What Will Come From Crisis Summit?
CBS' Charles Wolfson Previews Weekend G-20 Fiscal Crisis Summit?
-
Any major decisions about the global financial crisis coming out of this weekend's summit of world leaders will likely be put off until the summit's host, President Bush, has left office. (CBS)
-
Timeline Financial Meltdown Track major events that lead to one of the most tumultuous times in Wall Street's history.
-
Section Weathering The Downturn In this economy, it's smart to save. CBS News shows you how.
Speaking about the current global economic meltdown, President George W. Bush had this to say: "This crisis did not develop overnight and it is not going to be solved overnight."
Ditto for this weekend, when world leaders representing the so-called G-20 gather in Washington to confront the current state of global economic turmoil.
Large gatherings of world leaders are not uncommon. However, this weekend’s meeting in Washington is unusual -- and the telling factor to gauge this meeting can be seen in the nameplates around the table. Everyone, from President George W. Bush (who is playing host) on, is a head of government.
Another key factor which makes this meeting unusual is that the list of attendees includes leaders not only of twenty-one countries but also of five international institutions, such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and the United Nations, who will be represented at the bureaucratically-named Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy.
No one needs to be told there is a crisis. What everyone wants to know is what new steps the political and financial leaders who control economic and monetary policy are going to take to stop the seemingly endless downward spiral which has forced Mr. Bush to convene this meeting even as he has one foot out the door of the Oval Office.
The British ambassador to America, Sir Nigel Sheinwald, said "we need a global response to a global crisis." In briefings this week in Washington and in foreign capitals, diplomats and economic advisors have been talking about some of their concerns: that there be a cooperative global response; that such technical areas as the regulation of hedge funds and rating agencies be addressed; that financial instruments such as derivatives come under more scrutiny; and that institutions which lend money should not be able to pass off all the risk but should share it to some extent, thus making them more responsible lenders.
On another level, there is recognition that the international organizations which deal with economic and financial matters be strengthened. One way to do this, informed experts say, is to give the IMF more power.
Another possibility would be to strengthen a smaller group, the Financial Stability Forum, which represents central bankers of the biggest countries. But bolstering the FSF is less popular with developing countries, since they are not well represented in that organization (while all nations are represented in the IMF).
Another open question is what role prosperous developing countries will play. China and Saudi Arabia have lots of cash but it is not yet clear how much they will put on the line to prop up those in a weaker economic position.
Coming to grips with such problems and getting agreement on solutions of course will not happen in one weekend meeting. While some sort of positive statement is likely to result, to give the financial markets a certain level of confidence (if for no other reason), the major decisions will be put off until experts can deal with them in detail.
Perhaps finance ministers will be tasked by their leaders to come back with proposals after a few months.
After all, President-elect Barack Obama, who will not attend this weekend’s meeting, will not take office until late January, and he and his team will certainly play a big part in how we resolve this crisis.
On one level, what is going on this weekend represents a global shift in both economic and political power. Ten or twenty years ago, the G-7 major industrialized nations would have convened to confront such a crisis. Now there is agreement the developing world must be represented - thus the gathering of the G-20, which includes such nations as Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico and Turkey.
Speaking at the Brookings Institution ahead of the summit, France’s Foreign Minister Bernard Kouchner openly acknowledging this move, saying, “The balance of power is shifting from West to East; from North to South. … Globalization means we are not alone.”
Before arriving in Washington, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown spoke of the urgency of the situation, saying, "The cost of inaction will be far greater than the cost of any action."
© MMVIII, CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- "What Will Come From Crisis Summit?"
T-shirts that reads: "I Attended the World Financial Crisis Summit and All I Got Was This Lousy Shirt" (at $20,000 a pop, they may just break even...) - Reply to this comment
- Thomas Paine wrote in Common Sense:
In America, the law is king. For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other.
The unitary executive doctrine conflicts with Paine''s principle - one that is fundamental to our constitutional system. If Bush can ignore or evade laws, then the law is no longer king. Americans need to decide whether we are still a country of laws - and if we are, we need to decide whether a President who has determined to ignore or evade the law has not acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and subversive of constitutional government.
------
See also the "Federalist Society". It''s no surprise that belonging to the Federalist Society has been a pre-requisite for getting a job in the Bush
"Masterful and arrogant wealth, created largely by Government protection of its profits, not content with its domination and influence within a single party, had sought to corrupt them both, and to that end had insinuated itself into the primaries, in order that no candidates might be nominated whose views were not in accord with theirs." (%u2018Colonel%u2019 Edward Mandell House in ''Philip Dru: Administrator'', circa 1912)
For the want of a nail,the shoe was lost,for the want of a shoe the horse was lost,for the want of a horse the rider lost,being overtaken and slain by the enemy, all for the want of care about a horseshoe nail. - Reply to this comment
- PLEASE...PLEASE...MUST READ...website entitled ...."prophetic voices"....future events revealed..God Bless...
- Reply to this comment

Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




