WASHINGTON, Nov. 14, 2008

Indictment Looms In Blackwater Shooting

6 U.S. Security Guards Accused In Baghdad Shootings That Left 17 Iraqi Civilians Dead

  •  (AP)

  • In The Spotlight Under Fire

    A look at Blackwater USA, the State Department's top private security contractor.

(AP)  Federal prosecutors have drafted an indictment against six Blackwater Worldwide security guards in last year's deadly Baghdad shootings of 17 Iraqi civilians, The Associated Press has learned.

The draft is being reviewed by senior Justice Department officials but no charging decisions have been made. A decision is not expected until at least later this month, people close to the case said.

Also still undecided is whether the Justice Department would charge the guards with manslaughter or assault, according to the people, all of whom spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the case.

It's also possible that prosecutors ultimately will seek charges against as few as three of the guards, whose identities are still secret. Depending on the charges, an indictment would carry maximum sentences of five to 20 years.

An indictment would send the message that the Justice Department believes U.S. contractors do not operate with legal impunity in war zones. It's an untested legal theory, since the law is murky on whether contractors could be charged in U.S. courts, or anywhere, for crimes committed overseas.

The indictment against the Blackwater guards would be filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, even though the shootings occurred 6,200 miles away.

Blackwater guards opened fire in a busy intersection Sept. 16, 2007, in what witnesses said was an unprovoked attack. Young children were among the 17 civilians killed. The shootings outraged Iraqis and embarrassed the United States, further straining relations between the two nations.

Blackwater is adamant that its guards, who protect U.S. diplomats, were ambushed by insurgents in Baghdad's Nisoor Square.

Based in Moyock, N.C., Blackwater itself is not a target of the investigation. The company has pledged to cooperate with the investigation and said it wants to decrease its reliance on the security business.

Blackwater has been at the forefront of the debate over the use of contractors in war zones.

Capitol Hill lawmakers have described Blackwater guards as mercenaries. Human rights groups have sued the company. And Iraq's government is pushing for more authority to prosecute U.S. contractors in its own courts.

Fast Fact

Blackwater has been paid nearly $1.25 billion in federal business since 2000.

Among the issues under discussion at the Justice Department is whether prosecutors have authority to bring the case. The largest security contractor in Iraq, Blackwater operates in a legal gray area. Its guards are immune from prosecution in Iraqi courts and U.S. law does not normally apply to crimes committed overseas.

To prosecute, authorities must argue that the guards can be charged under a law meant to cover soldiers and military contractors. Since Blackwater works for the State Department, not the military, it's unclear whether that law applies to its guards.

It would be the first such case of its kind. The Justice Department recently lost a similar case against former Marine Jose Luis Nazario Jr., who was charged in San Diego with killing four unarmed Iraqi detainees. Jurors questioned whether such cases should even be brought in civilian courts.

"I don't think we had any business doing that," juror Nicole Peters said at the time. She wiped away tears after the August verdict and later hugged the defendant. "I thought it was unfair to us and to him."

Prosecutors will also face challenges over the evidence. Before the FBI began investigating the shooting, the State Department granted limited immunity to Blackwater guards who talked to investigators. The Justice Department will need to prove that its case was not influenced by any evidence gathered under that immunity deal.

Attorneys for six Blackwater guards made those arguments and more at a September meeting with top Justice Department officials. The lawyers urged prosecutors not to indict.

A decision before January about whether to indict the guards would mean that President-elect Barack Obama's incoming Justice Department team would not inherit the politically sensitive choice. But the legal hurdles will remain in a case that could drag on for a year or longer.

In December 2007, several months after the shootings, the Pentagon and the State Department agreed to give the military in Iraq more control over Blackwater and other private security contractors. Five months later, in April, the State Department renewed its multimillion-dollar contract with Blackwater for the third year of its five-year life.

Blackwater has been paid nearly $1.25 billion in federal business since 2000.



© MMVIII The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 22 Comments
by niceface19 November 16, 2008 3:58 PM EST
Bush''s death squads, organized by Cheney should be treated as such.....let''s spray them with bullets on their heads.
Reply to this comment
by babooph November 16, 2008 5:03 AM EST
I thought they were sent to do gods work?
Reply to this comment
by hitoyou1 November 15, 2008 3:58 PM EST
These people ae no more then SCUM
Reply to this comment
by omnibus66 November 15, 2008 10:21 AM EST
None of them will ever spend a single day in jail. Bush will see to it.
Reply to this comment
by evian_ycnan November 15, 2008 7:16 AM EST
It`s not so much that they have killed 10s of Iraqis directly, but 1000s of Americans indirectly.
Reply to this comment
by clovisbuford November 15, 2008 3:18 AM EST
Posted by autumn987 at 10:58 PM : Nov 14, 2008
err ya smoking crack or paid to clog the web pages on an important issue ,none of that made a lick of sense.
Reply to this comment
by birdyspice7 November 15, 2008 1:47 AM EST
Blackwater is capitalism at its finest.

These creeps are financed with your tax dollars and they go unchecked while money paid to them is unaccounted for.

There is no reason we should be paying a private company to do the govt''s job. If we can''t get enough into our military to carry out necessary orders, then perhaps we ought to rethink the pay structure of our soldiers so more will enlist instead of shelling out millions to these evil corporations that make a few guys rich.

Reply to this comment
by combatvet03 November 15, 2008 1:15 AM EST
Christian Fascists, how original... I hope those of you who support these thugs, GET WHAT YOU DESERVE... pray me you perverts.
Reply to this comment
by antizion November 14, 2008 11:28 PM EST
The are merchants of death. Let the Iraqis deal with them. Otherwise, there will never be justice and without that, there will never be peace.
Reply to this comment
by dmgenet November 14, 2008 10:41 PM EST
Can we please raise the pay of the regular army and stop using mercenaries. They are mercenaries. No different than the ones who fought for the highest bidder in Africa and other small countries. They could care less about our country. It matters NOT that it is an American company (subsidiary of Halliburton BTW). If walks and smells like a duck, just say, ''Quack''.
Reply to this comment
by toolmangler-2009 November 14, 2008 10:30 PM EST
the feeling around the world is that US military never pay for their mistakes
Posted by Caligola at 06:47 PM : Nov 14, 2008



Yes they do but blackwater is not US military. It is a privately owned and operated mercenary company.
Reply to this comment
by cdfoxtrot5 November 14, 2008 10:05 PM EST
No-one is ever going to held accountable for what these mercenaries do. This is a sham, to give the pretense that there is some serious investigation going on. They''ll likely charge someone, do some bu_llsh_it inquiry and then drop charges, for "lack of evidence". The Israelis are masters of this kind of tactic and I wouldn''t be surprised if they''ve trained their American counterparts in the art of deception and general "bull_shittery".
Reply to this comment
by caligola-2009 November 14, 2008 9:52 PM EST
Can you imagine Hitler defending himself:" I didn''t kill jews, my security forces did!!!!

Hitler was INNOCENT!!
Bush is INNOCENT!!
Reply to this comment
by caligola-2009 November 14, 2008 9:49 PM EST
chris32324 I am with you!
Reply to this comment
by caligola-2009 November 14, 2008 9:47 PM EST
the feeling around the world is that US military never pay for their mistakes
Reply to this comment
by perk235 November 14, 2008 7:49 PM EST
The government should also be going after Blackwater for all of the assaults against female workers, as well as Blackwater overcharging the government. These terrorist run-a-muck cowboys need to be permanently corralled and quartered.
--------------
Agreed.
Reply to this comment
by credibility2 November 14, 2008 7:30 PM EST
The government should also be going after Blackwater for all of the assaults against female workers, as well as Blackwater overcharging the government. These terrorist run-a-muck cowboys need to be permanently corralled and quartered.
Reply to this comment
by tyronehogleg November 14, 2008 7:18 PM EST
They must be really proud....beig able to play war like that and kill innocent children....
Reply to this comment
by stevex47 November 14, 2008 6:30 PM EST
When are they going to indict "someone" for outting CIA agent Plame?

Forgot to say, I''m very sorry for the murder of the innocent civilians.
Reply to this comment
by mytoosense November 14, 2008 5:58 PM EST
When I grow up, I want to be able to shoot people AND get paid big bucks while doing it!!!

Is there any place in the world for me?...

There sure is, son! Have you heard of a company called Blackwater??!!

Reply to this comment
See all 22 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Latest News
News in Pictures
Scroll Left Scroll Right
Connect with CBS News

Stay connected with the CBS News using your favorite social networks and online news applications: