WASHINGTON, Nov. 18, 2008

Lieberman Dodges Bullet For Backing McCain

Senate Democrats Vote 42-13 To Allow Independent Senator To Keep Powerful Committee Chairmanship

    • Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., center, flanked by Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin of Ill., left, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., meets with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday,Nov. 18, 2008, after a Democratic Caucus meeting.

      Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., center, flanked by Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin of Ill., left, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., meets with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday,Nov. 18, 2008, after a Democratic Caucus meeting.  (AP)

    • Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., is questioned by reporters as he walks to the Old Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2008, where his colleagues will vote on party leadership and other matters.

      Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., is questioned by reporters as he walks to the Old Senate Chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2008, where his colleagues will vote on party leadership and other matters.  (AP)

    • Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn. makes a statement on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 6, 2008, after meeting with Senate Majority Leader Reid of Nev.

      Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn. makes a statement on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 6, 2008, after meeting with Senate Majority Leader Reid of Nev.  (AP/Lauren Victoria Burke)

    • Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., center, flanked by Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin of Ill., left, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., meets with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2008, after a Democratic Caucus meeting.

      Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., center, flanked by Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin of Ill., left, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nev., meets with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2008, after a Democratic Caucus meeting.  (AP)

    Previous slide Next slide
  • Blog Enter The Crypt

    Read the latest behind-the-scenes news from Capitol Hill in this blog provided by our partner The Politico.

(CBS/AP)  Sen. Joe Lieberman will keep his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee despite hard feelings over his support for GOP nominee John McCain during the presidential campaign.

The Connecticut independent will lose a post on the Environment and Public Works panel as punishment for criticizing Obama this fall.

Lieberman's colleagues in the Democratic caucus voted 42-13 Tuesday to approve a resolution condemning statements made by Lieberman during the campaign but allowing him to keep the Homeland Security Committee gavel.

Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said he had been very angry about Lieberman's actions but that "we're looking forward, we're not looking back."

Added Reid: "This was not a time for retribution, it was a time for moving forward on the problems of this country."

Lieberman's grasp on his chairmanship had gotten stronger since President-elect Barack Obama signaled to Democratic leaders that he's not interested in punishing Lieberman for boosting McCain and criticizing the Democratic nominee during the long campaign.

"This is the beginning of a new chapter, and I know that my colleagues in the Senate Democratic Caucus were moved not only by the kind words that Senator Reid said about my longtime record, but by the appeal from President-elect Obama himself that the nation now unite to confront our very serious problems," Lieberman said after the vote.

"This vote will anger many progressives and party faithful who felt Lieberman's support of the Republican nominee was tantamount to party treason," said CBSNews.com senior political editor Vaughn Ververs. "But while it may have been tempting to punish him for his transgression, it’s also a nod to reality."

"The Connecticut senator has remained a reliable Democratic vote on most issues outside of some national security matters since becoming an independent and is still one that the party will need to pass some major legislation in the coming four years. President-elect Obama's support for him keeping his chairmanship was reflective of that."

Anger toward Lieberman seems to have softened since Election Day, and Democrats didn't want to drive him from the Democratic caucus by taking away his chairmanship, and as a result send the wrong signals as Mr. Obama takes office on a pledge to unite the country. Lieberman had indicated it would be unacceptable for him to lose his chairmanship.

Lieberman, who was Democratic presidential nominee Al Gore's running mate in 2000, was re-elected in 2006 as an independent after losing his state's Democratic primary to Greenwich businessman Ned Lamont amid intense anti-war sentiment. Lieberman is a strong supporter of the war.

One senator, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the meeting was private, said Lieberman spoke openly about the rejection he faced in 2006, when many Democrats supported his opponent during the Connecticut Senate race.

"He spoke earnestly of the pain he felt when he was rejected by the Democratic Party in his re-election and in turn, the rejection he felt from many in the caucus who campaigned against him after decades and decades of friendship," the lawmaker said. "And that put him in a very different place approaching the 2008 election and John McCain was the only candidate for president who asked for his support."

The senator added: "He apologized for crossing the line in a few instances."

He remains a registered Democrat and aligns with the party inside the Senate, where he supports the party position on most issues other than the war.

But Lieberman angered colleagues by signing onto McCain's campaign, touring the country on McCain's campaign plane and speaking on his behalf at the GOP convention in September. Democrats were particularly upset that he had attacked Mr. Obama rather than simply saying positive things about McCain.

"There are some (statements) that I made that I wish I had not," Lieberman told reporters. "In the heat of campaigns, that happens to all of us, but I regret that. And now it's time to move on."

"It's time to unite our country," said Lieberman supporter Ken Salazar, D-Colo., said upon entering the meeting.

Salazar added afterwards: "It was very clear people want Senator Lieberman to be part of the caucus."

"I was concerned and was upset about what happened earlier this year," Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., said on "Fox News Sunday." "But you know what? We turn the page."

On the other side were senators who feel that one requirement to be installed in a leadership position is party loyalty.

Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Pat Leahy, D-Vt., spoke against allowing Lieberman keep the Homeland Security and Government Affairs post. Reid, Majority Whip Dick Durbin, D-Ill., and John Kerry, D-Mass., were among those speaking in his favor, according to a Democratic aide, who spoke anonymously to discuss a private meeting.

Some, like Iowan Tom Harkin, still harbor hard feelings for statements Lieberman made during the campaign. Harkin took particular offense when Lieberman said a vote against funding the war in Iraq without a deadline for a troop withdrawal meant Mr. Obama had voted to cut off funding for troops in harm's way.

"That's outrageous, what he said," Harkin complained.

"To reward Senator Lieberman with a major committee chairmanship would be a slap in the face of millions of Americans who worked tirelessly for Barack Obama and who want to see real change in our country," Sanders said in a statement on Friday. "Appointing someone to a major post who led the opposition to everything we are fighting for is not 'change we can believe in.'"

©MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 263 Comments
by atpay1 November 19, 2008 6:41 PM EST
We democratic voters are sick to death of whining Joe Lieberman, if it were us making the choice we would throw him to the wolves! But Barack Obama is a better person than we are and lots more forgiving!! Joe should kiss his butt!!
Reply to this comment
by neoconrcrazy November 19, 2008 2:58 PM EST
lie-berman would get into any bed, with any dog, for his true homeland, israel, the apartheid state where only jews have rights and where land-grabbing has been perfected into an art form....

it''s the place, folks, where the terrorists are born trying to get their fathers land back.

Reply to this comment
by carlylaine November 19, 2008 12:44 PM EST
How odd of you LIBERALS. So what if Lieberman support John McCain. This is a supposedly-free country. Leave Lieberman alone and so what if he likes Jews and looks out for their interests. GAWD...you guys make such a big deal...all of you do.
Reply to this comment
by trishab56 November 19, 2008 12:00 PM EST
Lieberman is nothing more than a slime-ball opportunist. Had McCain won, he would have switched officially to Republican.

His real constituency are the Israelis, and he will do and say anything to get money and weapons for Israel. He should have stripped from every assignment he holds, and removed from the Democratic caucus.

I am furious at this move by the Democrats. They have no backbone.
-------------------------------------------
Posted by omnibus66 at 08:29 AM : Nov 19, 2008

- In a way, Obama is not stupid. This is quite a good decision. He now has all under his control, even the culprit caught with the hand in the jar is under his mercy!

-It''s a credit in favor of Obama. Magdalena was not liked by the Israelites. Jesus pardoned her and he kept all the ''prostittutes'' under his mercy. That resulted in less ''prostitution'' in the community!

-This is a wise decision after all!
Reply to this comment
by omnibus66 November 19, 2008 11:29 AM EST
Lieberman is nothing more than a slime-ball opportunist. Had McCain won, he would have switched officially to Republican.

His real constituency are the Israelis, and he will do and say anything to get money and weapons for Israel. He should have stripped from every assignment he holds, and removed from the Democratic caucus.

I am furious at this move by the Democrats. They have no backbone.
Reply to this comment
by oldguy4truth November 19, 2008 11:12 AM EST
Sonder Commando
They made it possible for a small number of combat rejects to control 10s of thousands of at Auwchwitz
Reply to this comment
by oldguy4truth November 19, 2008 11:08 AM EST
alsdailynews
You may want to look up Sonder Commando.
That was the name the Nazis gave them .
Reply to this comment
by r9119111 November 19, 2008 10:25 AM EST
Rowdydfw: Grow up.
Reply to this comment
by excoachken November 19, 2008 10:20 AM EST
This is a transparent "deal." The Dems agree to support everything Lieberman wants for Israel (the people he REALLY represents) and he will flip back to their side on ALL other issues. "Deals" are made by good people and bad people all the time in Congress-------It is the way of life in the "Washington Warp."
Reply to this comment
by nuffera November 19, 2008 10:04 AM EST
his constituents will vote him out in the next election because they now have "buyer''s remorse"!
He thinks he got away with it, but we''ll see!
Reply to this comment
by r9119111 November 19, 2008 9:56 AM EST
Extreme partisanship is exclusionary and divisive. Mr. Obama is proving more inclusionary already and he has just begun. I see it as a good sign. I felt completely left out during the GOP rise to imperial power and I was a Republican when it started. Personally, I think Barack Obama is showing signs of maturity that have been missing in country for far too long. Thanks Barack.
Reply to this comment
by neoconrcrazy November 19, 2008 9:54 AM EST
Once again, NeoNaziCrazyConMan has slithered out from under his rock, along with Konabike.

Posted by juwboy

as always, jewboy supports those who would betray American interests for a foreign country, israel.

America first!


Reply to this comment
by juwboy November 19, 2008 9:24 AM EST
Once again, NeoNaziCrazyConMan has slithered out from under his rock, along with Konabike.
Reply to this comment
by ffoulkes-2009 November 19, 2008 7:36 AM EST
Not punishing Sen. Joe Lieberman is a necessary step toward a filibuster proof majority in the Senate.

It is not evidence that Joe Lieberman is not a traitorist ******.

If he knows what''''s good for him, Joe''''s days of independant thinking better be over for a while.

Posted by mytoosense at 12:59 PM : Nov 18, 2008
______________________________________
So, what? Independent thinking is a bad thing now? Must walk in lock step with comrades...must not deviate in thought or beliefs...

I can''t believe this ***...Democrats AND Republicans should never be able to force an opinion on one of their fellow members in office. That goes against all that is American.
Reply to this comment
by rangerdahl November 19, 2008 6:56 AM EST
Of course the democracks let him stay put. If they didn''t, he would go Republican to teach them a lesson and that would upset Nancy''s and Harry''s applecart.
Reply to this comment
by neoconrcrazy November 19, 2008 6:34 AM EST
lie-berman has an israeli passport - he should use it and go home. Shalom.
Reply to this comment
by McHineguy November 19, 2008 4:46 AM EST
farouk7: It was pretty simple, really... Clinton asked Saddam to let us inspect his chem factories. He didn''''t. Then came 9-11. Americans wanted revenge and after Afghanistan, it was pretty easy to convince Bush that you needed to be next. Next time, just say yes sir and we promise not to return you to the stone age, or about 10 years from where you were when we got there.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by endofempire at 01:39 AM : Nov 19, 2008

There was a second layer.

sadam ruled in fear and his staff lied to him. they told him they were building enormous weapons of mass destruction. traitors within his staff sold other countries those secrets and we thought they were true. So, secret papers that had been written to appease Sadam were leaked to mislead us. We attacked believing them true.

We were stupid for not looking further before we attacked but Sadam needed to be replaced anyway. Now the trick is to return the country to its people and go home with dignity.

If we had acted this way in 1939 there would not have been WWII.
Reply to this comment
by endofempire November 19, 2008 4:39 AM EST
farouk7: It was pretty simple, really... Clinton asked Saddam to let us inspect his chem factories. He didn''t. Then came 9-11. Americans wanted revenge and after Afghanistan, it was pretty easy to convince Bush that you needed to be next. Next time, just say yes sir and we promise not to return you to the stone age, or about 10 years from where you were when we got there.
Reply to this comment
by trishab56 November 19, 2008 4:35 AM EST
Every morning,,,

looks in the mirror,,,

leaves the house,,,

"Somebody''''s gonna pay for this !!!"
-----------------------------------
Posted by ajaxtheleast at 01:10 AM : Nov 19, 2008

-next thing you know Israel Invades Gaza with tanks, artillery, bulldozers and choppers. Three families decimated and a dozen homes crushed.
-When will the folly stop, from both ends?
Reply to this comment
by McHineguy November 19, 2008 4:24 AM EST
When the Great one was hanged, you said " Ila Jahanam", to hell...Yabba you are from hell yourselves. And I say to you...wa bi''''ssa al masseer..illa abad al abeedeen -- from here till eternity may you be cursed, for your hypocrisy.

And you filthy (patriotic Americans) re-enlisting to kill more Muslims, rejoice in your "surge". It has worked. Your sectarian Shiites and your brothers the filthy, Zionist Jews and the dumb azzholes called - Americans - In the eyes of all true Muslims you are all one and the same.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by farouk7 at 12:33 AM : Nov 19, 2008

What did your great one say when he gassed the Kurds? Women and children died. What did he say when he ruled with fear and hate? His own people shuddered from him.

He was scum and you should thank us for clearing your homeland so it could prosper once again. Go home and help rebuild it. We will leave soon and you can enjoy whatever you choose to make of it. We are the only conquerors the world has known that willingly returns the homeland to its people.

Find someon else to bash.
Reply to this comment
See all 263 Comments
  • MOST POPULAR
Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: