Lawmakers Grill Bailout's Architects
Paulson, Bernanke Tell Lawmakers Strategy Needs To Be Flexible
-
-
Photo
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, left, gestures while testifying on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Nov. 18, 2008, before the House Financial Services Committee. At right Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
-
Photo
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, left, and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, right, testify before the House Financial Services Committee Nov. 18, 2008 (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
-
Photo
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, second from left, and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, third from left, meet Speaker Nancy Pelosi, not seen, and other House Democratic leaders on Capitol Hill, Nov. 17, 2008, in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)
-
Photo
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, left, and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testify on Capitol Hill in Washington, Nov. 18, 2008 in Washington, before the House Financial Services Committee. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
-
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Congress Questions Bailout
A group of lawmakers fired questions at the man in charge of the bailout for more than two hours. Sharyl Attkisson has more.
-
Video
Effect Of Bailout On Economy
Bob Schieffer spoke to Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., about a possible Fed bailout for automakers and the effect it may have on the economy.
-
Video
Anger At Bailout Hearing
Congress wants to know if the money they gave the Treasury Department as part of the financial rescue program is being used to help the people it was intended to help, or to make the rich get richer.
-
Timeline
Financial Meltdown
Track major events that lead to one of the most tumultuous times in Wall Street's history.
-
In-Depth
Q&A: Big Three Bailout?
Why Detroit's automakers might get a rescue package
Although having a U.S. auto company fail during such a fragile time for the economy would not be a "good thing," Paulson told the House Financial Services Committee that he remains against diverting some of the bailout money to aid Detroit as the panel's chairman Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and other Democrats want.
"I don't see this as the purpose" of the bailout program, which is intended to stabilize jittery financial markets and get lending flowing more freely again, which eventually should help revive the ailing economy, Paulson said.
The U.S. had "turned a corner" in averting a financial collapse, but more work needs to be done to get things back to normal, he said.
Focusing the program on infusing billions into banks - and possibly other types of companies - to pump up their capital and bolster lending to customers was deemed a faster and more effective approach to stabilizing the financial system than buying rotten assets from financial institutions, the centerpiece of the original plan, Paulson said.
Buying those toxic debts would have required a "massive commitment" of the bailout money, Paulson said in testimony before the House Financial Services Committee. As economic and financial conditions quickly worsened, it became clear that the first installment of the money - $350 billion - for that purpose "simply isn't enough firepower," he said.
It's crucial that the administration be nimble in assessing changing conditions and adapt the bailout strategy accordingly, the Treasury chief said. "If we have learned anything throughout this year, we have learned that this financial crisis is unpredictable and difficult to counteract," Paulson said.
Last week, Paulson changed course and said the government would not use any of the $700 billion to buy bad assets from banks. That had been the focus of the plan Paulson and Bernanke originally pitched to lawmakers.
"There is no playbook for responding to turmoil we have never faced," Paulson said. "We adjusted our strategy to reflect the facts of a severe market crisis."
But lawmakers worried the administration was sending confusing signals to taxpayers and Wall Street investors.
"We all understand that when conditions on the ground change, policymakers must be agile enough to adjust to those changed circumstances," said Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala. "But changing too quickly, without adequately explaining why you've changed or what you're going to do next, risks sending mixed signals to a marketplace that is in dire need of certainty and a sense of direction."
Rep. Paul Kanjorski, D-Pa., complained about the administration's "180 degree change in policy," which he didn't necessarily fault, but suggested could hurt public confidence. "Do we have a plan? Where are we going?" Kanjorski asked.
In a profile published Tuesday in The Washington Post, Paulson said he was also working on a proposal that would allow the government to take over a wide range of financial institutions - not just banks - that are in danger of collapse.
In an interview with 60 Minutes' Steve Kroft, President-elect Barack Obama was measured in his assessment of Paulson's handling of the massive government bailout.
"We've got an unprecedented crisis, or at least something that we have not seen since the Great Depression," said Obama. "And I think Hank [Paulson] would be the first one to acknowledge that probably not everything that's been done has worked the way he had hoped it would work. But I'm less interested in looking backwards than I am in looking forwards."
There is no playbook for responding to turmoil we have never faced. We adjusted our strategy to reflect the facts of a severe market crisis.
Treasury Secretary Henry PaulsonPaulson said the department will focus on rolling out a capital injection program to pour $250 billion into banks in return for partial ownership stakes in them. Treasury on Monday confirmed that it supplied $33.56 billion to 21 banks in a second round of payments. That followed the initial $125 billion allocated to nine of the country's largest banks, and brought the total earmarked payments to $158.56 billion.
Treasury also will search for new ways to boost the availability of auto loans, student loans and credit cards, which have been become harder to get due to the credit crisis.
Specifically, the department along with the Federal Reserve, is exploring using some of the bailout money to bankroll a new loan facility designed to help companies that issue credit cards, make student loans and finance car purchases. Paulson said he expected putting up only a "relatively modest share" of the bailout money for this facility.
Paulson repeated his opposition to using some of the bailout money to provide guarantees for mortgages at risk of falling into foreclosure, another huge source of distress for the economy. The incoming Obama administration may approach the mortgage crisis much differently.
"One area that I'm concerned about, and I've said this publicly, is we have not focused on foreclosures and what's happening to homeowners as much as I would like," Obama said in his 60 Minutes interview. "We have the tools to do it. We've gotta set up a negotiation between banks and borrowers so that people can stay in their homes. That is gonna have an impact on the economy as a whole. And, you know, one thing I'm determined is that if we don't have a clear focused program for homeowners by the time I take office, we will after I take office."
In a break with the administration, Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair, also testifying before the panel, pressed anew for using $24 billion of the bailout money to help some American households avoid foreclosure. As foreclosures mount, the government is "clearly falling behind the curve," she said.
Bernanke, meanwhile, called Bair's plan a "very promising approach"
So far, the Treasury Department has pledged $250 billion for banks and has agreed to devote $40 billion to troubled insurer American International Group its first slice of funds going to a company other than a bank. That leaves just $60 billion available from Congress' first bailout installment of $350 billion.
Paulson said he is not planning to initiate another capital injection program beyond those already announced. Thus he's unlikely to tap the remaining $350 billion before the Bush administration leaves office on Jan. 20. That would mean the incoming Obama administration would decide whether and how the money should be spent.
The idea behind the capital injection program is for banks to use the money to rebuild reserves and lend more freely to customers. However, banks do have the leeway to use the money for other things, such as buying other banks, paying dividends to investors or bonuses to executives. That has touched a nerve with some lawmakers.
Locked-up lending is a prime reason why the U.S. is suffering through the worst financial crisis since the 1930s. All the fallout from the housing, credit and financial crises have badly hurt the economy, which is almost certainly in recession, analysts say.
Frank has been tapped by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to draft an aid package for Detroit. The auto companies are seeking $25 billion for emergency loans.
Executives from Detroit's Big Three automakers were scheduled to appear before the Senate Banking Committee in hopes of prodding Congress to provide a rescue package that has stalled in the face of White House opposition.
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.



- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 101 CommentsSOMEBODY, SOMEWHERE should be held responsible for all these bad decisions. They are truly crimes of theft, deception, and coersion. These crooks have invaded the national treasury much like a local theif enters a home and ends up being charged with burglary/theft. Just like religion should stay out of politics, the government should not own BANKS, partially or completely.
Posted by panhandlpete
Not only should the government own banks, they should mandate a morning prayer for the bankers and their employees. Only god can save us now from the greed and sloth of the liberals.
What does this tell you? Does this mean if I make a serious financial blunder with my personal finances I will then get a great big bonus check? I''m sure all the other readers here will send me the money.
What does this tell you? Does this mean if I make a serious financial blunder with my personal finances I will then get a great big bonus check? I''''m sure all the other readers here will send me the money.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by jerryspoor
=======================
It tells me that you engage in class warfare. Those executives deserve those bonus checks and those who dare question this are the same as terrorists.
Posted by paidGOPshill at 08:43 AM : Nov 18, 2008
______________
First of all, God should be capitalized GOP.
If you get the bank employees praying the may begin "testifying" and "signifying" against their bosses "the bankers". Not too sure that is what the GOP wants from their toe-the-GOP-party-line bankers. If that happens I am sure that God will listen and have a few if thise greedy souls confess their sins and turn over a few more for proisecution.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by tj217
======================
How can say this is Bushs fault. Clearly he has no responsibility here and you are trying to make this a partisan issue and deflect the the blame from the liberals.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by tj217
=====================
They were the real vicitms here. The low level employees would approve loans to people who didnt have the means to pay it back. I feel sorry for the executives here and maybe their bonus check can halp them overcome their feeling of victimhood.
Posted by patay2k
It''s flawed reasoning like this that got us labeled as a nation of whiners. It never fails to amaze me that at the first sign of mental recession, the libs are ready to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
The "Frick and Frack" of the Great Emperor Bush II intend on giving the members of Congress a "Dog and Pony Show" comparible to the shows given to Congress by Alberto "The Great Gonzo" Gonzales, complete with dumb looks, stuttering, and nonsense answers!
The bottom line of all this is that ONCE AGAIN, the Great Emperor Bush II has shown that he can con Congress and the average citizen into ANYTHING, no matter how stupid it is, and get away with it!
SIG HEIL, I''M JUST A GOOD OLD EXPERT CON MAN!!!, BUSH!!!
Posted by hclinton2012 at 09:30 AM : Nov 18, 2008
Don''t forget to ask for your Bonus check also! Being incompetent and irresponsible should always be rewarded with a multimillion dollar bonus !
Have a rotten day and rot in you know where.
Posted by demswin08
Hopefully congress will demand and get some sort of transparency of where our money is going. As far as manipulation of the market it''s become apparent that the daily ticker is no longer a economic indicator, as much as it''s become a score board for the floor players. With daily swings of hundreds of points it means nothing to the average investor anymore. Our system is being hijacked from under us and these financial big guns are doubled over with belly laughter as they pull off the most gigantic rip-off in the history of the world.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by hclinton2012
============================
Excuse me? The bailout plan was an idea from the liberals.
Posted by gop_will_win at 10:23 AM : Nov 18, 2008
ROFL!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by CBSNews53
========================
Laugh all you want liberal but that doesnt negate the fact that this is all the fault of liberals.
. Then the demos won congress and OBAMA started winning attention. now look at us. Wait until late JAN. Will we ever recover ?? OH YESS We should blame BUSH That excuses the stupid demo/libs who will now be in charge with NO NO NO reposibilty for anything ??
Sure something has to be done. Trickle down recovery will be as big of a failure as trickle down economics.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aFQwLGTYEM3Y&refer=home
The American people begged you guys to say "NO TO THE BAILOUTS"!!!!
Now you look stupid asking these clowns "WHAT HAPPENED TO THE BAILOUT MONEY?"
THE AMERICAN TAX-PAYER IS BEING LOOTED RIGHT NOW!!!!
No help for foreclosures just billions handed out to Goldman Smacks to buy up banks and consolidate when they are absolutely and with out a doubt BANKRUPT!
Instead of hearings, haul off ''helicopter-Ben'' and Hank the Snake Paulson off to jail and SHUT-DOWN THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM NOW!!!!!
These ''wise-guys'' are doing nothing more then SUCKING the BLOOD out of the American people to save over a QUADRILLION IN WORTHLESS DERIVATIVES!!!!!
CALL CONGRESS AND TELL THEM TO ''SHUT-DOWN THE DERIVATIVES MARKET NOW"!!!!
REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS UNITE AND TELL CONGRESS TO ''SHUT-DOWN THE MULTI-QUADRILLION-DERIVATIVES MARKET NOW"!!!!
WE MUST DO THIS NOW BEFORE WE ARE EATEN ALIVE BY OVER A QUADRILLION IN WORTHLESS KRAP DERIVATIVES!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by william7900
======================
Your money will be worthless then.
Alright NO BONUS can you tell them that.
You mean they don''t even know what they authorized?
If this clueless liberal underperforming bunch think they can do a better job than a guy who knows how Wall Street works, Paulson............................... then take the reins Democrats.
Gee whiz who are the clueless Dems going to blame after January 20th?
After all this is the same bunch that came to power nearly two years ago that took their eye off the economy to conduct their "poitical lynchings" and endless votes on "US troop withdraws" from Iraq.
And of course the most corrupt and worthless institution in America today, our mostly corrupt liberal NAZI-like MSM wolfpack press covers for them.
Just like they did for their new hero Obama.....................................sad and true.
Paulson, Bernanke Tell Lawmakers Strategy Needs To Be Flexible
How many meetings they need to make a frinking decision? C''Mon lets get this $hit moving already people.
Didn''t the Republican Congress at that time see a ''conflict of interest'' between Mr. Paulson and Goldman Smacks?
This is ridiculous.
This clown has to be fired or impeached RIGHT NOW!!!
After all this is the same bunch that came to power nearly two years ago that took their eye off the economy to conduct their "poitical lynchings" and endless votes on "US troop withdraws" from Iraq.
And of course the most corrupt and worthless institution in America today, our mostly corrupt liberal NAZI-like MSM wolfpack press covers for them.
Just like they did for their new hero Obama...................................
..sad and true.
Posted by perceptions5 a
This is a "real American" from "real America" that happens to have his head screwed on right, unlike all you liberals out there!
The American people will still BLAME YOU for not fixing the problem!
And don''t count on the Republicans who voted against you to remember that you sided with the Bush Administration.
YOU WERE ELECTED TO STOP THEM NOT JOIN THEM!!!
JFK was wrong when he said "Ask what you can do for your country, not what your country can do for you". In a capitalist society the individual does not owe the country or anyone else anything. It is about the freedoms of the individual. If the U.S. is not about that anymore who cares if it fails?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted by barbaraf4 at 11:46
======================================
Yeah barbaraf4 and your hero Obama said that he put "oversite" in this bill.
Where is it? Or did Obama just lie to us?
Remember the last scene in Star Wars Episode III when Obi-Wan scolded him: "You were the Chosen-One who was supposed to destroy the Sith not join them".
Remember you Mr. Obama, was elected to DESTROY the disastrous policies of the Bush administration NOT JOIN THEM!
- 1
- 2
- 3
- next
See all 101 Comments