Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rose In 2000-06

U.N.: While Some Nations Cut Emissions Responsible For Climate Change, Overall Emissions Were Up

(CBS/AP)  The world's 40 leading industrialized nations produced 2.3 percent more greenhouse gases from 2000 to 2006 - showing that a new deal to curb global warming is urgently needed, the United Nations said Monday.

The U.N. Climate Change Secretariat released the news two weeks before it holds its next conference in Poland to review progress in setting new international goals for reducing emissions.

"The increase in emissions continues to be a cause of concern," top U.N. climate official Yvo de Boer told reporters.

"The data underscore the urgent need for action," he said.

But the U.N. report was not all bad news, saying that while emissions had risen over the past six years, they were still down 5 percent from 1990 levels - a drop attributed mostly to earlier economic decline in former communist eastern European countries.

Since 2000, however, these "economies in transition" have posted the highest emissions increases, with 7.4 percent more in 2006, Boer said.

The Bonn-based U.N. secretariat hopes a new agreement can be reached next year to replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, which required 37 industrialized nations to reduce greenhouse gas emissions an average of 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012.

Those countries have lowered emissions by about 17 percent since 1990, but also posted a rise after 2000 - with just 16 nations on target to reach their Kyoto obligations. The U.N. report said 20 countries were lagging, and information on other countries was incomplete.

Experts say a new deal should be signed at the 2009 climate conference in Copenhagen, Denmark, so it can be ratified in time to replace the Kyoto Protocol when it expires in 2012.

Discussions at the Dec. 1-12 climate conference in Poznan, Poland, will be based on a 2007 accord reached in Bali, Indonesia, when the United States, India and China indicated they would participate.

The three nations - among the world's largest polluters - have not taken part in efforts under the Kyoto Protocol. The U.S. refused to ratify the treaty, largely because rapidly developing economies such as India and China faced no climate obligations.

De Boer (left) said he did not expect U.S. President-elect Barack Obama to send a representative to Poznan, but assured the U.S. delegation would not be dismissed as a "lame duck" group.

"I expect them to participate fully in the negotiations," de Boer said.


Total Aggregate Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 1990-2006 (in %)

Source: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

Seventeen countries whose emissions increased more than 1% are in bold.

Australia 6.6%
Austria 12.5%
Belarus* -47.8%
Belgium -5.0%
Bulgaria* -50.4%
Canada 54.8%
Croatia* -17.6%
Czech Republic* -23.9%
Denmark -1.1%
Estonia* -57.5%
European Community -4.6%
Finland -10.8%
France -9.4%
Germany -19.3%
Greece 26.2%
Hungary* -34.9%
Iceland 9.8%
Ireland 24.3%
Italy 4.1%
Japan 5.8%
Latvia* -207.4%
Liechtenstein 20.5%
Lithuania* -60.2%
Luxembourg 1.1%
Monaco -13.1%
Netherlands -2%
New Zealand 33%
Norway -28.7%
Poland* -32.2%
Portugal 29.6%
Romania* -52.2%
Russian Federation* -29.3%
Slovakia* -35.7%
Slovenia* -15.4%
Spain 53.5%
Sweden 110.6%
Switzerland 1.5%
Turkey** 102.9%
Ukraine* -52%
United Kingdom -15.6%
United States 14%

Base years differ for Bulgaria (1988), Hungary (1985-1987), Poland (1988), Romania (1989) and Slovenia (1986).
* Indicates countries transitioning to a market economy.
** Special consideration for Turkey, which is in early stages of industrialization; had not submitted complete data in time for report.

[juwboy]

No, Displeased, global temperatures have remained stable in the period, 2000-2006.

They are, however, 0.5C higher than the global average from 1990-1999, but they have NOT increased with increasing "greenhouse gas" emissions during the years, 2000-2006.

If a theory doesn`t fit the facts, the theory is wrong.

[cbcw]

Wow. For people we''re trusting to help our world run smoothly and stay safe, they all sure hold tight to their blinders.

If you want to look and think for yourself, go to www.telegraph.co.uk, the main newspaper in the UK, and find the article "The world has never seen such freezing heat." It''s the 2nd most-read article today.

[rf35]

Hmmm.
2000: Bush is elected (or whatever) as President.
2000-2006: Greenhouse gasses begin to rise.

Coincidence?

[displeased]

However, global temperatures remained stable in 2000-2006.
Posted by juwboy

Where do you see that information? The last I heard, the average global temperature increased by .5 degrees celsius.

[juwboy]

"Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rose in 2000-2006" screams the headline.

However, global temperatures remained stable in 2000-2006.

So, how can anyone claim that global gas emissions raise global temperatures?

If a theory doesn`t fit the facts, the theory is wrong.

[ubrew12]

Article: "emissions... were...down 5 percent from 1990 levels - a drop attributed mostly to earlier economic decline in former communist eastern European countries. "

That can only be good news for global warming, seeing that we''re ALL in a global recession NOW.