixmix98 at 11:52 AM : Nov 18, 2008

Just by the confrontational tone of your post I see that you have all the humor of a sack of dead kittens. If you''re so sensitive to a few jokes, maybe jmdintpa post explains why you were in the Army & not the Marines. And don''t spew that old "if you weren''t there you can''t say anything.
If I may quote a famous & well known military genius, Army Sergeant Hulka---"Lighten up Francis"
Reply to this comment
by nvorr November 18, 2008 12:13 PM PST
Just curious. Did your sorry asss serve in the military?

Posted by rixmix98
---------------------

I don''t think Questionnews or alsdailynews had the balls or ovaries (as appropriate) to do anything except what they''re doing now. Sadly, these are some of the people whose rights we fought in defense of.
Reply to this comment
by questionnews November 18, 2008 12:21 PM PST
I don''''t think Questionnews or alsdailynews had the balls or ovaries (as appropriate) to do anything except what they''''re doing now. Sadly, these are some of the people whose rights we fought in defense of.

Posted by nvorr at 12:13 PM : Nov 18, 2008

Again, "Lighten up Francis" Every comedian on the planet jokes about this subject since it appears to be unique to the US. Or is your skin so thin that a joke really really hurt your feelings?
Reply to this comment
by miriambk November 18, 2008 12:22 PM PST
I am ADAMANTLY against gay marriage. However, this is a MILITARY issue, and as a civilian having never served in any branch of the armed forces, this particular issue is best left to those in military authority.
Reply to this comment
by rixmix98 November 18, 2008 12:44 PM PST
don''''t think Questionnews or alsdailynews had the balls or ovaries (as appropriate) to do anything except what they''''re doing now. Sadly, these are some of the people whose rights we fought in defense of.

Posted by nvorr at 12:13 PM : Nov 18, 2008



Regardless, he/she never did answer my question.
Reply to this comment
by duhrer November 18, 2008 1:23 PM PST
So let me pose this question... if the military decides it''s okay for *** to serve in the military (which they''ve been doing since day 1), then we must accept that gay people are serving their country in defence of our rights as Americans. But the American people (generally) are against gay marriage and/or gay rights as a whole, so what we would really be telling them is "... you''re fighting for the rights of only heterosexual Americans, cause you don''t warrant the same rights as they do, but keep on fighting and killing for us". I can''t imagine why any gay person would want to serve this country that hates them so much they would restrict their rights as a citizen.
Reply to this comment
by olivia4441 November 18, 2008 1:28 PM PST
SO, swith the question and ask yourself "Does it mater that a black President was elected mostly by people who have no idea what they voted for?" When asked who Pelosi or Reed are they do not know. When asked who runs Congress they do not know. Whether you are gay or not, black or not, is not the point, what is the point is whether they are qualified..are *** any less qualified? Is the black man qualified? Two differant answers, indeed.
Reply to this comment
by colt8881 November 18, 2008 1:35 PM PST
Who cares if somebody is GAYE, I sure dont care if somebody is Gaye. There are 3 people who work on my floor and in my division that are gay and all 3 of them are great workers and Are at Work On Time more they 90% of the Straight people.

WHO CARES. I sure dont & some of the people who wisper and gossip about being gaye are just stupid and need to grow the frack up and get a life and mind their own business. NOZY PEOPLE SUCK !

I have more things to worry about then somebodys sexxuality.
Reply to this comment
by questionnews November 18, 2008 1:41 PM PST
So let me pose this question... if the military decides it''''s okay for *** to serve in the military (which they''''ve been doing since day 1), then we must accept that gay people are serving their country in defence of our rights as Americans. But the American people (generally) are against gay marriage and/or gay rights as a whole, so what we would really be telling them is "... you''''re fighting for the rights of only heterosexual Americans, cause you don''''t warrant the same rights as they do, but keep on fighting and killing for us". I can''''t imagine why any gay person would want to serve this country that hates them so much they would restrict their rights as a citizen.

Posted by duhrer at 01:23 PM : Nov 18, 2008


Excellent point!! After a while, with effort & enlightenment the state votes will favor Gay marriage and hopefully that issue will get resolved.

BTW--CBS will allow the word Gay to be used, but not the plural form as in Gay.s. You still have to mangle that word.

I guess CBS wants to take it one gay at a time!
Reply to this comment
by doug716ac November 18, 2008 1:47 PM PST
It''s pretty clear that the majority of people in this country do not feel we should have equal rights. No right to marry, no open military service, etc.

So why waste time and energy fighting it? I can be very happy with my partner, our soon to be highly taxed income, our houses and vacations. Might just as well let the straight folks send their sons and daughters to the Middle East to be maimed and killed while I sun on the beach.

If they don''t want us, seems like a pretty good deal all around. They''ve done all they can to erode our patriotism anyway, so let''s move back to hedonism and let them do the heavy lifting. More power to them.

I''ll gladly pay another $5,000 in taxes to buy them all the weapons, supplies and body bags they require. No problem. They''re keeping me safe, rich and happy! Thank you :) !!!
Reply to this comment
by cheetah-man7 November 18, 2008 3:15 PM PST
doug716ac -- I wholeheartedly agree with you! Let those straighties get shot up and killed. If the GLBT members are not good enough to fight, then they are not good enough to die either. OK, please pass the BonBons...
Reply to this comment
by questionnews November 18, 2008 3:51 PM PST
I think the CBS censor must be having a bad day. Posts are getting deleted like porn on a priest''s laptop.
Reply to this comment
by aldon61 November 18, 2008 4:06 PM PST
I see the f*u*d*g*e packers are out in force today.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Obama_Dkhed at 03:53 PM : Nov 18, 2008
+ report abuse
Is everyone on this board a ***??


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Obama_Dkhed at 03:51 PM : Nov 18, 2008
report abuse

You had three posts deleted by CBS on the site where Obama said the US would lead to clean up the planet. The guy that said CBS is very active today is right on the money.
Reply to this comment
by aldon61 November 18, 2008 4:14 PM PST
I''m an old f.a.r.t. and don''t pretend to be gay rights supporter. However, with the information that''s available to us, we know there are many gay people, most of them still not in the open. First, I favor civil unions with full rights to each of the partners. I am opposed to gay "marraige" as that should be a rite between a man and a woman. I served in the military and probably served with gay men, although I didn''t know it at the time. When you''re in combat, you need someone at your back; you''re not going to ask about their religion, race or sexuality, you need your back covered. There is no reason why these gay soldiers can''t serve openly. The biggest problem I can see is how they might be treated by their fellow soldiers and non-coms. Life could become pretty brutal given the make-up of their unit.
Reply to this comment
by questionnews November 18, 2008 4:53 PM PST
I''''m an old f.a.r.t. and don''''t pretend to be gay rights supporter. However, with the information that''''s available to us, we know there are many gay people, most of them still not in the open. First, I favor civil unions with full rights to each of the partners. I am opposed to gay "marraige" as that should be a rite between a man and a woman. I served in the military and probably served with gay men, although I didn''''t know it at the time. When you''''re in combat, you need someone at your back; you''''re not going to ask about their religion, race or sexuality, you need your back covered.

Posted by aldon61 at 04:14 PM : Nov 18, 2008


Whether in service or not Gay men will always watch your back.

Sorry, but that one was served on a silver platter. I couldn''t resist.

Before you go all postal, I don''t support don''t ask don''t tell but I support humor. Some of the gay jokes I get are from my gay friends.
Reply to this comment
by doug716ac November 18, 2008 5:10 PM PST
Here''s the Bon Bons cheetah - could you pass the binoculars; I want to read the big sign on the ship President Bush just landed on . . . "M-I-S-S-I . . ."
Reply to this comment
by ord6591 November 18, 2008 6:19 PM PST
Instead of retired generals and admirals, ask the junior enlisted how they''d feel about being barracked with gay servicepeople - and if they express a negative or hostile opinion, then ask them why they feel or react that way...the answer you get right at that point will be your starting point for your dialogue, not from any general grade officer.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 November 18, 2008 11:19 PM PST
AP) More than 100 retired generals and admirals called Monday for repeal of the military''s "don''t ask, don''t tell" policy on *** so they can serve openly, according to a statement obtained by The Associated Press.
***********************************

Oh, my gosh. You mean the military is supporting this. It will be interesting to see if the spit-slinging Republicans who have been screaming bloody murder about, "Support the troops...support the troops" for six years will now "support the troops." I doubt it. Their version of "support the troops" is letting them die for Bush''s failed policies and terrible planning on the ground, without proper equipment.
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 November 18, 2008 11:23 PM PST
Excellent point!! After a while, with effort & enlightenment the state votes will favor Gay marriage and hopefully that issue will get resolved.

BTW--CBS will allow the word Gay to be used, but not the plural form as in Gay.s. You still have to mangle that word.

I guess CBS wants to take it one gay at a time!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Questionnews at 01:41 PM : Nov 18, 2008
+ report abuse
**************************************

LOL. Well OK, gay. You are right. Full rights and liberties will come for gay s. All of these civil liberties issues have taken some time and some fighting. Look at what it took to get women just the right to vote. When something is right, the majority of people eventually overcome their fears and preducices and see the light. The hope is in our young voters. They are not concerned about this issue and will push the bigots "to the back of the bus." :o)
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 November 18, 2008 11:27 PM PST
So why waste time and energy fighting it? I can be very happy with my partner, our soon to be highly taxed income, our houses and vacations. Might just as well let the straight folks send their sons and daughters to the Middle East to be maimed and killed while I sun on the beach.
*******************************************

Doug, I have been saying this for years. I used to just make some of the lunch bunch furious when in talking about Iraq and my opposition to it, that if they instituted the draft that I would just tell my grandson to say he was gay. Of course they thought that was unpatriotic, but it was OK to deny young gay men and women the right to serve their country and forfeit their lives for that country that won''t even acknowledge they exist in the armed forces. Of course, bigots never have made much sense. Enjoy your Pina Colada on that beach!! :o)
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 November 18, 2008 11:29 PM PST
Whether in service or not Gay men will always watch your back.

Sorry, but that one was served on a silver platter. I couldn''''t resist.

Before you go all postal, I don''''t support don''''t ask don''''t tell but I support humor. Some of the gay jokes I get are from my gay friends.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by Questionnews at 04:53 PM : Nov 18, 2008

*********************************************

LMAO. Don''t worry. Most folks with tolerance also have a sense of humor. It is the bigots and intolerant that don''t. Good eye, I only wish I would have thought of it... :o)
Reply to this comment
by assemblyofso November 19, 2008 7:39 AM PST
No one should be asked to go into battle and risk their lives accompanied by sexual deviants.

If they must openly go into the service, set up all gay units and let them be the front line infantry.
Our enemies would get a real kick out of that.
Reply to this comment
by oldguy4truth November 19, 2008 8:59 AM PST
Guns, ***, and on and on.. PARANOIA.
fear= suspicion = hate= intolerence.
They have always been *** in the military. I fought beside some in Viet Nam. I did not have to watch my azz because of them. I was glad to have anyone watching mine. The same rules apply today with more women in the military. Intimant sexual relationships are not tolerated.... That is good enough for me. Though, I am sure I would have been shot while engaged, had ther been a willing woman around.
Reply to this comment
by gaymale1 November 19, 2008 2:21 PM PST
It is a NICE IDEA ; HOWEVER just like that commentor there is STILL TOO MUCH PREJUGDES TOWARD *** , AND OUR RIGHTS . REMARKABLE , this country can elect a black person to the highest office in the country ; YET APPARENTLY IT IS STILL OK TO BE A BIGOT TOWARD THE GAY COMMUNITY ( anti. same *** marriage ).
Reply to this comment
by kansas1946 November 19, 2008 10:17 PM PST
No one should be asked to go into battle and risk their lives accompanied by sexual deviants.

If they must openly go into the service, set up all gay units and let them be the front line infantry.
Our enemies would get a real kick out of that.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by assemblyofso at 07:39 AM : Nov 19, 2008
********************************

No one should be asked to go into battle and risk their lives next to red-neck-pekker-headed bigots. If they must openly go into the service, set up all red-neck-pekker-headed units, and assign them laundry duty. Bigots are dangerous on a battle field.
Reply to this comment
See all 36 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented
Latest News
Featured Blogs